Crackdown on Crypto Continues: CFTC Busts Cryptobravos
- CFTC files civil enforcement action against Cryptobravos in New Jersey Court.
- It recognizes worldwide assistance in the Cryptobravos investigation.
The Commodity Futures Trading Commission (CFTC) has filed a civil enforcement action against individuals and entities associated with Cryptobravos. It has accused them of a massive fraud scheme.
The CFTC alleges that the defendants fraudulently solicited and misappropriated tens of millions of dollars from hundreds of individuals worldwide, including the United States, under various trading aliases.
Deceptive Tactics: Cryptobravos' False Promises to Investors
The CFTC filed the complaint in the US District Court for the District of New Jersey. It has identified the defendants as Or Patreanu (Israel), Snir Hananya (Italy), Elijah Samson (Germany), Artem Prokopenko (Ukraine), and Expected Value Plus Ltd. (a Seychelles company), all operating collectively as Cryptobravos.
The accused entities are known by several other trading names, including Trade2Get, Coinbull, Cryptonxt, Tradenix, Cryptobravos, Nittrex, Pinance, and Wobit.
The CFTC alleges that from approximately January 2017 through October 2021, the defendants orchestrated a global fraudulent scheme with operations in Israel, Ukraine, Albania, South Africa, and other locations.
Their mode of operation involved soliciting bitcoin and other funds from individuals, with a particular focus on US customers. The funds were intended for the establishment of managed accounts to engage in the trading of digital asset commodities, primarily bitcoin.
CFTC Seeks Justice: Restitution and Penalties in Cryptobravos Case
Cryptobravos agents falsely represented several key points to potential investors. It included promises that the customer funds would be used for trading activities with assurances of risk-free returns and claims that customers could withdraw their funds at any time. However, the CFTC alleges that these representations were nothing but deceptive tactics.
In reality, the defendants did not engage in any trading activities involving bitcoin or other digital asset commodities for their customers. The CFTC claims that they never delivered on the promised returns. Instead, they held onto customer funds.
In many instances, customers were encouraged to withdraw funds from their retirement accounts, take out loans to make additional deposits, or pay non-existent taxes or commissions. Most customers who deposited money with Cryptobravos have not seen their funds returned.
In response to these allegations, the CFTC is seeking various forms of relief. It includes restitution for victims, disgorgement of ill-gotten gains, civil monetary penalties, permanent trading and registration bans for the accused, and a permanent injunction against any further violations of the Commodity Exchange Exchange An exchange is known as a marketplace that supports the trading of derivatives, commodities, securities, and other financial instruments.Generally, an exchange is accessible through a digital platform or sometimes at a tangible address where investors organize to perform trading. Among the chief responsibilities of an exchange would be to uphold honest and fair-trading practices. These are instrumental in making sure that the distribution of supported security rates on that exchange are effectiv An exchange is known as a marketplace that supports the trading of derivatives, commodities, securities, and other financial instruments.Generally, an exchange is accessible through a digital platform or sometimes at a tangible address where investors organize to perform trading. Among the chief responsibilities of an exchange would be to uphold honest and fair-trading practices. These are instrumental in making sure that the distribution of supported security rates on that exchange are effectiv Read this Term Act (CEA) and CFTC regulations.
International Collaboration: Agencies Unite to Combat Cryptocurrency Fraud
Ian McGinley, the Director of Enforcement at the CFTC CFTC The 1974 Commodity Exchange Act (CEA) in the United States created the Commodity Futures Trading Commission (CFTC). The Commission protects and regulates market activities against manipulation, fraud, and abuse trade practices and promotes fairness in futures contracts. The CEA also included the Sad-Johnson Agreement, which defined the authority and responsibilities for the monitoring of financial contracts between the Commodity Futures Trading Commission and the Securities and Exchange Commiss The 1974 Commodity Exchange Act (CEA) in the United States created the Commodity Futures Trading Commission (CFTC). The Commission protects and regulates market activities against manipulation, fraud, and abuse trade practices and promotes fairness in futures contracts. The CEA also included the Sad-Johnson Agreement, which defined the authority and responsibilities for the monitoring of financial contracts between the Commodity Futures Trading Commission and the Securities and Exchange Commiss Read this Term, emphasized the international cooperation involved in this case, having stated: "This case is a triumph of international cooperation. The roster of agencies who assisted the Division of Enforcement's investigation makes it clear to fraudsters in our markets that we will pursue them wherever they are located."
The CFTC has acknowledged the assistance of multiple agencies worldwide in their investigation, including the Alabama Securities Commission, Albanian Financial Supervisory Authority, British Columbia Securities Commission, Financial Supervision Commission of Bulgaria, Cyprus Securities and Exchange Commission, Czech National Bank, Securities and Futures Commission of Hong Kong, Central Bank of Hungary, Israel Securities Authority, Liechtenstein Financial Market Authority, and the Ontario Securities Commission.
The CFTC's Division of Enforcement is leading the case, with Michael Cazakoff, Jack Murphy, K. Brent Tomer, Lenel Hickson Jr., and Manal M. Sultan among the staff responsible for the prosecution. Jennifer Diamond from the Division of Enforcement's Office of Chief Counsel also provided valuable assistance in the investigation.
The Commodity Futures Trading Commission (CFTC) has filed a civil enforcement action against individuals and entities associated with Cryptobravos. It has accused them of a massive fraud scheme.
The CFTC alleges that the defendants fraudulently solicited and misappropriated tens of millions of dollars from hundreds of individuals worldwide, including the United States, under various trading aliases.
Deceptive Tactics: Cryptobravos' False Promises to Investors
The CFTC filed the complaint in the US District Court for the District of New Jersey. It has identified the defendants as Or Patreanu (Israel), Snir Hananya (Italy), Elijah Samson (Germany), Artem Prokopenko (Ukraine), and Expected Value Plus Ltd. (a Seychelles company), all operating collectively as Cryptobravos.
The accused entities are known by several other trading names, including Trade2Get, Coinbull, Cryptonxt, Tradenix, Cryptobravos, Nittrex, Pinance, and Wobit.
The CFTC alleges that from approximately January 2017 through October 2021, the defendants orchestrated a global fraudulent scheme with operations in Israel, Ukraine, Albania, South Africa, and other locations.
Their mode of operation involved soliciting bitcoin and other funds from individuals, with a particular focus on US customers. The funds were intended for the establishment of managed accounts to engage in the trading of digital asset commodities, primarily bitcoin.
CFTC Seeks Justice: Restitution and Penalties in Cryptobravos Case
Cryptobravos agents falsely represented several key points to potential investors. It included promises that the customer funds would be used for trading activities with assurances of risk-free returns and claims that customers could withdraw their funds at any time. However, the CFTC alleges that these representations were nothing but deceptive tactics.
In reality, the defendants did not engage in any trading activities involving bitcoin or other digital asset commodities for their customers. The CFTC claims that they never delivered on the promised returns. Instead, they held onto customer funds.
In many instances, customers were encouraged to withdraw funds from their retirement accounts, take out loans to make additional deposits, or pay non-existent taxes or commissions. Most customers who deposited money with Cryptobravos have not seen their funds returned.
In response to these allegations, the CFTC is seeking various forms of relief. It includes restitution for victims, disgorgement of ill-gotten gains, civil monetary penalties, permanent trading and registration bans for the accused, and a permanent injunction against any further violations of the Commodity Exchange Exchange An exchange is known as a marketplace that supports the trading of derivatives, commodities, securities, and other financial instruments.Generally, an exchange is accessible through a digital platform or sometimes at a tangible address where investors organize to perform trading. Among the chief responsibilities of an exchange would be to uphold honest and fair-trading practices. These are instrumental in making sure that the distribution of supported security rates on that exchange are effectiv An exchange is known as a marketplace that supports the trading of derivatives, commodities, securities, and other financial instruments.Generally, an exchange is accessible through a digital platform or sometimes at a tangible address where investors organize to perform trading. Among the chief responsibilities of an exchange would be to uphold honest and fair-trading practices. These are instrumental in making sure that the distribution of supported security rates on that exchange are effectiv Read this Term Act (CEA) and CFTC regulations.
International Collaboration: Agencies Unite to Combat Cryptocurrency Fraud
Ian McGinley, the Director of Enforcement at the CFTC CFTC The 1974 Commodity Exchange Act (CEA) in the United States created the Commodity Futures Trading Commission (CFTC). The Commission protects and regulates market activities against manipulation, fraud, and abuse trade practices and promotes fairness in futures contracts. The CEA also included the Sad-Johnson Agreement, which defined the authority and responsibilities for the monitoring of financial contracts between the Commodity Futures Trading Commission and the Securities and Exchange Commiss The 1974 Commodity Exchange Act (CEA) in the United States created the Commodity Futures Trading Commission (CFTC). The Commission protects and regulates market activities against manipulation, fraud, and abuse trade practices and promotes fairness in futures contracts. The CEA also included the Sad-Johnson Agreement, which defined the authority and responsibilities for the monitoring of financial contracts between the Commodity Futures Trading Commission and the Securities and Exchange Commiss Read this Term, emphasized the international cooperation involved in this case, having stated: "This case is a triumph of international cooperation. The roster of agencies who assisted the Division of Enforcement's investigation makes it clear to fraudsters in our markets that we will pursue them wherever they are located."
The CFTC has acknowledged the assistance of multiple agencies worldwide in their investigation, including the Alabama Securities Commission, Albanian Financial Supervisory Authority, British Columbia Securities Commission, Financial Supervision Commission of Bulgaria, Cyprus Securities and Exchange Commission, Czech National Bank, Securities and Futures Commission of Hong Kong, Central Bank of Hungary, Israel Securities Authority, Liechtenstein Financial Market Authority, and the Ontario Securities Commission.
The CFTC's Division of Enforcement is leading the case, with Michael Cazakoff, Jack Murphy, K. Brent Tomer, Lenel Hickson Jr., and Manal M. Sultan among the staff responsible for the prosecution. Jennifer Diamond from the Division of Enforcement's Office of Chief Counsel also provided valuable assistance in the investigation.