SEC Proposes Last-Resort Crypto Self-Custody for Advisers and Funds

Friday, 02/10/2026 | 18:00 GMT by Tanya Chepkova
  • Advisers and regulated funds might be allowed to self-custody crypto only when no permitted custodian is available.
  • The proposal would also let eligible state trust companies provide crypto custody.
the seal of the United States SEC seen at its headquarters in Washington, DC
The seal of the United States SEC seen at its headquarters in Washington, DC

The US Securities and Exchange Commission has proposed allowing investment advisers and regulated funds to self-custody crypto assets when no permitted custodian is available.

The exception is designed partly for newer or less widely supported tokens, but would come with extensive operational requirements.

Self-custody would be a fallback rather than a free choice. Before holding an asset itself, an adviser would have to document that no permitted custodian can provide the service. That assessment would need to be repeated every quarter.

The proposal covers registered investment advisers, registered investment companies and business development companies. It remains subject to public consultation and has not yet taken effect. The comment period will run for 60 days after publication in the Federal Register.

Self-Custody Comes with Strict Controls

In the proposal self-custody is treated as a controlled institutional process, not simply permission for an adviser to manage private keys. Firms would need suitable expertise, dedicated client addresses and safeguards preventing one person from moving assets alone.

These arrangements imply annual control and cybersecurity reviews, including independent accountant reporting. Clients would receive quarterly statements, while fund boards would oversee both the decision to use self-custody and the protections applied to the assets.

The SEC would also formally recognise eligible state trust companies as crypto custodians. Advisers and funds would remain responsible for checking that a provider is authorised, maintains adequate controls and keeps client assets separate from its own holdings.

The custody plan follows the SEC’s August Regulation Crypto Assets proposal, which would create new fundraising exemptions for token issuers and define when a crypto asset may cease to be treated as part of an investment contract.

A Shift from the 2023 Safeguarding Plan

The initiative replaces the approach taken under former SEC Chair Gary Gensler. A 2023 safeguarding proposal sought to broaden qualified-custodian requirements but drew criticism because suitable custodians were unavailable for many crypto assets. The SEC withdrew that proposal in June 2025 without adopting it.

The new framework retains controls around custody but adds alternatives where conventional providers cannot support a particular asset. The SEC has not established when a final rule could be adopted.

Until then, the proposed self-custody route and the new treatment of state trust companies do not change the existing custody requirements.

The US Securities and Exchange Commission has proposed allowing investment advisers and regulated funds to self-custody crypto assets when no permitted custodian is available.

The exception is designed partly for newer or less widely supported tokens, but would come with extensive operational requirements.

Self-custody would be a fallback rather than a free choice. Before holding an asset itself, an adviser would have to document that no permitted custodian can provide the service. That assessment would need to be repeated every quarter.

The proposal covers registered investment advisers, registered investment companies and business development companies. It remains subject to public consultation and has not yet taken effect. The comment period will run for 60 days after publication in the Federal Register.

Self-Custody Comes with Strict Controls

In the proposal self-custody is treated as a controlled institutional process, not simply permission for an adviser to manage private keys. Firms would need suitable expertise, dedicated client addresses and safeguards preventing one person from moving assets alone.

These arrangements imply annual control and cybersecurity reviews, including independent accountant reporting. Clients would receive quarterly statements, while fund boards would oversee both the decision to use self-custody and the protections applied to the assets.

The SEC would also formally recognise eligible state trust companies as crypto custodians. Advisers and funds would remain responsible for checking that a provider is authorised, maintains adequate controls and keeps client assets separate from its own holdings.

The custody plan follows the SEC’s August Regulation Crypto Assets proposal, which would create new fundraising exemptions for token issuers and define when a crypto asset may cease to be treated as part of an investment contract.

A Shift from the 2023 Safeguarding Plan

The initiative replaces the approach taken under former SEC Chair Gary Gensler. A 2023 safeguarding proposal sought to broaden qualified-custodian requirements but drew criticism because suitable custodians were unavailable for many crypto assets. The SEC withdrew that proposal in June 2025 without adopting it.

The new framework retains controls around custody but adds alternatives where conventional providers cannot support a particular asset. The SEC has not established when a final rule could be adopted.

Until then, the proposed self-custody route and the new treatment of state trust companies do not change the existing custody requirements.

About the Author: Tanya Chepkova
Tanya Chepkova
  • 516 Articles
  • 3 Followers
About the Author: Tanya Chepkova
Tanya Chepkova is a News Editor at Finance Magnates with more than 16 years of experience in financial journalism, covering forex, crypto, and digital asset markets. Her work spans daily industry reporting and data-driven, long-form explainers focused on market structure, trading models, and regulatory shifts. Before joining Finance Magnates, she led the editorial team of a cryptocurrency-focused media outlet for six years. Her reporting combines analytical depth with clear storytelling, with particular attention to how structural changes in trading, stablecoin infrastructure, and emerging products such as prediction markets reshape the broader financial ecosystem. She covers global developments and provides additional insight into CIS markets. Areas of Coverage: Crypto and digital asset markets Prediction markets Stablecoins and cross-border payments Industry analysis and long-form explainers
  • 516 Articles
  • 3 Followers

More from the Author

CryptoCurrency

!"#$%&'()*+,-./0123456789:;<=>?@ABCDEFGHIJKLMNOPQRSTUVWXYZ[\]^_`abcdefghijklmnopqrstuvwxyz{|} !"#$%&'()*+,-./0123456789:;<=>?@ABCDEFGHIJKLMNOPQRSTUVWXYZ[\]^_`abcdefghijklmnopqrstuvwxyz{|}