FSC Reaffirms ICO Ban in South Korea
- The FSC termed ICOs a “high risk” investment.
The South Korean regulatory authority has decided to continue with the initial coin offering (ICO) ban within its jurisdiction, according to an official announcement made by the Financial Services Commission (FSC).
The decision taken by the country’s financial regulator is based on the results of a recent survey conducted by the Financial Supervisory Service (FSS) on several token offerings administered from outside the country. The FSS found that most of them are following illegal practices to raise money from South Korean investors.
Shady Tricks for Raising Funds
In the ICO survey, the FSS sent questionaries to 22 South Korean Blockchain Blockchain Blockchain comprises a digital network of blocks with a comprehensive ledger of transactions made in a cryptocurrency such as Bitcoin or other altcoins.One of the signature features of blockchain is that it is maintained across more than one computer. The ledger can be public or private (permissioned.) In this sense, blockchain is immune to the manipulation of data making it not only open but verifiable. Because a blockchain is stored across a network of computers, it is very difficult to tampe Blockchain comprises a digital network of blocks with a comprehensive ledger of transactions made in a cryptocurrency such as Bitcoin or other altcoins.One of the signature features of blockchain is that it is maintained across more than one computer. The ledger can be public or private (permissioned.) In this sense, blockchain is immune to the manipulation of data making it not only open but verifiable. Because a blockchain is stored across a network of computers, it is very difficult to tampe Read this Term firms which conducted ICOs in the global platform raising around 566.4 billion won ($509 million) since the second half of 2017. However, only 13 firms replied to the agency’s inquiries.
The study revealed that many South Korean companies are setting up shell companies in crypto friendly jurisdiction like Singapore and Switzerland to circumvent the countries ICO ban. This also allowed the firms to attract Korean investors as the Payments Payments One of the bases of mediums of exchange in the modern world, a payment constitutes the transfer of a legal currency or equivalent from one party in exchange for goods or services to another entity. The payments industry has become a fixture of modern commerce, though the players involved and means of exchange have dramatically shifted over time.In particular, a party making a payment is referred to as a payer, with the payee reflecting the individual or entity receiving the payment. Most commonl One of the bases of mediums of exchange in the modern world, a payment constitutes the transfer of a legal currency or equivalent from one party in exchange for goods or services to another entity. The payments industry has become a fixture of modern commerce, though the players involved and means of exchange have dramatically shifted over time.In particular, a party making a payment is referred to as a payer, with the payee reflecting the individual or entity receiving the payment. Most commonl Read this Term were done mostly in Bitcoin or Ethereum.
In addition, some ICOs did not even disclose essential pieces of information like company profiles and financial statements. The survey also found that in some cases, the companies even furnished false information to potential investors.
According to the FSS’ report, the average value of the ICOs plunged by 67.7 percent since launch.
South Korea put a ban on then booming ICOs in September 2017 citing lack of stability of the digital asset prices. The authorities even pointed out that the asset prices can be easily manipulated by the issuers to get high prices from the potential investors.
Despite the hard stance of the government, many blockchain groups in the country were pushing for a lift of the ban as, last month, a blockchain company went to a local court calling the ban “unconstitutional”. However, after the results of the FSS survey, it is hard for the blockchain firms to get permission even from the court to issue an ICO in South Korea.
The South Korean regulatory authority has decided to continue with the initial coin offering (ICO) ban within its jurisdiction, according to an official announcement made by the Financial Services Commission (FSC).
The decision taken by the country’s financial regulator is based on the results of a recent survey conducted by the Financial Supervisory Service (FSS) on several token offerings administered from outside the country. The FSS found that most of them are following illegal practices to raise money from South Korean investors.
Shady Tricks for Raising Funds
In the ICO survey, the FSS sent questionaries to 22 South Korean Blockchain Blockchain Blockchain comprises a digital network of blocks with a comprehensive ledger of transactions made in a cryptocurrency such as Bitcoin or other altcoins.One of the signature features of blockchain is that it is maintained across more than one computer. The ledger can be public or private (permissioned.) In this sense, blockchain is immune to the manipulation of data making it not only open but verifiable. Because a blockchain is stored across a network of computers, it is very difficult to tampe Blockchain comprises a digital network of blocks with a comprehensive ledger of transactions made in a cryptocurrency such as Bitcoin or other altcoins.One of the signature features of blockchain is that it is maintained across more than one computer. The ledger can be public or private (permissioned.) In this sense, blockchain is immune to the manipulation of data making it not only open but verifiable. Because a blockchain is stored across a network of computers, it is very difficult to tampe Read this Term firms which conducted ICOs in the global platform raising around 566.4 billion won ($509 million) since the second half of 2017. However, only 13 firms replied to the agency’s inquiries.
The study revealed that many South Korean companies are setting up shell companies in crypto friendly jurisdiction like Singapore and Switzerland to circumvent the countries ICO ban. This also allowed the firms to attract Korean investors as the Payments Payments One of the bases of mediums of exchange in the modern world, a payment constitutes the transfer of a legal currency or equivalent from one party in exchange for goods or services to another entity. The payments industry has become a fixture of modern commerce, though the players involved and means of exchange have dramatically shifted over time.In particular, a party making a payment is referred to as a payer, with the payee reflecting the individual or entity receiving the payment. Most commonl One of the bases of mediums of exchange in the modern world, a payment constitutes the transfer of a legal currency or equivalent from one party in exchange for goods or services to another entity. The payments industry has become a fixture of modern commerce, though the players involved and means of exchange have dramatically shifted over time.In particular, a party making a payment is referred to as a payer, with the payee reflecting the individual or entity receiving the payment. Most commonl Read this Term were done mostly in Bitcoin or Ethereum.
In addition, some ICOs did not even disclose essential pieces of information like company profiles and financial statements. The survey also found that in some cases, the companies even furnished false information to potential investors.
According to the FSS’ report, the average value of the ICOs plunged by 67.7 percent since launch.
South Korea put a ban on then booming ICOs in September 2017 citing lack of stability of the digital asset prices. The authorities even pointed out that the asset prices can be easily manipulated by the issuers to get high prices from the potential investors.
Despite the hard stance of the government, many blockchain groups in the country were pushing for a lift of the ban as, last month, a blockchain company went to a local court calling the ban “unconstitutional”. However, after the results of the FSS survey, it is hard for the blockchain firms to get permission even from the court to issue an ICO in South Korea.