Does Web Traffic Actually Drive CFD Volumes? We Ran the Numbers

Thursday, 19/02/2026 | 12:34 GMT by Damian Chmiel
  • The broker with the most website visitors isn't the one processing the most trades, according to Finance Magnates Intelligence.
  • A new dataset covering almost 50 retail brokers exposes a striking mismatch between online visibility and real trading activity.
organic surge

Conventional wisdom in brokerage marketing holds that more website traffic means more business. A dataset from the newly launched fmintelligence portal puts that assumption to rest.

Across 47 retail forex and CFD brokers, the correlation between organic web traffic and actual trading volumes comes in at just 0.09 - statistically, almost nothing. The data, which pairs January 2026 traffic figures with recent average monthly CFD volumes, suggests that the two metrics are essentially measuring different things entirely.

Traffic Is Booming, Just Not Evenly

The sector's total organic traffic hit 40.2 million visits in January 2026, up 36.5% from 29.4 million a year earlier. On the surface, that looks like broad-based growth. Dig in, and the picture is more divided: 57% of brokers gained visitors year-over-year, while 36% shed them. The top five brokers alone now account for almost 74% of all organic visits, up from 69% in January 2025.

OANDA leads the traffic rankings, eToro follows and Capital.com posted the most visible climb of any large broker.

All of this is happening at a time when the number of active CFD accounts jumped by nearly one million in a single quarter, reaching almost 7 million by the end of 2025, according to Finance Magnates Intelligence data.

Volume Leaders Live in a Different World

However, swap the ranking criteria from traffic to trading volume, and the leaderboard barely overlaps.

IC Markets tops the volume table with $1.76 trillion in average monthly activity, yet ranks fifth by web traffic. OANDA, by contrast, pulls in 14.6 million visitors to generate $430 billion in volume.

CMC Markets and Plus500 tell another story worth noting. Both saw traffic fall, according to Finance Magnates Intelligence data, yet both held onto substantial trading volumes positioning among top 10 brokers. Client retention, it turns out, doesn't depend on Google rankings.

The Full Picture Is on fmintelligence

This is only part of what the data shows. The full analysis - covering all 47 brokers, traffic-to-volume efficiency ratios, business model breakdowns, and year-over-year growth patterns across broker size tiers, is available on the newly launched fmintelligence portal.

Registration is free, and the platform gives access to broker volume data, traffic metrics, and in-depth industry research that goes well beyond what any single article can cover.

We've recently also written about how much total CFD trading volume MetaTrader 5 holds, we analyzed India, and we examined how regional internet traffic is shifting among retail traders

Conventional wisdom in brokerage marketing holds that more website traffic means more business. A dataset from the newly launched fmintelligence portal puts that assumption to rest.

Across 47 retail forex and CFD brokers, the correlation between organic web traffic and actual trading volumes comes in at just 0.09 - statistically, almost nothing. The data, which pairs January 2026 traffic figures with recent average monthly CFD volumes, suggests that the two metrics are essentially measuring different things entirely.

Traffic Is Booming, Just Not Evenly

The sector's total organic traffic hit 40.2 million visits in January 2026, up 36.5% from 29.4 million a year earlier. On the surface, that looks like broad-based growth. Dig in, and the picture is more divided: 57% of brokers gained visitors year-over-year, while 36% shed them. The top five brokers alone now account for almost 74% of all organic visits, up from 69% in January 2025.

OANDA leads the traffic rankings, eToro follows and Capital.com posted the most visible climb of any large broker.

All of this is happening at a time when the number of active CFD accounts jumped by nearly one million in a single quarter, reaching almost 7 million by the end of 2025, according to Finance Magnates Intelligence data.

Volume Leaders Live in a Different World

However, swap the ranking criteria from traffic to trading volume, and the leaderboard barely overlaps.

IC Markets tops the volume table with $1.76 trillion in average monthly activity, yet ranks fifth by web traffic. OANDA, by contrast, pulls in 14.6 million visitors to generate $430 billion in volume.

CMC Markets and Plus500 tell another story worth noting. Both saw traffic fall, according to Finance Magnates Intelligence data, yet both held onto substantial trading volumes positioning among top 10 brokers. Client retention, it turns out, doesn't depend on Google rankings.

The Full Picture Is on fmintelligence

This is only part of what the data shows. The full analysis - covering all 47 brokers, traffic-to-volume efficiency ratios, business model breakdowns, and year-over-year growth patterns across broker size tiers, is available on the newly launched fmintelligence portal.

Registration is free, and the platform gives access to broker volume data, traffic metrics, and in-depth industry research that goes well beyond what any single article can cover.

We've recently also written about how much total CFD trading volume MetaTrader 5 holds, we analyzed India, and we examined how regional internet traffic is shifting among retail traders

About the Author: Damian Chmiel
Damian Chmiel
  • 3263 Articles
  • 102 Followers
About the Author: Damian Chmiel
Damian's adventure with financial markets began at the Cracow University of Economics, where he obtained his MA in finance and accounting. Starting from the retail trader perspective, he collaborated with brokerage houses and financial portals in Poland as an independent editor and content manager. His adventure with Finance Magnates began in 2016, where he is working as a business intelligence analyst.
  • 3263 Articles
  • 102 Followers

More from the Author

Retail FX

!"#$%&'()*+,-./0123456789:;<=>?@ABCDEFGHIJKLMNOPQRSTUVWXYZ[\]^_`abcdefghijklmnopqrstuvwxyz{|} !"#$%&'()*+,-./0123456789:;<=>?@ABCDEFGHIJKLMNOPQRSTUVWXYZ[\]^_`abcdefghijklmnopqrstuvwxyz{|}