China Just Gave Offshore Brokers Two Years to Exit the Mainland

Thursday, 04/06/2026 | 16:00 GMT by Damian Chmiel
  • The SRC fined Futu and Tiger Brokers parent UP Fintech a combined $331 million, then gave the entire cross-border model two years to wind down.
  • A new FM Intelligence analysis maps how much of the mainland revenue actually survives the forced runoff.
China Shutterstock

China's securities regulator has set a two-year deadline to close the cross-border channel that let mainland investors trade global stocks through offshore brokers, and the bill is already showing up in earnings.

The China Securities Regulatory Commission (SRC) named three firms on May 22 and disclosed about $331 million in fines and confiscated income across two of them. A new FM Intelligence analysis breaks down who pays, how much revenue is at risk and how fast it could disappear.

Futu Holdings disclosed a proposed penalty of about RMB1.85 billion, or roughly $271 million, while UP Fintech, the parent of Tiger Brokers, reported RMB411.2 million, about $59.7 million.

The regulator did not attach a figure to the third firm, Longbridge Securities. FinanceMagnates.com first reported the Futu penalty when the company disclosed it.

The Penalties Hit Reported Profit but Not the Underlying Business

The charges cut Futu's reported first-quarter net income 61.2% to HK$831 million, and pushed UP Fintech to a $26.9 million net loss against a $30.4 million profit a year earlier. Both firms booked the penalties as one-time items.

Strip out the charge and the operating picture looks different. Futu's revenue rose 24.7%, funded accounts climbed 34.3%, and client assets grew 47.2% year over year. UP Fintech 's revenue rose 26.3%.

Chief Financial Officer Arthur Yu Chen
Futu's Chief Financial Officer Arthur Yu Chen

"This amount does not impact our business fundamentals or financial stability," said Arthur Yu Chen, chief financial officer of Futu Holdings.

Investors took a darker view at first. Futu shares fell 27.5% on the day, then rebounded about 20% three sessions later, helped by an S&P Global Ratings decision to reaffirm the company's investment-grade rating.

How Much Mainland Revenue Is Actually at Stake

This is where the FM Intelligence modeling comes in. Futu has said mainland clients make up about 13% of funded accounts but roughly 20% of revenue, a gap that signals each mainland account is worth more than the firm-wide average.

Because the wind-down lets existing clients only sell and withdraw, that revenue erodes over two years rather than vanishing at once.

FM Intelligence models three paths for how much survives, with a base case that sees the mainland contribution roughly halve in the first year and shrink further in the second.

The action is not isolated. The CSRC first declared the activity illegal back in 2022, when it ordered Futu and UP Fintech to stop taking new mainland clients, and the latest penalties sit inside an eight-agency plan approved by the State Council.

The full FM Intelligence analysis lays out the scenario ranges, the annualized revenue exposure and why the regulator's two-year deadline may run faster than an orderly runoff.

China's securities regulator has set a two-year deadline to close the cross-border channel that let mainland investors trade global stocks through offshore brokers, and the bill is already showing up in earnings.

The China Securities Regulatory Commission (SRC) named three firms on May 22 and disclosed about $331 million in fines and confiscated income across two of them. A new FM Intelligence analysis breaks down who pays, how much revenue is at risk and how fast it could disappear.

Futu Holdings disclosed a proposed penalty of about RMB1.85 billion, or roughly $271 million, while UP Fintech, the parent of Tiger Brokers, reported RMB411.2 million, about $59.7 million.

The regulator did not attach a figure to the third firm, Longbridge Securities. FinanceMagnates.com first reported the Futu penalty when the company disclosed it.

The Penalties Hit Reported Profit but Not the Underlying Business

The charges cut Futu's reported first-quarter net income 61.2% to HK$831 million, and pushed UP Fintech to a $26.9 million net loss against a $30.4 million profit a year earlier. Both firms booked the penalties as one-time items.

Strip out the charge and the operating picture looks different. Futu's revenue rose 24.7%, funded accounts climbed 34.3%, and client assets grew 47.2% year over year. UP Fintech 's revenue rose 26.3%.

Chief Financial Officer Arthur Yu Chen
Futu's Chief Financial Officer Arthur Yu Chen

"This amount does not impact our business fundamentals or financial stability," said Arthur Yu Chen, chief financial officer of Futu Holdings.

Investors took a darker view at first. Futu shares fell 27.5% on the day, then rebounded about 20% three sessions later, helped by an S&P Global Ratings decision to reaffirm the company's investment-grade rating.

How Much Mainland Revenue Is Actually at Stake

This is where the FM Intelligence modeling comes in. Futu has said mainland clients make up about 13% of funded accounts but roughly 20% of revenue, a gap that signals each mainland account is worth more than the firm-wide average.

Because the wind-down lets existing clients only sell and withdraw, that revenue erodes over two years rather than vanishing at once.

FM Intelligence models three paths for how much survives, with a base case that sees the mainland contribution roughly halve in the first year and shrink further in the second.

The action is not isolated. The CSRC first declared the activity illegal back in 2022, when it ordered Futu and UP Fintech to stop taking new mainland clients, and the latest penalties sit inside an eight-agency plan approved by the State Council.

The full FM Intelligence analysis lays out the scenario ranges, the annualized revenue exposure and why the regulator's two-year deadline may run faster than an orderly runoff.

About the Author: Damian Chmiel
Damian Chmiel
  • 3610 Articles
  • 112 Followers
About the Author: Damian Chmiel
Damian Chmiel is a Senior Analyst & Editor at Finance Magnates with more than 15 years of experience in the CFD and online trading industry. Active as both a trader and journalist since 2010, he focuses on broker coverage, fintech innovation, and regulatory developments across Europe, the Middle East, and Asia. His work includes interviews with C-level leaders at major brokerages and fintech platforms, as well as co-authoring Finance Magnates’ quarterly industry benchmarking reports. Damian’s reporting is data-driven, market-aware, and grounded in direct industry engagement. His analysis and commentary have also been cited by external media outlets, including Investing.com, Binance, The Asset, Stockhead, and Dispatch. Education: MA in Finance and Accounting, Cracow University of Economics
  • 3610 Articles
  • 112 Followers

More from the Author

Retail FX

!"#$%&'()*+,-./0123456789:;<=>?@ABCDEFGHIJKLMNOPQRSTUVWXYZ[\]^_`abcdefghijklmnopqrstuvwxyz{|} !"#$%&'()*+,-./0123456789:;<=>?@ABCDEFGHIJKLMNOPQRSTUVWXYZ[\]^_`abcdefghijklmnopqrstuvwxyz{|}