SEC Charges Josh Garza with Fraud for GAW, ZenMiner Scams

The US Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) has formally charged Josh Garza (Homero Joshua Garza) with fraud stemming from his operation of GAW Miners.

Garza allegedly perpetrated the fraud by falsely claiming to produce Bitcoin Bitcoin While some may still be wondering what is Bitcoin, who created Bitcoin, or how does Bitcoin work, one thing is certain: Bitcoin has changed the world.No one can remain indifferent to this revolutionary, decentralized, digital asset nor to its blockchain technology.In fact, we’ve gone a long way ever since a Florida resident Laszlo Hanyecz made BTC’s first official commercial transaction with a real company by trading 10,000 Bitcoins for 2 pizzas at his local Papa John’s.One could now argue that While some may still be wondering what is Bitcoin, who created Bitcoin, or how does Bitcoin work, one thing is certain: Bitcoin has changed the world.No one can remain indifferent to this revolutionary, decentralized, digital asset nor to its blockchain technology.In fact, we’ve gone a long way ever since a Florida resident Laszlo Hanyecz made BTC’s first official commercial transaction with a real company by trading 10,000 Bitcoins for 2 pizzas at his local Papa John’s.One could now argue that Read this Term hashing power that GAW did not own, "so most investors paid for a share of computing power that never existed," according to the SEC.

“Garza and his companies cloaked their scheme in technological sophistication and jargon, but the fraud was simple at its core: they sold what they did not own, misrepresented what they were selling, and robbed one investor to pay another,” said Paul G. Levenson, Director of the SEC’s Boston Regional Office.

Quoting the SEC’s complaint:

• From August 2014 to December 2014, Garza and his companies sold $20 million worth of purported shares in a digital mining contract they called a Hashlet.
• More than 10,000 investors purchased Hashlets, which were touted as always profitable and never obsolete.
• Although Hashlets were depicted in GAW Miners’ marketing materials as a physical product or piece of mining hardware, the promised contract purportedly entitled the investor to control a share of computing power that GAW Miners claimed to own and operate.
• Investors were misled to believe they would share in returns earned by the Bitcoin mining activities when in reality GAW Miners directed little or no computing power toward any mining activity.
• Because Garza and his companies sold far more computing power than they owned, they owed investors a daily return that was larger than any actual return they were making on their limited mining operations.
• Therefore, investors were simply paid back gradually over time under the mantra of “returns” out of funds that Garza and his companies collected from other investors.
• Most Hashlet investors never recovered the full amount of their investments, and few made a profit.

The SEC is seeking "permanent injunctive relief as well as the disgorgement of ill-gotten gains plus prejudgment interest and penalties," without specifying amounts.

Not Like Other Crypto Scams

Previously unheard of in the crypto industry, GAW ("Geniuses at Work") burst on to the crypto scene in the summer of 2014 by unveiling its low-priced "hashlet" miners. The offerings generated some complaints of scam-like behavior at the time, but not audibly more than other mining offerings.

Months later, GAW suddenly phased out its Hashlet program and instead introduced a new Payments Payments One of the bases of mediums of exchange in the modern world, a payment constitutes the transfer of a legal currency or equivalent from one party in exchange for goods or services to another entity. The payments industry has become a fixture of modern commerce, though the players involved and means of exchange have dramatically shifted over time.In particular, a party making a payment is referred to as a payer, with the payee reflecting the individual or entity receiving the payment. Most commonl One of the bases of mediums of exchange in the modern world, a payment constitutes the transfer of a legal currency or equivalent from one party in exchange for goods or services to another entity. The payments industry has become a fixture of modern commerce, though the players involved and means of exchange have dramatically shifted over time.In particular, a party making a payment is referred to as a payer, with the payee reflecting the individual or entity receiving the payment. Most commonl Read this Term solution, PayBase, and cryptocurrency, PayCoin. The currency was guaranteed a $20 floor, but never held onto this value. In occasionally conflicting statements, Garza reiterated the guaranteed floor and launched the “Paycoin Honor Program”. Currently, each coin is worth $0.025.

In March, the supposed head of an operation called ZenMiner claimed that the reported $8 million merger with GAW "was a total lie."

The whereabouts of Garza have been unknown since shortly before the entire scheme ceased in April.

Practically all of Garza's (abundant) tweets (@gawceo) have been deleted. Anticipating this, Finance Magnates saved a few in January:

The account has since reawakened:

Enjoying some champane with my eggs #hashkingbreakfast

— Garza (@gawceo) December 2, 2015

https://t.co/tw1X2jct6G. This article is FUD, don't let the detrators stop you from buying XPY. Remember, Innovative makes a coining.

— Garza (@gawceo) December 1, 2015

I plan to fork Paycoin back into my possession. Back to POW...I am the HashKing, this is my house! — Garza (@gawceo) November 26, 2015

(images have been saved just in case)

According a civil lawsuit filed in Hartford Superior Court in July, two U.S. residents claimed that GAW failed to deliver mining hardware they purchased and stole PayCoins from them. They also claimed damages for PayCoin's reduced market value. GAW did not show up in court, and the pair were awarded a $205,000 pre-judgment remedy.

The SEC began investigating GAW in August and sued Josh Garza's brother, Carlos Garza, who was reportedly not cooperating with the investigation. Around the same time, a court awarded default judgement against GAW over unpaid electricity bills for a Mississippi warehouse, used to house GAW's supposedly massive mining operation.

A Crafty Fraud

Garza, who was around 30 when running the schemes, managed to pull off one of the craftiest series of frauds in cryptocurrency history.

Initially, the noise surrounding GAW's operations would have classified them as "controversial", which wouldn't have been too bad for the mining industry at the time. Garza and team made appearances at Bitcoin conferences and openly addressed the media, giving some impression of running a legitimate operation, albeit a controversial one.

Lavish praise of GAW and PayCoin was prevalent on the GAW-run forum, HashTalk. The commentary even made its way over into other media channels as well. But as pointed out by vigilant Bitcoiners at the time, the commentary, whose authors cannot be verified, was produced by paid shills- or often Garza himself.

As of this time last year, GAW was still humming along and most commentators were uneasy calling out the operation as an outright scam.

Wall Street Journal even ran an upbeat story on the pending launch of PayBase and PayCoin, highlighting the virtues of the programs without even questioning them. Indeed, WSJ ran a follow-up piece a few days later that highlighted the controversy, motivated partly by a slew of angry comments posted in response to the initial article.

During GAW's operation, Garza made claims that really stretched one's imagination. But Garza invested heavily in painting a picture of legitimacy, so the net image that resulted was one of controversy. Overall, the saga was a painful one for the crypto industry, which will now hopefully emerge stronger.