The Australian Securities and Investments Commission (ASIC), in an April update, appears to have foolishly bowed to industry pressure and has done a complete 180, by announcing this Wednesday that it will seriously consider to no longer be implementing product intervention measures against contracts for difference (CFDs).
The announcement comes months after the Aussie regulator first launched its consultation on the measures last year. As Finance Magnates reported at the time, the authority had decided to take its measures one step further than its European counterparts.
Specifically, ASIC had proposed a number of restrictions, such as imposing leverage limits, enhancing the transparency of CFD pricing, execution, costs, and risks, implementing negative balance protection and a standardized approach to automatic close-outs of client’s CFD positions in a margin call.
However, the Australian regulator had taken a different approach to the exact leverage limits it would apply. Unlike ESMA, ASIC said last year that it would not distinguish between major and minor currency pairs. Instead, the watchdog proposed a single leverage ratio limit for all currency pairs 20:1.
Ready to kick-off your Trading Game with Manchester United?Go to article >>
For equity indices, ASIC suggested a ratio of 15:1, commodities excluding gold 10:1, Gold 20:1, crypto-assets 2:1, and equities 5:1.
Speaking to Finance Magnates, the Chief Compliance Officer of a major brokerage in Australia said this was a massive relief to the retail trading sector, and couldn’t have come at a better time with pressures surrounding coronavirus weighing on brokers.
“We didn’t think ASIC would step away from the product intervention measures. We had spoken to the regulator extensively, warning them on the negative side effects these measures could have, such as stifling innovation, and it sounds like they listened. We expect this to be a boost to Australia’s markets.”
Why did ASIC change its mind?
So what has caused today’s backtrack? Well, it might have something to do with the fact that its April Fools, and this article, has, in fact, been a joke. Happy Wednesday, folks!