>
Ponzi Scheme Eh? Ontario Regulator To Hear FX Fraud Case Tomorrow at 10.00am
Ponzi Scheme Eh? Ontario Regulator To Hear FX Fraud Case Tomorrow at 10.00am
Monday,16/09/2013|13:06GMTby
Andrew Saks McLeod
The Ontario Securities Commission is scheduled to hear the case against FX trader Sylvan Blackett, Rezwealth Financial Services and Tiffin Financial in legal proceedings which have been a somewhat long, drawn-out affair.
Whilst the US government, and its associated financial markets' regulatory bodies continue the extensive reform of the entire national capital markets' economy, and clamp down on those with nefarious intentions, publicly highlighting them and often issuing very fitting sentences, things are somewhat different north of the border.
Tomorrow at 10.00 am, the Ontario Securities Commission is scheduled to hear the case of Rezwealth Financial Services and its senior management, on charges of operating an illegal FX trading and distribution scheme.
The Hare And The Tortoise
Whilst the United States often responds quickly and dispenses long sentences subject to federal law, Canada’s regulatory rulings are dispensed on a provincial basis, differing slightly between each province of Canada.
With Toronto being home to Canada’s financial sector, the Ontario Securities Commission is the most adept at dealing with cases relating to individuals or firms wishing to bilk their customers.
Despite this, it takes a long time to bring a case to justice, and in the case of Rezwealth Financial Services, tomorrow’s hearing signifies the latest in what is proving to be a lengthy case, with no definitive outcome almost four years after the perpetrators were apprehended, and two years after the case was brought to court.
Investors entered into written agreements with Mr. Blackett and the company of which he was the sole director, 215 Incorporated, with respect to these investments.
Mr. Blackett then solicited Ontario residents, both directly and through Willoughby Smith and 1778445 Ontario Incorporated, to invest in investment contracts offered by Mr. Blackett.
The remainder of the defendants in this case, Rezwealth Financial Services, Pamela Ramoutar and Justin Ramoutar, then in turn solicited Ontario residents, both directly and through another party, Daniel Tiffin and Tiffin Financial Corporation, to invest in investment contracts offered by Rezwealth Financial Services.
Rezwealth Financial Services in turn invested part of the investor funds received with Mr. Blackett.
Very Unrealistic Returns
Although the Blackett Investment Contracts were characterized as “loan agreements” between Blackett and/or 215 Incorporated and investors, Mr. Blackett informed investors that he used investor funds to engage in Forex trading, and that the monthly returns payable to investors, would be funded by the profits he generated through Forex trading.
Investors were typically promised a fixed return of 5% per month, equating to 60% per annum, although, some investors were promised a fixed return of as much as 10% per month, amounting to 120% per annum.
In order to perpetrate the scheme, Mr. Blackett solicited Ontario residents to invest in the Blackett Investment Contracts by meeting with potential investors, discussing the nature of the investment and promised returns, as well as showing some investors a purported example of the profits he had generated through Forex trading.
He prepared and signed the Blackett Investment Contracts and deposited investor funds to several bank accounts in his name, and in the name of 215 Incorporated, as well as soliciting further investors to pay funds into the Blackett Investment Contracts via associates, including Mr. Smith and 177 Incorporated.
Fraudulent Conduct
Tomorrow’s case will hear the circumstances by which, contrary to the representations made by Mr. Blackett to investors, most of the investor funds he and 215 Incorporated received, were not used for Forex trading.
On this basis, between the period of January 1, 2008 and April 14, 2009, a total of approximately $4.2 million was deposited into the Blackett Accounts, of which at least $3 million was investor funds.
A much smaller sum, approximately $542,000 was transferred from the Blackett Accounts to Forex trading accounts, and only around $28,000 was deposited back into the Blackett Accounts from Forex trading accounts.
Approximately $1.6 million was paid to investors from the Blackett Accounts to satisfy monthly return and redemption payments, and approximately $1 million was paid out of the Blackett Accounts for personal expenditures by Mr. Blackett, including cash withdrawals and credit card payments.
In addition to the fraudulent activities committed by Rezwealth Financial Services and its management team between July 1, 2009 and December 31, 2009, during which the company accepted at least $904,000 in new investments in the Rezwealth Investment Contracts, while continuing to make monthly interest payments to investors, and to repay the principal of investors who elected to redeem.
Rezwealth stopped receiving monthly return payments from Mr. Blackett in April 2009. However, during the period between July 1, 2009 and December 31, 2009, Rezwealth Financial Services’ other investments and business operations did not generate sufficient revenue to cover its interest and principal repayment obligations to investors.
Illegal Distribution
Mr. Tiffin solicited Ontario residents to invest in the Rezwealth Investment Contracts, both directly and indirectly through Tiffin Financial. He sent emails to potential investors, and posted promotional materials on Tiffin Financial’s website regarding the Rezwealth Investment Contracts.
In these materials, Tiffin stated that he had “joined forces with Rezwealth” to offer the Rezwealth Investment Contracts, and that they offered guaranteed returns of 24% per annum, as well as guarantees on investors’ principal. Tiffin also met with investors, discussed the features of the investment, assisted investors in completing the Rezwealth Investment Contracts, and facilitated the payment of investor funds to Rezwealth Financial Services.
As a result of these activities, at least 19 investors invested at least $2 million in the Rezwealth Investment Contracts, during the period of time relating to the court case.
Mr. Tiffin and Tiffin Financial received commission payments from Rezwealth for referring investors. Rezwealth agreed to pay Tiffin a trailer fee of 2% per month (or 24% per annum) of the principal invested by the Tiffin Investors. During the material time, Tiffin and Tiffin Financial received a total of approximately $548,000 in trailer fees from Rezwealth Financial Services.
According to the Ontario Securities Commission, none of the parties cited in this case were registered to trade in securities or provide Forex trading services to clients, representing a further transgression of the law, and demonstrating that Ontario, until recently a region with very little experience in asserting legal enforcement over Forex firms and traders, is, although very slowly, getting to grips with those who seek to commit criminal activity in which substantial sums of money are misappropriated.
Whilst the US government, and its associated financial markets' regulatory bodies continue the extensive reform of the entire national capital markets' economy, and clamp down on those with nefarious intentions, publicly highlighting them and often issuing very fitting sentences, things are somewhat different north of the border.
Tomorrow at 10.00 am, the Ontario Securities Commission is scheduled to hear the case of Rezwealth Financial Services and its senior management, on charges of operating an illegal FX trading and distribution scheme.
The Hare And The Tortoise
Whilst the United States often responds quickly and dispenses long sentences subject to federal law, Canada’s regulatory rulings are dispensed on a provincial basis, differing slightly between each province of Canada.
With Toronto being home to Canada’s financial sector, the Ontario Securities Commission is the most adept at dealing with cases relating to individuals or firms wishing to bilk their customers.
Despite this, it takes a long time to bring a case to justice, and in the case of Rezwealth Financial Services, tomorrow’s hearing signifies the latest in what is proving to be a lengthy case, with no definitive outcome almost four years after the perpetrators were apprehended, and two years after the case was brought to court.
Investors entered into written agreements with Mr. Blackett and the company of which he was the sole director, 215 Incorporated, with respect to these investments.
Mr. Blackett then solicited Ontario residents, both directly and through Willoughby Smith and 1778445 Ontario Incorporated, to invest in investment contracts offered by Mr. Blackett.
The remainder of the defendants in this case, Rezwealth Financial Services, Pamela Ramoutar and Justin Ramoutar, then in turn solicited Ontario residents, both directly and through another party, Daniel Tiffin and Tiffin Financial Corporation, to invest in investment contracts offered by Rezwealth Financial Services.
Rezwealth Financial Services in turn invested part of the investor funds received with Mr. Blackett.
Very Unrealistic Returns
Although the Blackett Investment Contracts were characterized as “loan agreements” between Blackett and/or 215 Incorporated and investors, Mr. Blackett informed investors that he used investor funds to engage in Forex trading, and that the monthly returns payable to investors, would be funded by the profits he generated through Forex trading.
Investors were typically promised a fixed return of 5% per month, equating to 60% per annum, although, some investors were promised a fixed return of as much as 10% per month, amounting to 120% per annum.
In order to perpetrate the scheme, Mr. Blackett solicited Ontario residents to invest in the Blackett Investment Contracts by meeting with potential investors, discussing the nature of the investment and promised returns, as well as showing some investors a purported example of the profits he had generated through Forex trading.
He prepared and signed the Blackett Investment Contracts and deposited investor funds to several bank accounts in his name, and in the name of 215 Incorporated, as well as soliciting further investors to pay funds into the Blackett Investment Contracts via associates, including Mr. Smith and 177 Incorporated.
Fraudulent Conduct
Tomorrow’s case will hear the circumstances by which, contrary to the representations made by Mr. Blackett to investors, most of the investor funds he and 215 Incorporated received, were not used for Forex trading.
On this basis, between the period of January 1, 2008 and April 14, 2009, a total of approximately $4.2 million was deposited into the Blackett Accounts, of which at least $3 million was investor funds.
A much smaller sum, approximately $542,000 was transferred from the Blackett Accounts to Forex trading accounts, and only around $28,000 was deposited back into the Blackett Accounts from Forex trading accounts.
Approximately $1.6 million was paid to investors from the Blackett Accounts to satisfy monthly return and redemption payments, and approximately $1 million was paid out of the Blackett Accounts for personal expenditures by Mr. Blackett, including cash withdrawals and credit card payments.
In addition to the fraudulent activities committed by Rezwealth Financial Services and its management team between July 1, 2009 and December 31, 2009, during which the company accepted at least $904,000 in new investments in the Rezwealth Investment Contracts, while continuing to make monthly interest payments to investors, and to repay the principal of investors who elected to redeem.
Rezwealth stopped receiving monthly return payments from Mr. Blackett in April 2009. However, during the period between July 1, 2009 and December 31, 2009, Rezwealth Financial Services’ other investments and business operations did not generate sufficient revenue to cover its interest and principal repayment obligations to investors.
Illegal Distribution
Mr. Tiffin solicited Ontario residents to invest in the Rezwealth Investment Contracts, both directly and indirectly through Tiffin Financial. He sent emails to potential investors, and posted promotional materials on Tiffin Financial’s website regarding the Rezwealth Investment Contracts.
In these materials, Tiffin stated that he had “joined forces with Rezwealth” to offer the Rezwealth Investment Contracts, and that they offered guaranteed returns of 24% per annum, as well as guarantees on investors’ principal. Tiffin also met with investors, discussed the features of the investment, assisted investors in completing the Rezwealth Investment Contracts, and facilitated the payment of investor funds to Rezwealth Financial Services.
As a result of these activities, at least 19 investors invested at least $2 million in the Rezwealth Investment Contracts, during the period of time relating to the court case.
Mr. Tiffin and Tiffin Financial received commission payments from Rezwealth for referring investors. Rezwealth agreed to pay Tiffin a trailer fee of 2% per month (or 24% per annum) of the principal invested by the Tiffin Investors. During the material time, Tiffin and Tiffin Financial received a total of approximately $548,000 in trailer fees from Rezwealth Financial Services.
According to the Ontario Securities Commission, none of the parties cited in this case were registered to trade in securities or provide Forex trading services to clients, representing a further transgression of the law, and demonstrating that Ontario, until recently a region with very little experience in asserting legal enforcement over Forex firms and traders, is, although very slowly, getting to grips with those who seek to commit criminal activity in which substantial sums of money are misappropriated.
Aussie Regulator Ramps Up Pump-and-Dump Scheme Warning after Conviction of Four
Featured Videos
How FYNXT is Transforming Brokerages with Modular Tech | Executive Interview with Stephen Miles
How FYNXT is Transforming Brokerages with Modular Tech | Executive Interview with Stephen Miles
How FYNXT is Transforming Brokerages with Modular Tech | Executive Interview with Stephen Miles
How FYNXT is Transforming Brokerages with Modular Tech | Executive Interview with Stephen Miles
Join us for an exclusive interview with Stephen Miles, Chief Revenue Officer at FYNXT, recorded live at FMLS:25. In this conversation, Stephen breaks down how modular brokerage technology is driving growth, retention, and efficiency across the brokerage industry.
Learn how FYNXT's unified yet modular platform is giving brokers a competitive edge—powering faster onboarding, increased trading volumes, and dramatically improved IB performance.
🔑 What You'll Learn in This Video:
- The biggest challenges brokerages face going into 2026
- Why FYNXT’s modular platform is outperforming in-house builds
- How automation is transforming IB channels
- The real ROI: 11x LTV increases and reduced acquisition costs
👉 Don’t forget to like, comment, and subscribe.
#FYNXT #StephenMiles #FMLS2025 #BrokerageTechnology #ModularTech #FintechInterview #DigitalTransformation #FinancialMarkets #CROInterview #FintechInnovation #TradingTechnology #IndependentBrokers #FinanceLeaders
Join us for an exclusive interview with Stephen Miles, Chief Revenue Officer at FYNXT, recorded live at FMLS:25. In this conversation, Stephen breaks down how modular brokerage technology is driving growth, retention, and efficiency across the brokerage industry.
Learn how FYNXT's unified yet modular platform is giving brokers a competitive edge—powering faster onboarding, increased trading volumes, and dramatically improved IB performance.
🔑 What You'll Learn in This Video:
- The biggest challenges brokerages face going into 2026
- Why FYNXT’s modular platform is outperforming in-house builds
- How automation is transforming IB channels
- The real ROI: 11x LTV increases and reduced acquisition costs
👉 Don’t forget to like, comment, and subscribe.
#FYNXT #StephenMiles #FMLS2025 #BrokerageTechnology #ModularTech #FintechInterview #DigitalTransformation #FinancialMarkets #CROInterview #FintechInnovation #TradingTechnology #IndependentBrokers #FinanceLeaders
Join us for an exclusive interview with Stephen Miles, Chief Revenue Officer at FYNXT, recorded live at FMLS:25. In this conversation, Stephen breaks down how modular brokerage technology is driving growth, retention, and efficiency across the brokerage industry.
Learn how FYNXT's unified yet modular platform is giving brokers a competitive edge—powering faster onboarding, increased trading volumes, and dramatically improved IB performance.
🔑 What You'll Learn in This Video:
- The biggest challenges brokerages face going into 2026
- Why FYNXT’s modular platform is outperforming in-house builds
- How automation is transforming IB channels
- The real ROI: 11x LTV increases and reduced acquisition costs
👉 Don’t forget to like, comment, and subscribe.
#FYNXT #StephenMiles #FMLS2025 #BrokerageTechnology #ModularTech #FintechInterview #DigitalTransformation #FinancialMarkets #CROInterview #FintechInnovation #TradingTechnology #IndependentBrokers #FinanceLeaders
Join us for an exclusive interview with Stephen Miles, Chief Revenue Officer at FYNXT, recorded live at FMLS:25. In this conversation, Stephen breaks down how modular brokerage technology is driving growth, retention, and efficiency across the brokerage industry.
Learn how FYNXT's unified yet modular platform is giving brokers a competitive edge—powering faster onboarding, increased trading volumes, and dramatically improved IB performance.
🔑 What You'll Learn in This Video:
- The biggest challenges brokerages face going into 2026
- Why FYNXT’s modular platform is outperforming in-house builds
- How automation is transforming IB channels
- The real ROI: 11x LTV increases and reduced acquisition costs
👉 Don’t forget to like, comment, and subscribe.
#FYNXT #StephenMiles #FMLS2025 #BrokerageTechnology #ModularTech #FintechInterview #DigitalTransformation #FinancialMarkets #CROInterview #FintechInnovation #TradingTechnology #IndependentBrokers #FinanceLeaders
Executive Interview | Charlotte Bullock | Chief Product Officer, Bank of London | FMLS:25
Executive Interview | Charlotte Bullock | Chief Product Officer, Bank of London | FMLS:25
Executive Interview | Charlotte Bullock | Chief Product Officer, Bank of London | FMLS:25
Executive Interview | Charlotte Bullock | Chief Product Officer, Bank of London | FMLS:25
Executive Interview | Charlotte Bullock | Chief Product Officer, Bank of London | FMLS:25
Executive Interview | Charlotte Bullock | Chief Product Officer, Bank of London | FMLS:25
In this interview, we sat down with Charlotte Bullock, Head of Product at The Bank of London, previously at SAP and now shaping product at one of the sector’s most ambitious new banking players.
Charlotte reflects on the Summit so far and talks about the culture inside fintech banks today. We look at the pressures that come with scaling, and how firms can hold onto the nimble approach that made them stand out early on.
We also cover the state of payments ahead of her appearance on the payments roundtable: the blockages financial firms face, the areas that still need fixing, and what a realistic solution looks like in 2026.
In this interview, we sat down with Charlotte Bullock, Head of Product at The Bank of London, previously at SAP and now shaping product at one of the sector’s most ambitious new banking players.
Charlotte reflects on the Summit so far and talks about the culture inside fintech banks today. We look at the pressures that come with scaling, and how firms can hold onto the nimble approach that made them stand out early on.
We also cover the state of payments ahead of her appearance on the payments roundtable: the blockages financial firms face, the areas that still need fixing, and what a realistic solution looks like in 2026.
In this interview, we sat down with Charlotte Bullock, Head of Product at The Bank of London, previously at SAP and now shaping product at one of the sector’s most ambitious new banking players.
Charlotte reflects on the Summit so far and talks about the culture inside fintech banks today. We look at the pressures that come with scaling, and how firms can hold onto the nimble approach that made them stand out early on.
We also cover the state of payments ahead of her appearance on the payments roundtable: the blockages financial firms face, the areas that still need fixing, and what a realistic solution looks like in 2026.
In this interview, we sat down with Charlotte Bullock, Head of Product at The Bank of London, previously at SAP and now shaping product at one of the sector’s most ambitious new banking players.
Charlotte reflects on the Summit so far and talks about the culture inside fintech banks today. We look at the pressures that come with scaling, and how firms can hold onto the nimble approach that made them stand out early on.
We also cover the state of payments ahead of her appearance on the payments roundtable: the blockages financial firms face, the areas that still need fixing, and what a realistic solution looks like in 2026.
In this interview, we sat down with Charlotte Bullock, Head of Product at The Bank of London, previously at SAP and now shaping product at one of the sector’s most ambitious new banking players.
Charlotte reflects on the Summit so far and talks about the culture inside fintech banks today. We look at the pressures that come with scaling, and how firms can hold onto the nimble approach that made them stand out early on.
We also cover the state of payments ahead of her appearance on the payments roundtable: the blockages financial firms face, the areas that still need fixing, and what a realistic solution looks like in 2026.
In this interview, we sat down with Charlotte Bullock, Head of Product at The Bank of London, previously at SAP and now shaping product at one of the sector’s most ambitious new banking players.
Charlotte reflects on the Summit so far and talks about the culture inside fintech banks today. We look at the pressures that come with scaling, and how firms can hold onto the nimble approach that made them stand out early on.
We also cover the state of payments ahead of her appearance on the payments roundtable: the blockages financial firms face, the areas that still need fixing, and what a realistic solution looks like in 2026.
In this conversation, we sit down with Drew Niv, CSO at ATFX Connect and one of the most influential figures in modern FX.
We speak about market structure, the institutional view on liquidity, and the sharp rise of prop trading, a sector Drew has been commenting on in recent months. Drew explains why he once dismissed prop trading, why his view changed, and what he now thinks the model means for brokers, clients and risk managers.
We explore subscription-fee dependency, the high reneging rate, and the long-term challenge: how brokers can build a more stable and honest version of the model. Drew also talks about the traffic advantage standalone prop firms have built and why brokers may still win in the long run if they take the right approach.
In this conversation, we sit down with Drew Niv, CSO at ATFX Connect and one of the most influential figures in modern FX.
We speak about market structure, the institutional view on liquidity, and the sharp rise of prop trading, a sector Drew has been commenting on in recent months. Drew explains why he once dismissed prop trading, why his view changed, and what he now thinks the model means for brokers, clients and risk managers.
We explore subscription-fee dependency, the high reneging rate, and the long-term challenge: how brokers can build a more stable and honest version of the model. Drew also talks about the traffic advantage standalone prop firms have built and why brokers may still win in the long run if they take the right approach.
In this conversation, we sit down with Drew Niv, CSO at ATFX Connect and one of the most influential figures in modern FX.
We speak about market structure, the institutional view on liquidity, and the sharp rise of prop trading, a sector Drew has been commenting on in recent months. Drew explains why he once dismissed prop trading, why his view changed, and what he now thinks the model means for brokers, clients and risk managers.
We explore subscription-fee dependency, the high reneging rate, and the long-term challenge: how brokers can build a more stable and honest version of the model. Drew also talks about the traffic advantage standalone prop firms have built and why brokers may still win in the long run if they take the right approach.
In this conversation, we sit down with Drew Niv, CSO at ATFX Connect and one of the most influential figures in modern FX.
We speak about market structure, the institutional view on liquidity, and the sharp rise of prop trading, a sector Drew has been commenting on in recent months. Drew explains why he once dismissed prop trading, why his view changed, and what he now thinks the model means for brokers, clients and risk managers.
We explore subscription-fee dependency, the high reneging rate, and the long-term challenge: how brokers can build a more stable and honest version of the model. Drew also talks about the traffic advantage standalone prop firms have built and why brokers may still win in the long run if they take the right approach.
In this conversation, we sit down with Drew Niv, CSO at ATFX Connect and one of the most influential figures in modern FX.
We speak about market structure, the institutional view on liquidity, and the sharp rise of prop trading, a sector Drew has been commenting on in recent months. Drew explains why he once dismissed prop trading, why his view changed, and what he now thinks the model means for brokers, clients and risk managers.
We explore subscription-fee dependency, the high reneging rate, and the long-term challenge: how brokers can build a more stable and honest version of the model. Drew also talks about the traffic advantage standalone prop firms have built and why brokers may still win in the long run if they take the right approach.
In this conversation, we sit down with Drew Niv, CSO at ATFX Connect and one of the most influential figures in modern FX.
We speak about market structure, the institutional view on liquidity, and the sharp rise of prop trading, a sector Drew has been commenting on in recent months. Drew explains why he once dismissed prop trading, why his view changed, and what he now thinks the model means for brokers, clients and risk managers.
We explore subscription-fee dependency, the high reneging rate, and the long-term challenge: how brokers can build a more stable and honest version of the model. Drew also talks about the traffic advantage standalone prop firms have built and why brokers may still win in the long run if they take the right approach.
Executive Interview | Remonda Z. Kirketerp Møller| CEO & Founder Muinmos | FMLS:25
Executive Interview | Remonda Z. Kirketerp Møller| CEO & Founder Muinmos | FMLS:25
Executive Interview | Remonda Z. Kirketerp Møller| CEO & Founder Muinmos | FMLS:25
Executive Interview | Remonda Z. Kirketerp Møller| CEO & Founder Muinmos | FMLS:25
Executive Interview | Remonda Z. Kirketerp Møller| CEO & Founder Muinmos | FMLS:25
Executive Interview | Remonda Z. Kirketerp Møller| CEO & Founder Muinmos | FMLS:25
In this interview, Remonda Z. Kirketerp Møller, founder of Muinmos, breaks down the state of AI in regtech and what responsible adoption really looks like for brokers. We talk about rising fragmentation, the pressures around compliance accuracy, and why most firms are still in the early stages of AI maturity.
Ramanda also shares insights on regulator sandboxes, shifting expectations around accountability, and the current reality of MiCA licensing and passporting in Europe.
A concise look at where compliance, onboarding, and AI-driven processes are heading next.
In this interview, Remonda Z. Kirketerp Møller, founder of Muinmos, breaks down the state of AI in regtech and what responsible adoption really looks like for brokers. We talk about rising fragmentation, the pressures around compliance accuracy, and why most firms are still in the early stages of AI maturity.
Ramanda also shares insights on regulator sandboxes, shifting expectations around accountability, and the current reality of MiCA licensing and passporting in Europe.
A concise look at where compliance, onboarding, and AI-driven processes are heading next.
In this interview, Remonda Z. Kirketerp Møller, founder of Muinmos, breaks down the state of AI in regtech and what responsible adoption really looks like for brokers. We talk about rising fragmentation, the pressures around compliance accuracy, and why most firms are still in the early stages of AI maturity.
Ramanda also shares insights on regulator sandboxes, shifting expectations around accountability, and the current reality of MiCA licensing and passporting in Europe.
A concise look at where compliance, onboarding, and AI-driven processes are heading next.
In this interview, Remonda Z. Kirketerp Møller, founder of Muinmos, breaks down the state of AI in regtech and what responsible adoption really looks like for brokers. We talk about rising fragmentation, the pressures around compliance accuracy, and why most firms are still in the early stages of AI maturity.
Ramanda also shares insights on regulator sandboxes, shifting expectations around accountability, and the current reality of MiCA licensing and passporting in Europe.
A concise look at where compliance, onboarding, and AI-driven processes are heading next.
In this interview, Remonda Z. Kirketerp Møller, founder of Muinmos, breaks down the state of AI in regtech and what responsible adoption really looks like for brokers. We talk about rising fragmentation, the pressures around compliance accuracy, and why most firms are still in the early stages of AI maturity.
Ramanda also shares insights on regulator sandboxes, shifting expectations around accountability, and the current reality of MiCA licensing and passporting in Europe.
A concise look at where compliance, onboarding, and AI-driven processes are heading next.
In this interview, Remonda Z. Kirketerp Møller, founder of Muinmos, breaks down the state of AI in regtech and what responsible adoption really looks like for brokers. We talk about rising fragmentation, the pressures around compliance accuracy, and why most firms are still in the early stages of AI maturity.
Ramanda also shares insights on regulator sandboxes, shifting expectations around accountability, and the current reality of MiCA licensing and passporting in Europe.
A concise look at where compliance, onboarding, and AI-driven processes are heading next.
In this conversation, we speak with Aydin Bonabi, CEO and co-founder of Surveill, a firm focused on fraud detection and AI-driven compliance tools for financial institutions.
We start with Aydin’s view of the Summit and the challenges brokers face as fraud tactics grow more complex. He explains how firms can stay ahead through real-time signals, data patterns, and early-stage detection.
We also talk about AI training and why compliance teams often struggle to keep models accurate, fair, and aligned with regulatory expectations. Aydin breaks down what “good” AI training looks like inside a financial environment, including the importance of clean data, domain expertise, and human oversight.
He closes with a clear message: fraud is scaling, and so must the tools that stop it.
In this conversation, we speak with Aydin Bonabi, CEO and co-founder of Surveill, a firm focused on fraud detection and AI-driven compliance tools for financial institutions.
We start with Aydin’s view of the Summit and the challenges brokers face as fraud tactics grow more complex. He explains how firms can stay ahead through real-time signals, data patterns, and early-stage detection.
We also talk about AI training and why compliance teams often struggle to keep models accurate, fair, and aligned with regulatory expectations. Aydin breaks down what “good” AI training looks like inside a financial environment, including the importance of clean data, domain expertise, and human oversight.
He closes with a clear message: fraud is scaling, and so must the tools that stop it.
In this conversation, we speak with Aydin Bonabi, CEO and co-founder of Surveill, a firm focused on fraud detection and AI-driven compliance tools for financial institutions.
We start with Aydin’s view of the Summit and the challenges brokers face as fraud tactics grow more complex. He explains how firms can stay ahead through real-time signals, data patterns, and early-stage detection.
We also talk about AI training and why compliance teams often struggle to keep models accurate, fair, and aligned with regulatory expectations. Aydin breaks down what “good” AI training looks like inside a financial environment, including the importance of clean data, domain expertise, and human oversight.
He closes with a clear message: fraud is scaling, and so must the tools that stop it.
In this conversation, we speak with Aydin Bonabi, CEO and co-founder of Surveill, a firm focused on fraud detection and AI-driven compliance tools for financial institutions.
We start with Aydin’s view of the Summit and the challenges brokers face as fraud tactics grow more complex. He explains how firms can stay ahead through real-time signals, data patterns, and early-stage detection.
We also talk about AI training and why compliance teams often struggle to keep models accurate, fair, and aligned with regulatory expectations. Aydin breaks down what “good” AI training looks like inside a financial environment, including the importance of clean data, domain expertise, and human oversight.
He closes with a clear message: fraud is scaling, and so must the tools that stop it.
In this conversation, we speak with Aydin Bonabi, CEO and co-founder of Surveill, a firm focused on fraud detection and AI-driven compliance tools for financial institutions.
We start with Aydin’s view of the Summit and the challenges brokers face as fraud tactics grow more complex. He explains how firms can stay ahead through real-time signals, data patterns, and early-stage detection.
We also talk about AI training and why compliance teams often struggle to keep models accurate, fair, and aligned with regulatory expectations. Aydin breaks down what “good” AI training looks like inside a financial environment, including the importance of clean data, domain expertise, and human oversight.
He closes with a clear message: fraud is scaling, and so must the tools that stop it.
In this conversation, we speak with Aydin Bonabi, CEO and co-founder of Surveill, a firm focused on fraud detection and AI-driven compliance tools for financial institutions.
We start with Aydin’s view of the Summit and the challenges brokers face as fraud tactics grow more complex. He explains how firms can stay ahead through real-time signals, data patterns, and early-stage detection.
We also talk about AI training and why compliance teams often struggle to keep models accurate, fair, and aligned with regulatory expectations. Aydin breaks down what “good” AI training looks like inside a financial environment, including the importance of clean data, domain expertise, and human oversight.
He closes with a clear message: fraud is scaling, and so must the tools that stop it.