FCA Flags High Overnight Fees as Only 12% of CFD Firms Change Charges

Friday, 16/10/2026 | 12:14 GMT by Tareq Sikder
  • The regulator surveyed 81 CFD firms and found limited pricing changes, opaque funding mark-ups and inadequate client disclosures.
  • CFD firms are expected to make fee information more prominent and clearer across websites, apps and deal entry screens.
FCA (Shutterstock)

The UK Financial Conduct Authority has warned that some CFD brokers may be charging retail clients excessive overnight funding fees and failing to explain these costs clearly. The regulator also questioned charges on matched or hedged positions, where clients hold open buy and sell CFDs on the same asset.

London's trading industry is coming home!

The findings follow the FCA's November 2025 review, which identified inconsistent charges and weaknesses in how CFD providers assessed fair value under the Consumer Duty. Finance Magnates previously examined the regulator's concerns about consumer protection and the pressure on brokers to justify their pricing.

The FCA surveyed 81 firms in May 2026 to assess their response to the review. Most had made changes or planned to do so, but only 12% said they had changed their charges.

Most CFD Brokers Keep Funding Fees Unchanged

Most firms focused on explaining existing rates rather than changing them. Measures taken or planned by the 12% included reducing fees on matched positions, lowering charges for certain asset groups and introducing interest payments on cash balances.

The FCA said some funding fees appeared high relative to prevailing base rates and peer comparisons. Mark-ups remained largely opaque, while only a minority of firms had added annual percentage rates to help clients compare financing costs.

FCA Demands Clearer CFD Funding Fee Disclosures

Most firms continued to apply overnight fees to matched positions, often using the same funding charge spread as for ordinary long or short trades. The FCA questioned whether this offered fair value, particularly when firms encouraged matched positions through reduced or waived margin requirements . Clients may incur additional spreads and funding fees by keeping both trades open.

The regulator also called for clearer fee disclosures on websites and deal entry screens, including explanations of how charges are calculated. It will continue monitoring firms' pricing practices and contact individual providers where necessary.

The UK Financial Conduct Authority has warned that some CFD brokers may be charging retail clients excessive overnight funding fees and failing to explain these costs clearly. The regulator also questioned charges on matched or hedged positions, where clients hold open buy and sell CFDs on the same asset.

London's trading industry is coming home!

The findings follow the FCA's November 2025 review, which identified inconsistent charges and weaknesses in how CFD providers assessed fair value under the Consumer Duty. Finance Magnates previously examined the regulator's concerns about consumer protection and the pressure on brokers to justify their pricing.

The FCA surveyed 81 firms in May 2026 to assess their response to the review. Most had made changes or planned to do so, but only 12% said they had changed their charges.

Most CFD Brokers Keep Funding Fees Unchanged

Most firms focused on explaining existing rates rather than changing them. Measures taken or planned by the 12% included reducing fees on matched positions, lowering charges for certain asset groups and introducing interest payments on cash balances.

The FCA said some funding fees appeared high relative to prevailing base rates and peer comparisons. Mark-ups remained largely opaque, while only a minority of firms had added annual percentage rates to help clients compare financing costs.

FCA Demands Clearer CFD Funding Fee Disclosures

Most firms continued to apply overnight fees to matched positions, often using the same funding charge spread as for ordinary long or short trades. The FCA questioned whether this offered fair value, particularly when firms encouraged matched positions through reduced or waived margin requirements . Clients may incur additional spreads and funding fees by keeping both trades open.

The regulator also called for clearer fee disclosures on websites and deal entry screens, including explanations of how charges are calculated. It will continue monitoring firms' pricing practices and contact individual providers where necessary.

About the Author: Tareq Sikder
Tareq Sikder
  • 2517 Articles
  • 48 Followers
About the Author: Tareq Sikder
Tareq is a financial writer with 15 years of experience covering global markets. His work spans technical analysis, forex broker reviews, and market sentiment, with a focus on topics relevant to retail traders. He joined Finance Magnates in 2023. At Finance Magnates, he serves as News Editor, covering retail forex and CFD brokers, cryptocurrency exchanges, fintech firms, and regulatory developments shaping the trading industry. He holds an Honours degree in Information Technology from Anfell College, London. Education: Honours degree Information Technology, Anfell College, London
  • 2517 Articles
  • 48 Followers

More from the Author

Retail FX

!"#$%&'()*+,-./0123456789:;<=>?@ABCDEFGHIJKLMNOPQRSTUVWXYZ[\]^_`abcdefghijklmnopqrstuvwxyz{|} !"#$%&'()*+,-./0123456789:;<=>?@ABCDEFGHIJKLMNOPQRSTUVWXYZ[\]^_`abcdefghijklmnopqrstuvwxyz{|}