OM token drops 90% after massive insider dump on centralized exchanges.
Mantra community blindsided; transparency takes a nosedive.
Allegations of insider trading trigger backlash and a desperate scramble for answers.
Mantra's price has cratered following sell offs and allegations are flying.
Mantra’s OM crypto token crashes harder than your aunt’s retirement plan, with
centralized exchanges and suspected insider dumpers in the spotlight.
From Zero to OM: The Spectacular Self-Destruction of a Token
Mantra’s OM token didn’t just take a hit—it faceplanted into the crypto
pavement, losing over 90% of its value in less time than it takes to microwave
popcorn. What looked like just another quiet Monday in the crypto markets
exploded into full-blown chaos when OM token holders watched their portfolios
evaporate before their very eyes.
In what appears to be the latest “how not to Web3” case study, the
crash has sparked allegations of insider trading, botched tokenomics, and an
epic failure in transparency. And if you’re wondering whether centralized
exchanges helped or hurt the situation, well—strap in.
The Sell-Off Heard 'Round the Blockchain
The OM token began its steep decline late on April 13, when its price plummeted from $6.1
to as low as $0.43 within a single day. While the exact cause remains
unconfirmed, the crash has sparked widespread speculation about potential
insider activity and large-scale token sell-offs.
Just within 3 days before the crash, this group of fresh $OM whales moved 14.27M $OM (~$91M) to #OKX at an average price of $6.375.
Back in late March, they had jointly scooped up 84.15M $OM from #Binance for ~$564.7M (avg. $6.711).
Naturally, this triggered the crypto community’s equivalent of DEFCON
1, with outraged token holders crying foul and demanding answers. Mantra’s
developers responded by telling them that it wasn’t them, but rather the
exchanges’ “reckless” actions.
Centralized Exchanges: The Enablers?
While much of the community's fury was directed at the suspected
insider dumpers, some of the spotlight has inevitably fallen on centralized
exchanges, which unwittingly became the battlefield for the OM
token bloodbath.
Sherpas, OMies, and broader crypto community,
First off, the team and I greatly appreciate the support that we have received over the past several hours, which we believe is a testament to the strong support MANTRA has among its investors and community.
No official statement from the project has confirmed whether any
wallets involved in the sell-off were compromised or tied to insiders. So, the theory
runs that either the hacker is a master strategist with impeccable timing—or
someone knows more than they’re letting on. Mantra strongly reject this.
What This Means for the OM Token (and You, Dear Investor)
The fallout has been predictably brutal. OM token is now trading at
just a sliver of its pre-dump value. Sentiment has tanked, and the community is
on high alert. As of writing, Mantra’s team does not appear to have announced
any concrete compensation plan or restructuring proposal.
For holders, this crash is more than just a financial hit—it’s a case
study of how fast trust can vanish in the crypto world. Projects like Mantra,
which boast cross-chain ambitions and DeFi innovations, are built on community
faith and transparent governance. When that evaporates, so does the valuation.
Is This Just Another Week in Crypto?
Unfortunately, yes. OM’s spectacular collapse isn’t exactly novel. The
crypto world has a long, illustrious history of mysterious token dumps,
suspicious wallet activity, and insider shenanigans. But what makes this one
stand out is how brazen it was—and how utterly unprepared Mantra seemed to be
for the fallout.
Investors and regulators alike are watching closely. If there’s a
silver lining here, it’s that events like this accelerate the push for clearer
rules, better transparency, and fewer “oops, we got hacked” excuses.
Until then, the lesson is simple: if you're going to ape into a token,
you better know who’s holding the sell button.
Mantra’s OM crypto token crashes harder than your aunt’s retirement plan, with
centralized exchanges and suspected insider dumpers in the spotlight.
From Zero to OM: The Spectacular Self-Destruction of a Token
Mantra’s OM token didn’t just take a hit—it faceplanted into the crypto
pavement, losing over 90% of its value in less time than it takes to microwave
popcorn. What looked like just another quiet Monday in the crypto markets
exploded into full-blown chaos when OM token holders watched their portfolios
evaporate before their very eyes.
In what appears to be the latest “how not to Web3” case study, the
crash has sparked allegations of insider trading, botched tokenomics, and an
epic failure in transparency. And if you’re wondering whether centralized
exchanges helped or hurt the situation, well—strap in.
The Sell-Off Heard 'Round the Blockchain
The OM token began its steep decline late on April 13, when its price plummeted from $6.1
to as low as $0.43 within a single day. While the exact cause remains
unconfirmed, the crash has sparked widespread speculation about potential
insider activity and large-scale token sell-offs.
Just within 3 days before the crash, this group of fresh $OM whales moved 14.27M $OM (~$91M) to #OKX at an average price of $6.375.
Back in late March, they had jointly scooped up 84.15M $OM from #Binance for ~$564.7M (avg. $6.711).
Naturally, this triggered the crypto community’s equivalent of DEFCON
1, with outraged token holders crying foul and demanding answers. Mantra’s
developers responded by telling them that it wasn’t them, but rather the
exchanges’ “reckless” actions.
Centralized Exchanges: The Enablers?
While much of the community's fury was directed at the suspected
insider dumpers, some of the spotlight has inevitably fallen on centralized
exchanges, which unwittingly became the battlefield for the OM
token bloodbath.
Sherpas, OMies, and broader crypto community,
First off, the team and I greatly appreciate the support that we have received over the past several hours, which we believe is a testament to the strong support MANTRA has among its investors and community.
No official statement from the project has confirmed whether any
wallets involved in the sell-off were compromised or tied to insiders. So, the theory
runs that either the hacker is a master strategist with impeccable timing—or
someone knows more than they’re letting on. Mantra strongly reject this.
What This Means for the OM Token (and You, Dear Investor)
The fallout has been predictably brutal. OM token is now trading at
just a sliver of its pre-dump value. Sentiment has tanked, and the community is
on high alert. As of writing, Mantra’s team does not appear to have announced
any concrete compensation plan or restructuring proposal.
For holders, this crash is more than just a financial hit—it’s a case
study of how fast trust can vanish in the crypto world. Projects like Mantra,
which boast cross-chain ambitions and DeFi innovations, are built on community
faith and transparent governance. When that evaporates, so does the valuation.
Is This Just Another Week in Crypto?
Unfortunately, yes. OM’s spectacular collapse isn’t exactly novel. The
crypto world has a long, illustrious history of mysterious token dumps,
suspicious wallet activity, and insider shenanigans. But what makes this one
stand out is how brazen it was—and how utterly unprepared Mantra seemed to be
for the fallout.
Investors and regulators alike are watching closely. If there’s a
silver lining here, it’s that events like this accelerate the push for clearer
rules, better transparency, and fewer “oops, we got hacked” excuses.
Until then, the lesson is simple: if you're going to ape into a token,
you better know who’s holding the sell button.
Louis Parks has lived and worked in and around the Middle East for much of his professional career. He writes about the meeting of the tech and finance worlds.
Retail Traders Get Tokenized US IPO Allocations at Offer Price as Payward Expands xStocks
Featured Videos
Buying The Deep: Digital Asset Adoption in APAC and Beyond
Buying The Deep: Digital Asset Adoption in APAC and Beyond
Buying The Deep: Digital Asset Adoption in APAC and Beyond
Buying The Deep: Digital Asset Adoption in APAC and Beyond
The persisting price drops test the industry's commitment to crypto adoption. While on-chain innovation is making headway across market mechanics, from stablecoins to tokenization, investors remains cautious.
This session brings together market structure experts and institutional investors to explore how a prolonged bear market affects their long-term strategy, and where the opportunities lie ahead of the next cycle.
Attendees will walk away with:
First-hand account of the bear market's impact on various industry players
Understanding of what custody, connectivity, and settlement gaps still hamper growth in APAC
Insight into how client mandates and operational readiness are shaping who moves and who waits
Perspective on what institutional investors need to move toward actual digital asset capital deployment
The persisting price drops test the industry's commitment to crypto adoption. While on-chain innovation is making headway across market mechanics, from stablecoins to tokenization, investors remains cautious.
This session brings together market structure experts and institutional investors to explore how a prolonged bear market affects their long-term strategy, and where the opportunities lie ahead of the next cycle.
Attendees will walk away with:
First-hand account of the bear market's impact on various industry players
Understanding of what custody, connectivity, and settlement gaps still hamper growth in APAC
Insight into how client mandates and operational readiness are shaping who moves and who waits
Perspective on what institutional investors need to move toward actual digital asset capital deployment
The persisting price drops test the industry's commitment to crypto adoption. While on-chain innovation is making headway across market mechanics, from stablecoins to tokenization, investors remains cautious.
This session brings together market structure experts and institutional investors to explore how a prolonged bear market affects their long-term strategy, and where the opportunities lie ahead of the next cycle.
Attendees will walk away with:
First-hand account of the bear market's impact on various industry players
Understanding of what custody, connectivity, and settlement gaps still hamper growth in APAC
Insight into how client mandates and operational readiness are shaping who moves and who waits
Perspective on what institutional investors need to move toward actual digital asset capital deployment
The persisting price drops test the industry's commitment to crypto adoption. While on-chain innovation is making headway across market mechanics, from stablecoins to tokenization, investors remains cautious.
This session brings together market structure experts and institutional investors to explore how a prolonged bear market affects their long-term strategy, and where the opportunities lie ahead of the next cycle.
Attendees will walk away with:
First-hand account of the bear market's impact on various industry players
Understanding of what custody, connectivity, and settlement gaps still hamper growth in APAC
Insight into how client mandates and operational readiness are shaping who moves and who waits
Perspective on what institutional investors need to move toward actual digital asset capital deployment
This panel explores the key insights and emerging trends shaping modern trading behavior, examining how user expectations are evolving across global markets and what these shifts mean for industry participants.
This panel explores the key insights and emerging trends shaping modern trading behavior, examining how user expectations are evolving across global markets and what these shifts mean for industry participants.
This panel explores the key insights and emerging trends shaping modern trading behavior, examining how user expectations are evolving across global markets and what these shifts mean for industry participants.
This panel explores the key insights and emerging trends shaping modern trading behavior, examining how user expectations are evolving across global markets and what these shifts mean for industry participants.
This panel explores the key insights and emerging trends shaping modern trading behavior, examining how user expectations are evolving across global markets and what these shifts mean for industry participants.
This panel explores the key insights and emerging trends shaping modern trading behavior, examining how user expectations are evolving across global markets and what these shifts mean for industry participants.
Funding & Exit in Singapore from Pre-Seed to Liquidity
Funding & Exit in Singapore from Pre-Seed to Liquidity
Funding & Exit in Singapore from Pre-Seed to Liquidity
Funding & Exit in Singapore from Pre-Seed to Liquidity
Funding & Exit in Singapore from Pre-Seed to Liquidity
Funding & Exit in Singapore from Pre-Seed to Liquidity
Singapore's capital infrastructure is wider than its reputation for stability suggests.
Sovereign backing from Temasek and GIC, a growing family office network, sector-specialized venture funds, and a public market pathway through the Singapore Exchange, the city-state supports capital formation at every stage of the lifecycle.
Held in partnership with 8Circle, this session gathers practitioners across the capital stack to examine how Singapore functions as both an investment and an exit destination.
Attendees will walk away with:
Understanding of what makes SGX a credible listing pathway for high-growth companies in 2026
Insight into alternative exit channels: private secondary markets, digital marketplace exits, and strategic acquisitions
Perspective on what founders and capital allocators should be doing at each stage to preserve exit optionality
Singapore's capital infrastructure is wider than its reputation for stability suggests.
Sovereign backing from Temasek and GIC, a growing family office network, sector-specialized venture funds, and a public market pathway through the Singapore Exchange, the city-state supports capital formation at every stage of the lifecycle.
Held in partnership with 8Circle, this session gathers practitioners across the capital stack to examine how Singapore functions as both an investment and an exit destination.
Attendees will walk away with:
Understanding of what makes SGX a credible listing pathway for high-growth companies in 2026
Insight into alternative exit channels: private secondary markets, digital marketplace exits, and strategic acquisitions
Perspective on what founders and capital allocators should be doing at each stage to preserve exit optionality
Singapore's capital infrastructure is wider than its reputation for stability suggests.
Sovereign backing from Temasek and GIC, a growing family office network, sector-specialized venture funds, and a public market pathway through the Singapore Exchange, the city-state supports capital formation at every stage of the lifecycle.
Held in partnership with 8Circle, this session gathers practitioners across the capital stack to examine how Singapore functions as both an investment and an exit destination.
Attendees will walk away with:
Understanding of what makes SGX a credible listing pathway for high-growth companies in 2026
Insight into alternative exit channels: private secondary markets, digital marketplace exits, and strategic acquisitions
Perspective on what founders and capital allocators should be doing at each stage to preserve exit optionality
Singapore's capital infrastructure is wider than its reputation for stability suggests.
Sovereign backing from Temasek and GIC, a growing family office network, sector-specialized venture funds, and a public market pathway through the Singapore Exchange, the city-state supports capital formation at every stage of the lifecycle.
Held in partnership with 8Circle, this session gathers practitioners across the capital stack to examine how Singapore functions as both an investment and an exit destination.
Attendees will walk away with:
Understanding of what makes SGX a credible listing pathway for high-growth companies in 2026
Insight into alternative exit channels: private secondary markets, digital marketplace exits, and strategic acquisitions
Perspective on what founders and capital allocators should be doing at each stage to preserve exit optionality
Singapore's capital infrastructure is wider than its reputation for stability suggests.
Sovereign backing from Temasek and GIC, a growing family office network, sector-specialized venture funds, and a public market pathway through the Singapore Exchange, the city-state supports capital formation at every stage of the lifecycle.
Held in partnership with 8Circle, this session gathers practitioners across the capital stack to examine how Singapore functions as both an investment and an exit destination.
Attendees will walk away with:
Understanding of what makes SGX a credible listing pathway for high-growth companies in 2026
Insight into alternative exit channels: private secondary markets, digital marketplace exits, and strategic acquisitions
Perspective on what founders and capital allocators should be doing at each stage to preserve exit optionality
Singapore's capital infrastructure is wider than its reputation for stability suggests.
Sovereign backing from Temasek and GIC, a growing family office network, sector-specialized venture funds, and a public market pathway through the Singapore Exchange, the city-state supports capital formation at every stage of the lifecycle.
Held in partnership with 8Circle, this session gathers practitioners across the capital stack to examine how Singapore functions as both an investment and an exit destination.
Attendees will walk away with:
Understanding of what makes SGX a credible listing pathway for high-growth companies in 2026
Insight into alternative exit channels: private secondary markets, digital marketplace exits, and strategic acquisitions
Perspective on what founders and capital allocators should be doing at each stage to preserve exit optionality
FM Daily Brief – 10 June 2026
FM Daily Brief – 10 June 2026
FM Daily Brief – 10 June 2026
FM Daily Brief – 10 June 2026
FM Daily Brief – 10 June 2026
FM Daily Brief – 10 June 2026
Today’s Wednesday, the 10th of June 2026, and these are our main stories: Bybit’s zero-fee stock CFD push, prop trading access to SpaceX shares, and TradeStation’s European expansion into US markets.
Today’s Wednesday, the 10th of June 2026, and these are our main stories: Bybit’s zero-fee stock CFD push, prop trading access to SpaceX shares, and TradeStation’s European expansion into US markets.
Today’s Wednesday, the 10th of June 2026, and these are our main stories: Bybit’s zero-fee stock CFD push, prop trading access to SpaceX shares, and TradeStation’s European expansion into US markets.
Today’s Wednesday, the 10th of June 2026, and these are our main stories: Bybit’s zero-fee stock CFD push, prop trading access to SpaceX shares, and TradeStation’s European expansion into US markets.
Today’s Wednesday, the 10th of June 2026, and these are our main stories: Bybit’s zero-fee stock CFD push, prop trading access to SpaceX shares, and TradeStation’s European expansion into US markets.
Today’s Wednesday, the 10th of June 2026, and these are our main stories: Bybit’s zero-fee stock CFD push, prop trading access to SpaceX shares, and TradeStation’s European expansion into US markets.
AI Getting Real for Brokers
AI Getting Real for Brokers
AI Getting Real for Brokers
AI Getting Real for Brokers
AI Getting Real for Brokers
AI Getting Real for Brokers
Brokers and providers moved from the noise phase to treating AI tools as a core product question, with implications on anything from hiring priorities to acquisition strategy.
This session gathers retail brokers, platform builders, and AI tool providers to examine how LLMs change affect client trust, results, and risk.
Attendees will walk away with:
A first-hand account of where AI-driven trading tools generate real client value
Insight into how institutional adoption is raising client expectations and what brokers need to do to keep pace
Clarity on the liability question: when an AI-driven recommendation leads to a bad trade, where does responsibility
Brokers and providers moved from the noise phase to treating AI tools as a core product question, with implications on anything from hiring priorities to acquisition strategy.
This session gathers retail brokers, platform builders, and AI tool providers to examine how LLMs change affect client trust, results, and risk.
Attendees will walk away with:
A first-hand account of where AI-driven trading tools generate real client value
Insight into how institutional adoption is raising client expectations and what brokers need to do to keep pace
Clarity on the liability question: when an AI-driven recommendation leads to a bad trade, where does responsibility
Brokers and providers moved from the noise phase to treating AI tools as a core product question, with implications on anything from hiring priorities to acquisition strategy.
This session gathers retail brokers, platform builders, and AI tool providers to examine how LLMs change affect client trust, results, and risk.
Attendees will walk away with:
A first-hand account of where AI-driven trading tools generate real client value
Insight into how institutional adoption is raising client expectations and what brokers need to do to keep pace
Clarity on the liability question: when an AI-driven recommendation leads to a bad trade, where does responsibility
Brokers and providers moved from the noise phase to treating AI tools as a core product question, with implications on anything from hiring priorities to acquisition strategy.
This session gathers retail brokers, platform builders, and AI tool providers to examine how LLMs change affect client trust, results, and risk.
Attendees will walk away with:
A first-hand account of where AI-driven trading tools generate real client value
Insight into how institutional adoption is raising client expectations and what brokers need to do to keep pace
Clarity on the liability question: when an AI-driven recommendation leads to a bad trade, where does responsibility
Brokers and providers moved from the noise phase to treating AI tools as a core product question, with implications on anything from hiring priorities to acquisition strategy.
This session gathers retail brokers, platform builders, and AI tool providers to examine how LLMs change affect client trust, results, and risk.
Attendees will walk away with:
A first-hand account of where AI-driven trading tools generate real client value
Insight into how institutional adoption is raising client expectations and what brokers need to do to keep pace
Clarity on the liability question: when an AI-driven recommendation leads to a bad trade, where does responsibility
Brokers and providers moved from the noise phase to treating AI tools as a core product question, with implications on anything from hiring priorities to acquisition strategy.
This session gathers retail brokers, platform builders, and AI tool providers to examine how LLMs change affect client trust, results, and risk.
Attendees will walk away with:
A first-hand account of where AI-driven trading tools generate real client value
Insight into how institutional adoption is raising client expectations and what brokers need to do to keep pace
Clarity on the liability question: when an AI-driven recommendation leads to a bad trade, where does responsibility
