Litecoin loyal are being urged to get out of the Coinotron Mining Pool
Mining Pool
A mining pool is a group of cryptocurrency miners that look to combine their hash power and computing potential to increase the chance that they will earn mining rewards. Crypto miners are presented with choices, either working with others and splitting a higher probability reward among pool members, or going solo with a decreased chance for a bigger reward.With cryptos such as Bitcoin for example, it is simply not plausible for a normal person operating with their own computer to make a profit mining. Many newer miners opt for altcoins instead, as this is much more feasible given hashing requirements.Of note, a mining pool can never exceed 51% of the overall hashing power of any network, as this would present other issues entirely. Who Uses Mining Pools?Mining pools are an ideal solution for cryptocurrency miners who may not have access to large amounts of expensive equipment. Mining crypto takes a huge amount of computing power and electricity, with hardware and other fixed costs becoming a prohibitory factor for most. And yet, without a huge amount of hash power, it is unlikely that a miner will be chosen by a cryptocurrency network to confirm a block of transaction data. Therefore, it is also unlikely that the miner will earn any mining rewards. This changes if a miner joins a mining pool. A network is more likely to choose the pool to confirm transaction data because the pool has a higher amount of hash power. Mining rewards are distributed throughout the mining pool in accordance with the amount of hash power that each member contributes to the pool.
A mining pool is a group of cryptocurrency miners that look to combine their hash power and computing potential to increase the chance that they will earn mining rewards. Crypto miners are presented with choices, either working with others and splitting a higher probability reward among pool members, or going solo with a decreased chance for a bigger reward.With cryptos such as Bitcoin for example, it is simply not plausible for a normal person operating with their own computer to make a profit mining. Many newer miners opt for altcoins instead, as this is much more feasible given hashing requirements.Of note, a mining pool can never exceed 51% of the overall hashing power of any network, as this would present other issues entirely. Who Uses Mining Pools?Mining pools are an ideal solution for cryptocurrency miners who may not have access to large amounts of expensive equipment. Mining crypto takes a huge amount of computing power and electricity, with hardware and other fixed costs becoming a prohibitory factor for most. And yet, without a huge amount of hash power, it is unlikely that a miner will be chosen by a cryptocurrency network to confirm a block of transaction data. Therefore, it is also unlikely that the miner will earn any mining rewards. This changes if a miner joins a mining pool. A network is more likely to choose the pool to confirm transaction data because the pool has a higher amount of hash power. Mining rewards are distributed throughout the mining pool in accordance with the amount of hash power that each member contributes to the pool.
Read this Term , which has been hovering precariously close to generating 51% of the network's hashing power.
Coinotron is a multicoin mining pool catering to Litecoin, Dogecoin, Vertcoin and others.
At such a level, the pool can technically function as the "majority" of the network, allowing it to double spend its own transactions or deny others from transacting. While it has been argued that the benefits enjoyed by the attackers are marginal, this doesn't rule out the harm they can cause with malicious intent.
The issue was first raised around 11 days ago when Coinotron's share grew to 48%. It can be explored in detail on the litecointalk forum . Between now and then, the value fluctuated between 40% and 50%, and two days ago, indeed hit 51% for a brief period.
Some have also pointed out that even at 40%, the aforementioned risk exists, just that the pool has only a 50% chance of successfully executing such schemes.
Some are alleging that Coinotron is impervious to the activities taking place on its platform and do not care to intervene. Others are taking it a step further and think Coinotron is deliberately trying to undermine Litecoin and/or Fork
Fork
A fork can occur when a blockchain diverges into two potential paths forward, there is a change in protocol, or a scenario occurs in which two or more blocks have the same block height.Because blockchain networks are decentralized, the participants on the network must come to an agreement when it comes to things like software upgrades to a network. This is called consensus.When consensus cannot be achieved on a software upgrade, a fork occurs, effectively representing a divergence in software that can result in the formation of a new blockchain, and a new cryptocurrency to go with it.Soft and Hard ForksA soft fork is a software upgrade that is compatible with previous versions of a blockchain network’s software. In other words, even if a miner doesn’t agree to install the upgrade, that miner’s software can still interact with the network. However, if the majority of miners on a network install the upgrade, there will come a point at which transactions confirmed by miners operating on the old version of the software will be made stale.A hard fork is a permanent divulgence from a blockchain. In other words, it occurs when a new set of consensus rules that are not compatible with the old rules is introduced onto a blockchain network. All participants on a network are required to upgrade onto the new version of the software in order to continue confirmation transactions. If there is enough support for the old version of a blockchain affected by a hard fork, then the two versions of the blockchains will operate independently of one another with two different cryptocurrencies. Two famous examples of this are the split between Ethereum and Ethereum Classic, and Bitcoin and Bitcoin Cash.
A fork can occur when a blockchain diverges into two potential paths forward, there is a change in protocol, or a scenario occurs in which two or more blocks have the same block height.Because blockchain networks are decentralized, the participants on the network must come to an agreement when it comes to things like software upgrades to a network. This is called consensus.When consensus cannot be achieved on a software upgrade, a fork occurs, effectively representing a divergence in software that can result in the formation of a new blockchain, and a new cryptocurrency to go with it.Soft and Hard ForksA soft fork is a software upgrade that is compatible with previous versions of a blockchain network’s software. In other words, even if a miner doesn’t agree to install the upgrade, that miner’s software can still interact with the network. However, if the majority of miners on a network install the upgrade, there will come a point at which transactions confirmed by miners operating on the old version of the software will be made stale.A hard fork is a permanent divulgence from a blockchain. In other words, it occurs when a new set of consensus rules that are not compatible with the old rules is introduced onto a blockchain network. All participants on a network are required to upgrade onto the new version of the software in order to continue confirmation transactions. If there is enough support for the old version of a blockchain affected by a hard fork, then the two versions of the blockchains will operate independently of one another with two different cryptocurrencies. Two famous examples of this are the split between Ethereum and Ethereum Classic, and Bitcoin and Bitcoin Cash.
Read this Term the chain, linking the large "Anonymous" users to the pool operators.
Some of the more rebellious commenters on the litecoin subreddit are cheering for 51% , since "this will teach everyone to reconsider proof of work system."
Indeed, such scares are not found with coins employing proof-of-stake algorithms, such as Peercoin .
Debate has been reignited as to if/how Litecoin should change its proof of work (POW) algorithm in order to get abusive or otherwise dominating mining powers, such as those employing ASIC, out of the game. Several weeks ago, Litecoin founder Charlie Lee rebuffed calls for change , arguing the risks outweigh the benefits.
Litecoin was also subject to other mining woes back in January when users of the Give Me Coins mining pool reported theft of their coins. That pool currently generates about 4% of the network's hashing power.
Litecoinpool.org has a tool that estimates litecoin pool mining hashing distribution based on the rate at which blocks are solved. Monitoring the site, Coinotron's share now stands at 48%. The total hashing power of the network is roughly 212 gigahash per second (GHS).
Litecoin loyal are being urged to get out of the Coinotron Mining Pool
Mining Pool
A mining pool is a group of cryptocurrency miners that look to combine their hash power and computing potential to increase the chance that they will earn mining rewards. Crypto miners are presented with choices, either working with others and splitting a higher probability reward among pool members, or going solo with a decreased chance for a bigger reward.With cryptos such as Bitcoin for example, it is simply not plausible for a normal person operating with their own computer to make a profit mining. Many newer miners opt for altcoins instead, as this is much more feasible given hashing requirements.Of note, a mining pool can never exceed 51% of the overall hashing power of any network, as this would present other issues entirely. Who Uses Mining Pools?Mining pools are an ideal solution for cryptocurrency miners who may not have access to large amounts of expensive equipment. Mining crypto takes a huge amount of computing power and electricity, with hardware and other fixed costs becoming a prohibitory factor for most. And yet, without a huge amount of hash power, it is unlikely that a miner will be chosen by a cryptocurrency network to confirm a block of transaction data. Therefore, it is also unlikely that the miner will earn any mining rewards. This changes if a miner joins a mining pool. A network is more likely to choose the pool to confirm transaction data because the pool has a higher amount of hash power. Mining rewards are distributed throughout the mining pool in accordance with the amount of hash power that each member contributes to the pool.
A mining pool is a group of cryptocurrency miners that look to combine their hash power and computing potential to increase the chance that they will earn mining rewards. Crypto miners are presented with choices, either working with others and splitting a higher probability reward among pool members, or going solo with a decreased chance for a bigger reward.With cryptos such as Bitcoin for example, it is simply not plausible for a normal person operating with their own computer to make a profit mining. Many newer miners opt for altcoins instead, as this is much more feasible given hashing requirements.Of note, a mining pool can never exceed 51% of the overall hashing power of any network, as this would present other issues entirely. Who Uses Mining Pools?Mining pools are an ideal solution for cryptocurrency miners who may not have access to large amounts of expensive equipment. Mining crypto takes a huge amount of computing power and electricity, with hardware and other fixed costs becoming a prohibitory factor for most. And yet, without a huge amount of hash power, it is unlikely that a miner will be chosen by a cryptocurrency network to confirm a block of transaction data. Therefore, it is also unlikely that the miner will earn any mining rewards. This changes if a miner joins a mining pool. A network is more likely to choose the pool to confirm transaction data because the pool has a higher amount of hash power. Mining rewards are distributed throughout the mining pool in accordance with the amount of hash power that each member contributes to the pool.
Read this Term , which has been hovering precariously close to generating 51% of the network's hashing power.
Coinotron is a multicoin mining pool catering to Litecoin, Dogecoin, Vertcoin and others.
At such a level, the pool can technically function as the "majority" of the network, allowing it to double spend its own transactions or deny others from transacting. While it has been argued that the benefits enjoyed by the attackers are marginal, this doesn't rule out the harm they can cause with malicious intent.
The issue was first raised around 11 days ago when Coinotron's share grew to 48%. It can be explored in detail on the litecointalk forum . Between now and then, the value fluctuated between 40% and 50%, and two days ago, indeed hit 51% for a brief period.
Some have also pointed out that even at 40%, the aforementioned risk exists, just that the pool has only a 50% chance of successfully executing such schemes.
Some are alleging that Coinotron is impervious to the activities taking place on its platform and do not care to intervene. Others are taking it a step further and think Coinotron is deliberately trying to undermine Litecoin and/or Fork
Fork
A fork can occur when a blockchain diverges into two potential paths forward, there is a change in protocol, or a scenario occurs in which two or more blocks have the same block height.Because blockchain networks are decentralized, the participants on the network must come to an agreement when it comes to things like software upgrades to a network. This is called consensus.When consensus cannot be achieved on a software upgrade, a fork occurs, effectively representing a divergence in software that can result in the formation of a new blockchain, and a new cryptocurrency to go with it.Soft and Hard ForksA soft fork is a software upgrade that is compatible with previous versions of a blockchain network’s software. In other words, even if a miner doesn’t agree to install the upgrade, that miner’s software can still interact with the network. However, if the majority of miners on a network install the upgrade, there will come a point at which transactions confirmed by miners operating on the old version of the software will be made stale.A hard fork is a permanent divulgence from a blockchain. In other words, it occurs when a new set of consensus rules that are not compatible with the old rules is introduced onto a blockchain network. All participants on a network are required to upgrade onto the new version of the software in order to continue confirmation transactions. If there is enough support for the old version of a blockchain affected by a hard fork, then the two versions of the blockchains will operate independently of one another with two different cryptocurrencies. Two famous examples of this are the split between Ethereum and Ethereum Classic, and Bitcoin and Bitcoin Cash.
A fork can occur when a blockchain diverges into two potential paths forward, there is a change in protocol, or a scenario occurs in which two or more blocks have the same block height.Because blockchain networks are decentralized, the participants on the network must come to an agreement when it comes to things like software upgrades to a network. This is called consensus.When consensus cannot be achieved on a software upgrade, a fork occurs, effectively representing a divergence in software that can result in the formation of a new blockchain, and a new cryptocurrency to go with it.Soft and Hard ForksA soft fork is a software upgrade that is compatible with previous versions of a blockchain network’s software. In other words, even if a miner doesn’t agree to install the upgrade, that miner’s software can still interact with the network. However, if the majority of miners on a network install the upgrade, there will come a point at which transactions confirmed by miners operating on the old version of the software will be made stale.A hard fork is a permanent divulgence from a blockchain. In other words, it occurs when a new set of consensus rules that are not compatible with the old rules is introduced onto a blockchain network. All participants on a network are required to upgrade onto the new version of the software in order to continue confirmation transactions. If there is enough support for the old version of a blockchain affected by a hard fork, then the two versions of the blockchains will operate independently of one another with two different cryptocurrencies. Two famous examples of this are the split between Ethereum and Ethereum Classic, and Bitcoin and Bitcoin Cash.
Read this Term the chain, linking the large "Anonymous" users to the pool operators.
Some of the more rebellious commenters on the litecoin subreddit are cheering for 51% , since "this will teach everyone to reconsider proof of work system."
Indeed, such scares are not found with coins employing proof-of-stake algorithms, such as Peercoin .
Debate has been reignited as to if/how Litecoin should change its proof of work (POW) algorithm in order to get abusive or otherwise dominating mining powers, such as those employing ASIC, out of the game. Several weeks ago, Litecoin founder Charlie Lee rebuffed calls for change , arguing the risks outweigh the benefits.
Litecoin was also subject to other mining woes back in January when users of the Give Me Coins mining pool reported theft of their coins. That pool currently generates about 4% of the network's hashing power.
Litecoinpool.org has a tool that estimates litecoin pool mining hashing distribution based on the rate at which blocks are solved. Monitoring the site, Coinotron's share now stands at 48%. The total hashing power of the network is roughly 212 gigahash per second (GHS).