Nvidia and Advanced Micro Devices Inc. agreed to pay 15% of their revenues from chip sales to China to the US government as part of a deal with the Trump administration to secure export licenses, the Financial Times reported Sunday https://t.co/5Mfdjm5OHr
But in Washington, nothing is permanent except political convenience —
and perhaps tariffs.
The 15% Cover Charge
Last week, the Bureau of Industry and Security began issuing the
long-awaited export licenses. The catch? Nvidia and AMD must hand
over 15% of their China chip revenues directly to the US government. For
Nvidia, that’s 15% of H20 sales. For AMD, 15% of MI308 sales. Both companies
have confirmed the arrangement in broad strokes, though AMD has kept its public
comments to a minimum.
Yes, you read that right, 15% of the revenue.
A US official described the deal as “unprecedented” — no American
company has ever been asked to part with a slice of its revenues in exchange
for an export license. A 15% levy doesn’t exactly erase any national security
risks, raising the awkward question: if the chips were such a threat in April,
why is selling them now okay as long as Washington gets paid?
Deborah Elms of the Hinrich Foundation (LinkedIn).
“You either have a national security problem or you don’t,” Deborah
Elms of the Hinrich Foundation told the BBC. “If you have a 15% payment, it
doesn’t somehow eliminate the national security issue.”
How We Got Here
The H20 was born out of compromise. When the Biden administration
slapped strict AI chip export controls on China in 2023, Nvidia engineered a
version that sat just under the limits, allowing it to keep a foot in the
market. Trump’s April ban on the chip closed that loophole — until CEO
Jensen Huang personally lobbied the president.
Most people don't realize how massive this announcement truly is.
This covers 15% of REVENUE from China, not PROFIT, for both Nvidia and AMD.
It also means the Trump Administration is now negotiating company-by-company "trade deals."
Within days of their White House meeting, licenses began flowing.
Officially, the reversal comes as part of broader US-China trade talks, which
have included Beijing loosening rare earth export controls and Washington
easing restrictions on chip design software firms. Both
sides appear to be having a breather, with no clear outcome at this point. Unofficially,
it fits a pattern: Trump’s administration has a habit of striking deals where
companies pay, build, or invest their way back into favor. The Art of the Deal,
anyone?
For now, there’s no sign Beijing will block the imports outright —
especially given its own need for cutting-edge AI hardware — but the political
and security baggage isn’t going away.
A Price Worth Paying?
From Nvidia’s perspective, 15% is steep but survivable, especially when
the alternative is zero China sales. The company’s statement to the BBC was
pragmatic: “We follow rules the US government sets for our participation in
worldwide markets […] America cannot repeat 5G and lose telecommunication
leadership.” Translation: it’s better to pay the toll, but the US needs to be
careful.
BREAKING: Trump’s plan to take a 15% cut of Nvidia and AMD chip sales to China isn’t a tariff, it’s a shakedown. The government is inserting itself as a middleman in international trade, hitting businesses and consumers with what could be the biggest tax hike in U.S. history. pic.twitter.com/JIxQqYCH60
For AMD, the deal could mean a valuable foothold in a market where it
trails Nvidia badly in AI hardware. But the precedent is startling — not just
for chipmakers, but for any US tech firm caught in the geopolitical crossfire.
Charlie Dai, VP, Principal Analyst at Forrester Research (LinkedIn).
Charlie Dai of tech and business research firm, Forrester, summed it
up: “The arrangement underscores the high cost of market access amid escalating
tech trade tensions, creating substantial financial pressure and strategic
uncertainty for tech vendors.”
The Bigger Game
The 15% deal is a microcosm of the current US-China relationship: an
uneasy mix of rivalry, mutual dependence, and transactional fixes. As of now,
both sides are still negotiating over tariffs and tech access, with a 90-day
truce in place but no long-term agreement in sight.
Liza Tobin, foreign policy expert, (LinkedIn).
If this experiment works, Washington may have found itself a new policy
lever: turning export controls into revenue streams. But as former National
Security Council China expert Liza Tobin quipped, “What’s next — letting Lockheed
Martin sell F-35s to China for a 15 per cent commission?”
For Nvidia and AMD, the calculation is simple. They’ve been let back
into one of the most lucrative markets on the planet. The price is high, the
politics are messy, but the alternative was watching competitors fill the gap.
In the end, sometimes you pay the toll and keep driving.
For more stories from the tech and finance worlds, follow our dedicated
Trending section.
After months of lost sales, the US gives Nvidia and AMD the green light to
sell AI chips to China… in exchange for a healthy cut of the revenue.
Nvidia and Advanced Micro Devices Inc. agreed to pay 15% of their revenues from chip sales to China to the US government as part of a deal with the Trump administration to secure export licenses, the Financial Times reported Sunday https://t.co/5Mfdjm5OHr
But in Washington, nothing is permanent except political convenience —
and perhaps tariffs.
The 15% Cover Charge
Last week, the Bureau of Industry and Security began issuing the
long-awaited export licenses. The catch? Nvidia and AMD must hand
over 15% of their China chip revenues directly to the US government. For
Nvidia, that’s 15% of H20 sales. For AMD, 15% of MI308 sales. Both companies
have confirmed the arrangement in broad strokes, though AMD has kept its public
comments to a minimum.
Yes, you read that right, 15% of the revenue.
A US official described the deal as “unprecedented” — no American
company has ever been asked to part with a slice of its revenues in exchange
for an export license. A 15% levy doesn’t exactly erase any national security
risks, raising the awkward question: if the chips were such a threat in April,
why is selling them now okay as long as Washington gets paid?
Deborah Elms of the Hinrich Foundation (LinkedIn).
“You either have a national security problem or you don’t,” Deborah
Elms of the Hinrich Foundation told the BBC. “If you have a 15% payment, it
doesn’t somehow eliminate the national security issue.”
How We Got Here
The H20 was born out of compromise. When the Biden administration
slapped strict AI chip export controls on China in 2023, Nvidia engineered a
version that sat just under the limits, allowing it to keep a foot in the
market. Trump’s April ban on the chip closed that loophole — until CEO
Jensen Huang personally lobbied the president.
Most people don't realize how massive this announcement truly is.
This covers 15% of REVENUE from China, not PROFIT, for both Nvidia and AMD.
It also means the Trump Administration is now negotiating company-by-company "trade deals."
Within days of their White House meeting, licenses began flowing.
Officially, the reversal comes as part of broader US-China trade talks, which
have included Beijing loosening rare earth export controls and Washington
easing restrictions on chip design software firms. Both
sides appear to be having a breather, with no clear outcome at this point. Unofficially,
it fits a pattern: Trump’s administration has a habit of striking deals where
companies pay, build, or invest their way back into favor. The Art of the Deal,
anyone?
For now, there’s no sign Beijing will block the imports outright —
especially given its own need for cutting-edge AI hardware — but the political
and security baggage isn’t going away.
A Price Worth Paying?
From Nvidia’s perspective, 15% is steep but survivable, especially when
the alternative is zero China sales. The company’s statement to the BBC was
pragmatic: “We follow rules the US government sets for our participation in
worldwide markets […] America cannot repeat 5G and lose telecommunication
leadership.” Translation: it’s better to pay the toll, but the US needs to be
careful.
BREAKING: Trump’s plan to take a 15% cut of Nvidia and AMD chip sales to China isn’t a tariff, it’s a shakedown. The government is inserting itself as a middleman in international trade, hitting businesses and consumers with what could be the biggest tax hike in U.S. history. pic.twitter.com/JIxQqYCH60
For AMD, the deal could mean a valuable foothold in a market where it
trails Nvidia badly in AI hardware. But the precedent is startling — not just
for chipmakers, but for any US tech firm caught in the geopolitical crossfire.
Charlie Dai, VP, Principal Analyst at Forrester Research (LinkedIn).
Charlie Dai of tech and business research firm, Forrester, summed it
up: “The arrangement underscores the high cost of market access amid escalating
tech trade tensions, creating substantial financial pressure and strategic
uncertainty for tech vendors.”
The Bigger Game
The 15% deal is a microcosm of the current US-China relationship: an
uneasy mix of rivalry, mutual dependence, and transactional fixes. As of now,
both sides are still negotiating over tariffs and tech access, with a 90-day
truce in place but no long-term agreement in sight.
Liza Tobin, foreign policy expert, (LinkedIn).
If this experiment works, Washington may have found itself a new policy
lever: turning export controls into revenue streams. But as former National
Security Council China expert Liza Tobin quipped, “What’s next — letting Lockheed
Martin sell F-35s to China for a 15 per cent commission?”
For Nvidia and AMD, the calculation is simple. They’ve been let back
into one of the most lucrative markets on the planet. The price is high, the
politics are messy, but the alternative was watching competitors fill the gap.
In the end, sometimes you pay the toll and keep driving.
For more stories from the tech and finance worlds, follow our dedicated
Trending section.
Louis Parks has lived and worked in and around the Middle East for much of his professional career. He writes about the meeting of the tech and finance worlds.
Why Is Gold Going Down? Gold Price Falls Below 200 EMA And This XAU/USD Forecasts Shows -20% Target
Featured Videos
FM Daily Brief – 11 June 2026
FM Daily Brief – 11 June 2026
FM Daily Brief – 11 June 2026
FM Daily Brief – 11 June 2026
Today’s Thursday, the 11th of June 2026, and these are our main stories: Spain moves to classify certain futures products as CFDs for retail investors, IUX reports more than $1.5 trillion in monthly trading volume, and a closer look at why crypto still struggles to reach the mainstream.
Today’s Thursday, the 11th of June 2026, and these are our main stories: Spain moves to classify certain futures products as CFDs for retail investors, IUX reports more than $1.5 trillion in monthly trading volume, and a closer look at why crypto still struggles to reach the mainstream.
Today’s Thursday, the 11th of June 2026, and these are our main stories: Spain moves to classify certain futures products as CFDs for retail investors, IUX reports more than $1.5 trillion in monthly trading volume, and a closer look at why crypto still struggles to reach the mainstream.
Today’s Thursday, the 11th of June 2026, and these are our main stories: Spain moves to classify certain futures products as CFDs for retail investors, IUX reports more than $1.5 trillion in monthly trading volume, and a closer look at why crypto still struggles to reach the mainstream.
In this video, we review @AxiOfficialChannel , a multi-asset broker offering access to forex and CFD markets through MetaTrader 4, MetaTrader 5, the Axi Trading App, and copy trading solutions.
We examine the broker’s regulatory framework, platform offering, market coverage, and customer support structure. We also explore key features such as available trading instruments, swap-free account options, funding considerations, and multilingual support.
Watch the full video for a clear, fact-based overview of Axi’s products, trading tools, and overall broker offering.
#Axi #ForexBroker #CFDTrading #FinanceMagnates #Trading #BrokerReview #OnlineTrading
In this video, we review @AxiOfficialChannel , a multi-asset broker offering access to forex and CFD markets through MetaTrader 4, MetaTrader 5, the Axi Trading App, and copy trading solutions.
We examine the broker’s regulatory framework, platform offering, market coverage, and customer support structure. We also explore key features such as available trading instruments, swap-free account options, funding considerations, and multilingual support.
Watch the full video for a clear, fact-based overview of Axi’s products, trading tools, and overall broker offering.
#Axi #ForexBroker #CFDTrading #FinanceMagnates #Trading #BrokerReview #OnlineTrading
In this video, we review @AxiOfficialChannel , a multi-asset broker offering access to forex and CFD markets through MetaTrader 4, MetaTrader 5, the Axi Trading App, and copy trading solutions.
We examine the broker’s regulatory framework, platform offering, market coverage, and customer support structure. We also explore key features such as available trading instruments, swap-free account options, funding considerations, and multilingual support.
Watch the full video for a clear, fact-based overview of Axi’s products, trading tools, and overall broker offering.
#Axi #ForexBroker #CFDTrading #FinanceMagnates #Trading #BrokerReview #OnlineTrading
In this video, we review @AxiOfficialChannel , a multi-asset broker offering access to forex and CFD markets through MetaTrader 4, MetaTrader 5, the Axi Trading App, and copy trading solutions.
We examine the broker’s regulatory framework, platform offering, market coverage, and customer support structure. We also explore key features such as available trading instruments, swap-free account options, funding considerations, and multilingual support.
Watch the full video for a clear, fact-based overview of Axi’s products, trading tools, and overall broker offering.
#Axi #ForexBroker #CFDTrading #FinanceMagnates #Trading #BrokerReview #OnlineTrading
In this video, we review @AxiOfficialChannel , a multi-asset broker offering access to forex and CFD markets through MetaTrader 4, MetaTrader 5, the Axi Trading App, and copy trading solutions.
We examine the broker’s regulatory framework, platform offering, market coverage, and customer support structure. We also explore key features such as available trading instruments, swap-free account options, funding considerations, and multilingual support.
Watch the full video for a clear, fact-based overview of Axi’s products, trading tools, and overall broker offering.
#Axi #ForexBroker #CFDTrading #FinanceMagnates #Trading #BrokerReview #OnlineTrading
In this video, we review @AxiOfficialChannel , a multi-asset broker offering access to forex and CFD markets through MetaTrader 4, MetaTrader 5, the Axi Trading App, and copy trading solutions.
We examine the broker’s regulatory framework, platform offering, market coverage, and customer support structure. We also explore key features such as available trading instruments, swap-free account options, funding considerations, and multilingual support.
Watch the full video for a clear, fact-based overview of Axi’s products, trading tools, and overall broker offering.
#Axi #ForexBroker #CFDTrading #FinanceMagnates #Trading #BrokerReview #OnlineTrading
Multi-Asset or Die: The New Brokerage Playbook
Multi-Asset or Die: The New Brokerage Playbook
Multi-Asset or Die: The New Brokerage Playbook
Multi-Asset or Die: The New Brokerage Playbook
Multi-Asset or Die: The New Brokerage Playbook
Multi-Asset or Die: The New Brokerage Playbook
This panel will explore how firms are moving beyond CFDs into crypto, perpetuals, equities, and multi‑asset offerings, and the challenges they face across regulation, technology, liquidity, and risk management. It examines what is driving the shift, what it takes to execute it successfully, and how brokers can position themselves for the next phase of growth.
This panel will explore how firms are moving beyond CFDs into crypto, perpetuals, equities, and multi‑asset offerings, and the challenges they face across regulation, technology, liquidity, and risk management. It examines what is driving the shift, what it takes to execute it successfully, and how brokers can position themselves for the next phase of growth.
This panel will explore how firms are moving beyond CFDs into crypto, perpetuals, equities, and multi‑asset offerings, and the challenges they face across regulation, technology, liquidity, and risk management. It examines what is driving the shift, what it takes to execute it successfully, and how brokers can position themselves for the next phase of growth.
This panel will explore how firms are moving beyond CFDs into crypto, perpetuals, equities, and multi‑asset offerings, and the challenges they face across regulation, technology, liquidity, and risk management. It examines what is driving the shift, what it takes to execute it successfully, and how brokers can position themselves for the next phase of growth.
This panel will explore how firms are moving beyond CFDs into crypto, perpetuals, equities, and multi‑asset offerings, and the challenges they face across regulation, technology, liquidity, and risk management. It examines what is driving the shift, what it takes to execute it successfully, and how brokers can position themselves for the next phase of growth.
This panel will explore how firms are moving beyond CFDs into crypto, perpetuals, equities, and multi‑asset offerings, and the challenges they face across regulation, technology, liquidity, and risk management. It examines what is driving the shift, what it takes to execute it successfully, and how brokers can position themselves for the next phase of growth.
Beyond Reach? Retail Investor Acquisition Across APAC
Beyond Reach? Retail Investor Acquisition Across APAC
Beyond Reach? Retail Investor Acquisition Across APAC
Beyond Reach? Retail Investor Acquisition Across APAC
Beyond Reach? Retail Investor Acquisition Across APAC
Beyond Reach? Retail Investor Acquisition Across APAC
APAC accounts for two-thirds of global retail trading traffic, but with differences of language, regulation, and trader profile, the region's growth is ag great as complexity.
This session gathers CMOs, heads of acquisition, and IB relationship managers to examine what actually works, channel by channel, market by market.
Attendees will walk away with:
A clear view of which channels deliver funded, retained traders across Singapore, Japan, and Southeast Asia
Understanding of how to structure IB partnerships for LTV, not first deposit
Insight into what localization actually costs beyond the translation budget
Perspective on how ad restrictions, crypto promotion limits, and bundling rules differ across APAC jurisdictions
A read on whether the super-app model changes acquisition economics for retail investing platforms
APAC accounts for two-thirds of global retail trading traffic, but with differences of language, regulation, and trader profile, the region's growth is ag great as complexity.
This session gathers CMOs, heads of acquisition, and IB relationship managers to examine what actually works, channel by channel, market by market.
Attendees will walk away with:
A clear view of which channels deliver funded, retained traders across Singapore, Japan, and Southeast Asia
Understanding of how to structure IB partnerships for LTV, not first deposit
Insight into what localization actually costs beyond the translation budget
Perspective on how ad restrictions, crypto promotion limits, and bundling rules differ across APAC jurisdictions
A read on whether the super-app model changes acquisition economics for retail investing platforms
APAC accounts for two-thirds of global retail trading traffic, but with differences of language, regulation, and trader profile, the region's growth is ag great as complexity.
This session gathers CMOs, heads of acquisition, and IB relationship managers to examine what actually works, channel by channel, market by market.
Attendees will walk away with:
A clear view of which channels deliver funded, retained traders across Singapore, Japan, and Southeast Asia
Understanding of how to structure IB partnerships for LTV, not first deposit
Insight into what localization actually costs beyond the translation budget
Perspective on how ad restrictions, crypto promotion limits, and bundling rules differ across APAC jurisdictions
A read on whether the super-app model changes acquisition economics for retail investing platforms
APAC accounts for two-thirds of global retail trading traffic, but with differences of language, regulation, and trader profile, the region's growth is ag great as complexity.
This session gathers CMOs, heads of acquisition, and IB relationship managers to examine what actually works, channel by channel, market by market.
Attendees will walk away with:
A clear view of which channels deliver funded, retained traders across Singapore, Japan, and Southeast Asia
Understanding of how to structure IB partnerships for LTV, not first deposit
Insight into what localization actually costs beyond the translation budget
Perspective on how ad restrictions, crypto promotion limits, and bundling rules differ across APAC jurisdictions
A read on whether the super-app model changes acquisition economics for retail investing platforms
APAC accounts for two-thirds of global retail trading traffic, but with differences of language, regulation, and trader profile, the region's growth is ag great as complexity.
This session gathers CMOs, heads of acquisition, and IB relationship managers to examine what actually works, channel by channel, market by market.
Attendees will walk away with:
A clear view of which channels deliver funded, retained traders across Singapore, Japan, and Southeast Asia
Understanding of how to structure IB partnerships for LTV, not first deposit
Insight into what localization actually costs beyond the translation budget
Perspective on how ad restrictions, crypto promotion limits, and bundling rules differ across APAC jurisdictions
A read on whether the super-app model changes acquisition economics for retail investing platforms
APAC accounts for two-thirds of global retail trading traffic, but with differences of language, regulation, and trader profile, the region's growth is ag great as complexity.
This session gathers CMOs, heads of acquisition, and IB relationship managers to examine what actually works, channel by channel, market by market.
Attendees will walk away with:
A clear view of which channels deliver funded, retained traders across Singapore, Japan, and Southeast Asia
Understanding of how to structure IB partnerships for LTV, not first deposit
Insight into what localization actually costs beyond the translation budget
Perspective on how ad restrictions, crypto promotion limits, and bundling rules differ across APAC jurisdictions
A read on whether the super-app model changes acquisition economics for retail investing platforms