The United
Kingdom’s Chancellor Jeremy Hunt has openly criticized the Financial Conduct
Authority's (FCA) proposed plan to publicly disclose the names of companies
under investigation at an earlier stage.
The
chancellor's intervention highlights the growing tension between the industry
and the regulator, being another voice of criticism coming from the UK
government regarding the controversial plan.
The UK Chancellor Urges
FCA to Reconsider “Naming and Shaming” Policy
The FCA's
controversial proposal, which aims to "name and shame" firms under
investigation more frequently and earlier in the process, has faced fierce
opposition from both the government and the City of London.
Critics
argue that this approach undermines the presumption of innocence and could
potentially harm the UK's international competitiveness in the financial
services industry.
“I think
it’s completely reasonable to name and shame a failing water company,” Hunt
told FT. “But I think in a financial services context, it’s different.”
BREAKING
Financial watchdog FCA wants transparency & to disclose some companies which are under investigation
JEREMY HUNT has intervened to warn FCA not to ‘name and shame
And right there is how the system of corruption is encouraged by the Tories👍🏼
RT https://t.co/Qy5zRBnxzL
— Carol Vorderman (@carolvorders) April 30, 2024
Chancellor
Hunt also emphasized the importance of the FCA's secondary growth duty, which
was introduced last year alongside the Prudential Regulation
Regulation
Like any other industry with a high net worth, the financial services industry is tightly regulated to help curb illicit behavior and manipulation. Each asset class has its own set of protocols put in place to combat their respective forms of abuse.In the foreign exchange space, regulation is assumed by authorities in multiple jurisdictions, though ultimately lacking a binding international order. Who are the Industry’s Leading Regulators?Regulators such as the UK’s Financial Conduct Authority (
Like any other industry with a high net worth, the financial services industry is tightly regulated to help curb illicit behavior and manipulation. Each asset class has its own set of protocols put in place to combat their respective forms of abuse.In the foreign exchange space, regulation is assumed by authorities in multiple jurisdictions, though ultimately lacking a binding international order. Who are the Industry’s Leading Regulators?Regulators such as the UK’s Financial Conduct Authority (
Read this Term Authority's new
competitiveness and growth objectives.
He urged
the regulator to reconsider its decision, stating that the proposed policy
"doesn't feel consistent" with the FCA's new responsibilities to
promote growth in the financial sector.
The
Chancellor's statements align with previous comments made by British ministers.
For instance, Kemi Badenoch, the Business Secretary and Equalities Minister,
criticized the FCA for "regulatory over-reach
Private Sector Also Says
No
Similarly,
the FCA's approach lacks support within the private sector. Silvija Krupena, the
Director of the Financial Intelligence Unit at RedCompass Labs, warned of a
"real danger" that the FCA might become a watchdog that "only
barks" but "does not bite."
„The FCA is
caught between a rock and a hard place,” commented Krupena. “Naming and shaming
shouldn’t be the FCA’s next move. Instead, the focus should be on giving the
regulator teeth by providing more powers and resources to do its job better.”
Krupena
cited the need to conduct annual bank exams and more thorough
investigations. Currently, 65% of all cases conclude without any action,
typically taking four years. This means that every second company could be
"named and shamed" unjustly, which would undoubtedly have a negative
impact on its reputation.
FCA faces backlash over plan to ‘name and shame’ companies under investigation https://t.co/GJaW57mxW7 via @ft
— John Davidson (@JohnDav79548222) April 22, 2024
“It would
significantly and pointlessly damage a firm’s reputation and value,” Miles
Celic, the Chief Executive of TheCityUK, told FT. His
statement clearly shows that the legal industry is also concerned. “Especially
given that FCA investigations take four years on average and many conclude
without requiring any action.”
What Is the FCA's
Position?
The FCA has
responded to the chancellor's comments by reaffirming its commitment to its primary objectives of protecting consumers, market integrity, and effective competition and its secondary objective of facilitating international
competitiveness and growth.
“As we have
said throughout the process, this is a consultation,” the FCA responded to Hunt’s
comments. The watchdog added that it would carefully consider the extensive feedback
received, including from the government, before deciding on its next steps.
Industry
groups, such as the Managed Funds Association, have also called for the FCA to
withdraw the proposal. They warn that publicly naming firms before any wrongdoing
is established could damage the UK's position as a global financial center and
prompt many firms to leave or avoid entering the UK market altogether.
“MFA is
concerned that the proposals would compromise the effective and orderly
operation of markets, and strongly suggests that the FCA withdraw the proposals
under the Consultation Paper in their entirety,” the MFA commented in the
e-mailed statement sent to Finance Magnates.
The outcome
of this debate will have significant implications for the future of the UK's
financial regulatory landscape and its ability to attract and retain
international investment in the post-Brexit
Brexit
Brexit stands for British Exit, or in reference to the United Kingdom’s decision to formally leave the European Union (EU) as declared in a June 23, 2016 referendum. In a more immediate sense, a tight vote and unexpected result helped drive British pound (GBP) to lows that had not been seen in decades.The day following the referendum, former Prime Minister David Cameron resigned from office where he was replaced by Theresa May, who later resigned from office on June 7th, 2019. Active Prime Minis
Brexit stands for British Exit, or in reference to the United Kingdom’s decision to formally leave the European Union (EU) as declared in a June 23, 2016 referendum. In a more immediate sense, a tight vote and unexpected result helped drive British pound (GBP) to lows that had not been seen in decades.The day following the referendum, former Prime Minister David Cameron resigned from office where he was replaced by Theresa May, who later resigned from office on June 7th, 2019. Active Prime Minis
Read this Term era.
The United
Kingdom’s Chancellor Jeremy Hunt has openly criticized the Financial Conduct
Authority's (FCA) proposed plan to publicly disclose the names of companies
under investigation at an earlier stage.
The
chancellor's intervention highlights the growing tension between the industry
and the regulator, being another voice of criticism coming from the UK
government regarding the controversial plan.
The UK Chancellor Urges
FCA to Reconsider “Naming and Shaming” Policy
The FCA's
controversial proposal, which aims to "name and shame" firms under
investigation more frequently and earlier in the process, has faced fierce
opposition from both the government and the City of London.
Critics
argue that this approach undermines the presumption of innocence and could
potentially harm the UK's international competitiveness in the financial
services industry.
“I think
it’s completely reasonable to name and shame a failing water company,” Hunt
told FT. “But I think in a financial services context, it’s different.”
BREAKING
Financial watchdog FCA wants transparency & to disclose some companies which are under investigation
JEREMY HUNT has intervened to warn FCA not to ‘name and shame
And right there is how the system of corruption is encouraged by the Tories👍🏼
RT https://t.co/Qy5zRBnxzL
— Carol Vorderman (@carolvorders) April 30, 2024
Chancellor
Hunt also emphasized the importance of the FCA's secondary growth duty, which
was introduced last year alongside the Prudential Regulation
Regulation
Like any other industry with a high net worth, the financial services industry is tightly regulated to help curb illicit behavior and manipulation. Each asset class has its own set of protocols put in place to combat their respective forms of abuse.In the foreign exchange space, regulation is assumed by authorities in multiple jurisdictions, though ultimately lacking a binding international order. Who are the Industry’s Leading Regulators?Regulators such as the UK’s Financial Conduct Authority (
Like any other industry with a high net worth, the financial services industry is tightly regulated to help curb illicit behavior and manipulation. Each asset class has its own set of protocols put in place to combat their respective forms of abuse.In the foreign exchange space, regulation is assumed by authorities in multiple jurisdictions, though ultimately lacking a binding international order. Who are the Industry’s Leading Regulators?Regulators such as the UK’s Financial Conduct Authority (
Read this Term Authority's new
competitiveness and growth objectives.
He urged
the regulator to reconsider its decision, stating that the proposed policy
"doesn't feel consistent" with the FCA's new responsibilities to
promote growth in the financial sector.
The
Chancellor's statements align with previous comments made by British ministers.
For instance, Kemi Badenoch, the Business Secretary and Equalities Minister,
criticized the FCA for "regulatory over-reach
Private Sector Also Says
No
Similarly,
the FCA's approach lacks support within the private sector. Silvija Krupena, the
Director of the Financial Intelligence Unit at RedCompass Labs, warned of a
"real danger" that the FCA might become a watchdog that "only
barks" but "does not bite."
„The FCA is
caught between a rock and a hard place,” commented Krupena. “Naming and shaming
shouldn’t be the FCA’s next move. Instead, the focus should be on giving the
regulator teeth by providing more powers and resources to do its job better.”
Krupena
cited the need to conduct annual bank exams and more thorough
investigations. Currently, 65% of all cases conclude without any action,
typically taking four years. This means that every second company could be
"named and shamed" unjustly, which would undoubtedly have a negative
impact on its reputation.
FCA faces backlash over plan to ‘name and shame’ companies under investigation https://t.co/GJaW57mxW7 via @ft
— John Davidson (@JohnDav79548222) April 22, 2024
“It would
significantly and pointlessly damage a firm’s reputation and value,” Miles
Celic, the Chief Executive of TheCityUK, told FT. His
statement clearly shows that the legal industry is also concerned. “Especially
given that FCA investigations take four years on average and many conclude
without requiring any action.”
What Is the FCA's
Position?
The FCA has
responded to the chancellor's comments by reaffirming its commitment to its primary objectives of protecting consumers, market integrity, and effective competition and its secondary objective of facilitating international
competitiveness and growth.
“As we have
said throughout the process, this is a consultation,” the FCA responded to Hunt’s
comments. The watchdog added that it would carefully consider the extensive feedback
received, including from the government, before deciding on its next steps.
Industry
groups, such as the Managed Funds Association, have also called for the FCA to
withdraw the proposal. They warn that publicly naming firms before any wrongdoing
is established could damage the UK's position as a global financial center and
prompt many firms to leave or avoid entering the UK market altogether.
“MFA is
concerned that the proposals would compromise the effective and orderly
operation of markets, and strongly suggests that the FCA withdraw the proposals
under the Consultation Paper in their entirety,” the MFA commented in the
e-mailed statement sent to Finance Magnates.
The outcome
of this debate will have significant implications for the future of the UK's
financial regulatory landscape and its ability to attract and retain
international investment in the post-Brexit
Brexit
Brexit stands for British Exit, or in reference to the United Kingdom’s decision to formally leave the European Union (EU) as declared in a June 23, 2016 referendum. In a more immediate sense, a tight vote and unexpected result helped drive British pound (GBP) to lows that had not been seen in decades.The day following the referendum, former Prime Minister David Cameron resigned from office where he was replaced by Theresa May, who later resigned from office on June 7th, 2019. Active Prime Minis
Brexit stands for British Exit, or in reference to the United Kingdom’s decision to formally leave the European Union (EU) as declared in a June 23, 2016 referendum. In a more immediate sense, a tight vote and unexpected result helped drive British pound (GBP) to lows that had not been seen in decades.The day following the referendum, former Prime Minister David Cameron resigned from office where he was replaced by Theresa May, who later resigned from office on June 7th, 2019. Active Prime Minis
Read this Term era.