The Financial Conduct Authority’s (FCA’s) Consumer Duty officially came into action over a year ago, with an implementation deadline of 31st July 2023 for all new and existing products and services.

The regulator favored a phased approach, with different obligations landing at different stages throughout the adaptation. This concluded in July 2024, the deadline for closed products and services, and also for firms’ first annual reports on complying with the new regulations.

The one-year anniversary is an appropriate milestone to assess the Duty’s impact so far, how well it has fulfilled its objectives, and how we’re likely to see it evolve.

Duty calls

In 2022, the FCA shared a document setting out its overarching strategy for the next three years. The Consumer Duty was labeled ‘the cornerstone’, built to modernize the British financial sector and regulatory system and strengthen the attractiveness of UK capital markets post-Brexit Brexit Brexit stands for British Exit, or in reference to the United Kingdom’s decision to formally leave the European Union (EU) as declared in a June 23, 2016 referendum. In a more immediate sense, a tight vote and unexpected result helped drive British pound (GBP) to lows that had not been seen in decades.The day following the referendum, former Prime Minister David Cameron resigned from office where he was replaced by Theresa May, who later resigned from office on June 7th, 2019. Active Prime Minis Brexit stands for British Exit, or in reference to the United Kingdom’s decision to formally leave the European Union (EU) as declared in a June 23, 2016 referendum. In a more immediate sense, a tight vote and unexpected result helped drive British pound (GBP) to lows that had not been seen in decades.The day following the referendum, former Prime Minister David Cameron resigned from office where he was replaced by Theresa May, who later resigned from office on June 7th, 2019. Active Prime Minis Read this Term.

WATCH: Consumer Duty Debate!

Had the pleasure of hosting a roundtable with regulatory experts to discuss consumer duty.

Check out the highlights! 🧵
Consumer duty debate: The ‘outrageously poor’ area missed by FCAhttps://t.co/eQulKPa1XF pic.twitter.com/0Zclc457gI

— Olivia Bybel (@oliviavenetia) February 13, 2024

Amid a cost-of-living crisis and a post-pandemic rise in e-commerce, consumer protection found itself at the top of the agenda.

That overarching premise was broken down into four target areas: products and services, price and value, consumer understanding, and consumer support. In the run-up to its introduction, there was much confusion around the Duty, including who it applied to, what actions needed to be taken, and how progress and adherence would be measured.

A Work in Progress

The first milestone of Consumer Duty was on the first day of its implementation. The FCA asserted its authority straight away, taking steps to ensure consumers benefited from higher interest rates in the savings market. This immediately demonstrated that the regulator meant business and was fighting to help consumers wherever possible.

The FCA released data in February 2023 showing that 43% of the firms surveyed had no difficulty implementing the duty. While this is framed as a positive, it does show that the majority had encountered some issues.

The regulator promptly shared guidelines on what firms were doing well and what could be improved. The guidelines contained six segments comprised of the four target areas, as well as sections on culture, governance, monitoring, and consumers in vulnerable circumstances.

It provided immensely detailed overviews for each of these six sections, and while most of the feedback provided on firms’ activity so far is positive, it also provides a great deal of direction for those having difficulty.

This level of analysis, positive reinforcement, and prescriptive guidelines, as well as the speed of its turnaround, suggests that the FCA is committed to delivering a successful Consumer Duty and has acknowledged that it’s a constant work in progress.

FCA's Perspective

On July 31st, 2024, Sheldon Mills, FCA executive director of consumers and competition, gave a speech assessing the impact of the Duty a year after its introduction. He reiterates what we have surmised above, albeit providing the kind of positive assessment that you would probably expect from one of the champions of the new rules under scrutiny.

“The duty is already having a tangible impact on consumer outcomes. And it has been driving improvements in firm culture, conduct, and governance, too, which, over time, will still drive better outcomes.”

“Some firms have changed their employee bonus structures to make sure that incentives are right, and employees only get good outcomes when their customers do.

“We are also seeing firms being more proactive with their communications, contacting customers to provide information on what better products may be available, and monitoring the impact so they can learn and improve. And many are rewriting those communications to make them simpler and easy to understand.”

The language is vague and non-committal, with no real examples shared of the successes being discussed, but instead ‘some’ and ‘many’ firms. While this could simply be a case of Mills not deeming it necessary to qualify every statement, it does feel vague and suggests that the Duty’s impact so far may have been underwhelming or unproven, at least in terms of the data available.

Negative Feedback

Despite the FCA’s assertions, feedback from elsewhere suggests there’s still much room for improvement. A year after the Duty was introduced, Abby Thomas, chief executive of the Financial Ombudsman Service, said poor administration and customer service continue to be the biggest areas of complaint.

“We now regularly receive complaints about things that have happened since the Duty’s been in force... Overall, poor administration and customer service continue to be among the biggest areas of complaint. This could be about poor service, lack of timely support, or broken promises,”

According to research from Moneyhub, an engagement, data, and customer journey platform, 41% of customers have not noticed any changes to their treatment since the regulations came into effect. The research, which polled 2,000 UK consumers, found that just 22% had noticed any positive changes.

Moneyhub Reveals Significant Fines Imposed as Consumer Duty Remains a Work in
Progress https://t.co/PMEEkmh2Qi

— FF News | Fintech Finance (@fintechf) July 9, 2024

The End of the Beginning

Despite some negativity about its impact so far, many customers believe that Consumer Duty will significantly affect how firms interact with them. 40% believe it will improve customer service, rising to 48% of younger respondents.

Above all else, firms will now need to evidence their actions to improve consumer outcomes with hard data. Firms have delivered their first annual Consumer Duty board report, showing that they have met the duty's requirements and are also making progress on delivering good outcomes for their customers.

The FCA is increasingly data-driven and wants the companies under its jurisdiction to commit to constant evolution and improvement. That means tangible facts and figures and demonstrable upgrades, year on year.

At the Consumer Duty: One Year On event, Sheldon Mills continued, “UK financial services are not in need of a resurrection. We are rightfully proud to have one of the most dynamic, capable, and innovative financial services industries in the world.

“But today does mark something of a new start. A year ago, the Duty came into force for open products and services. Today, it comes into force for closed products and services. You’ve heard this from us before, but the Consumer Duty was never going to be a once-and-done act. It is an ongoing journey for improvement that we’re on together.

“We know we have more to do. This is not the beginning of the end for all of our efforts to implement the Consumer Duty, but the end of the beginning.”

There’s a long way to go, but that troublesome first hurdle has been cleared. The FCA has bet the house on this initiative and, as demonstrated by the level of detail in its feedback so far, is doing everything in its power to ensure it continues improving. After all, that’s what it expects of the firms it regulates, who must find the right tools to demonstrate improved consumer outcomes.