Breaking: German Regulator BaFin Intends to Limit Advertisement of Select CFDs
The country has become the fifth European state to introduce substantial regulatory changes to retail traders.

The German financial regulator, BaFin (Bundesanstalt für Finanzdienstleistungsaufsicht) or the German Federal Financial Supervisory Authority, has taken a step to limit CFDs advertisement in the country.
The news comes only days after the UK Financial Conduct Authority introduced revisions that could substantially affect the retail market in the UK. BaFin’s intent is to limit the marketing, distribution and sale of financial contracts for difference (CFDs). In addition the regulator is going after negative balance risks and is therefore mandating that no CFDs with an additional payments obligation can be offered to retail clients.
Join the iFX EXPO Asia and discover your gateway to the Asian Markets
The German watchdog is stating that concerns about investor protection are at the core of its actions and that brokers can not expect additional payments obligations to be covered by retail clients.
Commenting on the news, the Chief Executive Director of BaFin, Elisabeth Roegele, stated: ”In the case of CFDs with an additional payments obligation, the risk of loss for the investor is incalculable. For consumer protection reasons, we cannot accept that.”
The limitations are applying only if a broker is not providing a negative balance protection. In a statement, IG Group elaborated that the intended measure issued by BaFin can only be undertaken if the client is not at risk of losing more than the value of their account.
The brokerage explains in a statement that such a policy is consistent with the introduction by the company of Limited Risk Accounts, where clients cannot incur losses in excess of the amount that is deposited in their account.
“IG will carefully consider the full implications of the BaFin announcement and will be seeking to meet with BaFin before responding to the consultation, in accordance with the timeline provided of 20 January 2017,” the statement reads.
Suggested articles
Why Your Enterprise’s Finances Rely on Employee TrainingGo to article >>
Negative Balance Protection and the SNB
According to the regulator, the risks of negative balance cannot be mitigated by the use of stop losses and/or a margin call that is issued by the brokers. Force closing an investor’s position can result in substantial losses as we have seen in the cases of the SNB and the GBP flash crash recently.
The issues arising from execution at the next available price, which can be substantially different from the intended stop loss order’s value, is greatly increasing the risks for traders, the official statement by the German regulator reads.
With financial contracts for difference, investors speculate on the performance of underlying instruments such as indices, shares, commodities, currency pairs or interest rates.
Compared to a direct investment, the capital invested is small. Positive and negative price changes are mirrored by the CFD.
Once again the Swiss National Bank black swan is at the heart of a regulatory decision that is reshaping the market.
“Such products came to the public’s attention primarily as a result of the “Swiss franc shock” at the beginning of 2015, when the Swiss National Bank abandoned the cap on the Swiss franc’s value against the euro and many CFD investors suffered major losses as a result of having to subsequently make additional payments,” the official announcement from the BaFin reads.
The regulator has published the planned General Administrative Act on its website and is welcoming comments from brokers and traders alike. The can be submitted writing until the 20th of January 2017.
It was only a matter of time, isn’t it odd that everyone is reacting after ESMA issued their Q&A despite the 2009 G0 meeting taking place many many years ago! Plus there’s a few s166s in the market & unfortunately a full-on watchdog investigation – scrutiny at its peak
Why does FM often forget to link to the regulatory comments page? I have to dig around to find it.
Can someone provide a link please.
Also, It’s not really breaking news…. ESMA Q&A affects the entire EU region….so it is unsurprising that all EU regulators will take steps to comply with ESMA.
Hi Guys, you misinterpreted the announcement from Bafin today. The are not intenting to ban advertising of CFDs. Plus they restrict the negative balance protection. The Bafin said: They will ban the distribution of CFDs with NO negative balance protection. That is all what they. You made it two subject and at the end it is something wrong.
Best regards,
Lothar Albert, Publisher TRADERS´magazine
(lothar@traders-mag.com)
Hi Lothar, we have explained that it only applies to CFDs that carry additional risk for the traders. The official BaFin circular states: I order the limitation of the marketing, distribution and sale of financial contracts for difference (“CFDs”) within the meaning of section 2 (2) no. 3 of the WpHG. The marketing, distribution and sale of CFDs to retail clients within the meaning of section 31a (3) of the WpHG shall be prohibited insofar as they may give rise to an additional payments obligation. This limitation is to be implemented [within three months of the date on which the… Read more »