The US Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) has once again deferred its decision on whether to approve Bitcoin ETF proposed by asset manager Bitwise. The San Francisco-based firm has filed its initial registration earlier in January, joining the race to launch a physically-backed bitcoin exchange-traded fund (ETF).

The regulator pushed the deadline to make a decision on the proposed ETF to mid-May. A decision was expected no earlier than April 1, 45 days from the time the application for the fund was published in the federal register.

The company filed with the US top watchdog for a regulated ETF that would track its Bitwise Bitcoin Total Return Index. Bitwise explains that the index aims to capture the total returns available to investors in the world’s largest crypto asset, including “any meaningful hard forks.”

Bitwise says its proposed ETF differs from previously-filed similar proposals in that it will safeguard holdings in 100%  Cold Storage  with an institutional, regulated third-party custodian and as the index draws prices from a large number of cryptocurrency exchanges.

The race to crypto ETF stumbles

If approved, NYSE Arca, the exchange owned and operated by the ‎Intercontinental Exchange (ICE)‎‏,‏ will host the proposed listing while Bitwise Index Services will produce and manage the bitcoin ETF.

However, Bitwise global head of ETF products said earlier that he didn’t think the SEC will be in a rush to approve a cryptocurrency-based ETF, but his company is excited to talk to regulators about what his firm has to offer.

Bitwise is the second to apply for a physically-backed exchange-traded product. The first was  Blockchain  technology company SolidX which filed with the SEC in collaboration with money management firm VanEck.

While some had argued that the proposal from New York-based VanEck, the ninth biggest ETF provider, was more likely to gain approval thanks to its plans for a high minimum share price, the US regulators have once again rescheduled its decision back in December. One month later, VanEck shelved its proposal for the coveted bitcoin license.

The US Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) has once again deferred its decision on whether to approve Bitcoin ETF proposed by asset manager Bitwise. The San Francisco-based firm has filed its initial registration earlier in January, joining the race to launch a physically-backed bitcoin exchange-traded fund (ETF).

The regulator pushed the deadline to make a decision on the proposed ETF to mid-May. A decision was expected no earlier than April 1, 45 days from the time the application for the fund was published in the federal register.

The company filed with the US top watchdog for a regulated ETF that would track its Bitwise Bitcoin Total Return Index. Bitwise explains that the index aims to capture the total returns available to investors in the world’s largest crypto asset, including “any meaningful hard forks.”

Bitwise says its proposed ETF differs from previously-filed similar proposals in that it will safeguard holdings in 100%  Cold Storage  with an institutional, regulated third-party custodian and as the index draws prices from a large number of cryptocurrency exchanges.

The race to crypto ETF stumbles

If approved, NYSE Arca, the exchange owned and operated by the ‎Intercontinental Exchange (ICE)‎‏,‏ will host the proposed listing while Bitwise Index Services will produce and manage the bitcoin ETF.

However, Bitwise global head of ETF products said earlier that he didn’t think the SEC will be in a rush to approve a cryptocurrency-based ETF, but his company is excited to talk to regulators about what his firm has to offer.

Bitwise is the second to apply for a physically-backed exchange-traded product. The first was  Blockchain  technology company SolidX which filed with the SEC in collaboration with money management firm VanEck.

While some had argued that the proposal from New York-based VanEck, the ninth biggest ETF provider, was more likely to gain approval thanks to its plans for a high minimum share price, the US regulators have once again rescheduled its decision back in December. One month later, VanEck shelved its proposal for the coveted bitcoin license.