US DOJ Opposes Sam Bankman-Fried’s Claims on Evidence

by Solomon Oladipupo
  • The lawyers representing FTX's Founder want evidence gathered after July 1 to be inadmissible.
  • However, the DOJ said the lawyers have had access to the discovery materials for months.
Sam Bankman-Fried
Sam Bankman-Fried

The US Department of Justice (DOJ) has responded to claims by the lawyers of FTX's Founder (Sam Bankman-Fried) that prosecutors are dumping “millions of pages” of discovery materials or evidence on the embattled crypto entrepreneur less than six weeks before his criminal trial. In a letter sent on Friday to Judge Lewis Kaplan, who is presiding over the case, Bankman’s legal team had claimed that prosecutors produced “an additional 4 million pages of discovery” without plans to make them available for the former CEO of FTX to review.

DOJ Slams Bankman-Fried’s Claims

In another letter sent yesterday (Monday), the lawyers claimed that US prosecutors produced another 3.7 million pages of discovery. They noted that producing these materials while Bankman-Fried is currently under detention at the Metropolitan Detention Centre in Brooklyn “is plainly inadequate” and violates the defendant's right to prepare for his defence. They, therefore, urged the court to stop prosecutors from using evidence gathered after July 1 during his trial.

However, in a new letter addressed to Judge Kaplan on Monday, Damian Williams, the US Attorney for the Southern District of New York, urged the court to dismiss the request, noting that the evidence was gathered from Bankman-Fried’s Google accounts. Williams added that the accused and his legal team have had access to the evidence for months.

“The defendant’s representations are distorted to the point of being misleading,” William stated in the letter. “The 4 million pages referenced in the defendant’s August 25, 2023 letter are materials that the government obtained from Google in response to a search warrant for the defendant’s own Google accounts.”

To buttress this point, Williams alleged that Bankman-Fried shared details from the Google accounts with The New York Times when he exposed personal details about Caroline Elision, his former romantic partners and the ex-CEO of FTX’s sister trading firm, Alameda Research. In addition, the attorney claimed that the 3.7 million pages of evidence claimed to have been produced by the prosecuting team “constitutes a duplicative subset of prior productions." This means that Bankman-Fried's legal team “is literally double counting to inflate the amount of discovery the Government has produced," Williams added.

“[Sam Bankman-Fried] cannot plausibly claim to be prejudiced by the Government’s production of these materials, as he had months prior to being detained to mine them for materials relevant to his defence,” the US Attorney commented.

Bankman-Fried Challenges Jail Decision

Finance Magnates reported that Judge Kaplan earlier this month ordered Bankman-Fried to be jailed ahead of his trial. The decision came after the judge agreed with prosecutors that the Founder of FTX attempted to tamper with witnesses on two separate occasions in the case, including by sharing Elison’s details with The New York Times.

Bankman’s lawyers have argued that the imprisonment of the former crypto billionaire is stalling his trial reparation. This week, they sought the 'temporary' release of the defendant. At the 2nd US Circuit Court of Appeals, they are challenging the court's decision to jail Bankman-Fried ahead of his trial scheduled for October 3.

Meanwhile, last week the accused pleaded not guilty in response to a revised indictment that includes seven counts of charges. The disgraced entrepreneur has been charged with fraud and money laundering, among other crimes, in connection to the downfall of his once-flourishing cryptocurrency business.

New Match-Trader head; TradingView charts on MultiHODL; read today's news nuggets.

The US Department of Justice (DOJ) has responded to claims by the lawyers of FTX's Founder (Sam Bankman-Fried) that prosecutors are dumping “millions of pages” of discovery materials or evidence on the embattled crypto entrepreneur less than six weeks before his criminal trial. In a letter sent on Friday to Judge Lewis Kaplan, who is presiding over the case, Bankman’s legal team had claimed that prosecutors produced “an additional 4 million pages of discovery” without plans to make them available for the former CEO of FTX to review.

DOJ Slams Bankman-Fried’s Claims

In another letter sent yesterday (Monday), the lawyers claimed that US prosecutors produced another 3.7 million pages of discovery. They noted that producing these materials while Bankman-Fried is currently under detention at the Metropolitan Detention Centre in Brooklyn “is plainly inadequate” and violates the defendant's right to prepare for his defence. They, therefore, urged the court to stop prosecutors from using evidence gathered after July 1 during his trial.

However, in a new letter addressed to Judge Kaplan on Monday, Damian Williams, the US Attorney for the Southern District of New York, urged the court to dismiss the request, noting that the evidence was gathered from Bankman-Fried’s Google accounts. Williams added that the accused and his legal team have had access to the evidence for months.

“The defendant’s representations are distorted to the point of being misleading,” William stated in the letter. “The 4 million pages referenced in the defendant’s August 25, 2023 letter are materials that the government obtained from Google in response to a search warrant for the defendant’s own Google accounts.”

To buttress this point, Williams alleged that Bankman-Fried shared details from the Google accounts with The New York Times when he exposed personal details about Caroline Elision, his former romantic partners and the ex-CEO of FTX’s sister trading firm, Alameda Research. In addition, the attorney claimed that the 3.7 million pages of evidence claimed to have been produced by the prosecuting team “constitutes a duplicative subset of prior productions." This means that Bankman-Fried's legal team “is literally double counting to inflate the amount of discovery the Government has produced," Williams added.

“[Sam Bankman-Fried] cannot plausibly claim to be prejudiced by the Government’s production of these materials, as he had months prior to being detained to mine them for materials relevant to his defence,” the US Attorney commented.

Bankman-Fried Challenges Jail Decision

Finance Magnates reported that Judge Kaplan earlier this month ordered Bankman-Fried to be jailed ahead of his trial. The decision came after the judge agreed with prosecutors that the Founder of FTX attempted to tamper with witnesses on two separate occasions in the case, including by sharing Elison’s details with The New York Times.

Bankman’s lawyers have argued that the imprisonment of the former crypto billionaire is stalling his trial reparation. This week, they sought the 'temporary' release of the defendant. At the 2nd US Circuit Court of Appeals, they are challenging the court's decision to jail Bankman-Fried ahead of his trial scheduled for October 3.

Meanwhile, last week the accused pleaded not guilty in response to a revised indictment that includes seven counts of charges. The disgraced entrepreneur has been charged with fraud and money laundering, among other crimes, in connection to the downfall of his once-flourishing cryptocurrency business.

New Match-Trader head; TradingView charts on MultiHODL; read today's news nuggets.

About the Author: Solomon Oladipupo
Solomon Oladipupo
  • 1050 Articles
  • 33 Followers
About the Author: Solomon Oladipupo
Solomon Oladipupo is a journalist and editor from Nigeria that covers the tech, FX, fintech and cryptocurrency industries. He is a former assistant editor at AgroNigeria Magazine where he covered the agribusiness industry. Solomon holds a first-class degree in Journalism & Mass Communication from the University of Lagos where he graduated top of his class.
  • 1050 Articles
  • 33 Followers

More from the Author

CryptoCurrency

!"#$%&'()*+,-./0123456789:;<=>?@ABCDEFGHIJKLMNOPQRSTUVWXYZ[\]^_`abcdefghijklmnopqrstuvwxyz{|} !"#$%&'()*+,-./0123456789:;<=>?@ABCDEFGHIJKLMNOPQRSTUVWXYZ[\]^_`abcdefghijklmnopqrstuvwxyz{|}