Democrats and Republicans are opposed on crypto, with Trump recently stating support for it.
Some Democrats recently broke ranks, voting against the SEC's crypto-hostile SAB 121 policy.
One selling point for Bitcoin is that it is politically neutral. After all, it's a ledger, decentralized, and wherever we each fall on the political spectrum, we all need to keep track of our own funds. That’s not to say everyone thinks Bitcoin is the best way to do this, but the neutrality of the technology itself looked like an area on which it was easy to find agreement.
But recently, that sense of being removed from political partisanship has been called into question in the United States, where increasingly, attitudes towards cryptocurrencies appear to be dividing along party lines as we head towards the presidential election. And what’s more, this might be shaping up to be the first US election in which crypto is a significant issue influencing voter decisions.
How Are Republicans and Democrats Opposed Over Crypto?
Recent events have seen the starkest divide yet open up between Republicans and Democrats on the subject of Bitcoin and crypto, evidenced most explicitly in comments made by Donald Trump at a meeting for holders of Trump Digital Trading Cards (an NFT collection first launched by the former president in 2022.)
Addressing the crowd, Trump offered a customary jibe at his opponent Biden’s expense, suggesting that the current president doesn’t know what crypto is, then directly stated that both Gary Gensler (Chair of the SEC) and the Democrats are “very much against it [crypto]”, before telling the crowd, “'if you’re in favor of crypto, you’d better vote for Trump”.
He also explained that crypto companies are leaving the US because of regulatory hostility, and expressed the view that “if we’re going to embrace it [crypto], we have to let them be here”.
This is a turnaround from in 2021, when Trump stated that Bitcoin “seems like a scam”, but it should also be noted that since those earlier comments, Trump has released his own crypto collectibles–the above-mentioned trading cards–on both the Ethereum and Bitcoin blockchains, and furthermore, on-chain records show that Trump is holding just under $9 million of crypto.
Democrat Hostility
In contrast to Trump’s recent pro-crypto statements, the Biden Administration has appeared to be on a crypto warpath, with Senator Elizabeth Warren going as far–in early 2023–as to tweet from her official account that she was assembling what she referred to as an “anti-crypto army”, a statement that sounds jarringly extreme when in various regions outside the US, there are moves to integrate crypto with traditional finance.
The SEC in the US has also, during the current administration’s time in office, been particularly hostile towards the crypto industry, and has been criticized for regulating through enforcement, rather than offering guidance to crypto companies.
On the whole, and for outwardly ambiguous reasons, the Democrats appear simply not to like crypto, a sentiment which is being communicated to voters. Much of the electorate may not have the time or the inclination to investigate underlying political motives, but in straightforward terms, one side of the political aisle is making openly pro-crypto statements, while the other is demonstrating through its actions that it is opposed.
What Is SAB 121?
There are, however, recent developments suggesting that a non-partisan approach to crypto is still viable. This became apparent this week when what may turn out to have been a critical vote took place in the Senate.
The issue at stake was the SEC’s proposed new SAB 121 accounting policy, which makes it difficult for banks to custody Bitcoin and other cryptocurrencies for clients. The Senate voted to overturn SAB 121 by a majority of 60 to 38, and notably, twelve Democrats joined the 48 Republicans voting against the policy.
However, President Biden previously stated that he intends to veto any attempt to kill the SEC policy, raising the question now of whether he will stick to that intent. If so, we might be looking at a split in attitudes within the Democratic Party itself, and the perception created may be that it is President Biden, Senator Warren, and perhaps Chair Gary Gensler at the SEC, who are opposed to crypto, while in the party as a whole there is a wider range of opinion.
Political Meme Coins Enter the Fray
The current crypto cycle has been heavily dominated by meme coins, and has seen a new category of token emerge within that niche: the political meme coin.
This category has seen the launch of multiple new tokens that take shots at politicians through caricature and deliberately misspelled names, featuring tickers such as BODEN and TREMP, while the current top political coin by market cap is the sincerely supportive (and unambiguously titled) TRUMP.
Trump token price chart from CoinGecko
Are these coins an indication that politics and crypto really are more closely entangled than ever before? Perhaps they measure cynically-expressed frustration with the political apparatus, and at the same time are a sign of the degree to which politics seems to have seeped into all corners of public life in recent years.
Or, on the other hand, political meme tokens may simply be nothing more than thrill-seeking crypto participants spinning up novel ways to profit in the blockchain casino. Still though, it seems telling, in an election year, that these politically-focused coins have gained a foothold in the crypto markets.
What Happens to Crypto After the Election?
Should Biden win, then it’s reasonable to expect–in the immediate term–more of the same: a Gensler-chaired SEC that continues to aggressively target crypto, an unwillingness from the authorities to take a break from hostilities and engage meaningfully with the industry, and ultimately, the gradual exclusion of crypto from the American economy.
On the other hand, a Trump victory is likely to act as a major boost for the crypto markets, and the industry would then actively press for regulatory clarity and changes at the SEC, both of which are plausible under a new administration.
However, these possible outcomes are predicated on Trump sticking to his stated openness towards crypto, and the Biden administration not wavering in its stance against crypto, and the latter of those is particularly questionable after Democrat Senators broke ranks from the president over SAB 121.
Regarding the quandary in which the Democratic Party has placed itself, Mike Novogratz–the founder and CEO of crypto firm Galaxy Digital–recently offered a neat description, explaining that the party’s current approach is “kind of like the Democrats went out and said ‘we don’t like dogs’. There are more crypto owners in America than there are dog owners."
From here until the election then, it looks likely that crypto will remain a pertinent issue, but it remains to be seen whether changes of direction are incoming.
One selling point for Bitcoin is that it is politically neutral. After all, it's a ledger, decentralized, and wherever we each fall on the political spectrum, we all need to keep track of our own funds. That’s not to say everyone thinks Bitcoin is the best way to do this, but the neutrality of the technology itself looked like an area on which it was easy to find agreement.
But recently, that sense of being removed from political partisanship has been called into question in the United States, where increasingly, attitudes towards cryptocurrencies appear to be dividing along party lines as we head towards the presidential election. And what’s more, this might be shaping up to be the first US election in which crypto is a significant issue influencing voter decisions.
How Are Republicans and Democrats Opposed Over Crypto?
Recent events have seen the starkest divide yet open up between Republicans and Democrats on the subject of Bitcoin and crypto, evidenced most explicitly in comments made by Donald Trump at a meeting for holders of Trump Digital Trading Cards (an NFT collection first launched by the former president in 2022.)
Addressing the crowd, Trump offered a customary jibe at his opponent Biden’s expense, suggesting that the current president doesn’t know what crypto is, then directly stated that both Gary Gensler (Chair of the SEC) and the Democrats are “very much against it [crypto]”, before telling the crowd, “'if you’re in favor of crypto, you’d better vote for Trump”.
He also explained that crypto companies are leaving the US because of regulatory hostility, and expressed the view that “if we’re going to embrace it [crypto], we have to let them be here”.
This is a turnaround from in 2021, when Trump stated that Bitcoin “seems like a scam”, but it should also be noted that since those earlier comments, Trump has released his own crypto collectibles–the above-mentioned trading cards–on both the Ethereum and Bitcoin blockchains, and furthermore, on-chain records show that Trump is holding just under $9 million of crypto.
Democrat Hostility
In contrast to Trump’s recent pro-crypto statements, the Biden Administration has appeared to be on a crypto warpath, with Senator Elizabeth Warren going as far–in early 2023–as to tweet from her official account that she was assembling what she referred to as an “anti-crypto army”, a statement that sounds jarringly extreme when in various regions outside the US, there are moves to integrate crypto with traditional finance.
The SEC in the US has also, during the current administration’s time in office, been particularly hostile towards the crypto industry, and has been criticized for regulating through enforcement, rather than offering guidance to crypto companies.
On the whole, and for outwardly ambiguous reasons, the Democrats appear simply not to like crypto, a sentiment which is being communicated to voters. Much of the electorate may not have the time or the inclination to investigate underlying political motives, but in straightforward terms, one side of the political aisle is making openly pro-crypto statements, while the other is demonstrating through its actions that it is opposed.
What Is SAB 121?
There are, however, recent developments suggesting that a non-partisan approach to crypto is still viable. This became apparent this week when what may turn out to have been a critical vote took place in the Senate.
The issue at stake was the SEC’s proposed new SAB 121 accounting policy, which makes it difficult for banks to custody Bitcoin and other cryptocurrencies for clients. The Senate voted to overturn SAB 121 by a majority of 60 to 38, and notably, twelve Democrats joined the 48 Republicans voting against the policy.
However, President Biden previously stated that he intends to veto any attempt to kill the SEC policy, raising the question now of whether he will stick to that intent. If so, we might be looking at a split in attitudes within the Democratic Party itself, and the perception created may be that it is President Biden, Senator Warren, and perhaps Chair Gary Gensler at the SEC, who are opposed to crypto, while in the party as a whole there is a wider range of opinion.
Political Meme Coins Enter the Fray
The current crypto cycle has been heavily dominated by meme coins, and has seen a new category of token emerge within that niche: the political meme coin.
This category has seen the launch of multiple new tokens that take shots at politicians through caricature and deliberately misspelled names, featuring tickers such as BODEN and TREMP, while the current top political coin by market cap is the sincerely supportive (and unambiguously titled) TRUMP.
Trump token price chart from CoinGecko
Are these coins an indication that politics and crypto really are more closely entangled than ever before? Perhaps they measure cynically-expressed frustration with the political apparatus, and at the same time are a sign of the degree to which politics seems to have seeped into all corners of public life in recent years.
Or, on the other hand, political meme tokens may simply be nothing more than thrill-seeking crypto participants spinning up novel ways to profit in the blockchain casino. Still though, it seems telling, in an election year, that these politically-focused coins have gained a foothold in the crypto markets.
What Happens to Crypto After the Election?
Should Biden win, then it’s reasonable to expect–in the immediate term–more of the same: a Gensler-chaired SEC that continues to aggressively target crypto, an unwillingness from the authorities to take a break from hostilities and engage meaningfully with the industry, and ultimately, the gradual exclusion of crypto from the American economy.
On the other hand, a Trump victory is likely to act as a major boost for the crypto markets, and the industry would then actively press for regulatory clarity and changes at the SEC, both of which are plausible under a new administration.
However, these possible outcomes are predicated on Trump sticking to his stated openness towards crypto, and the Biden administration not wavering in its stance against crypto, and the latter of those is particularly questionable after Democrat Senators broke ranks from the president over SAB 121.
Regarding the quandary in which the Democratic Party has placed itself, Mike Novogratz–the founder and CEO of crypto firm Galaxy Digital–recently offered a neat description, explaining that the party’s current approach is “kind of like the Democrats went out and said ‘we don’t like dogs’. There are more crypto owners in America than there are dog owners."
From here until the election then, it looks likely that crypto will remain a pertinent issue, but it remains to be seen whether changes of direction are incoming.
Sam White is a writer and journalist from the UK who covers cryptocurrencies and web3, with a particular interest in NFTs and the crossover between art and finance. His work, on a wide variety of topics, has appeared on platforms including The Spectator, Vice and Hacker Noon.
In this conversation, we sit down with Drew Niv, CSO at ATFX Connect and one of the most influential figures in modern FX.
We speak about market structure, the institutional view on liquidity, and the sharp rise of prop trading, a sector Drew has been commenting on in recent months. Drew explains why he once dismissed prop trading, why his view changed, and what he now thinks the model means for brokers, clients and risk managers.
We explore subscription-fee dependency, the high reneging rate, and the long-term challenge: how brokers can build a more stable and honest version of the model. Drew also talks about the traffic advantage standalone prop firms have built and why brokers may still win in the long run if they take the right approach.
In this conversation, we sit down with Drew Niv, CSO at ATFX Connect and one of the most influential figures in modern FX.
We speak about market structure, the institutional view on liquidity, and the sharp rise of prop trading, a sector Drew has been commenting on in recent months. Drew explains why he once dismissed prop trading, why his view changed, and what he now thinks the model means for brokers, clients and risk managers.
We explore subscription-fee dependency, the high reneging rate, and the long-term challenge: how brokers can build a more stable and honest version of the model. Drew also talks about the traffic advantage standalone prop firms have built and why brokers may still win in the long run if they take the right approach.
Executive Interview | Remonda Z. Kirketerp Møller| CEO & Founder Muinmos | FMLS:25
Executive Interview | Remonda Z. Kirketerp Møller| CEO & Founder Muinmos | FMLS:25
In this interview, Remonda Z. Kirketerp Møller, founder of Muinmos, breaks down the state of AI in regtech and what responsible adoption really looks like for brokers. We talk about rising fragmentation, the pressures around compliance accuracy, and why most firms are still in the early stages of AI maturity.
Ramanda also shares insights on regulator sandboxes, shifting expectations around accountability, and the current reality of MiCA licensing and passporting in Europe.
A concise look at where compliance, onboarding, and AI-driven processes are heading next.
In this interview, Remonda Z. Kirketerp Møller, founder of Muinmos, breaks down the state of AI in regtech and what responsible adoption really looks like for brokers. We talk about rising fragmentation, the pressures around compliance accuracy, and why most firms are still in the early stages of AI maturity.
Ramanda also shares insights on regulator sandboxes, shifting expectations around accountability, and the current reality of MiCA licensing and passporting in Europe.
A concise look at where compliance, onboarding, and AI-driven processes are heading next.
In this conversation, we speak with Aydin Bonabi, CEO and co-founder of Surveill, a firm focused on fraud detection and AI-driven compliance tools for financial institutions.
We start with Aydin’s view of the Summit and the challenges brokers face as fraud tactics grow more complex. He explains how firms can stay ahead through real-time signals, data patterns, and early-stage detection.
We also talk about AI training and why compliance teams often struggle to keep models accurate, fair, and aligned with regulatory expectations. Aydin breaks down what “good” AI training looks like inside a financial environment, including the importance of clean data, domain expertise, and human oversight.
He closes with a clear message: fraud is scaling, and so must the tools that stop it.
In this conversation, we speak with Aydin Bonabi, CEO and co-founder of Surveill, a firm focused on fraud detection and AI-driven compliance tools for financial institutions.
We start with Aydin’s view of the Summit and the challenges brokers face as fraud tactics grow more complex. He explains how firms can stay ahead through real-time signals, data patterns, and early-stage detection.
We also talk about AI training and why compliance teams often struggle to keep models accurate, fair, and aligned with regulatory expectations. Aydin breaks down what “good” AI training looks like inside a financial environment, including the importance of clean data, domain expertise, and human oversight.
He closes with a clear message: fraud is scaling, and so must the tools that stop it.
Exness expands its presence in Africa: Inside our interview with Paul Margarites in Cape Town
Exness expands its presence in Africa: Inside our interview with Paul Margarites in Cape Town
Finance Magnates met with Paul Margarites, Exness regional commercial director for Sub-Saharan Africa, during a visit to the firm’s office opening in Cape Town. In this talk, led by Andrea Badiola Mateos, Co-CEO at Finance Magnates, Paul shares views on the South African trading space, local user behavior, mobile trends, regulation, team growth, and how Exness plans to grow in more markets across the region. @Exness
Read the article at: https://www.financemagnates.com/thought-leadership/exness-expands-its-presence-in-africa-inside-our-interview-with-paul-margarites/
#exness #financemagnates #exnesstrading #CFDtrading #tradeonline #africanews #capetown
Finance Magnates met with Paul Margarites, Exness regional commercial director for Sub-Saharan Africa, during a visit to the firm’s office opening in Cape Town. In this talk, led by Andrea Badiola Mateos, Co-CEO at Finance Magnates, Paul shares views on the South African trading space, local user behavior, mobile trends, regulation, team growth, and how Exness plans to grow in more markets across the region. @Exness
Read the article at: https://www.financemagnates.com/thought-leadership/exness-expands-its-presence-in-africa-inside-our-interview-with-paul-margarites/
#exness #financemagnates #exnesstrading #CFDtrading #tradeonline #africanews #capetown
Executive Interview | Jas Shah | FMLS:25
Executive Interview | Jas Shah | FMLS:25
Interview with Jas Shah
Builder | Adviser | Fintech Writer | Product Strategist
In this episode, Jonathan Fine sat down with Jas Shah, one of the most thoughtful voices in global fintech. Known for his work across advisory, product, stablecoins, and his widely read writing, Jas brings a rare combination of industry insight and plain-spoken clarity.
We talk about his first impression of the Summit, the projects that keep him busy today, and how they connect to the stablecoin panel he joined. Jas shares his view on the link between fintech, wealthtech and retail brokers, especially as firms like Revolut, eToro and Trading212 blur long-standing lines in the market.
We also explore what stablecoin adoption might look like for retail investment platforms, including a few product and UX angles that are not obvious at first glance.
To close, Jas explains how he thinks about writing, and how he approaches “shipping” pieces that spark debate across the industry.
Interview with Jas Shah
Builder | Adviser | Fintech Writer | Product Strategist
In this episode, Jonathan Fine sat down with Jas Shah, one of the most thoughtful voices in global fintech. Known for his work across advisory, product, stablecoins, and his widely read writing, Jas brings a rare combination of industry insight and plain-spoken clarity.
We talk about his first impression of the Summit, the projects that keep him busy today, and how they connect to the stablecoin panel he joined. Jas shares his view on the link between fintech, wealthtech and retail brokers, especially as firms like Revolut, eToro and Trading212 blur long-standing lines in the market.
We also explore what stablecoin adoption might look like for retail investment platforms, including a few product and UX angles that are not obvious at first glance.
To close, Jas explains how he thinks about writing, and how he approaches “shipping” pieces that spark debate across the industry.
