Forex Brokers May Cut Costs as ESMA Seeks Input on Overlapping EU Financial Reporting

Monday, 23/06/2025 | 10:04 GMT by Tareq Sikder
  • Current rules cause duplicate reporting under MiFIR, EMIR, and SFTR, costing billions yearly.
  • Two options are proposed: separating reporting by instrument or event type, or creating a unified ā€œreport onceā€ system.
Inside ESMA headquarters
Inside an ESMA office; Source: ESMA

The European Securities and Markets Authority (ESMA) has issued a call for evidence to simplify financial transaction reporting. The consultation is part of an EU effort to reduce regulatory burdens. It focuses on overlaps across reporting regimes such as MiFIR, EMIR, and SFTR.

Forex Brokers Face Costly Reporting Overlaps

Forex brokers dealing in derivatives like FX swaps, forwards, and contracts for difference (CFDs) are among the entities affected. Under current rules, a single transaction may need to be reported under multiple regimes. MiFIR requires reporting for transparency purposes, while EMIR focuses on risk monitoring. This leads to duplicated efforts and higher costs.

ESMA estimates that about one-third of all EMIR-reported transactions are also covered by MiFIR. The combined reporting cost to the industry is estimated at between €1 billion and €4 billion per year. Smaller brokers face particular challenges, as compliance efforts may outweigh their business scale.

You may find it interesting at FinanceMagnates.com: ESMA Asks Firms and Trade Bodies: Are Rules Making It Harder for Retail Investment?

Two Options Proposed for Simplification

The paper outlines two main approaches for simplification.

Option 1 proposes removing overlaps by separating reporting either based on the type of instrument—where exchange-traded derivatives would be reported under MiFIR and over-the-counter trades under EMIR—or by the type of event, with transactions reported under MiFIR and post-trade events such as margin updates reported under EMIR.

Option 2 introduces a ā€œreport onceā€ framework. Under this approach, firms would submit data through a unified template. This would cover requirements across MiFIR, EMIR, and SFTR. Both options include a possible removal of dual-sided reporting, where both counterparties report the same trade.

ESMA Seeks Feedback on Reporting Simplification

ESMA is collecting feedback from market participants. Brokers are encouraged to share cost estimates and views on simplification. Specific questions in the paper address cost burdens, proportionality measures for smaller firms, and transition challenges.

Feedback is open until 19 September 2025. A final report is expected in early 2026. ESMA says the findings will inform future regulatory changes.

The European Securities and Markets Authority (ESMA) has issued a call for evidence to simplify financial transaction reporting. The consultation is part of an EU effort to reduce regulatory burdens. It focuses on overlaps across reporting regimes such as MiFIR, EMIR, and SFTR.

Forex Brokers Face Costly Reporting Overlaps

Forex brokers dealing in derivatives like FX swaps, forwards, and contracts for difference (CFDs) are among the entities affected. Under current rules, a single transaction may need to be reported under multiple regimes. MiFIR requires reporting for transparency purposes, while EMIR focuses on risk monitoring. This leads to duplicated efforts and higher costs.

ESMA estimates that about one-third of all EMIR-reported transactions are also covered by MiFIR. The combined reporting cost to the industry is estimated at between €1 billion and €4 billion per year. Smaller brokers face particular challenges, as compliance efforts may outweigh their business scale.

You may find it interesting at FinanceMagnates.com: ESMA Asks Firms and Trade Bodies: Are Rules Making It Harder for Retail Investment?

Two Options Proposed for Simplification

The paper outlines two main approaches for simplification.

Option 1 proposes removing overlaps by separating reporting either based on the type of instrument—where exchange-traded derivatives would be reported under MiFIR and over-the-counter trades under EMIR—or by the type of event, with transactions reported under MiFIR and post-trade events such as margin updates reported under EMIR.

Option 2 introduces a ā€œreport onceā€ framework. Under this approach, firms would submit data through a unified template. This would cover requirements across MiFIR, EMIR, and SFTR. Both options include a possible removal of dual-sided reporting, where both counterparties report the same trade.

ESMA Seeks Feedback on Reporting Simplification

ESMA is collecting feedback from market participants. Brokers are encouraged to share cost estimates and views on simplification. Specific questions in the paper address cost burdens, proportionality measures for smaller firms, and transition challenges.

Feedback is open until 19 September 2025. A final report is expected in early 2026. ESMA says the findings will inform future regulatory changes.

About the Author: Tareq Sikder
Tareq Sikder
  • 1990 Articles
  • 33 Followers
About the Author: Tareq Sikder
A Forex technical analyst and writer who has been engaged in financial writing for 12 years.
  • 1990 Articles
  • 33 Followers

More from the Author

Retail FX

!"#$%&'()*+,-./0123456789:;<=>?@ABCDEFGHIJKLMNOPQRSTUVWXYZ[\]^_`abcdefghijklmnopqrstuvwxyz{|} !"#$%&'()*+,-./0123456789:;<=>?@ABCDEFGHIJKLMNOPQRSTUVWXYZ[\]^_`abcdefghijklmnopqrstuvwxyz{|}