Brokers should view leads as the result of valuable interactions with potential partners.
pixabay: crown-sathees
There's a quote that goes something like: “The telephone book is full of facts, but it doesn't contain a single idea”.
I think sometimes our lead-driven industry values facts over ideas, certainties over imagination and in my opinion it's something that's holding us back. You either have them or you don't, right? Those lists of names and numbers either correspond to real human beings who are vaguely interested in your services, or they do not.
Your employees just need to finesse and finagle the humans on the other end
And the performance of your other people, the ones responsible for generating those leads, can also be judged according to how many they can bring in month over month. When you stop to think about it though, it's quite an unrefined way to do business and I think it's had its day. Allow me to explain.
FM
Not all leads are created equal
If someone walked into your office and tried to sell you that aforementioned telephone book disguised as 80,000 quality leads, would you bite? Or would you have them escorted out of your building?
Why, then, are businesses still wasting precious resources collecting and attempting to convert leads that are just as worthless to them as the yellow pages? I think our first problem here is one of definitions. The Oxford English Dictionary defines the word lead as: “Someone or something that may be useful, especially a potential customer or business opportunity”. Not bad as definitions go.
However, I think we're in danger of stretching the “may be useful” part to the point of complete meaninglessness. Especially when we still regard leads as little more than names and numbers that we can brute force into handing over a sums of money.
The humble lead redefined
In marketing spiel, people talk about 'qualified' leads, which is an attempt at further precision, but it is also problematic because what qualifies a lead will vary hugely from business to business, even within the same industry.
This leads us (no pun intended) back to square one, where we have no objective way to judge the quality of a lead, no 'basis grade', as it were.
In our industry, we could broadly define quality leads as being: prospective traders who are genuinely interested in trading independently on their own accounts. I'm quite satisfied with this definition, but I'd also like to investigate it further. Brokers are inundated with such leads every day and still fail to convert most of them. Why is this? In my experience there are three fundamental questions that must be asked before determining lead quality or indeed deciding what to do next.
Quality leads are prospect-ive traders who are genuinely interested in trading independent-ly on their own accounts
Where are they coming from?
Today, you're not just able to create detailed profiles for your incoming traffic, you can also segregate it in all sorts of interesting and creative ways. A lead's source should determine the strategy that you use to convert it. How many businesses are really doing this effectively?
I hear lip service paid to the idea of business intelligence all the time, but when you scratch the surface you realise that most business intelligence is an oxymoron. If you have the ability to track, then you also have the ability to apply rules and to redirect, so do this.
A lead that comes to you from one of our industry's major portals can and should be treated differently than a lead arriving organically, or from a PPC campaign, or an affiliate link etc. And I'm not just talking about those five crusty landing pages that you update every six months. In fact, even traffic from within different areas of the same portal, can and should be corralled in ways that better tailor your message to the sort of people hitting your online real estate.
What's their intention?
You have quality leads turning up all day long and you consistently let them slip through your fingers by failing to understand what they came to see. What do they want? Why did they click? And what do you have that corresponds with those intentions?
Online marketing is a lot like speed dating, there's a very small window in which to make the right impression before your dream date casts his or her attention elsewhere.
Online marketing is a lot like speed dating
For example, that ebook campaign you spent months on. It's finally paying off, correct? The landing page is blowing up. But is that ebook actually any good? Or did you create it to be another glorified advert for your business, complete with calls to action on every page and low resolution information that your readers can easily get elsewhere?
If so, what do you think the leads it's generating will be worth to your business? That's right, not much at all. Also, did your aggressive sales team start ringing people a full 28 seconds after they clicked 'download ebook'? Okay, well you just halved your potential conversions from an already problematic campaign.
Personally, I'm not even willing to call it a lead unless it has already had some kind of meaningful interaction with my business. That's how strict my definitions are, it's only a lead if the person has received something useful from me.
I call this principle 'connection before conversion' and I don't just mean it in some wishy-washy branding sense. I'm not talking about the catchy slogan that abducted his attention when reading the morning's news, or the cheeky YouTube spot that caused her to raise an eyebrow last night as it popped up on her feed.
By meaningful I mean that the person was looking for something very particular when they found you. Perhaps it was a thoughtful video on trading psychology that doesn't recycle the same five basic premises that content managers have been flogging to death for the past 10 years. Or maybe it was a glossary entry for the term 'dead cat bounce' that they came across on some trading blog, searched its meaning and found your explanation.
Or how about that nifty app that allows them to compare live spreads across the top 10 brokers in the industry? You see, when we start thinking about what we can do to create an atmosphere that's conducive to lead conversion, then we also start seeing high quality, convertible leads showing up in numbers. Coincidence? The one cannot take place in the absence of the other. And it's all about shifting our definitions from seeing leads as these sneaky things we have to corner and bully money out of, to seeing them as resulting from a process that places a premium on creating valuable interactions with potential future parters.
Conclusion
Throughout this article I've tried to narrow down the definition of a lead from something very general, to something highly specific that can be both generated and converted by asking the right questions and hopefully having the right answers. As I have tried to demonstrate, a lead should not be regarded as possessing quality in and of itself, independently of what your business does to attract it.
A lead's quality only becomes clear after it has had the opportunity to interact in a meaningful way with your business. If you're still casting as wide a net as possible and working with anything you can drag in, eventually, as everyone else becomes more surgical in their approach, all your business will be attracting is what others leave behind.
The onus is on you to ensure that your business treats potential customers with the respect they deserve, by adding value before any attempt to convert is made. This requires more imagination than we are currently deploying and is the only way forward in a world where attention is an increasingly scarce resource that more and more of us are competing over.
This article was written by Ran Cohen, founder and CEO of Traders Education.
There's a quote that goes something like: “The telephone book is full of facts, but it doesn't contain a single idea”.
I think sometimes our lead-driven industry values facts over ideas, certainties over imagination and in my opinion it's something that's holding us back. You either have them or you don't, right? Those lists of names and numbers either correspond to real human beings who are vaguely interested in your services, or they do not.
Your employees just need to finesse and finagle the humans on the other end
And the performance of your other people, the ones responsible for generating those leads, can also be judged according to how many they can bring in month over month. When you stop to think about it though, it's quite an unrefined way to do business and I think it's had its day. Allow me to explain.
FM
Not all leads are created equal
If someone walked into your office and tried to sell you that aforementioned telephone book disguised as 80,000 quality leads, would you bite? Or would you have them escorted out of your building?
Why, then, are businesses still wasting precious resources collecting and attempting to convert leads that are just as worthless to them as the yellow pages? I think our first problem here is one of definitions. The Oxford English Dictionary defines the word lead as: “Someone or something that may be useful, especially a potential customer or business opportunity”. Not bad as definitions go.
However, I think we're in danger of stretching the “may be useful” part to the point of complete meaninglessness. Especially when we still regard leads as little more than names and numbers that we can brute force into handing over a sums of money.
The humble lead redefined
In marketing spiel, people talk about 'qualified' leads, which is an attempt at further precision, but it is also problematic because what qualifies a lead will vary hugely from business to business, even within the same industry.
This leads us (no pun intended) back to square one, where we have no objective way to judge the quality of a lead, no 'basis grade', as it were.
In our industry, we could broadly define quality leads as being: prospective traders who are genuinely interested in trading independently on their own accounts. I'm quite satisfied with this definition, but I'd also like to investigate it further. Brokers are inundated with such leads every day and still fail to convert most of them. Why is this? In my experience there are three fundamental questions that must be asked before determining lead quality or indeed deciding what to do next.
Quality leads are prospect-ive traders who are genuinely interested in trading independent-ly on their own accounts
Where are they coming from?
Today, you're not just able to create detailed profiles for your incoming traffic, you can also segregate it in all sorts of interesting and creative ways. A lead's source should determine the strategy that you use to convert it. How many businesses are really doing this effectively?
I hear lip service paid to the idea of business intelligence all the time, but when you scratch the surface you realise that most business intelligence is an oxymoron. If you have the ability to track, then you also have the ability to apply rules and to redirect, so do this.
A lead that comes to you from one of our industry's major portals can and should be treated differently than a lead arriving organically, or from a PPC campaign, or an affiliate link etc. And I'm not just talking about those five crusty landing pages that you update every six months. In fact, even traffic from within different areas of the same portal, can and should be corralled in ways that better tailor your message to the sort of people hitting your online real estate.
What's their intention?
You have quality leads turning up all day long and you consistently let them slip through your fingers by failing to understand what they came to see. What do they want? Why did they click? And what do you have that corresponds with those intentions?
Online marketing is a lot like speed dating, there's a very small window in which to make the right impression before your dream date casts his or her attention elsewhere.
Online marketing is a lot like speed dating
For example, that ebook campaign you spent months on. It's finally paying off, correct? The landing page is blowing up. But is that ebook actually any good? Or did you create it to be another glorified advert for your business, complete with calls to action on every page and low resolution information that your readers can easily get elsewhere?
If so, what do you think the leads it's generating will be worth to your business? That's right, not much at all. Also, did your aggressive sales team start ringing people a full 28 seconds after they clicked 'download ebook'? Okay, well you just halved your potential conversions from an already problematic campaign.
Personally, I'm not even willing to call it a lead unless it has already had some kind of meaningful interaction with my business. That's how strict my definitions are, it's only a lead if the person has received something useful from me.
I call this principle 'connection before conversion' and I don't just mean it in some wishy-washy branding sense. I'm not talking about the catchy slogan that abducted his attention when reading the morning's news, or the cheeky YouTube spot that caused her to raise an eyebrow last night as it popped up on her feed.
By meaningful I mean that the person was looking for something very particular when they found you. Perhaps it was a thoughtful video on trading psychology that doesn't recycle the same five basic premises that content managers have been flogging to death for the past 10 years. Or maybe it was a glossary entry for the term 'dead cat bounce' that they came across on some trading blog, searched its meaning and found your explanation.
Or how about that nifty app that allows them to compare live spreads across the top 10 brokers in the industry? You see, when we start thinking about what we can do to create an atmosphere that's conducive to lead conversion, then we also start seeing high quality, convertible leads showing up in numbers. Coincidence? The one cannot take place in the absence of the other. And it's all about shifting our definitions from seeing leads as these sneaky things we have to corner and bully money out of, to seeing them as resulting from a process that places a premium on creating valuable interactions with potential future parters.
Conclusion
Throughout this article I've tried to narrow down the definition of a lead from something very general, to something highly specific that can be both generated and converted by asking the right questions and hopefully having the right answers. As I have tried to demonstrate, a lead should not be regarded as possessing quality in and of itself, independently of what your business does to attract it.
A lead's quality only becomes clear after it has had the opportunity to interact in a meaningful way with your business. If you're still casting as wide a net as possible and working with anything you can drag in, eventually, as everyone else becomes more surgical in their approach, all your business will be attracting is what others leave behind.
The onus is on you to ensure that your business treats potential customers with the respect they deserve, by adding value before any attempt to convert is made. This requires more imagination than we are currently deploying and is the only way forward in a world where attention is an increasingly scarce resource that more and more of us are competing over.
This article was written by Ran Cohen, founder and CEO of Traders Education.
SMX's 1900% Surge Since November Is Not a Momentum Trade; It's Based on Transformative and Deliverable Techology
Featured Videos
Executive Interview | Charlotte Bullock | Chief Product Officer, Bank of London | FMLS:25
Executive Interview | Charlotte Bullock | Chief Product Officer, Bank of London | FMLS:25
Executive Interview | Charlotte Bullock | Chief Product Officer, Bank of London | FMLS:25
Executive Interview | Charlotte Bullock | Chief Product Officer, Bank of London | FMLS:25
In this interview, we sat down with Charlotte Bullock, Head of Product at The Bank of London, previously at SAP and now shaping product at one of the sector’s most ambitious new banking players.
Charlotte reflects on the Summit so far and talks about the culture inside fintech banks today. We look at the pressures that come with scaling, and how firms can hold onto the nimble approach that made them stand out early on.
We also cover the state of payments ahead of her appearance on the payments roundtable: the blockages financial firms face, the areas that still need fixing, and what a realistic solution looks like in 2026.
In this interview, we sat down with Charlotte Bullock, Head of Product at The Bank of London, previously at SAP and now shaping product at one of the sector’s most ambitious new banking players.
Charlotte reflects on the Summit so far and talks about the culture inside fintech banks today. We look at the pressures that come with scaling, and how firms can hold onto the nimble approach that made them stand out early on.
We also cover the state of payments ahead of her appearance on the payments roundtable: the blockages financial firms face, the areas that still need fixing, and what a realistic solution looks like in 2026.
In this interview, we sat down with Charlotte Bullock, Head of Product at The Bank of London, previously at SAP and now shaping product at one of the sector’s most ambitious new banking players.
Charlotte reflects on the Summit so far and talks about the culture inside fintech banks today. We look at the pressures that come with scaling, and how firms can hold onto the nimble approach that made them stand out early on.
We also cover the state of payments ahead of her appearance on the payments roundtable: the blockages financial firms face, the areas that still need fixing, and what a realistic solution looks like in 2026.
In this interview, we sat down with Charlotte Bullock, Head of Product at The Bank of London, previously at SAP and now shaping product at one of the sector’s most ambitious new banking players.
Charlotte reflects on the Summit so far and talks about the culture inside fintech banks today. We look at the pressures that come with scaling, and how firms can hold onto the nimble approach that made them stand out early on.
We also cover the state of payments ahead of her appearance on the payments roundtable: the blockages financial firms face, the areas that still need fixing, and what a realistic solution looks like in 2026.
In this conversation, we sit down with Drew Niv, CSO at ATFX Connect and one of the most influential figures in modern FX.
We speak about market structure, the institutional view on liquidity, and the sharp rise of prop trading, a sector Drew has been commenting on in recent months. Drew explains why he once dismissed prop trading, why his view changed, and what he now thinks the model means for brokers, clients and risk managers.
We explore subscription-fee dependency, the high reneging rate, and the long-term challenge: how brokers can build a more stable and honest version of the model. Drew also talks about the traffic advantage standalone prop firms have built and why brokers may still win in the long run if they take the right approach.
In this conversation, we sit down with Drew Niv, CSO at ATFX Connect and one of the most influential figures in modern FX.
We speak about market structure, the institutional view on liquidity, and the sharp rise of prop trading, a sector Drew has been commenting on in recent months. Drew explains why he once dismissed prop trading, why his view changed, and what he now thinks the model means for brokers, clients and risk managers.
We explore subscription-fee dependency, the high reneging rate, and the long-term challenge: how brokers can build a more stable and honest version of the model. Drew also talks about the traffic advantage standalone prop firms have built and why brokers may still win in the long run if they take the right approach.
In this conversation, we sit down with Drew Niv, CSO at ATFX Connect and one of the most influential figures in modern FX.
We speak about market structure, the institutional view on liquidity, and the sharp rise of prop trading, a sector Drew has been commenting on in recent months. Drew explains why he once dismissed prop trading, why his view changed, and what he now thinks the model means for brokers, clients and risk managers.
We explore subscription-fee dependency, the high reneging rate, and the long-term challenge: how brokers can build a more stable and honest version of the model. Drew also talks about the traffic advantage standalone prop firms have built and why brokers may still win in the long run if they take the right approach.
In this conversation, we sit down with Drew Niv, CSO at ATFX Connect and one of the most influential figures in modern FX.
We speak about market structure, the institutional view on liquidity, and the sharp rise of prop trading, a sector Drew has been commenting on in recent months. Drew explains why he once dismissed prop trading, why his view changed, and what he now thinks the model means for brokers, clients and risk managers.
We explore subscription-fee dependency, the high reneging rate, and the long-term challenge: how brokers can build a more stable and honest version of the model. Drew also talks about the traffic advantage standalone prop firms have built and why brokers may still win in the long run if they take the right approach.
In this conversation, we sit down with Drew Niv, CSO at ATFX Connect and one of the most influential figures in modern FX.
We speak about market structure, the institutional view on liquidity, and the sharp rise of prop trading, a sector Drew has been commenting on in recent months. Drew explains why he once dismissed prop trading, why his view changed, and what he now thinks the model means for brokers, clients and risk managers.
We explore subscription-fee dependency, the high reneging rate, and the long-term challenge: how brokers can build a more stable and honest version of the model. Drew also talks about the traffic advantage standalone prop firms have built and why brokers may still win in the long run if they take the right approach.
In this conversation, we sit down with Drew Niv, CSO at ATFX Connect and one of the most influential figures in modern FX.
We speak about market structure, the institutional view on liquidity, and the sharp rise of prop trading, a sector Drew has been commenting on in recent months. Drew explains why he once dismissed prop trading, why his view changed, and what he now thinks the model means for brokers, clients and risk managers.
We explore subscription-fee dependency, the high reneging rate, and the long-term challenge: how brokers can build a more stable and honest version of the model. Drew also talks about the traffic advantage standalone prop firms have built and why brokers may still win in the long run if they take the right approach.
Executive Interview | Remonda Z. Kirketerp Møller| CEO & Founder Muinmos | FMLS:25
Executive Interview | Remonda Z. Kirketerp Møller| CEO & Founder Muinmos | FMLS:25
Executive Interview | Remonda Z. Kirketerp Møller| CEO & Founder Muinmos | FMLS:25
Executive Interview | Remonda Z. Kirketerp Møller| CEO & Founder Muinmos | FMLS:25
Executive Interview | Remonda Z. Kirketerp Møller| CEO & Founder Muinmos | FMLS:25
Executive Interview | Remonda Z. Kirketerp Møller| CEO & Founder Muinmos | FMLS:25
In this interview, Remonda Z. Kirketerp Møller, founder of Muinmos, breaks down the state of AI in regtech and what responsible adoption really looks like for brokers. We talk about rising fragmentation, the pressures around compliance accuracy, and why most firms are still in the early stages of AI maturity.
Ramanda also shares insights on regulator sandboxes, shifting expectations around accountability, and the current reality of MiCA licensing and passporting in Europe.
A concise look at where compliance, onboarding, and AI-driven processes are heading next.
In this interview, Remonda Z. Kirketerp Møller, founder of Muinmos, breaks down the state of AI in regtech and what responsible adoption really looks like for brokers. We talk about rising fragmentation, the pressures around compliance accuracy, and why most firms are still in the early stages of AI maturity.
Ramanda also shares insights on regulator sandboxes, shifting expectations around accountability, and the current reality of MiCA licensing and passporting in Europe.
A concise look at where compliance, onboarding, and AI-driven processes are heading next.
In this interview, Remonda Z. Kirketerp Møller, founder of Muinmos, breaks down the state of AI in regtech and what responsible adoption really looks like for brokers. We talk about rising fragmentation, the pressures around compliance accuracy, and why most firms are still in the early stages of AI maturity.
Ramanda also shares insights on regulator sandboxes, shifting expectations around accountability, and the current reality of MiCA licensing and passporting in Europe.
A concise look at where compliance, onboarding, and AI-driven processes are heading next.
In this interview, Remonda Z. Kirketerp Møller, founder of Muinmos, breaks down the state of AI in regtech and what responsible adoption really looks like for brokers. We talk about rising fragmentation, the pressures around compliance accuracy, and why most firms are still in the early stages of AI maturity.
Ramanda also shares insights on regulator sandboxes, shifting expectations around accountability, and the current reality of MiCA licensing and passporting in Europe.
A concise look at where compliance, onboarding, and AI-driven processes are heading next.
In this interview, Remonda Z. Kirketerp Møller, founder of Muinmos, breaks down the state of AI in regtech and what responsible adoption really looks like for brokers. We talk about rising fragmentation, the pressures around compliance accuracy, and why most firms are still in the early stages of AI maturity.
Ramanda also shares insights on regulator sandboxes, shifting expectations around accountability, and the current reality of MiCA licensing and passporting in Europe.
A concise look at where compliance, onboarding, and AI-driven processes are heading next.
In this interview, Remonda Z. Kirketerp Møller, founder of Muinmos, breaks down the state of AI in regtech and what responsible adoption really looks like for brokers. We talk about rising fragmentation, the pressures around compliance accuracy, and why most firms are still in the early stages of AI maturity.
Ramanda also shares insights on regulator sandboxes, shifting expectations around accountability, and the current reality of MiCA licensing and passporting in Europe.
A concise look at where compliance, onboarding, and AI-driven processes are heading next.
In this conversation, we speak with Aydin Bonabi, CEO and co-founder of Surveill, a firm focused on fraud detection and AI-driven compliance tools for financial institutions.
We start with Aydin’s view of the Summit and the challenges brokers face as fraud tactics grow more complex. He explains how firms can stay ahead through real-time signals, data patterns, and early-stage detection.
We also talk about AI training and why compliance teams often struggle to keep models accurate, fair, and aligned with regulatory expectations. Aydin breaks down what “good” AI training looks like inside a financial environment, including the importance of clean data, domain expertise, and human oversight.
He closes with a clear message: fraud is scaling, and so must the tools that stop it.
In this conversation, we speak with Aydin Bonabi, CEO and co-founder of Surveill, a firm focused on fraud detection and AI-driven compliance tools for financial institutions.
We start with Aydin’s view of the Summit and the challenges brokers face as fraud tactics grow more complex. He explains how firms can stay ahead through real-time signals, data patterns, and early-stage detection.
We also talk about AI training and why compliance teams often struggle to keep models accurate, fair, and aligned with regulatory expectations. Aydin breaks down what “good” AI training looks like inside a financial environment, including the importance of clean data, domain expertise, and human oversight.
He closes with a clear message: fraud is scaling, and so must the tools that stop it.
In this conversation, we speak with Aydin Bonabi, CEO and co-founder of Surveill, a firm focused on fraud detection and AI-driven compliance tools for financial institutions.
We start with Aydin’s view of the Summit and the challenges brokers face as fraud tactics grow more complex. He explains how firms can stay ahead through real-time signals, data patterns, and early-stage detection.
We also talk about AI training and why compliance teams often struggle to keep models accurate, fair, and aligned with regulatory expectations. Aydin breaks down what “good” AI training looks like inside a financial environment, including the importance of clean data, domain expertise, and human oversight.
He closes with a clear message: fraud is scaling, and so must the tools that stop it.
In this conversation, we speak with Aydin Bonabi, CEO and co-founder of Surveill, a firm focused on fraud detection and AI-driven compliance tools for financial institutions.
We start with Aydin’s view of the Summit and the challenges brokers face as fraud tactics grow more complex. He explains how firms can stay ahead through real-time signals, data patterns, and early-stage detection.
We also talk about AI training and why compliance teams often struggle to keep models accurate, fair, and aligned with regulatory expectations. Aydin breaks down what “good” AI training looks like inside a financial environment, including the importance of clean data, domain expertise, and human oversight.
He closes with a clear message: fraud is scaling, and so must the tools that stop it.
In this conversation, we speak with Aydin Bonabi, CEO and co-founder of Surveill, a firm focused on fraud detection and AI-driven compliance tools for financial institutions.
We start with Aydin’s view of the Summit and the challenges brokers face as fraud tactics grow more complex. He explains how firms can stay ahead through real-time signals, data patterns, and early-stage detection.
We also talk about AI training and why compliance teams often struggle to keep models accurate, fair, and aligned with regulatory expectations. Aydin breaks down what “good” AI training looks like inside a financial environment, including the importance of clean data, domain expertise, and human oversight.
He closes with a clear message: fraud is scaling, and so must the tools that stop it.
In this conversation, we speak with Aydin Bonabi, CEO and co-founder of Surveill, a firm focused on fraud detection and AI-driven compliance tools for financial institutions.
We start with Aydin’s view of the Summit and the challenges brokers face as fraud tactics grow more complex. He explains how firms can stay ahead through real-time signals, data patterns, and early-stage detection.
We also talk about AI training and why compliance teams often struggle to keep models accurate, fair, and aligned with regulatory expectations. Aydin breaks down what “good” AI training looks like inside a financial environment, including the importance of clean data, domain expertise, and human oversight.
He closes with a clear message: fraud is scaling, and so must the tools that stop it.
Exness expands its presence in Africa: Inside our interview with Paul Margarites in Cape Town
Exness expands its presence in Africa: Inside our interview with Paul Margarites in Cape Town
Exness expands its presence in Africa: Inside our interview with Paul Margarites in Cape Town
Exness expands its presence in Africa: Inside our interview with Paul Margarites in Cape Town
Exness expands its presence in Africa: Inside our interview with Paul Margarites in Cape Town
Exness expands its presence in Africa: Inside our interview with Paul Margarites in Cape Town
Finance Magnates met with Paul Margarites, Exness regional commercial director for Sub-Saharan Africa, during a visit to the firm’s office opening in Cape Town. In this talk, led by Andrea Badiola Mateos, Co-CEO at Finance Magnates, Paul shares views on the South African trading space, local user behavior, mobile trends, regulation, team growth, and how Exness plans to grow in more markets across the region. @Exness
Read the article at: https://www.financemagnates.com/thought-leadership/exness-expands-its-presence-in-africa-inside-our-interview-with-paul-margarites/
#exness #financemagnates #exnesstrading #CFDtrading #tradeonline #africanews #capetown
Finance Magnates met with Paul Margarites, Exness regional commercial director for Sub-Saharan Africa, during a visit to the firm’s office opening in Cape Town. In this talk, led by Andrea Badiola Mateos, Co-CEO at Finance Magnates, Paul shares views on the South African trading space, local user behavior, mobile trends, regulation, team growth, and how Exness plans to grow in more markets across the region. @Exness
Read the article at: https://www.financemagnates.com/thought-leadership/exness-expands-its-presence-in-africa-inside-our-interview-with-paul-margarites/
#exness #financemagnates #exnesstrading #CFDtrading #tradeonline #africanews #capetown
Finance Magnates met with Paul Margarites, Exness regional commercial director for Sub-Saharan Africa, during a visit to the firm’s office opening in Cape Town. In this talk, led by Andrea Badiola Mateos, Co-CEO at Finance Magnates, Paul shares views on the South African trading space, local user behavior, mobile trends, regulation, team growth, and how Exness plans to grow in more markets across the region. @Exness
Read the article at: https://www.financemagnates.com/thought-leadership/exness-expands-its-presence-in-africa-inside-our-interview-with-paul-margarites/
#exness #financemagnates #exnesstrading #CFDtrading #tradeonline #africanews #capetown
Finance Magnates met with Paul Margarites, Exness regional commercial director for Sub-Saharan Africa, during a visit to the firm’s office opening in Cape Town. In this talk, led by Andrea Badiola Mateos, Co-CEO at Finance Magnates, Paul shares views on the South African trading space, local user behavior, mobile trends, regulation, team growth, and how Exness plans to grow in more markets across the region. @Exness
Read the article at: https://www.financemagnates.com/thought-leadership/exness-expands-its-presence-in-africa-inside-our-interview-with-paul-margarites/
#exness #financemagnates #exnesstrading #CFDtrading #tradeonline #africanews #capetown
Finance Magnates met with Paul Margarites, Exness regional commercial director for Sub-Saharan Africa, during a visit to the firm’s office opening in Cape Town. In this talk, led by Andrea Badiola Mateos, Co-CEO at Finance Magnates, Paul shares views on the South African trading space, local user behavior, mobile trends, regulation, team growth, and how Exness plans to grow in more markets across the region. @Exness
Read the article at: https://www.financemagnates.com/thought-leadership/exness-expands-its-presence-in-africa-inside-our-interview-with-paul-margarites/
#exness #financemagnates #exnesstrading #CFDtrading #tradeonline #africanews #capetown
Finance Magnates met with Paul Margarites, Exness regional commercial director for Sub-Saharan Africa, during a visit to the firm’s office opening in Cape Town. In this talk, led by Andrea Badiola Mateos, Co-CEO at Finance Magnates, Paul shares views on the South African trading space, local user behavior, mobile trends, regulation, team growth, and how Exness plans to grow in more markets across the region. @Exness
Read the article at: https://www.financemagnates.com/thought-leadership/exness-expands-its-presence-in-africa-inside-our-interview-with-paul-margarites/
#exness #financemagnates #exnesstrading #CFDtrading #tradeonline #africanews #capetown