November FCM Data Shows FXDD & GFT Fall Below Net Capital Requirements

Yesterday we saw the publishing of the CFTC’s Q4 account profitability report, today we take a look at net deposits from FCMs as of November 30th 2012. In the past we have compared monthly ‘Adjusted Net Capital’ and ‘Retail Forex Funds’ figures and ignored the ‘Excess Net Capital’ number as firms were adequately capitalized (at least […]

FXCM Reports December 2012 Metrics – Most Numbers Down

FXCM reported December 2012 metrics and the results are disappointing with retail and institutional volume down 16% and 11% respectively comparing to the previous month and 11% and 23% comparing to same period last year. While volumes were down, the average number of trades for both retail and institutional was up and so was the number of […]

Advertising

Generic_Forex

Yesterday we saw the publishing of the CFTC’s Q4 account profitability report, today we take a look at net deposits from FCMs as of November 30th 2012. In the past we have compared monthly ‘Adjusted Net Capital’ and ‘Retail Forex Funds’ figures and ignored the ‘Excess Net Capital’ number as firms were adequately capitalized (at least in their reports –ie. PFG Best), and there was rarely much of a surprise. However, for this time around we have replaced the month over month ‘Net Capital’ number with the ‘Excess Net Capital’ figure.

As can be seen below, both FXDD and GFT fell below their Excess Net Capital requirements at the end of November. The drop in FXDD was previously documented in the NFA’s memorandum they issued to the broker which had been disputed by FXDD. However, the GFT net capital drop is a huge surprise and apparently this was the point of contention between the CFTC/NFA and the broker. Based on numerous sources, we wrote in the past that the NFA had embarked on enforcing ignored accounting principles in regards to the pooling of funds from foreign subsidiaries. As can be seen below, the new accounting calculations had severe effects on both GFT and FXDD. It’s worth noting that among large brokers, with the exception of Oanda, firms experienced a drop in their ‘Adjusted Net Capital’.

In addition to the drop in Net Capital, during November US brokers also saw a huge fall in Retail Forex Funds. Account funds dropped over $75 million to $742,103,740 from $817,134,898, with FXCM responsible for 2/3 of the decline. Other than FXCM, the other notable drop in funds occurred from GFT. Overall, the drop in total retail account funds follows the negative trend in the US where the Forex industry has been contracting due to an exit of brokers, the MF Global and PFG scandal, a renewed interest in equity trading among retail customers, as well as fewer foreign clients due to the lack of CFDs and high margin requirements.

nov fcm asset data

Got a news tip? Let Us Know
FOUND A MISTAKE
IN THE ARTICLE?
How do you feel about the article?
  • Educated 0
  • Surprised 0
  • Intrigued 0
  • Indifferent 0
  • Annoyed 0

Discuss the Article


7 + 9 =

I agree to the Terms of Use Required field

Notify me of followup comments via e-mail.
You can also subscribe without commenting.

6 Comments

  1. Michael Greenberg

    that’s NFA’s way to show that they were ‘right’ and GFT was wrong, but what actually happened is that NFA changed a rule overnight which overnight made GFT fall below capital requirements and then reported GFT as being undercapitalized…

    • 0
    • 0
  2. Ohmygosh

    Wow….ILQ is just $64K over capital requirements.. Looks really scary.
    Seems if one month they get a bigger utility bill they might go under…

    • 0
    • 0
  3. Michael Greenberg

    not really, remember that they keep 20+ mil frozen and with less than 1k clients this capital alone is probably x2-3 times the customer obligations

    • 0
    • 0
  4. Ron FinbergRon Finberg

    Re: ILQ – In the previous month’s report, the had a slightly larger capital requirement with net capital of $21 mil+. With a $900k in excess capital they may have been doing some shifting of funds around.

    • 0
    • 0
  5. A.

    It’s not ILQ that attracted my attention, but Interactive Brokers. 1.4 billion? Are you sure there’s no mistake? It’s 7 times more than the next one, Knight Capital Americas. This is huge, mind-blowing!

    • 0
    • 0
  6. Ron FinbergRon Finberg

    IB is a huge company. It’s also split between its option market making division (Timber Hill I belive its called) and the brokerage business. Being well capitalized has been one of their strengths for years.

    • 0
    • 0