Democrats and Republicans are opposed on crypto, with Trump recently stating support for it.
Some Democrats recently broke ranks, voting against the SEC's crypto-hostile SAB 121 policy.
One selling point for Bitcoin is that it is politically neutral. After all, it's a ledger, decentralized, and wherever we each fall on the political spectrum, we all need to keep track of our own funds. That’s not to say everyone thinks Bitcoin is the best way to do this, but the neutrality of the technology itself looked like an area on which it was easy to find agreement.
But recently, that sense of being removed from political partisanship has been called into question in the United States, where increasingly, attitudes towards cryptocurrencies appear to be dividing along party lines as we head towards the presidential election. And what’s more, this might be shaping up to be the first US election in which crypto is a significant issue influencing voter decisions.
How Are Republicans and Democrats Opposed Over Crypto?
Addressing the crowd, Trump offered a customary jibe at his opponent Biden’s expense, suggesting that the current president doesn’t know what crypto is, then directly stated that both Gary Gensler (Chair of the SEC) and the Democrats are “very much against it [crypto]”, before telling the crowd, “'if you’re in favor of crypto, you’d better vote for Trump”.
He also explained that crypto companies are leaving the US because of regulatory hostility, and expressed the view that “if we’re going to embrace it [crypto], we have to let them be here”.
i asked donald trump how he’s going to keep crypto businesses in america.
In contrast to Trump’s recent pro-crypto statements, the Biden Administration has appeared to be on a crypto warpath, with Senator Elizabeth Warren going as far–in early 2023–as to tweet from her official account that she was assembling what she referred to as an “anti-crypto army”, a statement that sounds jarringly extreme when in various regions outside the US, there are moves to integrate crypto with traditional finance.
The SEC in the US has also, during the current administration’s time in office, been particularly hostile towards the crypto industry, and has been criticized for regulating through enforcement, rather than offering guidance to crypto companies.
On the whole, and for outwardly ambiguous reasons, the Democrats appear simply not to like crypto, a sentiment which is being communicated to voters. Much of the electorate may not have the time or the inclination to investigate underlying political motives, but in straightforward terms, one side of the political aisle is making openly pro-crypto statements, while the other is demonstrating through its actions that it is opposed.
What Is SAB 121?
There are, however, recent developments suggesting that a non-partisan approach to crypto is still viable. This became apparent this week when what may turn out to have been a critical vote took place in the Senate.
The issue at stake was the SEC’s proposed new SAB 121 accounting policy, which makes it difficult for banks to custody Bitcoin and other cryptocurrencies for clients. The Senate voted to overturn SAB 121 by a majority of 60 to 38, and notably, twelve Democrats joined the 48 Republicans voting against the policy.
However, President Biden previously stated that he intends to veto any attempt to kill the SEC policy, raising the question now of whether he will stick to that intent. If so, we might be looking at a split in attitudes within the Democratic Party itself, and the perception created may be that it is President Biden, Senator Warren, and perhaps Chair Gary Gensler at the SEC, who are opposed to crypto, while in the party as a whole there is a wider range of opinion.
Political Meme Coins Enter the Fray
The current crypto cycle has been heavily dominated by meme coins, and has seen a new category of token emerge within that niche: the political meme coin.
This category has seen the launch of multiple new tokens that take shots at politicians through caricature and deliberately misspelled names, featuring tickers such as BODEN and TREMP, while the current top political coin by market cap is the sincerely supportive (and unambiguously titled) TRUMP.
Trump token price chart from CoinGecko
Are these coins an indication that politics and crypto really are more closely entangled than ever before? Perhaps they measure cynically-expressed frustration with the political apparatus, and at the same time are a sign of the degree to which politics seems to have seeped into all corners of public life in recent years.
Or, on the other hand, political meme tokens may simply be nothing more than thrill-seeking crypto participants spinning up novel ways to profit in the blockchain casino. Still though, it seems telling, in an election year, that these politically-focused coins have gained a foothold in the crypto markets.
What Happens to Crypto After the Election?
Should Biden win, then it’s reasonable to expect–in the immediate term–more of the same: a Gensler-chaired SEC that continues to aggressively target crypto, an unwillingness from the authorities to take a break from hostilities and engage meaningfully with the industry, and ultimately, the gradual exclusion of crypto from the American economy.
On the other hand, a Trump victory is likely to act as a major boost for the crypto markets, and the industry would then actively press for regulatory clarity and changes at the SEC, both of which are plausible under a new administration.
However, these possible outcomes are predicated on Trump sticking to his stated openness towards crypto, and the Biden administration not wavering in its stance against crypto, and the latter of those is particularly questionable after Democrat Senators broke ranks from the president over SAB 121.
It’s been a fascinating week in crypto. Narratives are forming and odds are shifting. It’ll be interesting to watch the next few months play out, and even more interesting to watch the jump shift that’ll occur as soon as there’s regulatory clarity around crypto in the U.S.… pic.twitter.com/t0g5rTIKjP
Regarding the quandary in which the Democratic Party has placed itself, Mike Novogratz–the founder and CEO of crypto firm Galaxy Digital–recently offered a neat description, explaining that the party’s current approach is “kind of like the Democrats went out and said ‘we don’t like dogs’. There are more crypto owners in America than there are dog owners."
From here until the election then, it looks likely that crypto will remain a pertinent issue, but it remains to be seen whether changes of direction are incoming.
One selling point for Bitcoin is that it is politically neutral. After all, it's a ledger, decentralized, and wherever we each fall on the political spectrum, we all need to keep track of our own funds. That’s not to say everyone thinks Bitcoin is the best way to do this, but the neutrality of the technology itself looked like an area on which it was easy to find agreement.
But recently, that sense of being removed from political partisanship has been called into question in the United States, where increasingly, attitudes towards cryptocurrencies appear to be dividing along party lines as we head towards the presidential election. And what’s more, this might be shaping up to be the first US election in which crypto is a significant issue influencing voter decisions.
How Are Republicans and Democrats Opposed Over Crypto?
Addressing the crowd, Trump offered a customary jibe at his opponent Biden’s expense, suggesting that the current president doesn’t know what crypto is, then directly stated that both Gary Gensler (Chair of the SEC) and the Democrats are “very much against it [crypto]”, before telling the crowd, “'if you’re in favor of crypto, you’d better vote for Trump”.
He also explained that crypto companies are leaving the US because of regulatory hostility, and expressed the view that “if we’re going to embrace it [crypto], we have to let them be here”.
i asked donald trump how he’s going to keep crypto businesses in america.
In contrast to Trump’s recent pro-crypto statements, the Biden Administration has appeared to be on a crypto warpath, with Senator Elizabeth Warren going as far–in early 2023–as to tweet from her official account that she was assembling what she referred to as an “anti-crypto army”, a statement that sounds jarringly extreme when in various regions outside the US, there are moves to integrate crypto with traditional finance.
The SEC in the US has also, during the current administration’s time in office, been particularly hostile towards the crypto industry, and has been criticized for regulating through enforcement, rather than offering guidance to crypto companies.
On the whole, and for outwardly ambiguous reasons, the Democrats appear simply not to like crypto, a sentiment which is being communicated to voters. Much of the electorate may not have the time or the inclination to investigate underlying political motives, but in straightforward terms, one side of the political aisle is making openly pro-crypto statements, while the other is demonstrating through its actions that it is opposed.
What Is SAB 121?
There are, however, recent developments suggesting that a non-partisan approach to crypto is still viable. This became apparent this week when what may turn out to have been a critical vote took place in the Senate.
The issue at stake was the SEC’s proposed new SAB 121 accounting policy, which makes it difficult for banks to custody Bitcoin and other cryptocurrencies for clients. The Senate voted to overturn SAB 121 by a majority of 60 to 38, and notably, twelve Democrats joined the 48 Republicans voting against the policy.
However, President Biden previously stated that he intends to veto any attempt to kill the SEC policy, raising the question now of whether he will stick to that intent. If so, we might be looking at a split in attitudes within the Democratic Party itself, and the perception created may be that it is President Biden, Senator Warren, and perhaps Chair Gary Gensler at the SEC, who are opposed to crypto, while in the party as a whole there is a wider range of opinion.
Political Meme Coins Enter the Fray
The current crypto cycle has been heavily dominated by meme coins, and has seen a new category of token emerge within that niche: the political meme coin.
This category has seen the launch of multiple new tokens that take shots at politicians through caricature and deliberately misspelled names, featuring tickers such as BODEN and TREMP, while the current top political coin by market cap is the sincerely supportive (and unambiguously titled) TRUMP.
Trump token price chart from CoinGecko
Are these coins an indication that politics and crypto really are more closely entangled than ever before? Perhaps they measure cynically-expressed frustration with the political apparatus, and at the same time are a sign of the degree to which politics seems to have seeped into all corners of public life in recent years.
Or, on the other hand, political meme tokens may simply be nothing more than thrill-seeking crypto participants spinning up novel ways to profit in the blockchain casino. Still though, it seems telling, in an election year, that these politically-focused coins have gained a foothold in the crypto markets.
What Happens to Crypto After the Election?
Should Biden win, then it’s reasonable to expect–in the immediate term–more of the same: a Gensler-chaired SEC that continues to aggressively target crypto, an unwillingness from the authorities to take a break from hostilities and engage meaningfully with the industry, and ultimately, the gradual exclusion of crypto from the American economy.
On the other hand, a Trump victory is likely to act as a major boost for the crypto markets, and the industry would then actively press for regulatory clarity and changes at the SEC, both of which are plausible under a new administration.
However, these possible outcomes are predicated on Trump sticking to his stated openness towards crypto, and the Biden administration not wavering in its stance against crypto, and the latter of those is particularly questionable after Democrat Senators broke ranks from the president over SAB 121.
It’s been a fascinating week in crypto. Narratives are forming and odds are shifting. It’ll be interesting to watch the next few months play out, and even more interesting to watch the jump shift that’ll occur as soon as there’s regulatory clarity around crypto in the U.S.… pic.twitter.com/t0g5rTIKjP
Regarding the quandary in which the Democratic Party has placed itself, Mike Novogratz–the founder and CEO of crypto firm Galaxy Digital–recently offered a neat description, explaining that the party’s current approach is “kind of like the Democrats went out and said ‘we don’t like dogs’. There are more crypto owners in America than there are dog owners."
From here until the election then, it looks likely that crypto will remain a pertinent issue, but it remains to be seen whether changes of direction are incoming.
Sam White is a writer and journalist from the UK who covers cryptocurrencies and web3, with a particular interest in NFTs and the crossover between art and finance. His work, on a wide variety of topics, has appeared on platforms including The Spectator, Vice and Hacker Noon.
Lebowa Capital's Jimmy Moyaha at an FMLS:24 panel discussion
Lebowa Capital's Jimmy Moyaha at an FMLS:24 panel discussion
Lebowa Capital's Jimmy Moyaha at an FMLS:24 panel discussion
Lebowa Capital's Jimmy Moyaha at an FMLS:24 panel discussion
Lebowa Capital's Jimmy Moyaha at an FMLS:24 panel discussion
Lebowa Capital's Jimmy Moyaha at an FMLS:24 panel discussion
Lebowa Capital's Jimmy Moyaha at an FMLS:24 panel discussion explaining the impact of news on trading.
Lebowa Capital's Jimmy Moyaha at an FMLS:24 panel discussion explaining the impact of news on trading.
Lebowa Capital's Jimmy Moyaha at an FMLS:24 panel discussion explaining the impact of news on trading.
Lebowa Capital's Jimmy Moyaha at an FMLS:24 panel discussion explaining the impact of news on trading.
Lebowa Capital's Jimmy Moyaha at an FMLS:24 panel discussion explaining the impact of news on trading.
Lebowa Capital's Jimmy Moyaha at an FMLS:24 panel discussion explaining the impact of news on trading.
Doo Prime's Fraser Nelson is explaining the challenges of liquidity in different markets.
Doo Prime's Fraser Nelson is explaining the challenges of liquidity in different markets.
Doo Prime's Fraser Nelson is explaining the challenges of liquidity in different markets.
Doo Prime's Fraser Nelson is explaining the challenges of liquidity in different markets.
Doo Prime's Fraser Nelson is explaining the challenges of liquidity in different markets.
Doo Prime's Fraser Nelson is explaining the challenges of liquidity in different markets.
Doo Prime's Fraser Nelson is explaining the challenges of liquidity in different markets while participating in a panel discussion on "How to Trade the News."
Doo Prime's Fraser Nelson is explaining the challenges of liquidity in different markets while participating in a panel discussion on "How to Trade the News."
Doo Prime's Fraser Nelson is explaining the challenges of liquidity in different markets while participating in a panel discussion on "How to Trade the News."
Doo Prime's Fraser Nelson is explaining the challenges of liquidity in different markets while participating in a panel discussion on "How to Trade the News."
Doo Prime's Fraser Nelson is explaining the challenges of liquidity in different markets while participating in a panel discussion on "How to Trade the News."
Doo Prime's Fraser Nelson is explaining the challenges of liquidity in different markets while participating in a panel discussion on "How to Trade the News."
FMLS:24 exhibition venue is crowded on the second day.
FMLS:24 exhibition venue is crowded on the second day.
FMLS:24 exhibition venue is crowded on the second day.
FMLS:24 exhibition venue is crowded on the second day.
FMLS:24 exhibition venue is crowded on the second day.
FMLS:24 exhibition venue is crowded on the second day.
Panel Discussion on "Regulation, Trust, and the Future of Trading in Africa"
Panel Discussion on "Regulation, Trust, and the Future of Trading in Africa"
Panel Discussion on "Regulation, Trust, and the Future of Trading in Africa"
Panel Discussion on "Regulation, Trust, and the Future of Trading in Africa"
Panel Discussion on "Regulation, Trust, and the Future of Trading in Africa"
Panel Discussion on "Regulation, Trust, and the Future of Trading in Africa"
Experts discuss the topic "Regulation, Trust, and the Future of Trading in Africa" at FMLS:24
Experts discuss the topic "Regulation, Trust, and the Future of Trading in Africa" at FMLS:24
Experts discuss the topic "Regulation, Trust, and the Future of Trading in Africa" at FMLS:24
Experts discuss the topic "Regulation, Trust, and the Future of Trading in Africa" at FMLS:24
Experts discuss the topic "Regulation, Trust, and the Future of Trading in Africa" at FMLS:24
Experts discuss the topic "Regulation, Trust, and the Future of Trading in Africa" at FMLS:24
