PropAccount.com Adds Equities to White-Label Prop Stack, Entering a Crowded Race

Tuesday, 21/04/2026 | 07:28 GMT by Damian Chmiel
  • Operators on the FPFX-backed network can now offer stock trading challenges alongside forex, futures, and crypto, the Boca Raton firm said.
  • The move lands months after Blueberry Funded, The Trading Pit, and EBSWare pushed equities into prop firm challenges, setting up direct competition.
Justin Hertzberg, the CEO of FPFX Tech
Justin Hertzberg, the CEO of FPFX Tech

PropAccount.com said it has added equities trading to its white-label prop firm platform, giving operators on its network the ability to run U.S. stock challenges alongside forex, futures, and crypto within a single infrastructure.

Singapore Summit: Meet the largest APAC brokers you know (and those you still don't!)

The Boca Raton company, which is powered by FPFX Tech, said the launch covers both single-session and swing-trading challenges. The four-asset setup slots into the existing onboarding, risk, KYC, and payments tools already used by partner firms, according to the company.

Operators Get Equities Without New Infrastructure, Firm Says

PropAccount said the equities module runs on the same back end that handles forex, futures, and crypto across DXtrade, Match-Trader, cTrader, Rithmic, and Tradovate.

For existing partners, adding stock challenges requires no new vendor integration and carries no additional cost, the company claimed. New operators can go live within seven days, a timeline PropAccount has promoted since it rolled out fully customizable challenge formats for its white-label partners in 2025.

Chief executive Justin Hertzberg said the firm built the addition around demand from stock traders who have not engaged with the prop firm model.

"Equities are the largest traded market in the world, and traders have been underserved by the retail prop industry for too long," Hertzberg said in the announcement. He added that the inclusion lets operators reach stock traders "without forcing them to adjust to equity CFDs."

Stock Challenges Were Already Spreading Across Prop Firms

PropAccount is not first into equities. A cluster of prop firms has been pushing into stock-based challenges since early 2025, testing whether a model built on forex leverage can translate to equities, where margin is lower and spreads are tighter.

Blueberry Funded, backed by Australian broker Blueberry Markets, expanded its evaluation program in April 2025 to include CFD stock trading on MetaTrader 5 and DXtrade, covering more than 1,000 stocks.

The Trading Pit and Trade The Pool have operated stock-focused programs for longer, with Trade The Pool offering access to over 12,000 U.S. stock and ETF symbols through the Trader Evolution platform. FXIFY and Lark Funding also run stock CFD challenges, though most of these offerings remain structured around contracts for difference rather than direct exchange access.

On the infrastructure side, PropAccount's closest competitor is EBSWare, which added U.S., Hong Kong, and Indian equities to its white-label prop platform in March 2025, giving brokers a back end for stock challenges without building the plumbing themselves. EBSWare's rollout and PropAccount's launch target the same narrow segment: operators that want to sell stock challenges without assembling the technology.

A $68 Trillion Market, but a Different Economic Model

PropAccount pointed to Securities Industry and Financial Markets Association data showing U.S. equity market capitalization at $68.2 trillion at year-end 2025, with average daily volume of 18.6 billion shares. The company did not provide projections for how much of that activity it expects to pull into the prop firm ecosystem.

The push into stocks comes as the retail prop trading sector absorbs a period of heavy attrition. Between 80 and 100 prop firms shut down in 2024 after MetaQuotes restricted MetaTrader licenses for firms serving U.S. clients, prompting a migration to DXtrade, Match-Trader, cTrader, and TradeLocker.

The sector was valued at over $10 billion in 2025, with firms paying out roughly $325 million to traders last year, according to Prop Firm Match data cited by Devexperts.

FPFX Tech's own data, shared with FinanceMagnates.com in 2024, found that only 7% of traders across 300,000 prop accounts achieved payouts, with the average payout reaching 4% of plan size.

Those base rates frame the economics stock challenges now have to fit into. Equities carry lower typical leverage than forex or futures, which alters both the math of the challenge fee model and the risk profile operators face on funded accounts.

An Industry Still Built on Challenge Fees

The broader question for PropAccount and its rivals is whether stock-challenge economics can sustain the same margins forex and futures have generated. Payout structures across the prop industry have already come under pressure this year, with several firms restricting gold trading after metal rallies stretched budgets.

Hertzberg has argued earlier that prop trading will eventually face tighter regulation, citing CySEC chair George Theocharides, who has said prop trading will fall under robust oversight at some point.

Any shift in regulatory treatment of simulated equity challenges, particularly if U.S. regulators eventually classify them as securities-adjacent products, would fall more heavily on infrastructure providers like PropAccount than on single-asset operators.

PropAccount.com said it has added equities trading to its white-label prop firm platform, giving operators on its network the ability to run U.S. stock challenges alongside forex, futures, and crypto within a single infrastructure.

Singapore Summit: Meet the largest APAC brokers you know (and those you still don't!)

The Boca Raton company, which is powered by FPFX Tech, said the launch covers both single-session and swing-trading challenges. The four-asset setup slots into the existing onboarding, risk, KYC, and payments tools already used by partner firms, according to the company.

Operators Get Equities Without New Infrastructure, Firm Says

PropAccount said the equities module runs on the same back end that handles forex, futures, and crypto across DXtrade, Match-Trader, cTrader, Rithmic, and Tradovate.

For existing partners, adding stock challenges requires no new vendor integration and carries no additional cost, the company claimed. New operators can go live within seven days, a timeline PropAccount has promoted since it rolled out fully customizable challenge formats for its white-label partners in 2025.

Chief executive Justin Hertzberg said the firm built the addition around demand from stock traders who have not engaged with the prop firm model.

"Equities are the largest traded market in the world, and traders have been underserved by the retail prop industry for too long," Hertzberg said in the announcement. He added that the inclusion lets operators reach stock traders "without forcing them to adjust to equity CFDs."

Stock Challenges Were Already Spreading Across Prop Firms

PropAccount is not first into equities. A cluster of prop firms has been pushing into stock-based challenges since early 2025, testing whether a model built on forex leverage can translate to equities, where margin is lower and spreads are tighter.

Blueberry Funded, backed by Australian broker Blueberry Markets, expanded its evaluation program in April 2025 to include CFD stock trading on MetaTrader 5 and DXtrade, covering more than 1,000 stocks.

The Trading Pit and Trade The Pool have operated stock-focused programs for longer, with Trade The Pool offering access to over 12,000 U.S. stock and ETF symbols through the Trader Evolution platform. FXIFY and Lark Funding also run stock CFD challenges, though most of these offerings remain structured around contracts for difference rather than direct exchange access.

On the infrastructure side, PropAccount's closest competitor is EBSWare, which added U.S., Hong Kong, and Indian equities to its white-label prop platform in March 2025, giving brokers a back end for stock challenges without building the plumbing themselves. EBSWare's rollout and PropAccount's launch target the same narrow segment: operators that want to sell stock challenges without assembling the technology.

A $68 Trillion Market, but a Different Economic Model

PropAccount pointed to Securities Industry and Financial Markets Association data showing U.S. equity market capitalization at $68.2 trillion at year-end 2025, with average daily volume of 18.6 billion shares. The company did not provide projections for how much of that activity it expects to pull into the prop firm ecosystem.

The push into stocks comes as the retail prop trading sector absorbs a period of heavy attrition. Between 80 and 100 prop firms shut down in 2024 after MetaQuotes restricted MetaTrader licenses for firms serving U.S. clients, prompting a migration to DXtrade, Match-Trader, cTrader, and TradeLocker.

The sector was valued at over $10 billion in 2025, with firms paying out roughly $325 million to traders last year, according to Prop Firm Match data cited by Devexperts.

FPFX Tech's own data, shared with FinanceMagnates.com in 2024, found that only 7% of traders across 300,000 prop accounts achieved payouts, with the average payout reaching 4% of plan size.

Those base rates frame the economics stock challenges now have to fit into. Equities carry lower typical leverage than forex or futures, which alters both the math of the challenge fee model and the risk profile operators face on funded accounts.

An Industry Still Built on Challenge Fees

The broader question for PropAccount and its rivals is whether stock-challenge economics can sustain the same margins forex and futures have generated. Payout structures across the prop industry have already come under pressure this year, with several firms restricting gold trading after metal rallies stretched budgets.

Hertzberg has argued earlier that prop trading will eventually face tighter regulation, citing CySEC chair George Theocharides, who has said prop trading will fall under robust oversight at some point.

Any shift in regulatory treatment of simulated equity challenges, particularly if U.S. regulators eventually classify them as securities-adjacent products, would fall more heavily on infrastructure providers like PropAccount than on single-asset operators.

About the Author: Damian Chmiel
Damian Chmiel
  • 3464 Articles
  • 108 Followers
About the Author: Damian Chmiel
Damian Chmiel is a Senior Analyst & Editor at Finance Magnates with more than 15 years of experience in the CFD and online trading industry. Active as both a trader and journalist since 2010, he focuses on broker coverage, fintech innovation, and regulatory developments across Europe, the Middle East, and Asia. His work includes interviews with C-level leaders at major brokerages and fintech platforms, as well as co-authoring Finance Magnates’ quarterly industry benchmarking reports. Damian’s reporting is data-driven, market-aware, and grounded in direct industry engagement. His analysis and commentary have also been cited by external media outlets, including Investing.com, Binance, The Asset, Stockhead, and Dispatch. Education: MA in Finance and Accounting, Cracow University of Economics
  • 3464 Articles
  • 108 Followers

More from the Author

Retail FX

!"#$%&'()*+,-./0123456789:;<=>?@ABCDEFGHIJKLMNOPQRSTUVWXYZ[\]^_`abcdefghijklmnopqrstuvwxyz{|} !"#$%&'()*+,-./0123456789:;<=>?@ABCDEFGHIJKLMNOPQRSTUVWXYZ[\]^_`abcdefghijklmnopqrstuvwxyz{|}