SEC Slaps Credit Suisse with $600K Fine for EBS Lapses
- The company was previously fined by multiple US regulators for similar violations.
The United States' Securities and Exchange Exchange An exchange is known as a marketplace that supports the trading of derivatives, commodities, securities, and other financial instruments.Generally, an exchange is accessible through a digital platform or sometimes at a tangible address where investors organize to perform trading. Among the chief responsibilities of an exchange would be to uphold honest and fair-trading practices. These are instrumental in making sure that the distribution of supported security rates on that exchange are effectiv An exchange is known as a marketplace that supports the trading of derivatives, commodities, securities, and other financial instruments.Generally, an exchange is accessible through a digital platform or sometimes at a tangible address where investors organize to perform trading. Among the chief responsibilities of an exchange would be to uphold honest and fair-trading practices. These are instrumental in making sure that the distribution of supported security rates on that exchange are effectiv Read this Term Commission (SEC) announced today that it has settled with Credit Suisse for a civil penalty of $600,000 as the investment banking giant failed to submit some mandatory trading information.
Broker-dealers need to furnish the market regulator with transaction information. The SEC uses these so-called 'blue sheet data' to carry out regulatory scrutiny, including the possibility of insider trading and other fraudulent activities.
“It is a fundamental obligation of broker-dealers to provide complete and accurate EBS data when requested by representatives of the Commission to do so,” SEC stated.
According to the regulator's announcement on Wednesday, half of 135 fixed-income electronic blue sheets (EBS) submitted by Credit Suisse between March 16, 2015, and March 11, 2019, were deficient. This resulted in the misreporting of trade data for 2,460 transactions.
“Credit Suisse’s fixed-income EBS submissions contained inaccurate fields because the submissions included only allocation level information and did not include Execution Execution Execution is the process during which a client submits an order to the brokerage, which consequently executes it resulting in an open position in a given asset. The execution of the order occurs only when it is filled. There is typically a time delay between the placement of the order and the execution which is called latency.In the retail FX space, reliable brokers always strive to deliver best execution to their clients in order to maintain a solid business relationship with them. This is a co Execution is the process during which a client submits an order to the brokerage, which consequently executes it resulting in an open position in a given asset. The execution of the order occurs only when it is filled. There is typically a time delay between the placement of the order and the execution which is called latency.In the retail FX space, reliable brokers always strive to deliver best execution to their clients in order to maintain a solid business relationship with them. This is a co Read this Term level information,” the notice added.
Furthermore, the company reported incorrect exchange codes and average price account data for all of its 2,460 fixed-income transactions.
The regulator highlighted that, with all this, the financial services company has willfully violated provisions of Section 17(a)(1) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and Rules 17a-4(j) and 17a-25.
In addition to the fine, the company admitted the cease-and-desist order by the regulator and also agreed to be censured.
Not Learning from Previous Mistakes
Meanwhile, Credit Suisse has a history of such EBS lapses and was fined multiple times by the SEC as well as the Financial Industry Regulatory Authority (FINRA). In 2016, Credit Suisse consented to a cease and desist order, censure, and a penalty of $4,250,000 slapped by the financial regulator for similar lapses.
In Switzerland, the Financial Market Supervisory Authority (FINMA) opened a probe against the banking giant for its involvement in corporate espionage over its own employees.
The United States' Securities and Exchange Exchange An exchange is known as a marketplace that supports the trading of derivatives, commodities, securities, and other financial instruments.Generally, an exchange is accessible through a digital platform or sometimes at a tangible address where investors organize to perform trading. Among the chief responsibilities of an exchange would be to uphold honest and fair-trading practices. These are instrumental in making sure that the distribution of supported security rates on that exchange are effectiv An exchange is known as a marketplace that supports the trading of derivatives, commodities, securities, and other financial instruments.Generally, an exchange is accessible through a digital platform or sometimes at a tangible address where investors organize to perform trading. Among the chief responsibilities of an exchange would be to uphold honest and fair-trading practices. These are instrumental in making sure that the distribution of supported security rates on that exchange are effectiv Read this Term Commission (SEC) announced today that it has settled with Credit Suisse for a civil penalty of $600,000 as the investment banking giant failed to submit some mandatory trading information.
Broker-dealers need to furnish the market regulator with transaction information. The SEC uses these so-called 'blue sheet data' to carry out regulatory scrutiny, including the possibility of insider trading and other fraudulent activities.
“It is a fundamental obligation of broker-dealers to provide complete and accurate EBS data when requested by representatives of the Commission to do so,” SEC stated.
According to the regulator's announcement on Wednesday, half of 135 fixed-income electronic blue sheets (EBS) submitted by Credit Suisse between March 16, 2015, and March 11, 2019, were deficient. This resulted in the misreporting of trade data for 2,460 transactions.
“Credit Suisse’s fixed-income EBS submissions contained inaccurate fields because the submissions included only allocation level information and did not include Execution Execution Execution is the process during which a client submits an order to the brokerage, which consequently executes it resulting in an open position in a given asset. The execution of the order occurs only when it is filled. There is typically a time delay between the placement of the order and the execution which is called latency.In the retail FX space, reliable brokers always strive to deliver best execution to their clients in order to maintain a solid business relationship with them. This is a co Execution is the process during which a client submits an order to the brokerage, which consequently executes it resulting in an open position in a given asset. The execution of the order occurs only when it is filled. There is typically a time delay between the placement of the order and the execution which is called latency.In the retail FX space, reliable brokers always strive to deliver best execution to their clients in order to maintain a solid business relationship with them. This is a co Read this Term level information,” the notice added.
Furthermore, the company reported incorrect exchange codes and average price account data for all of its 2,460 fixed-income transactions.
The regulator highlighted that, with all this, the financial services company has willfully violated provisions of Section 17(a)(1) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and Rules 17a-4(j) and 17a-25.
In addition to the fine, the company admitted the cease-and-desist order by the regulator and also agreed to be censured.
Not Learning from Previous Mistakes
Meanwhile, Credit Suisse has a history of such EBS lapses and was fined multiple times by the SEC as well as the Financial Industry Regulatory Authority (FINRA). In 2016, Credit Suisse consented to a cease and desist order, censure, and a penalty of $4,250,000 slapped by the financial regulator for similar lapses.
In Switzerland, the Financial Market Supervisory Authority (FINMA) opened a probe against the banking giant for its involvement in corporate espionage over its own employees.