ASIC Slaps Commonwealth Bank of Australia With $20 Million Fine

by Celeste Skinner
  • The CBA has to pay $15 million to the community, and $5 million to the Australian regulator.
ASIC Slaps Commonwealth Bank of Australia With $20 Million Fine

The Australian Securities and Investments Commission (ASIC) announced on that it has fined the Commonwealth Bank of Australia (CBA) $20 million following their participation in the setting of the Bank Bill Swap Rate (BBSW), a key benchmark and reference interest rate in the Australian financial system.

According to the statement, the multinational bank has entered into a court enforceable undertaking with ASIC, due to Federal Court proceedings that were launched by the regulator in January.

In the proceedings, the Australian bank admitted to the Federal Court in Melbourne that it tried to affect where the BBSW set on five separate occasions between January 31, 2012, and June 15, in 2012. As a result, CBA was fined a pecuniary penalty of $5 million on June 21, 2018.

CBA to appoint independent expert

According to the statement, the CBA will also appoint an independent expert to assess changes the bank has made and will make, to its policies, procedures, systems, controls, training, guidance and framework for the monitoring and supervision of employees and trading in Prime Bank Bills.

In addition, the statement also says that the bank admitted to failing to adequately train its traders and not doing everything necessary to ensure it provided financial services honestly and fairly.

Commenting on the enforceable undertaking and the additional $5 million penalty, Justice Beach of the Federal Court said: “that sum together with the other Payments all totalling $25 million should be an adequate denouncement of and deterrence against the unacceptable trading behaviour of individuals within CBA that ought to have known better and a bank that ought to have better supervised its personnel.’

ASIC initially began the legal proceedings in the Federal Court against the bank on January 30, 2018. The watchdog alleged that on three specific occasions between January and October 2012 CBA traded in an unconscionable manner. This is because it created an artificial price which resulted in a false appearance on the market for certain financial products that were priced or valued off BBSW.

Benchmark reforms

The CBA is not the only bank in Australia to come under fire for trying to manipulate the BBSW. In fact, the Australia and New Zealand Banking Group (ANZ), National Australia Bank (NAB) and the Westpac Banking Corporation (Westpac) have been accused by the regulator of trying to tamper with the BBSW. Both ANZ and NAB had to pay fines up to $50 million each, while Westpac’s case is awaiting a hearing in October 2018.

To try and counter this, the Australian government has recently introduced legislation to implement financial benchmark regulatory reform. ASIC has consulted on the proposed Regulation .

The Australian Securities and Investments Commission (ASIC) announced on that it has fined the Commonwealth Bank of Australia (CBA) $20 million following their participation in the setting of the Bank Bill Swap Rate (BBSW), a key benchmark and reference interest rate in the Australian financial system.

According to the statement, the multinational bank has entered into a court enforceable undertaking with ASIC, due to Federal Court proceedings that were launched by the regulator in January.

In the proceedings, the Australian bank admitted to the Federal Court in Melbourne that it tried to affect where the BBSW set on five separate occasions between January 31, 2012, and June 15, in 2012. As a result, CBA was fined a pecuniary penalty of $5 million on June 21, 2018.

CBA to appoint independent expert

According to the statement, the CBA will also appoint an independent expert to assess changes the bank has made and will make, to its policies, procedures, systems, controls, training, guidance and framework for the monitoring and supervision of employees and trading in Prime Bank Bills.

In addition, the statement also says that the bank admitted to failing to adequately train its traders and not doing everything necessary to ensure it provided financial services honestly and fairly.

Commenting on the enforceable undertaking and the additional $5 million penalty, Justice Beach of the Federal Court said: “that sum together with the other Payments all totalling $25 million should be an adequate denouncement of and deterrence against the unacceptable trading behaviour of individuals within CBA that ought to have known better and a bank that ought to have better supervised its personnel.’

ASIC initially began the legal proceedings in the Federal Court against the bank on January 30, 2018. The watchdog alleged that on three specific occasions between January and October 2012 CBA traded in an unconscionable manner. This is because it created an artificial price which resulted in a false appearance on the market for certain financial products that were priced or valued off BBSW.

Benchmark reforms

The CBA is not the only bank in Australia to come under fire for trying to manipulate the BBSW. In fact, the Australia and New Zealand Banking Group (ANZ), National Australia Bank (NAB) and the Westpac Banking Corporation (Westpac) have been accused by the regulator of trying to tamper with the BBSW. Both ANZ and NAB had to pay fines up to $50 million each, while Westpac’s case is awaiting a hearing in October 2018.

To try and counter this, the Australian government has recently introduced legislation to implement financial benchmark regulatory reform. ASIC has consulted on the proposed Regulation .

About the Author: Celeste Skinner
Celeste Skinner
  • 2872 Articles
  • 25 Followers
About the Author: Celeste Skinner
  • 2872 Articles
  • 25 Followers

More from the Author

Institutional FX

!"#$%&'()*+,-./0123456789:;<=>?@ABCDEFGHIJKLMNOPQRSTUVWXYZ[\]^_`abcdefghijklmnopqrstuvwxyz{|} !"#$%&'()*+,-./0123456789:;<=>?@ABCDEFGHIJKLMNOPQRSTUVWXYZ[\]^_`abcdefghijklmnopqrstuvwxyz{|}