OneCoin Investors Entirely Dismiss Class Actions Lawsuit

Friday, 08/10/2021 | 08:43 GMT by Arnab Shome
  • They determined that it would be very difficult to obtain a judgment against the defendants.
OneCoin Investors Entirely Dismiss Class Actions Lawsuit
OneCoin

The investors of the billion-dollar crypto scam, OneCoin, have dismissed all charges against the remaining individuals accused in the class-action lawsuit, a court document filed on Thursday revealed.

The lead plaintiff, Donald Berdeaux and plaintiff, Christine Grablis, have already dismissed all their claims against Mark Scott, David Pike, Nicole Huesmann and The Bank of New York Mellon on September 20, who were initially named in the lawsuit.

The latest dismissal has dropped the name of Onecoin Ltd, mastermind Ruja Ignatova, Sebastian Greenwood and Gilbert Armenta, all of whom have defaulted.

The court documents detailed that now OneCoin is a defunct entity with no attachable assets, while Ignatova’s whereabouts remain unknown. Greenwood and Armenta are in federal custody and are separately charged for their involvement in OneCoin’s operations and promotion.

A Tough Case

Additionally, the investors in the class-action lawsuit settled with OneCoin’s co-mastermind and Ruja’s brother, Konstantin Ignatov, earlier. Moreover, the court warned the plaintiffs last April for not showing reasons against the dismissal of the class-action lawsuit.

“Plaintiffs have concluded that the dismissal of Mark Scott, David Pike, Nicole Huesmann and Bank of New York Mellon Corporation from this Action has rendered this litigation untenable and no longer a productive use of judicial resources, due largely to the fact that the remaining defendants all appear to be essentially judgment proof, in that it will be extremely difficult or impossible to successfully enforce a judgment against any of the remaining defendants due to their imprisonment and/or lack of recoverable assets,” the court document stated.

“As no class has yet been certified, no payment or monetary inducement has been offered or promised to Plaintiffs or Plaintiffs’ counsel, and voluntary dismissal without prejudice at this stage does not bind any putative/absent class claimant other than the named Plaintiffs, Plaintiffs believe it is advisable and is in the best interest of judicial efficiency to voluntarily dismiss the Action without prejudice at this time.”

The investors of the billion-dollar crypto scam, OneCoin, have dismissed all charges against the remaining individuals accused in the class-action lawsuit, a court document filed on Thursday revealed.

The lead plaintiff, Donald Berdeaux and plaintiff, Christine Grablis, have already dismissed all their claims against Mark Scott, David Pike, Nicole Huesmann and The Bank of New York Mellon on September 20, who were initially named in the lawsuit.

The latest dismissal has dropped the name of Onecoin Ltd, mastermind Ruja Ignatova, Sebastian Greenwood and Gilbert Armenta, all of whom have defaulted.

The court documents detailed that now OneCoin is a defunct entity with no attachable assets, while Ignatova’s whereabouts remain unknown. Greenwood and Armenta are in federal custody and are separately charged for their involvement in OneCoin’s operations and promotion.

A Tough Case

Additionally, the investors in the class-action lawsuit settled with OneCoin’s co-mastermind and Ruja’s brother, Konstantin Ignatov, earlier. Moreover, the court warned the plaintiffs last April for not showing reasons against the dismissal of the class-action lawsuit.

“Plaintiffs have concluded that the dismissal of Mark Scott, David Pike, Nicole Huesmann and Bank of New York Mellon Corporation from this Action has rendered this litigation untenable and no longer a productive use of judicial resources, due largely to the fact that the remaining defendants all appear to be essentially judgment proof, in that it will be extremely difficult or impossible to successfully enforce a judgment against any of the remaining defendants due to their imprisonment and/or lack of recoverable assets,” the court document stated.

“As no class has yet been certified, no payment or monetary inducement has been offered or promised to Plaintiffs or Plaintiffs’ counsel, and voluntary dismissal without prejudice at this stage does not bind any putative/absent class claimant other than the named Plaintiffs, Plaintiffs believe it is advisable and is in the best interest of judicial efficiency to voluntarily dismiss the Action without prejudice at this time.”

About the Author: Arnab Shome
Arnab Shome
  • 7319 Articles
  • 133 Followers
About the Author: Arnab Shome
Arnab Shome is an electronics engineer-turned-financial editor. He holds a Bachelor of Technology from the National Institute of Technology, Agartala. He entered the retail trading industry about a decade ago, covering the cryptocurrency market for Finance Magnates, and later expanded his coverage to include forex and CFDs as well. His work at Finance Magnates includes C-level interviews, data-driven analysis, opinion pieces, and scoops of industry exclusives. He also contributes to Finance Magnates’ quarterly industry report. Area of coverage: 1. CFD broker-related news 2. Industry-related Regulatory updates and developments 3. New retail trading trends 4. Prop trading industry updates 5. Executive interviews Education: Bachelor of Technology - National Institute of Technology, Agartala (India)
  • 7319 Articles
  • 133 Followers

More from the Author

CryptoCurrency

!"#$%&'()*+,-./0123456789:;<=>?@ABCDEFGHIJKLMNOPQRSTUVWXYZ[\]^_`abcdefghijklmnopqrstuvwxyz{|} !"#$%&'()*+,-./0123456789:;<=>?@ABCDEFGHIJKLMNOPQRSTUVWXYZ[\]^_`abcdefghijklmnopqrstuvwxyz{|}