The European Securities and Markets Authority (ESMA) said in a statement on Wednesday that it will not extend its transition period to allow investment firms to implement Legal Entity Identifiers (LEIs) when reporting trades under the Markets in Financial Instruments Regulation (MiFIR).
According to the statement, since the grace period began in December 2017, the ESMA and National Competent Authorities (NCAs) have seen a significant increase in the LEI coverage for issuers and clients. Therefore, investment firms now have until July 2, 2018, to meet their obligations under the MiFIR.
The temporary period was initially introduced as many investment firms were not able to meet their obligations. This was despite the ESMA consistently urging EU companies to maintain full compliance before the MiFID II came into effect on January 3, 2018. The regulation introduced many obligations for investment firms, including the enhanced and expanded transaction reporting requirement.
The Participants in Forex Trading and their Role in the MarketGo to article >>
Once the six month transition period ends in July, the NCAs’ role in respect to the LEI requirements will shift from monitoring to ongoing supervisory actions. The ESMA and NCAs are currently coordinating the development of a joint supervisory action plan. This will focus on ensuring investment firms comply with the LEI reporting requirements under the MiFIR provisions.
Importance of LEIs
An LEI is a 20-character identification code that enables consistent and accurate identification of legal entities that engage in financial transactions, including non-financial institutions. Under the MiFIR, investment firms within the EU are required to identify their clients that are legal persons with LEIs for MiFID II transaction reporting.
The LEI is an incredibly important piece of the MiFIR, as it is crucial for matching and aggregating data for both MiFIR regulatory and transparency reporting. The code is essential to transparency and market surveillance, including the detection of market abuse.
Many regulators around the world have stressed that LEIs need to be made a global public good, as a common framework is paramount for regulators to clearly identify each exposure for the risk management of financial transactions.