CFTC Tells Prediction Markets: If It's a Derivative, Don't Make It Look Like a Bet

Friday, 07/08/2026 | 20:01 GMT by Tanya Chepkova
  • The CFTC told regulated event-contract firms not to use American-style bookmaker odds when listing, soliciting or advertising derivatives.
  • The warning shows that the legal fight over prediction markets is now shaping how firms display prices and market contracts to customers.
CFTC

Prediction market operators and the CFTC have been defending event contracts in court and publicly as federally regulated derivatives rather than sports bets. The regulator is now warning regulated firms not to present those contracts using one of the most familiar conventions of American sports betting.

According to Bloomberg, the CFTC sent a letter to regulated entities reminding them that derivatives must not be listed, solicited or advertised through deceptive practices.

The agency said firms should not use American-style bookmaker odds, where prices are displayed with plus or minus signs to show how much a bettor can win from a given stake.

CFTC Targets Bookmaker-Style Odds

The CFTC said derivatives should be displayed in nominal or percentage terms that reflect market pricing as bookmaker-style pricing is likely to mislead market participants about the nature of the transaction they are entering.

The agency also cited research linking American-style odds with increased risk-taking in sports betting. CFTC Chairman Michael Selig had raised concerns about this type of marketing, Bloomberg reports, citing sources familiar with the matter.

The warning addresses a narrow operational point: if a regulated firm offers event contracts as derivatives, their pricing and marketing should reflect that regulatory character rather than borrow formats associated with sportsbook products.

Warning Lands During State-Federal Dispute

The presentation issue arises amid a broader jurisdictional fight. The CFTC and prediction market platforms have argued in court and publicly that event contracts are financial derivatives subject to federal commodities regulation.

Several US states have taken the opposite view, alleging that sports related event contracts amount to unlicensed gambling. That dispute has become central to the expansion of regulated prediction markets in the US.

Platforms including Kalshi and Polymarket allow users to trade contracts tied to sports, entertainment, politics, geopolitics and other real-world outcomes.

States challenging the model argue that some of those contracts cross into gambling, while the platforms say they operate under federal derivatives law.

Bloomberg reported that the letter went to all exchanges offering event contracts. Introducing brokers, futures commission merchants and designated contract markets involved in prediction markets must confirm receipt of the regulator’s message by 31 August.

Publicly accessible pages reviewed by Finance Magnates did not show American-style plus-or-minus odds as the default presentation. Bloomberg did not identify which platform, interface or marketing material prompted the warning.

CFTC considered the practice important enough to issue an industry-wide warning. The legal fight over event contracts now extends beyond jurisdiction and product approval to how regulated firms display pricing and market those contracts to customers..

Prediction market operators and the CFTC have been defending event contracts in court and publicly as federally regulated derivatives rather than sports bets. The regulator is now warning regulated firms not to present those contracts using one of the most familiar conventions of American sports betting.

According to Bloomberg, the CFTC sent a letter to regulated entities reminding them that derivatives must not be listed, solicited or advertised through deceptive practices.

The agency said firms should not use American-style bookmaker odds, where prices are displayed with plus or minus signs to show how much a bettor can win from a given stake.

CFTC Targets Bookmaker-Style Odds

The CFTC said derivatives should be displayed in nominal or percentage terms that reflect market pricing as bookmaker-style pricing is likely to mislead market participants about the nature of the transaction they are entering.

The agency also cited research linking American-style odds with increased risk-taking in sports betting. CFTC Chairman Michael Selig had raised concerns about this type of marketing, Bloomberg reports, citing sources familiar with the matter.

The warning addresses a narrow operational point: if a regulated firm offers event contracts as derivatives, their pricing and marketing should reflect that regulatory character rather than borrow formats associated with sportsbook products.

Warning Lands During State-Federal Dispute

The presentation issue arises amid a broader jurisdictional fight. The CFTC and prediction market platforms have argued in court and publicly that event contracts are financial derivatives subject to federal commodities regulation.

Several US states have taken the opposite view, alleging that sports related event contracts amount to unlicensed gambling. That dispute has become central to the expansion of regulated prediction markets in the US.

Platforms including Kalshi and Polymarket allow users to trade contracts tied to sports, entertainment, politics, geopolitics and other real-world outcomes.

States challenging the model argue that some of those contracts cross into gambling, while the platforms say they operate under federal derivatives law.

Bloomberg reported that the letter went to all exchanges offering event contracts. Introducing brokers, futures commission merchants and designated contract markets involved in prediction markets must confirm receipt of the regulator’s message by 31 August.

Publicly accessible pages reviewed by Finance Magnates did not show American-style plus-or-minus odds as the default presentation. Bloomberg did not identify which platform, interface or marketing material prompted the warning.

CFTC considered the practice important enough to issue an industry-wide warning. The legal fight over event contracts now extends beyond jurisdiction and product approval to how regulated firms display pricing and market those contracts to customers..

About the Author: Tanya Chepkova
Tanya Chepkova
  • 354 Articles
  • 2 Followers
About the Author: Tanya Chepkova
Tanya Chepkova is a News Editor at Finance Magnates with more than 16 years of experience in financial journalism, covering forex, crypto, and digital asset markets. Her work spans daily industry reporting and data-driven, long-form explainers focused on market structure, trading models, and regulatory shifts. Before joining Finance Magnates, she led the editorial team of a cryptocurrency-focused media outlet for six years. Her reporting combines analytical depth with clear storytelling, with particular attention to how structural changes in trading, stablecoin infrastructure, and emerging products such as prediction markets reshape the broader financial ecosystem. She covers global developments and provides additional insight into CIS markets. Areas of Coverage: Crypto and digital asset markets Prediction markets Stablecoins and cross-border payments Industry analysis and long-form explainers
  • 354 Articles
  • 2 Followers

More from the Author

FinTech

!"#$%&'()*+,-./0123456789:;<=>?@ABCDEFGHIJKLMNOPQRSTUVWXYZ[\]^_`abcdefghijklmnopqrstuvwxyz{|} !"#$%&'()*+,-./0123456789:;<=>?@ABCDEFGHIJKLMNOPQRSTUVWXYZ[\]^_`abcdefghijklmnopqrstuvwxyz{|}