In August 1998, as Russia faced a slowing economy that had partially been triggered by the 1997 Asian financial crisis, as well as rising internal budget expenses. The country’s government made the move to devalue its currency and default on its debt. The immediate aftermath was GDP per capita sinking to its lowest since the Russian Federation was formed in 1991 and the ruble devaluating by 75%. The actions also led to a contraction of Western investment in Russia.
Talk of a repeat of 1998 has begun to get louder as volatility in the ruble has led many Western dealers to suspend dealing in the currency as clearing and settlement solutions have vanished. A government-led devaluation began to take form as a possibility earlier in the year as the ruble’s weakening began. After trading most of the year between 32.00 to 36.00, the USD/RUB rate rose above 37.00 in August to the mid-40’s by November.
The weakness was confronted by aggressive currency defending by the Central Bank of Russia (CBR) in December, culminating in Tuesday’s emergency interest rate hike to 17% from 10.5%. Rather than pump stability into the currency, the rate hike triggered panic, leading to USD/RUB rates temporarily hitting a high of 78.00.
Even after settling again below 60.00 today, the move can be attributed to thin liquidity as Western dealers remain offline. Also contributing are holiday closures, with FX trading at the Moscow Exchange set to be closed from the end of the year until January 10th.
As a result, many banks and trading venues that have suspended ruble trading are now taking a wait-and-see approach, such as that announced by FastMatch’s CEO, Dmitri Galinov, to clients, “Ruble trading was suspended because of notices from prime brokers that they will not settle trades using the currency during the holidays.” He added, “FastMatch plans to reactivate ruble trading in mid-January when prime brokers return to that market.”
As John J. Hardy, Head of FX Strategy at Saxo Bank, commented to Forex Magnates in his assessment of the market, “The Russian ruble is still trading, though it is very difficult to trade anything but small amounts (poor liquidity).”
A Repeat of 1998?
The current environment for Russia is much different than it was sixteen years ago. Russia is the holder of a large position of foreign reserves that can be used to intervene in ruble and stimulate their economy. The foreign reserves are the fruits of years of high oil prices which theoretically provide an economic cushion during periods of falling energy prices, such as the current environment we are in.
Also, unlike 1998, global markets have shown to be more fluid this decade than in the past. A case in point was the Cyprus financial crisis, in which outsiders viewed the small island as “being finished”, with very little chance of restoring foreign confidence and investment. The island though has shown its resilience with foreign firms continuing to adopt it as their home for entering the European market.
Nonetheless, the volatility and lack of liquidity have created a stumbling block for foreign firms to do business in Russia. The troubles in the market have led to an announcement from Apple that it was suspending sales of ruble-denominated products in Russia as it reevaluates its pricing structure to accommodate for currency valuations.
It has also been reported that neighboring governments are reevaluating their trade conditions with Russia, as Belarusian President Alexander Lukashenko went public with statements that future Belarus’s transactions with Russia will be settled in dollars or euros.
ACY Securities Supports ASIC’s Product Intervention OrderGo to article >>
Jasper Lawler, Market Analyst at CMC Markets, explained the liquidity situation further to Forex Magnates by stating, “When banks stop pricing the ruble, this is a big problem for Russian businesses and the large population of migrant workers that rely on bilateral trade.” He added, “If the exchange rate volatility picks up again there is a risk dealing will stop but fears of the Russian government introducing capital controls have abated, and banks have resumed normal operations.”
Like in 1998, geopolitical issues are also on the forefront due to tensions with Ukraine. In addition, while high energy prices, specifically for crude oil, have benefitted Russia in the past, it’s unclear whether the current oversupply hitting the market will subside anytime soon; thus causing damaging effects to the country’s oil producing companies.
In regards to the numerous factors in play, John J. Hardy said, “The real crux of the matter is not only oil prices, but Ukraine and the pressure from trade and financial sanctions that have slowed foreign involvement and investment in Russia’s economy. A permanent deal on Ukraine between Russia and Europe/US is really needed to put a lid on the further risks of this negative spiral and would probably quickly bring back confidence.”
Confidence Through Intervention
Presently, government intervention has been in the form of monetary stimulus, such as rate hikes and buying of their currency to support the combat of the ruble’s weakening, but has yet to introduce capital controls on its population and local businesses. While the aggressiveness of the CBR may signal the government is panicking, it also lets the market and foreign firms know they are serious about applying a solution.
Commenting on the emergency rate hike, Philip Uglow, Chief Economist at MNI Indicators, stated, “While the emergency rate hike in the early Moscow hours was surprising, it is the sort of drastic action the Central Bank of Russia needs to take if it is serious about addressing the slide in the ruble.” Uglow added, “The size of the hike, though, also shows just how serious the situation is in Russia and how slow the central bank has been to react to the significant weakening in the currency.”
Capital Controls on the Horizon or Just Intervention?
According to Saxo Bank’s Hardy, Russia is at best headed to an “ugly recession” in 2015, as he explained, “Neither the government nor the private sector is able to fund itself externally, and the population is rapidly using up ruble savings to buy things now as it fears a repeat of ’98, which is cannibalizing forward demand.”
Hardy added, “At “worst”, Russia is forced to employ capital controls and defaults on external debt, which perhaps eases the pressure on the central bank reserves in the near term, but presents long-term risks of damage to trading and investing relationships in Russia which would take a long time to repair.”
Philip Uglow also pointed to the little occurring over the short-term to stem ruble weakness, with as he cited, “A change in the fortunes of the price of oil would help matters, although this doesn’t appear forthcoming. In its absence we’re unlikely to see pressure on the ruble subside, with the authorities likely to have to step in again at some point to try and put a floor under the currency.”
However, Uglow viewed that the CBR will first do what it can with intervention before it resorts to capital controls, stating, “Capital controls are a last resort, and while for now the authorities appear to have ruled them out, in such a fast moving situation nothing is out of the question.”
Echoing some of those thoughts, Jasper Lawler explained that Russia has much more at its disposal financially than they did in 1998, as he stated, “The fact that Russia has large foreign currency and gold reserves put it in a much stronger financial position than 1998 since the central bank can make large interventions into the market.” He further explained that Russia needs to keep cross money flow continuing, as he said, “Conversely, as long as Russian authorities don’t put up any major barriers to the free flow of money then there should be no point of attack for speculators to trigger a currency crisis.”