A Saskatchewan, Canada-based bitcoin mining company, Dominion Bitcoin Mining Company Ltd., has fought back against charges of violating securities laws.
The case has been dragging on for over a year. The Financial and Consumer Affairs Authority (FCAA) of Saskatchewan, the province’s financial regulator, first issued a temporary Cease Trade Order to Dominion on May 1, 2014.
The FCAA alleges that the company publicly advertised the sale of securities on its website without registering with the Authority. In addition, no prospectus was filed and misleading statements were allegedly made.
Whereas recent cases in the U.S. between regulators (SEC, CFTC) and Bitcoin companies have been settled without much of a fuss, this one is just getting started. The FCAA has not penalized Dominion or its directors, its only request being the cessation of the securities marketing.
One of the core issues is whether Dominion was in fact actively soliciting shareholders. As reported by Regina Leader-Post, one page of Dominion’s site stated, “if you are a sophisticated investor, please feel free to peruse the rest of the site. Learn about bitcoins and learn how to share in the proceeds.” Other pages referred to 10 corporations that contract with Dominion, stating “by taking part in our offering, you own a share in one of the ten provincial companies.”
When Is the Right Time to Take Out a Business Loan?Go to article >>
Jason Dearborn, one of the company’s officials, said the accusations are “spurious”. The lawyer representing Dominion argues that the regulator peeked at “a chalkboard in a locked room”, “picking the lock” on a draft version of an encrypted website that wasn’t publicly accessible. Thus, he argues, the FCAA is regulating “thought crimes”, as no investors were actually solicited.
An FCAA investigator countered that he “only had access to what was publicly available” when he accessed the site in April 2014. The site is currently not publicly viewable.
The original Cease Trade Order in fact expired in September. At the time, Dominion president Peter Voldeng said the charges were unfounded and based on ignorance. “They have absolutely no idea what bitcoin is. It may have been that they thought bitcoin was a security that they could regulate,” he told CBC News.
The FCAA, however, reissued the order with new charges shortly thereafter. In March this year, Dearborn sought an administrative penalty of $100,000 against the FCAA.
Much of Wednesday’s hearing was in fact consumed by wrangling over procedural issues and legal technicalities. Dominion charged that evidence gathered is inadmissible, arguing that it was illegally obtained, and took issue with the hearing even proceeding. Other matters of contention included a secret informant, whether a proper witness list had been provided and constitutional challenges.