White label tech helps prop firms launch fast, but it often comes at a high cost and reduced control over risk, branding, and infrastructure.
Building in-house tech gives flexibility and control, but many prop firms underestimate the complexity, cost, and staffing required.
White label solution providers are quick to point out the challenges of building a prop trading platform, but leading firms tell FinanceMagnates.com that this approach still comes with limitations in terms of flexibility, cost and risk management.
As we recently reported, growth in prop trading is enabling non-bank liquidity providers to compete effectively with banks despite the latter’s dominance of market making activities.
According to broker solutions vendors, using a ready-made system enables prop firms to tap into this lucrative market much more quickly and without the hassle of finding and retaining in-house development teams.
Most of the entrepreneurs who want to be prop firm operators have a background in brokerage, sales, marketing and/or social influence rather than technology, says Justin Hertzberg, CEO FPFX Tech.
Justin Hertzberg, CEO of FPFX Tech, Source: LinkedIn
“The pattern we are seeing is very similar to what has happened in the brokerage space over the past decade,” he adds. “Most brokers are licensing their foundational technologies and focusing more of their efforts on client acquisition, marketing differentiation and brand value. They aren't spending time or money developing their own trading platforms, liquidity bridges or CRM/client areas.”
Given that he comes from a technology and consulting background, Blueberry Funded managing director, Marcus Fetherston, says he has seen many firms jump into building their own technology to save costs only to find out that it is far from easy.
Marcus Fetherston, Blueberry Funded’s General Manager (photo: LinkedIn)
“Prop CRMs—unlike brokerage CRMs—require intricate, near real-time data handling and automation and any bugs during development can seriously impact the business,” he observes. “Most firms still lean heavily on white label solutions for CRMs, trading platforms and bridges. That said, more established firms often partially own or heavily customise their tech stacks to maintain flexibility, margins and branding control.”
E8 Markets believes that owning and continuously improving its in-house technology allows it to deliver a tailored, stable and scalable experience that evolves with traders' needs without being held back by vendor limitations, says Chief Growth Officer, Yavuz Karadeniz.
Yavuz Karadeniz, Director of Community Development at E8 Markets
“That said, we recognise the value of third party solutions in areas where trader preference matters, such as widely adopted trading platforms,” he adds. “While our core infrastructure is built in-house, we selectively integrate external tools that enhance the overall experience without compromising control.”
Upside Funding also operates a mix of white label and in-house development explains CEO and founder, Charles Finkelstein.
“A trade execution platform licence like MetaTrader 5 typically costs around $10,000 a month and (the events of) last year taught the industry that you probably want to be diversified,” he says. “You then need a bridge—the best provider in the market costs $20,000 a month, or you can white label, give up some control but pay around $3,500 a month.”
Charles Finkelstein, CEO and founder of Upside Funding
On the CRM/trader dashboard, Finkelstein suggests it could cost between $350,000 and $2 million to build a platform before taking into account staffing costs compared to between $5,000 and $10,000 a month for a white label solution.
“Payment solutions are another headache for prop firm owners,” he adds. “We have more than a dozen different solutions and some firms have more. We felt it was best to outsource this rather than manage each provider ourselves, finding a payment orchestrator that packages it for us.”
Simone Nateri, Chief Operating Officer at City Traders Imperium acknowledges that as the industry has evolved, companies have emerged offering robust white label solutions.
Simone Nateri, Chief Operating Officer at City Traders Imperium (Photo: LinkedIn)
“However, it is important to acknowledge a significant trade-off,” he says. “Relying on external providers means white labelled prop firms have less control over their technological infrastructure. This can pose risks, particularly in areas like risk management where the control often resides with the technology provider rather than the trading firm itself. For traders, this could mean adjustments in terms and conditions that are not always aligned with their expectations.”
“Exorbitant” Profit Sharing Models
David Dombrowsky, CEO & founder of FX2 Funding is even more critical, suggesting that white label technology providers have been demanding “exorbitant” profit sharing models that he says make it increasingly difficult for prop firms to succeed under that structure.
David Dombrowsky, CEO and Founder of FX2 Funding
He is also sceptical that the profile of the typical prop trader has changed significantly following recent new platform launches.
“What I have seen is a growing portion of the market attempting to hedge, cheat or game the system,” says Dombrowsky. “If a firm doesn’t place strong emphasis on risk management, these groups will exploit it and they can quickly overwhelm a poorly protected model.”
Hertzberg refers to significant growth in overall awareness of prop trading and client acquisition, as well as the increasing tension that exists with prop firms and brokerages competing for the same customer and the finite amount of investable dollars those customers have to spend on their trading activity.
“But the profile of prop traders hasn't changed too much over the past five years,” he says. “The demographics are similar to those seen at brokerages, although the average age is skewed a bit younger as the newer generation of traders are enamoured by the lower barriers to entry in prop trading and the greater upside it has to offer over self-funded trading accounts.”
Karadeniz reckons traders are becoming more disciplined and risk-aware, adapting their strategies to align with structured rules and long term sustainability rather than aggressive gains, while Fetherston references an influx of traders from underserved regions like Asia, Africa and South America, driven by platform, pricing and payment options that offer region-specific accessibility.
“We have also seen an increase in average trader profitability in the industry,” he says. “Prop trading often gives traders the chance to improve their trading since the downside risk is limited compared to trading their own funds, along with having risk parameters that they need to trade around. This aligns with the educational focus we strongly emphasise and means the business model for the prop industry needs to continue developing.”
White label solution providers are quick to point out the challenges of building a prop trading platform, but leading firms tell FinanceMagnates.com that this approach still comes with limitations in terms of flexibility, cost and risk management.
As we recently reported, growth in prop trading is enabling non-bank liquidity providers to compete effectively with banks despite the latter’s dominance of market making activities.
According to broker solutions vendors, using a ready-made system enables prop firms to tap into this lucrative market much more quickly and without the hassle of finding and retaining in-house development teams.
Most of the entrepreneurs who want to be prop firm operators have a background in brokerage, sales, marketing and/or social influence rather than technology, says Justin Hertzberg, CEO FPFX Tech.
Justin Hertzberg, CEO of FPFX Tech, Source: LinkedIn
“The pattern we are seeing is very similar to what has happened in the brokerage space over the past decade,” he adds. “Most brokers are licensing their foundational technologies and focusing more of their efforts on client acquisition, marketing differentiation and brand value. They aren't spending time or money developing their own trading platforms, liquidity bridges or CRM/client areas.”
Given that he comes from a technology and consulting background, Blueberry Funded managing director, Marcus Fetherston, says he has seen many firms jump into building their own technology to save costs only to find out that it is far from easy.
Marcus Fetherston, Blueberry Funded’s General Manager (photo: LinkedIn)
“Prop CRMs—unlike brokerage CRMs—require intricate, near real-time data handling and automation and any bugs during development can seriously impact the business,” he observes. “Most firms still lean heavily on white label solutions for CRMs, trading platforms and bridges. That said, more established firms often partially own or heavily customise their tech stacks to maintain flexibility, margins and branding control.”
E8 Markets believes that owning and continuously improving its in-house technology allows it to deliver a tailored, stable and scalable experience that evolves with traders' needs without being held back by vendor limitations, says Chief Growth Officer, Yavuz Karadeniz.
Yavuz Karadeniz, Director of Community Development at E8 Markets
“That said, we recognise the value of third party solutions in areas where trader preference matters, such as widely adopted trading platforms,” he adds. “While our core infrastructure is built in-house, we selectively integrate external tools that enhance the overall experience without compromising control.”
Upside Funding also operates a mix of white label and in-house development explains CEO and founder, Charles Finkelstein.
“A trade execution platform licence like MetaTrader 5 typically costs around $10,000 a month and (the events of) last year taught the industry that you probably want to be diversified,” he says. “You then need a bridge—the best provider in the market costs $20,000 a month, or you can white label, give up some control but pay around $3,500 a month.”
Charles Finkelstein, CEO and founder of Upside Funding
On the CRM/trader dashboard, Finkelstein suggests it could cost between $350,000 and $2 million to build a platform before taking into account staffing costs compared to between $5,000 and $10,000 a month for a white label solution.
“Payment solutions are another headache for prop firm owners,” he adds. “We have more than a dozen different solutions and some firms have more. We felt it was best to outsource this rather than manage each provider ourselves, finding a payment orchestrator that packages it for us.”
Simone Nateri, Chief Operating Officer at City Traders Imperium acknowledges that as the industry has evolved, companies have emerged offering robust white label solutions.
Simone Nateri, Chief Operating Officer at City Traders Imperium (Photo: LinkedIn)
“However, it is important to acknowledge a significant trade-off,” he says. “Relying on external providers means white labelled prop firms have less control over their technological infrastructure. This can pose risks, particularly in areas like risk management where the control often resides with the technology provider rather than the trading firm itself. For traders, this could mean adjustments in terms and conditions that are not always aligned with their expectations.”
“Exorbitant” Profit Sharing Models
David Dombrowsky, CEO & founder of FX2 Funding is even more critical, suggesting that white label technology providers have been demanding “exorbitant” profit sharing models that he says make it increasingly difficult for prop firms to succeed under that structure.
David Dombrowsky, CEO and Founder of FX2 Funding
He is also sceptical that the profile of the typical prop trader has changed significantly following recent new platform launches.
“What I have seen is a growing portion of the market attempting to hedge, cheat or game the system,” says Dombrowsky. “If a firm doesn’t place strong emphasis on risk management, these groups will exploit it and they can quickly overwhelm a poorly protected model.”
Hertzberg refers to significant growth in overall awareness of prop trading and client acquisition, as well as the increasing tension that exists with prop firms and brokerages competing for the same customer and the finite amount of investable dollars those customers have to spend on their trading activity.
“But the profile of prop traders hasn't changed too much over the past five years,” he says. “The demographics are similar to those seen at brokerages, although the average age is skewed a bit younger as the newer generation of traders are enamoured by the lower barriers to entry in prop trading and the greater upside it has to offer over self-funded trading accounts.”
Karadeniz reckons traders are becoming more disciplined and risk-aware, adapting their strategies to align with structured rules and long term sustainability rather than aggressive gains, while Fetherston references an influx of traders from underserved regions like Asia, Africa and South America, driven by platform, pricing and payment options that offer region-specific accessibility.
“We have also seen an increase in average trader profitability in the industry,” he says. “Prop trading often gives traders the chance to improve their trading since the downside risk is limited compared to trading their own funds, along with having risk parameters that they need to trade around. This aligns with the educational focus we strongly emphasise and means the business model for the prop industry needs to continue developing.”
Paul Golden is an experienced freelance financial journalist with a strong institutional background. Over the past two decades, he has written for globally recognised financial publications, covering topics such as market structure, regulation, trading behaviour, and economic policy.
73% of Young Investors Say Traditional Wealth Building Is Broken – Here’s How They Trade Instead
Featured Videos
Executive Interview | Charlotte Bullock | Chief Product Officer, Bank of London | FMLS:25
Executive Interview | Charlotte Bullock | Chief Product Officer, Bank of London | FMLS:25
Executive Interview | Charlotte Bullock | Chief Product Officer, Bank of London | FMLS:25
Executive Interview | Charlotte Bullock | Chief Product Officer, Bank of London | FMLS:25
In this interview, we sat down with Charlotte Bullock, Head of Product at The Bank of London, previously at SAP and now shaping product at one of the sector’s most ambitious new banking players.
Charlotte reflects on the Summit so far and talks about the culture inside fintech banks today. We look at the pressures that come with scaling, and how firms can hold onto the nimble approach that made them stand out early on.
We also cover the state of payments ahead of her appearance on the payments roundtable: the blockages financial firms face, the areas that still need fixing, and what a realistic solution looks like in 2026.
In this interview, we sat down with Charlotte Bullock, Head of Product at The Bank of London, previously at SAP and now shaping product at one of the sector’s most ambitious new banking players.
Charlotte reflects on the Summit so far and talks about the culture inside fintech banks today. We look at the pressures that come with scaling, and how firms can hold onto the nimble approach that made them stand out early on.
We also cover the state of payments ahead of her appearance on the payments roundtable: the blockages financial firms face, the areas that still need fixing, and what a realistic solution looks like in 2026.
In this interview, we sat down with Charlotte Bullock, Head of Product at The Bank of London, previously at SAP and now shaping product at one of the sector’s most ambitious new banking players.
Charlotte reflects on the Summit so far and talks about the culture inside fintech banks today. We look at the pressures that come with scaling, and how firms can hold onto the nimble approach that made them stand out early on.
We also cover the state of payments ahead of her appearance on the payments roundtable: the blockages financial firms face, the areas that still need fixing, and what a realistic solution looks like in 2026.
In this interview, we sat down with Charlotte Bullock, Head of Product at The Bank of London, previously at SAP and now shaping product at one of the sector’s most ambitious new banking players.
Charlotte reflects on the Summit so far and talks about the culture inside fintech banks today. We look at the pressures that come with scaling, and how firms can hold onto the nimble approach that made them stand out early on.
We also cover the state of payments ahead of her appearance on the payments roundtable: the blockages financial firms face, the areas that still need fixing, and what a realistic solution looks like in 2026.
In this conversation, we sit down with Drew Niv, CSO at ATFX Connect and one of the most influential figures in modern FX.
We speak about market structure, the institutional view on liquidity, and the sharp rise of prop trading, a sector Drew has been commenting on in recent months. Drew explains why he once dismissed prop trading, why his view changed, and what he now thinks the model means for brokers, clients and risk managers.
We explore subscription-fee dependency, the high reneging rate, and the long-term challenge: how brokers can build a more stable and honest version of the model. Drew also talks about the traffic advantage standalone prop firms have built and why brokers may still win in the long run if they take the right approach.
In this conversation, we sit down with Drew Niv, CSO at ATFX Connect and one of the most influential figures in modern FX.
We speak about market structure, the institutional view on liquidity, and the sharp rise of prop trading, a sector Drew has been commenting on in recent months. Drew explains why he once dismissed prop trading, why his view changed, and what he now thinks the model means for brokers, clients and risk managers.
We explore subscription-fee dependency, the high reneging rate, and the long-term challenge: how brokers can build a more stable and honest version of the model. Drew also talks about the traffic advantage standalone prop firms have built and why brokers may still win in the long run if they take the right approach.
In this conversation, we sit down with Drew Niv, CSO at ATFX Connect and one of the most influential figures in modern FX.
We speak about market structure, the institutional view on liquidity, and the sharp rise of prop trading, a sector Drew has been commenting on in recent months. Drew explains why he once dismissed prop trading, why his view changed, and what he now thinks the model means for brokers, clients and risk managers.
We explore subscription-fee dependency, the high reneging rate, and the long-term challenge: how brokers can build a more stable and honest version of the model. Drew also talks about the traffic advantage standalone prop firms have built and why brokers may still win in the long run if they take the right approach.
In this conversation, we sit down with Drew Niv, CSO at ATFX Connect and one of the most influential figures in modern FX.
We speak about market structure, the institutional view on liquidity, and the sharp rise of prop trading, a sector Drew has been commenting on in recent months. Drew explains why he once dismissed prop trading, why his view changed, and what he now thinks the model means for brokers, clients and risk managers.
We explore subscription-fee dependency, the high reneging rate, and the long-term challenge: how brokers can build a more stable and honest version of the model. Drew also talks about the traffic advantage standalone prop firms have built and why brokers may still win in the long run if they take the right approach.
In this conversation, we sit down with Drew Niv, CSO at ATFX Connect and one of the most influential figures in modern FX.
We speak about market structure, the institutional view on liquidity, and the sharp rise of prop trading, a sector Drew has been commenting on in recent months. Drew explains why he once dismissed prop trading, why his view changed, and what he now thinks the model means for brokers, clients and risk managers.
We explore subscription-fee dependency, the high reneging rate, and the long-term challenge: how brokers can build a more stable and honest version of the model. Drew also talks about the traffic advantage standalone prop firms have built and why brokers may still win in the long run if they take the right approach.
In this conversation, we sit down with Drew Niv, CSO at ATFX Connect and one of the most influential figures in modern FX.
We speak about market structure, the institutional view on liquidity, and the sharp rise of prop trading, a sector Drew has been commenting on in recent months. Drew explains why he once dismissed prop trading, why his view changed, and what he now thinks the model means for brokers, clients and risk managers.
We explore subscription-fee dependency, the high reneging rate, and the long-term challenge: how brokers can build a more stable and honest version of the model. Drew also talks about the traffic advantage standalone prop firms have built and why brokers may still win in the long run if they take the right approach.
Executive Interview | Remonda Z. Kirketerp Møller| CEO & Founder Muinmos | FMLS:25
Executive Interview | Remonda Z. Kirketerp Møller| CEO & Founder Muinmos | FMLS:25
Executive Interview | Remonda Z. Kirketerp Møller| CEO & Founder Muinmos | FMLS:25
Executive Interview | Remonda Z. Kirketerp Møller| CEO & Founder Muinmos | FMLS:25
Executive Interview | Remonda Z. Kirketerp Møller| CEO & Founder Muinmos | FMLS:25
Executive Interview | Remonda Z. Kirketerp Møller| CEO & Founder Muinmos | FMLS:25
In this interview, Remonda Z. Kirketerp Møller, founder of Muinmos, breaks down the state of AI in regtech and what responsible adoption really looks like for brokers. We talk about rising fragmentation, the pressures around compliance accuracy, and why most firms are still in the early stages of AI maturity.
Ramanda also shares insights on regulator sandboxes, shifting expectations around accountability, and the current reality of MiCA licensing and passporting in Europe.
A concise look at where compliance, onboarding, and AI-driven processes are heading next.
In this interview, Remonda Z. Kirketerp Møller, founder of Muinmos, breaks down the state of AI in regtech and what responsible adoption really looks like for brokers. We talk about rising fragmentation, the pressures around compliance accuracy, and why most firms are still in the early stages of AI maturity.
Ramanda also shares insights on regulator sandboxes, shifting expectations around accountability, and the current reality of MiCA licensing and passporting in Europe.
A concise look at where compliance, onboarding, and AI-driven processes are heading next.
In this interview, Remonda Z. Kirketerp Møller, founder of Muinmos, breaks down the state of AI in regtech and what responsible adoption really looks like for brokers. We talk about rising fragmentation, the pressures around compliance accuracy, and why most firms are still in the early stages of AI maturity.
Ramanda also shares insights on regulator sandboxes, shifting expectations around accountability, and the current reality of MiCA licensing and passporting in Europe.
A concise look at where compliance, onboarding, and AI-driven processes are heading next.
In this interview, Remonda Z. Kirketerp Møller, founder of Muinmos, breaks down the state of AI in regtech and what responsible adoption really looks like for brokers. We talk about rising fragmentation, the pressures around compliance accuracy, and why most firms are still in the early stages of AI maturity.
Ramanda also shares insights on regulator sandboxes, shifting expectations around accountability, and the current reality of MiCA licensing and passporting in Europe.
A concise look at where compliance, onboarding, and AI-driven processes are heading next.
In this interview, Remonda Z. Kirketerp Møller, founder of Muinmos, breaks down the state of AI in regtech and what responsible adoption really looks like for brokers. We talk about rising fragmentation, the pressures around compliance accuracy, and why most firms are still in the early stages of AI maturity.
Ramanda also shares insights on regulator sandboxes, shifting expectations around accountability, and the current reality of MiCA licensing and passporting in Europe.
A concise look at where compliance, onboarding, and AI-driven processes are heading next.
In this interview, Remonda Z. Kirketerp Møller, founder of Muinmos, breaks down the state of AI in regtech and what responsible adoption really looks like for brokers. We talk about rising fragmentation, the pressures around compliance accuracy, and why most firms are still in the early stages of AI maturity.
Ramanda also shares insights on regulator sandboxes, shifting expectations around accountability, and the current reality of MiCA licensing and passporting in Europe.
A concise look at where compliance, onboarding, and AI-driven processes are heading next.
In this conversation, we speak with Aydin Bonabi, CEO and co-founder of Surveill, a firm focused on fraud detection and AI-driven compliance tools for financial institutions.
We start with Aydin’s view of the Summit and the challenges brokers face as fraud tactics grow more complex. He explains how firms can stay ahead through real-time signals, data patterns, and early-stage detection.
We also talk about AI training and why compliance teams often struggle to keep models accurate, fair, and aligned with regulatory expectations. Aydin breaks down what “good” AI training looks like inside a financial environment, including the importance of clean data, domain expertise, and human oversight.
He closes with a clear message: fraud is scaling, and so must the tools that stop it.
In this conversation, we speak with Aydin Bonabi, CEO and co-founder of Surveill, a firm focused on fraud detection and AI-driven compliance tools for financial institutions.
We start with Aydin’s view of the Summit and the challenges brokers face as fraud tactics grow more complex. He explains how firms can stay ahead through real-time signals, data patterns, and early-stage detection.
We also talk about AI training and why compliance teams often struggle to keep models accurate, fair, and aligned with regulatory expectations. Aydin breaks down what “good” AI training looks like inside a financial environment, including the importance of clean data, domain expertise, and human oversight.
He closes with a clear message: fraud is scaling, and so must the tools that stop it.
In this conversation, we speak with Aydin Bonabi, CEO and co-founder of Surveill, a firm focused on fraud detection and AI-driven compliance tools for financial institutions.
We start with Aydin’s view of the Summit and the challenges brokers face as fraud tactics grow more complex. He explains how firms can stay ahead through real-time signals, data patterns, and early-stage detection.
We also talk about AI training and why compliance teams often struggle to keep models accurate, fair, and aligned with regulatory expectations. Aydin breaks down what “good” AI training looks like inside a financial environment, including the importance of clean data, domain expertise, and human oversight.
He closes with a clear message: fraud is scaling, and so must the tools that stop it.
In this conversation, we speak with Aydin Bonabi, CEO and co-founder of Surveill, a firm focused on fraud detection and AI-driven compliance tools for financial institutions.
We start with Aydin’s view of the Summit and the challenges brokers face as fraud tactics grow more complex. He explains how firms can stay ahead through real-time signals, data patterns, and early-stage detection.
We also talk about AI training and why compliance teams often struggle to keep models accurate, fair, and aligned with regulatory expectations. Aydin breaks down what “good” AI training looks like inside a financial environment, including the importance of clean data, domain expertise, and human oversight.
He closes with a clear message: fraud is scaling, and so must the tools that stop it.
In this conversation, we speak with Aydin Bonabi, CEO and co-founder of Surveill, a firm focused on fraud detection and AI-driven compliance tools for financial institutions.
We start with Aydin’s view of the Summit and the challenges brokers face as fraud tactics grow more complex. He explains how firms can stay ahead through real-time signals, data patterns, and early-stage detection.
We also talk about AI training and why compliance teams often struggle to keep models accurate, fair, and aligned with regulatory expectations. Aydin breaks down what “good” AI training looks like inside a financial environment, including the importance of clean data, domain expertise, and human oversight.
He closes with a clear message: fraud is scaling, and so must the tools that stop it.
In this conversation, we speak with Aydin Bonabi, CEO and co-founder of Surveill, a firm focused on fraud detection and AI-driven compliance tools for financial institutions.
We start with Aydin’s view of the Summit and the challenges brokers face as fraud tactics grow more complex. He explains how firms can stay ahead through real-time signals, data patterns, and early-stage detection.
We also talk about AI training and why compliance teams often struggle to keep models accurate, fair, and aligned with regulatory expectations. Aydin breaks down what “good” AI training looks like inside a financial environment, including the importance of clean data, domain expertise, and human oversight.
He closes with a clear message: fraud is scaling, and so must the tools that stop it.
Exness expands its presence in Africa: Inside our interview with Paul Margarites in Cape Town
Exness expands its presence in Africa: Inside our interview with Paul Margarites in Cape Town
Exness expands its presence in Africa: Inside our interview with Paul Margarites in Cape Town
Exness expands its presence in Africa: Inside our interview with Paul Margarites in Cape Town
Exness expands its presence in Africa: Inside our interview with Paul Margarites in Cape Town
Exness expands its presence in Africa: Inside our interview with Paul Margarites in Cape Town
Finance Magnates met with Paul Margarites, Exness regional commercial director for Sub-Saharan Africa, during a visit to the firm’s office opening in Cape Town. In this talk, led by Andrea Badiola Mateos, Co-CEO at Finance Magnates, Paul shares views on the South African trading space, local user behavior, mobile trends, regulation, team growth, and how Exness plans to grow in more markets across the region. @Exness
Read the article at: https://www.financemagnates.com/thought-leadership/exness-expands-its-presence-in-africa-inside-our-interview-with-paul-margarites/
#exness #financemagnates #exnesstrading #CFDtrading #tradeonline #africanews #capetown
Finance Magnates met with Paul Margarites, Exness regional commercial director for Sub-Saharan Africa, during a visit to the firm’s office opening in Cape Town. In this talk, led by Andrea Badiola Mateos, Co-CEO at Finance Magnates, Paul shares views on the South African trading space, local user behavior, mobile trends, regulation, team growth, and how Exness plans to grow in more markets across the region. @Exness
Read the article at: https://www.financemagnates.com/thought-leadership/exness-expands-its-presence-in-africa-inside-our-interview-with-paul-margarites/
#exness #financemagnates #exnesstrading #CFDtrading #tradeonline #africanews #capetown
Finance Magnates met with Paul Margarites, Exness regional commercial director for Sub-Saharan Africa, during a visit to the firm’s office opening in Cape Town. In this talk, led by Andrea Badiola Mateos, Co-CEO at Finance Magnates, Paul shares views on the South African trading space, local user behavior, mobile trends, regulation, team growth, and how Exness plans to grow in more markets across the region. @Exness
Read the article at: https://www.financemagnates.com/thought-leadership/exness-expands-its-presence-in-africa-inside-our-interview-with-paul-margarites/
#exness #financemagnates #exnesstrading #CFDtrading #tradeonline #africanews #capetown
Finance Magnates met with Paul Margarites, Exness regional commercial director for Sub-Saharan Africa, during a visit to the firm’s office opening in Cape Town. In this talk, led by Andrea Badiola Mateos, Co-CEO at Finance Magnates, Paul shares views on the South African trading space, local user behavior, mobile trends, regulation, team growth, and how Exness plans to grow in more markets across the region. @Exness
Read the article at: https://www.financemagnates.com/thought-leadership/exness-expands-its-presence-in-africa-inside-our-interview-with-paul-margarites/
#exness #financemagnates #exnesstrading #CFDtrading #tradeonline #africanews #capetown
Finance Magnates met with Paul Margarites, Exness regional commercial director for Sub-Saharan Africa, during a visit to the firm’s office opening in Cape Town. In this talk, led by Andrea Badiola Mateos, Co-CEO at Finance Magnates, Paul shares views on the South African trading space, local user behavior, mobile trends, regulation, team growth, and how Exness plans to grow in more markets across the region. @Exness
Read the article at: https://www.financemagnates.com/thought-leadership/exness-expands-its-presence-in-africa-inside-our-interview-with-paul-margarites/
#exness #financemagnates #exnesstrading #CFDtrading #tradeonline #africanews #capetown
Finance Magnates met with Paul Margarites, Exness regional commercial director for Sub-Saharan Africa, during a visit to the firm’s office opening in Cape Town. In this talk, led by Andrea Badiola Mateos, Co-CEO at Finance Magnates, Paul shares views on the South African trading space, local user behavior, mobile trends, regulation, team growth, and how Exness plans to grow in more markets across the region. @Exness
Read the article at: https://www.financemagnates.com/thought-leadership/exness-expands-its-presence-in-africa-inside-our-interview-with-paul-margarites/
#exness #financemagnates #exnesstrading #CFDtrading #tradeonline #africanews #capetown
