ASIC Moves to Cut Sell-Side Research Guide From 42 Pages to Eight

Thursday, 23/07/2026 | 07:48 GMT by Damian Chmiel
  • The regulator wants research analysts closer to IPO preparation while keeping conflict controls in place.
  • Rules separating analyst pay from corporate advisory revenue stay in the draft guide.
ASIC

Australia's corporate regulator proposed today (Thursday) to replace its 42-page guidance on sell-side research with an eight-page, principles-based document. The Australian Securities and Investments Commission said the rewrite should draw more analyst coverage into initial public offerings and other capital raisings.

Sell-side research is the analysis investment banks and stockbrokers hand to clients before they buy, including the notes circulated ahead of a float.

ASIC wants the guide covering it stripped of prescription, part of a cleanup that has already removed more than 9,000 pages of regulatory content.

Analysts Get Closer to Deals as Pay Rules Hold

The draft keeps the harder edges. Analyst pay cannot be tied to corporate advisory revenue, research teams stay physically and technologically separated from advisory and sales desks, and senior management sets research budgets with no advisory input.

Analysts also cannot pitch for capital raising mandates unless they have been wall-crossed, and once they are, they cannot publish on the issuer until the deal completes. ASIC said its expectations on conflicts, inside information and research independence are unchanged.

On analyst involvement in live deals, the draft is direct about the cost. Firms need strong controls and should "avoid them where possible," the document says of the conflicts created when analysts deal with advisory teams or issuers.

Australia's Listings Slide Sets the Backdrop

ASIC has spent 18 months on the shrinking public market. It published a discussion paper on public and private markets in February 2025, began a two-year fast-track IPO trial that June, and set out a capital markets roadmap in November.

The regulator has also opened the listings business itself. Cboe won approval in late 2025 to host IPOs and dual listings, ending the ASX's effective monopoly on new floats.

Retail brokerages sit in the pipeline ASIC is trying to fill. BlackBull Markets, the Auckland-based CFD firm, ran a non-deal roadshow with Barrenjoey, UBS and Forsyth Barr ahead of a possible listing in Sydney and Wellington.

London Rewrote Its Research Rules First

The UK came at the same problem from the payment side. The Financial Conduct Authority proposed letting asset managers bundle research and execution payments again in April 2024, unwinding part of the MiFID II regime that forced research to be priced separately from trade execution.

London rebuilt its listing rulebook in the same stretch. The FCA replaced the premium and standard segments with a single listing category in July 2024.

Simplification programs are running in parallel elsewhere. ASIC's progress report in May said email lodgement had expanded to 88 forms and that roughly 45,000 paper filings a year had been eliminated, while ESMA has said MiFID II disclosure rules were pushing retail investors out of capital markets.

Two Consultations, One Month to Respond

One piece is left open. ASIC asked for views on how valuation information appears in investor education reports, the analyst notes released before a prospectus is lodged, and on whether corporate advisory teams should be allowed to fact check drafts.

The draft bars advisory teams from that step, leaving it to compliance, legal advisers and the issuer with all valuations redacted. Anyone arguing for something looser has been told to explain how it would support IPO activity and what controls would come with it.

A second consultation landed the same day. ASIC proposed remaking the instrument that exempts low-volume financial markets from holding an Australian market licence, lifting the transaction value threshold to A$2.5 million (about $1.75 million) from A$1.5 million, a level untouched since 2016.

That instrument sunsets on October 1, the same date as two AFS licensing relief instruments the regulator moved to preserve in May. Feedback on the low-volume paper closes on August 20, a day before submissions on the research guide.

Australia's corporate regulator proposed today (Thursday) to replace its 42-page guidance on sell-side research with an eight-page, principles-based document. The Australian Securities and Investments Commission said the rewrite should draw more analyst coverage into initial public offerings and other capital raisings.

Sell-side research is the analysis investment banks and stockbrokers hand to clients before they buy, including the notes circulated ahead of a float.

ASIC wants the guide covering it stripped of prescription, part of a cleanup that has already removed more than 9,000 pages of regulatory content.

Analysts Get Closer to Deals as Pay Rules Hold

The draft keeps the harder edges. Analyst pay cannot be tied to corporate advisory revenue, research teams stay physically and technologically separated from advisory and sales desks, and senior management sets research budgets with no advisory input.

Analysts also cannot pitch for capital raising mandates unless they have been wall-crossed, and once they are, they cannot publish on the issuer until the deal completes. ASIC said its expectations on conflicts, inside information and research independence are unchanged.

On analyst involvement in live deals, the draft is direct about the cost. Firms need strong controls and should "avoid them where possible," the document says of the conflicts created when analysts deal with advisory teams or issuers.

Australia's Listings Slide Sets the Backdrop

ASIC has spent 18 months on the shrinking public market. It published a discussion paper on public and private markets in February 2025, began a two-year fast-track IPO trial that June, and set out a capital markets roadmap in November.

The regulator has also opened the listings business itself. Cboe won approval in late 2025 to host IPOs and dual listings, ending the ASX's effective monopoly on new floats.

Retail brokerages sit in the pipeline ASIC is trying to fill. BlackBull Markets, the Auckland-based CFD firm, ran a non-deal roadshow with Barrenjoey, UBS and Forsyth Barr ahead of a possible listing in Sydney and Wellington.

London Rewrote Its Research Rules First

The UK came at the same problem from the payment side. The Financial Conduct Authority proposed letting asset managers bundle research and execution payments again in April 2024, unwinding part of the MiFID II regime that forced research to be priced separately from trade execution.

London rebuilt its listing rulebook in the same stretch. The FCA replaced the premium and standard segments with a single listing category in July 2024.

Simplification programs are running in parallel elsewhere. ASIC's progress report in May said email lodgement had expanded to 88 forms and that roughly 45,000 paper filings a year had been eliminated, while ESMA has said MiFID II disclosure rules were pushing retail investors out of capital markets.

Two Consultations, One Month to Respond

One piece is left open. ASIC asked for views on how valuation information appears in investor education reports, the analyst notes released before a prospectus is lodged, and on whether corporate advisory teams should be allowed to fact check drafts.

The draft bars advisory teams from that step, leaving it to compliance, legal advisers and the issuer with all valuations redacted. Anyone arguing for something looser has been told to explain how it would support IPO activity and what controls would come with it.

A second consultation landed the same day. ASIC proposed remaking the instrument that exempts low-volume financial markets from holding an Australian market licence, lifting the transaction value threshold to A$2.5 million (about $1.75 million) from A$1.5 million, a level untouched since 2016.

That instrument sunsets on October 1, the same date as two AFS licensing relief instruments the regulator moved to preserve in May. Feedback on the low-volume paper closes on August 20, a day before submissions on the research guide.

About the Author: Damian Chmiel
Damian Chmiel
  • 3765 Articles
  • 115 Followers
About the Author: Damian Chmiel
Damian Chmiel is a Senior Analyst & Editor at Finance Magnates with more than 15 years of experience in the CFD and online trading industry. Active as both a trader and journalist since 2010, he focuses on broker coverage, fintech innovation, and regulatory developments across Europe, the Middle East, and Asia. His work includes interviews with C-level leaders at major brokerages and fintech platforms, as well as co-authoring Finance Magnates’ quarterly industry benchmarking reports. Damian’s reporting is data-driven, market-aware, and grounded in direct industry engagement. His analysis and commentary have also been cited by external media outlets, including Investing.com, Binance, The Asset, Stockhead, and Dispatch. Education: MA in Finance and Accounting, Cracow University of Economics
  • 3765 Articles
  • 115 Followers

More from the Author

Retail FX

!"#$%&'()*+,-./0123456789:;<=>?@ABCDEFGHIJKLMNOPQRSTUVWXYZ[\]^_`abcdefghijklmnopqrstuvwxyz{|} !"#$%&'()*+,-./0123456789:;<=>?@ABCDEFGHIJKLMNOPQRSTUVWXYZ[\]^_`abcdefghijklmnopqrstuvwxyz{|}