For nearly two decades, Bitcoin’s creator has hidden behind the pseudonym Satoshi Nakamoto, but a new investigation by The New York Times has refocused attention on British cryptographer Adam Back as the most likely person behind the name.

Singapore Summit: Meet the largest APAC brokers you know (and those you still don't!)

The report relies on a year-long review of technical history and writing patterns, while Back publicly rejects any suggestion that he founded the world’s largest cryptocurrency.

Mysterious Bitcoin inventor Satoshi Nakamoto is 'unmasked' as British nerd who could secretly be worth $70bn https://t.co/CO40kxoE8W

— Daily Mail (@DailyMail) April 8, 2026

NYT Investigation Narrows on Adam Back

According to The New York Times, reporters examined decades-old cryptography mailing-list posts, Bitcoin Bitcoin While some may still be wondering what is Bitcoin, who created Bitcoin, or how does Bitcoin work, one thing is certain: Bitcoin has changed the world.No one can remain indifferent to this revolutionary, decentralized, digital asset nor to its blockchain technology.In fact, we’ve gone a long way ever since a Florida resident Laszlo Hanyecz made BTC’s first official commercial transaction with a real company by trading 10,000 Bitcoins for 2 pizzas at his local Papa John’s.One could now argue that While some may still be wondering what is Bitcoin, who created Bitcoin, or how does Bitcoin work, one thing is certain: Bitcoin has changed the world.No one can remain indifferent to this revolutionary, decentralized, digital asset nor to its blockchain technology.In fact, we’ve gone a long way ever since a Florida resident Laszlo Hanyecz made BTC’s first official commercial transaction with a real company by trading 10,000 Bitcoins for 2 pizzas at his local Papa John’s.One could now argue that Read this Term-related messages and other technical writings as part of a forensic review.

• Search for Satoshi Nakamoto: Will the Bitcoin Creator's Identity Remain a Mystery Forever?
• Florida Judge Orders Craig Wright to Show Up in Court
• Who Cares Who Satoshi Nakamoto Is, Anyway?

The investigation used several forms of text analysis, including stylometry and computational comparison of grammatical habits, to compare known Satoshi writings with material from multiple candidates. Experts cited by the Times said Back’s texts most closely matched Satoshi’s, although they stopped short of calling the result definitive.

Read more: Craig Wright Files Billionaire Lawsuit against Coinbase and Kraken

Back, 55, is a British computer scientist and cryptographer known for creating Hashcash, a proof-of-work system that predated Bitcoin and influenced its design. The article notes overlaps between concepts Back discussed in the late 1990s and core elements later described in Bitcoin’s 2008 white paper Whitepaper A whitepaper is defined as a pitch or persuasive, authoritative, and often in-depth report on a specific topic that presents a problem along with a respective solution. Marketers rely on whitepapers for a variety of reasons, most simply to educate an audience about a particular issue or to promote a particular methodology. In the cryptocurrency world, a whitepaper is a document that should contain all of the information about the technology that was used to build a cryptocurrency network, and ho A whitepaper is defined as a pitch or persuasive, authoritative, and often in-depth report on a specific topic that presents a problem along with a respective solution. Marketers rely on whitepapers for a variety of reasons, most simply to educate an audience about a particular issue or to promote a particular methodology. In the cryptocurrency world, a whitepaper is a document that should contain all of the information about the technology that was used to build a cryptocurrency network, and ho Read this Term, including decentralized validation and proof-of-work mining.

The Times also drew on newly surfaced archives from early Bitcoin forums and email exchanges that became public during recent litigation related to competing claims over Satoshi’s identity.

Public Denial and Unresolved Questions

Following publication of the report, Back reiterated on social media that he is not Satoshi Nakamoto. Posting on X, he wrote “I’m not Satoshi” and added that he does not know who Satoshi is, arguing that the continued anonymity supports viewing Bitcoin as a neutral, “mathematically scarce” digital asset rather than a founder-driven project.

i'm not satoshi, but I was early in laser focus on the positive societal implications of cryptography, online privacy and electronic cash, hence my ~1992 onwards active interest in applied research on ecash, privacy tech on cypherpunks list which led to hashcash and other ideas.

— Adam Back (@adam3us) April 8, 2026

He has also previously appeared in the HBO documentary “Money Electric: The Bitcoin Mystery,” where his on-screen discomfort when the subject of Satoshi arose attracted attention but did not produce any hard evidence.

Despite the New York Times’ findings, the investigation acknowledges that any attribution remains circumstantial without on-chain proof. Members of the Bitcoin community have long argued that only movement of coins linked to Satoshi’s early mining activity, estimated at around 1.1 million bitcoins, would provide conclusive confirmation of identity.

Those holdings, now worth tens of billions of dollars, have remained untouched, leaving one of modern finance’s most enduring mysteries officially unsolved.

Meanwhile, Craig Wright, the Australian computer scientist who has long styled himself as Bitcoin’s creator, suffered a decisive setback after a UK High Court ruled he is not Satoshi Nakamoto and is neither the author of the Bitcoin white paper nor the creator of Bitcoin’s original software.

After a British court ruled in May this year that Craig Wright was not Satoshi Nakamoto, Craig Wright has been forced to update a legal statement on his personal website stating that he is not the inventor of Bitcoin. The court declared that Wright is not the author of the…

— Wu Blockchain (@WuBlockchain) July 17, 2024

The judge found that Wright had relied on falsified documents and described the evidence against his claims as “overwhelming,” undercutting nearly a decade of public assertions and aggressive legal action against critics and Bitcoin developers.

The ruling was widely seen as a major victory for the open‑source Bitcoin community, easing a long‑running legal overhang for contributors who had faced lawsuits tied to Wright’s Satoshi narrative.