FINRA Fines Wells Fargo Second Time in a Month
- The bank accepted the censure and a fine of $75,000.
The Financial Industry Regulatory Authority (FINRA) has slapped Wells Fargo Clearing Clearing Clearing is a general term that simply means many different things depending on the subject and related industry. Most commonly, this refers to the reciprocal exchange between banks of checks and drafts, and the settlement of the differences, or the total of claims settled at a clearinghouse. In finance and banking, the word clearing has different meanings depending on the more specific business model. Moving checks from the bank where they were deposited to the bank on which they were drawn. Th Clearing is a general term that simply means many different things depending on the subject and related industry. Most commonly, this refers to the reciprocal exchange between banks of checks and drafts, and the settlement of the differences, or the total of claims settled at a clearinghouse. In finance and banking, the word clearing has different meanings depending on the more specific business model. Moving checks from the bank where they were deposited to the bank on which they were drawn. Th Read this Term Services, LLC with a fresh fine of $75,000 for inconsistencies in data reporting. This is the bank's second fine by the financial watchdog this month.
The California-headquartered bank has already accepted censure and the fine but did not admit or deny any allegations on it.
“This AWC [Letter of Acceptance, Waiver, and Consent] is submitted on the condition that, if accepted, FINRA will not bring any future actions against respondents alleging violations based on the same factual findings described in this AWC,” the official letter already signed by FINRA stated.
According to the allegations, Wells Fargo failed to make accurate order memoranda and transmitted inaccurate reports to the Order Audit Trail System (OATS) between October 1, 2016, and June 12, 2018.
FINRA highlighted that all licensed broker-dealers need to make and keep a memorandum of each brokerage order given or received for the purchase or sale of securities.
For OATS reporting, broker-dealers enter the order details into their systems immediately upon receiving them from customers, and it is automatically appended to other records. In case of a system failure, the firms need to record the order on paper and then manually enter the receipt time into the system.
The regulator alleged that Wells Fargo recorded inaccurate order receipt times on 114,394 order memorandum. It found further reporting violations in Q4 of 2016.
Wells Fargo’s Tussle with FINRA
Earlier this month, FINRA imposed a similar censure and a fine of $300,000 on the same unit of Wells Fargo for sending around 7,000 inaccurate monthly and quarterly account statements to 2,390 customers over seven months.
In September, the self-regulatory organization fined two Wells Fargo subsidiaries over $2 million for supervisory failures due to switching customers’ variable annuities.
The Financial Industry Regulatory Authority (FINRA) has slapped Wells Fargo Clearing Clearing Clearing is a general term that simply means many different things depending on the subject and related industry. Most commonly, this refers to the reciprocal exchange between banks of checks and drafts, and the settlement of the differences, or the total of claims settled at a clearinghouse. In finance and banking, the word clearing has different meanings depending on the more specific business model. Moving checks from the bank where they were deposited to the bank on which they were drawn. Th Clearing is a general term that simply means many different things depending on the subject and related industry. Most commonly, this refers to the reciprocal exchange between banks of checks and drafts, and the settlement of the differences, or the total of claims settled at a clearinghouse. In finance and banking, the word clearing has different meanings depending on the more specific business model. Moving checks from the bank where they were deposited to the bank on which they were drawn. Th Read this Term Services, LLC with a fresh fine of $75,000 for inconsistencies in data reporting. This is the bank's second fine by the financial watchdog this month.
The California-headquartered bank has already accepted censure and the fine but did not admit or deny any allegations on it.
“This AWC [Letter of Acceptance, Waiver, and Consent] is submitted on the condition that, if accepted, FINRA will not bring any future actions against respondents alleging violations based on the same factual findings described in this AWC,” the official letter already signed by FINRA stated.
According to the allegations, Wells Fargo failed to make accurate order memoranda and transmitted inaccurate reports to the Order Audit Trail System (OATS) between October 1, 2016, and June 12, 2018.
FINRA highlighted that all licensed broker-dealers need to make and keep a memorandum of each brokerage order given or received for the purchase or sale of securities.
For OATS reporting, broker-dealers enter the order details into their systems immediately upon receiving them from customers, and it is automatically appended to other records. In case of a system failure, the firms need to record the order on paper and then manually enter the receipt time into the system.
The regulator alleged that Wells Fargo recorded inaccurate order receipt times on 114,394 order memorandum. It found further reporting violations in Q4 of 2016.
Wells Fargo’s Tussle with FINRA
Earlier this month, FINRA imposed a similar censure and a fine of $300,000 on the same unit of Wells Fargo for sending around 7,000 inaccurate monthly and quarterly account statements to 2,390 customers over seven months.
In September, the self-regulatory organization fined two Wells Fargo subsidiaries over $2 million for supervisory failures due to switching customers’ variable annuities.