After beginning the year on a fairly steady course towards the $10k mark, Bitcoin--along with the rest of the economy--tanked.
At the end of the second week of March, crypto markets fell so sharply that March 12th came to be colloquially known as “Crypto’s Black Thursday." Between Wednesday, March 11th, and Friday, March 13th, the price of BTC fell from nearly $8,000 to roughly $4,700; by the end of the month, Bitcoin had recovered to roughly $6,400.
Since then, things have recovered considerably for BTC: by the end of April, Bitcoin had already hit back over the $9,000 level, where it managed to stay around for the rest of the quarter; the coin even briefly surpassed $10,000 on June 1st, and has floated between $9,000 and $10,000 ever since.
What has ensued since then has been--well, almost boring; almost a little too boring: in fact, the last 8 weeks or so have constituted one of the least volatile time-periods in Bitcoin’s recent history.
“This is very uncharacteristic of Bitcoin, as it is known for its rampant volatility,” he said.
Therefore, he believes that this period is not likely to continue for too much longer: “it is unlikely that this will continue and quite possible that BTC is gearing up for a big move,” he said. “In fact, the last time that Bitcoin was behaving like this was in April 2019 just before making a huge move.”
OKEx CEO Jay Hao.
Indeed, April 2019 was quite a stable time for Bitcoin: after a jump upward at the beginning of the month, BTC floated between $4,800 and $5,300; by mid-May, the price of BTC was over $8000, and eventually peaked over $13,000 in July of 2019.
Therefore, it could be that Bitcoin is poised for another large upward movement: David Waslen, co-founder and chief executive of HedgeTrade, also told Finance Magnates that “generally speaking, a drawn-out period of low-volatility price consolidation will lead to a huge move on either side.”
“The longer the consolidation persists, the more violent the breakout or breakdown will end up being,” he explained.
”Investors are sitting on the sidelines, waiting to see which way the market is going to move after breaking this range.”
But will the movement be a breakout or a breakdown?
“The volatility decline could likely be the result of a noticeable lack in clear directional bias concerning the market,” Waslen said. In other words: nobody knows.
Indeed, “uncertainty” seems to be the name of the game at the moment: Tanim Rasul, Head of Operations for Canadian cryptocurrency exchange NDAX, told Finance Magnates that uncertainty is the primary cause of the lack of volatility.
“The case for the bulls versus bears has been ongoing since Bitcoin has recovered from the COVID-19 price drop,” Rasul said.
Tanim Rasul, Head of Operations for Canadian cryptocurrency exchange NDAX.
Therefore, the lack of movement is resulting from--well, a lack of movement: “essentially, the price has been ranging for the past couple of months and many investors are sitting on the sidelines, waiting to see which way the market is going to move after breaking this range,” Rasul explained.
Like Waslen and Hao, Rasul believes that extended flatlining in Bitcoin’s price could give way to a big move: “historically, Bitcoin's volatility index paints a picture that low volatility does not last long and if the past repeats itself, we may see an incoming volatility spike.”
Bitcoin “is starting to act in similar ways to the stock market.”
But could the circumstances of the Bitcoin market alter the historical pattern of consolidation before volatility?
Indeed, OKEx’s Jay Hao told Finance Magnates that Bitcoin’s lack of volatility could be explained by the fact that “BTC is maturing as an asset class with a developed derivatives infrastructure, and it is therefore becoming less volatile.”
Collin Plume, founder and chief executive of Noble Gold Investments, also told Finance Magnates that the development of trading infrastructure could have something to do with the lack of volatility in Bitcoin.
“Now that Bitcoin has moved into the world of day traders and hedge funds, it is starting to act in similar ways to the stock market,” he said.
Therefore, a larger number of investors may be engaging with Bitcoin as they would with traditional markets--specifically, “one of the famous quotes in regards to the stock market is ‘sell in May, and go away’,” Plume said. “Traders used to liquidate their major trades and go on vacation for the summer.”
Collin Plume, chief executive and founder of Noble Gold Investments.
While there haven’t been signs of liquidation in recent months (aside from the market crash in March), it may very well be that the entrance of more traditional institutional traders into the space could mean that the summer months increasingly bring a ‘cooling’ effect to Bitcoin’s volatility levels--though, historically speaking, this hasn’t been the case.
”BTC traders love volatility”--so they may be looking for other markets
However, even if there has been an increase in Bitcoin traders who interact with the Bitcoin market as though it were the stock market, the Bitcoin traders who have traditionally focused on Bitcoin because of its volatility may have been left out in the cold by Bitcoin’s lack of movement.
David Waslen explained that indeed, traditionally speaking, “BTC traders love volatility.”
David Waslen, chief executive and founder of HedgeTrade.
“To be able to profit off an asset class that can move 10% in a matter of minutes provides opportunities that you're unable to find in a lot of the traditional asset classes,” he said. “Superior traders have been able to lock massive returns in the past.”
Therefore, “with the drop in volatility you've seen a drop in [trading] volume as traders are hesitant to take positions, as there are fewer opportunities.”
”Exchanges have seen very low trading volume lately.”
This is indeed the case--cryptocurrency exchanges that typically pull in much of their profits from BTC trades have gotten significantly less revenue from Bitcoin trading than they usually do.
OKEx’s Jay Hao said that indeed, “exchanges have seen very low trading volume lately.”
“Spot trading volume is the lowest that it has been in half a year, and the same pattern can be seen in derivatives,” he said.
“Since the value of Bitcoin derivatives is mainly reflected in hedging market risks, there is a stronger trading demand during periods of high volatility. The decline in bitcoin futures trading volume is mainly due to the continued decline in Bitcoin volatility.”
However, trading volumes on trading platforms outside of spot and derivatives markets don’t seem to have been affected in the same way: “that's not necessarily the case with other cryptocurrency platforms, such as over-the-counter [trading venues,” Jay said.
For example, “if you consider Localbitcoins and Paxful, not only has trading volume not decreased, but it has actually increased in some places,” Hao said.
via Coin.Dance
Is this the beginning of altcoin season?
Additionally, while the lack of volatility in Bitcoin may have caused a decrease in Bitcoin-related trading volume on exchanges, it seems to have caused an increase in trading volume related to altcoins, which have maintained higher levels of volatility.
“Traders looking to make big gains may start looking to the altcoin markets where coins like DOGE and COMP are allowing traders to capitalize off of high volatility,” Jay Hao said. This has “[...led] some to say that altcoin season has begun. If this is the case, then it is normal that we see less trading action on BTC.
Jay pointed specifically to tokens that have originated from the decentralized finance space as possible points of attention in crypto trading markets: “there has also been a lot of action in the DeFi space with DeFi tokens seeing massive gains,” he said.
DeFi tokens could be a new hotspot for traders in search of volatility
Indeed, the thing that seems to have called the most attention to the DeFi sphere in recent times is the surge in value of governance tokens of certain DeFi platforms–most famously, perhaps, the rise of COMP: the governance token of decentralized loan platform Compound, which jumped nearly 300% in value within a week of its mid-June launch.
So far, COMP has delivered on volatility: after peaking at roughly $372 last month, COMP gradually slipped as low as $165 over the course of several weeks–a decrease of roughly 55 percent. (By press time, the price had recovered to $176.
The quick succession of boom and bust has a number of analysts predicting further volatility in the future as the market eventually settles on what may be a more appropriate valuation of the company: Twitter commentator @ThetaSeek wrote that the project was overvalued, saying that “[…] The value of the Protocol is an AUM business and AUM businesses are normally valued at less than 1/3 or 1/4 of the companies’ AUM.
ThetaSeek said, pointing to BlockFi as an example: “@realblockfi is valued at around 200M when their AUM was 650M. (This is generous as Goldman Sachs is valued at less than 1/50 of their AUM),” he said. Therefore, he believes that COMP should be valued at something like $50.
Editor's note: This article previously and erroneously contained a picture of Bilal Hammoud, President & CEO of NDAX, rather than Tanim Rasul, Head of Operations for Canadian cryptocurrency exchange NDAX. Finance Magnates apologizes to NDAX and to readers for the confusion.
After beginning the year on a fairly steady course towards the $10k mark, Bitcoin--along with the rest of the economy--tanked.
At the end of the second week of March, crypto markets fell so sharply that March 12th came to be colloquially known as “Crypto’s Black Thursday." Between Wednesday, March 11th, and Friday, March 13th, the price of BTC fell from nearly $8,000 to roughly $4,700; by the end of the month, Bitcoin had recovered to roughly $6,400.
Since then, things have recovered considerably for BTC: by the end of April, Bitcoin had already hit back over the $9,000 level, where it managed to stay around for the rest of the quarter; the coin even briefly surpassed $10,000 on June 1st, and has floated between $9,000 and $10,000 ever since.
What has ensued since then has been--well, almost boring; almost a little too boring: in fact, the last 8 weeks or so have constituted one of the least volatile time-periods in Bitcoin’s recent history.
“This is very uncharacteristic of Bitcoin, as it is known for its rampant volatility,” he said.
Therefore, he believes that this period is not likely to continue for too much longer: “it is unlikely that this will continue and quite possible that BTC is gearing up for a big move,” he said. “In fact, the last time that Bitcoin was behaving like this was in April 2019 just before making a huge move.”
OKEx CEO Jay Hao.
Indeed, April 2019 was quite a stable time for Bitcoin: after a jump upward at the beginning of the month, BTC floated between $4,800 and $5,300; by mid-May, the price of BTC was over $8000, and eventually peaked over $13,000 in July of 2019.
Therefore, it could be that Bitcoin is poised for another large upward movement: David Waslen, co-founder and chief executive of HedgeTrade, also told Finance Magnates that “generally speaking, a drawn-out period of low-volatility price consolidation will lead to a huge move on either side.”
“The longer the consolidation persists, the more violent the breakout or breakdown will end up being,” he explained.
”Investors are sitting on the sidelines, waiting to see which way the market is going to move after breaking this range.”
But will the movement be a breakout or a breakdown?
“The volatility decline could likely be the result of a noticeable lack in clear directional bias concerning the market,” Waslen said. In other words: nobody knows.
Indeed, “uncertainty” seems to be the name of the game at the moment: Tanim Rasul, Head of Operations for Canadian cryptocurrency exchange NDAX, told Finance Magnates that uncertainty is the primary cause of the lack of volatility.
“The case for the bulls versus bears has been ongoing since Bitcoin has recovered from the COVID-19 price drop,” Rasul said.
Tanim Rasul, Head of Operations for Canadian cryptocurrency exchange NDAX.
Therefore, the lack of movement is resulting from--well, a lack of movement: “essentially, the price has been ranging for the past couple of months and many investors are sitting on the sidelines, waiting to see which way the market is going to move after breaking this range,” Rasul explained.
Like Waslen and Hao, Rasul believes that extended flatlining in Bitcoin’s price could give way to a big move: “historically, Bitcoin's volatility index paints a picture that low volatility does not last long and if the past repeats itself, we may see an incoming volatility spike.”
Bitcoin “is starting to act in similar ways to the stock market.”
But could the circumstances of the Bitcoin market alter the historical pattern of consolidation before volatility?
Indeed, OKEx’s Jay Hao told Finance Magnates that Bitcoin’s lack of volatility could be explained by the fact that “BTC is maturing as an asset class with a developed derivatives infrastructure, and it is therefore becoming less volatile.”
Collin Plume, founder and chief executive of Noble Gold Investments, also told Finance Magnates that the development of trading infrastructure could have something to do with the lack of volatility in Bitcoin.
“Now that Bitcoin has moved into the world of day traders and hedge funds, it is starting to act in similar ways to the stock market,” he said.
Therefore, a larger number of investors may be engaging with Bitcoin as they would with traditional markets--specifically, “one of the famous quotes in regards to the stock market is ‘sell in May, and go away’,” Plume said. “Traders used to liquidate their major trades and go on vacation for the summer.”
Collin Plume, chief executive and founder of Noble Gold Investments.
While there haven’t been signs of liquidation in recent months (aside from the market crash in March), it may very well be that the entrance of more traditional institutional traders into the space could mean that the summer months increasingly bring a ‘cooling’ effect to Bitcoin’s volatility levels--though, historically speaking, this hasn’t been the case.
”BTC traders love volatility”--so they may be looking for other markets
However, even if there has been an increase in Bitcoin traders who interact with the Bitcoin market as though it were the stock market, the Bitcoin traders who have traditionally focused on Bitcoin because of its volatility may have been left out in the cold by Bitcoin’s lack of movement.
David Waslen explained that indeed, traditionally speaking, “BTC traders love volatility.”
David Waslen, chief executive and founder of HedgeTrade.
“To be able to profit off an asset class that can move 10% in a matter of minutes provides opportunities that you're unable to find in a lot of the traditional asset classes,” he said. “Superior traders have been able to lock massive returns in the past.”
Therefore, “with the drop in volatility you've seen a drop in [trading] volume as traders are hesitant to take positions, as there are fewer opportunities.”
”Exchanges have seen very low trading volume lately.”
This is indeed the case--cryptocurrency exchanges that typically pull in much of their profits from BTC trades have gotten significantly less revenue from Bitcoin trading than they usually do.
OKEx’s Jay Hao said that indeed, “exchanges have seen very low trading volume lately.”
“Spot trading volume is the lowest that it has been in half a year, and the same pattern can be seen in derivatives,” he said.
“Since the value of Bitcoin derivatives is mainly reflected in hedging market risks, there is a stronger trading demand during periods of high volatility. The decline in bitcoin futures trading volume is mainly due to the continued decline in Bitcoin volatility.”
However, trading volumes on trading platforms outside of spot and derivatives markets don’t seem to have been affected in the same way: “that's not necessarily the case with other cryptocurrency platforms, such as over-the-counter [trading venues,” Jay said.
For example, “if you consider Localbitcoins and Paxful, not only has trading volume not decreased, but it has actually increased in some places,” Hao said.
via Coin.Dance
Is this the beginning of altcoin season?
Additionally, while the lack of volatility in Bitcoin may have caused a decrease in Bitcoin-related trading volume on exchanges, it seems to have caused an increase in trading volume related to altcoins, which have maintained higher levels of volatility.
“Traders looking to make big gains may start looking to the altcoin markets where coins like DOGE and COMP are allowing traders to capitalize off of high volatility,” Jay Hao said. This has “[...led] some to say that altcoin season has begun. If this is the case, then it is normal that we see less trading action on BTC.
Jay pointed specifically to tokens that have originated from the decentralized finance space as possible points of attention in crypto trading markets: “there has also been a lot of action in the DeFi space with DeFi tokens seeing massive gains,” he said.
DeFi tokens could be a new hotspot for traders in search of volatility
Indeed, the thing that seems to have called the most attention to the DeFi sphere in recent times is the surge in value of governance tokens of certain DeFi platforms–most famously, perhaps, the rise of COMP: the governance token of decentralized loan platform Compound, which jumped nearly 300% in value within a week of its mid-June launch.
So far, COMP has delivered on volatility: after peaking at roughly $372 last month, COMP gradually slipped as low as $165 over the course of several weeks–a decrease of roughly 55 percent. (By press time, the price had recovered to $176.
The quick succession of boom and bust has a number of analysts predicting further volatility in the future as the market eventually settles on what may be a more appropriate valuation of the company: Twitter commentator @ThetaSeek wrote that the project was overvalued, saying that “[…] The value of the Protocol is an AUM business and AUM businesses are normally valued at less than 1/3 or 1/4 of the companies’ AUM.
ThetaSeek said, pointing to BlockFi as an example: “@realblockfi is valued at around 200M when their AUM was 650M. (This is generous as Goldman Sachs is valued at less than 1/50 of their AUM),” he said. Therefore, he believes that COMP should be valued at something like $50.
Editor's note: This article previously and erroneously contained a picture of Bilal Hammoud, President & CEO of NDAX, rather than Tanim Rasul, Head of Operations for Canadian cryptocurrency exchange NDAX. Finance Magnates apologizes to NDAX and to readers for the confusion.
Rachel is a self-taught crypto geek and a passionate writer. She believes in the power that the written word has to educate, connect and empower individuals to make positive and powerful financial choices. She is the Podcast Host and a Cryptocurrency Editor at Finance Magnates.
Schwab Aims Crypto Custody at Its $5 Trillion Advisor Channel by 2027
Featured Videos
Buy, Build or Both? Trading Tech for Brokers, Banks & Beyond
Buy, Build or Both? Trading Tech for Brokers, Banks & Beyond
Buy, Build or Both? Trading Tech for Brokers, Banks & Beyond
Buy, Build or Both? Trading Tech for Brokers, Banks & Beyond
For every feature and product, someone has to decide: build it in-house or buy from a vendor. In Singapore and across APAC, local banks and global players face the same question with very different constraints.
This session gathers heads of technology and e-trading to compare how client demand and cost structures shape their choices, and how long it actually takes to ship in each.
Attendees will walk away with:
First-hand view of how client feedback informs decision-making across different market participants.
Understanding pain points and benefits of working with 3rd party integrations at scale.
Insight into products and innovation banks’ retail and trading heads will look for in 2026.
For every feature and product, someone has to decide: build it in-house or buy from a vendor. In Singapore and across APAC, local banks and global players face the same question with very different constraints.
This session gathers heads of technology and e-trading to compare how client demand and cost structures shape their choices, and how long it actually takes to ship in each.
Attendees will walk away with:
First-hand view of how client feedback informs decision-making across different market participants.
Understanding pain points and benefits of working with 3rd party integrations at scale.
Insight into products and innovation banks’ retail and trading heads will look for in 2026.
For every feature and product, someone has to decide: build it in-house or buy from a vendor. In Singapore and across APAC, local banks and global players face the same question with very different constraints.
This session gathers heads of technology and e-trading to compare how client demand and cost structures shape their choices, and how long it actually takes to ship in each.
Attendees will walk away with:
First-hand view of how client feedback informs decision-making across different market participants.
Understanding pain points and benefits of working with 3rd party integrations at scale.
Insight into products and innovation banks’ retail and trading heads will look for in 2026.
For every feature and product, someone has to decide: build it in-house or buy from a vendor. In Singapore and across APAC, local banks and global players face the same question with very different constraints.
This session gathers heads of technology and e-trading to compare how client demand and cost structures shape their choices, and how long it actually takes to ship in each.
Attendees will walk away with:
First-hand view of how client feedback informs decision-making across different market participants.
Understanding pain points and benefits of working with 3rd party integrations at scale.
Insight into products and innovation banks’ retail and trading heads will look for in 2026.
Regulation Roundup: Setup, Compliance, and Hidden Costs of Entry
Regulation Roundup: Setup, Compliance, and Hidden Costs of Entry
Regulation Roundup: Setup, Compliance, and Hidden Costs of Entry
Regulation Roundup: Setup, Compliance, and Hidden Costs of Entry
Regulation Roundup: Setup, Compliance, and Hidden Costs of Entry
Regulation Roundup: Setup, Compliance, and Hidden Costs of Entry
As Singapore's capital-intensive requirements leave only a few retail brokers active in the city-state, there are many opportunities to be made in and around.
This session gathers regulators, advisors, and operators who have set up across multiple APAC jurisdictions to break down figures, what's working, what's breaking, and what's next.
Attendees will walk away with:
Survey of capital thresholds and other requirements across regions in APAC
Nuanced understanding of Singapore's role in the retail trading space
Glimpse into parallel developments in digital assets and RWA
As Singapore's capital-intensive requirements leave only a few retail brokers active in the city-state, there are many opportunities to be made in and around.
This session gathers regulators, advisors, and operators who have set up across multiple APAC jurisdictions to break down figures, what's working, what's breaking, and what's next.
Attendees will walk away with:
Survey of capital thresholds and other requirements across regions in APAC
Nuanced understanding of Singapore's role in the retail trading space
Glimpse into parallel developments in digital assets and RWA
As Singapore's capital-intensive requirements leave only a few retail brokers active in the city-state, there are many opportunities to be made in and around.
This session gathers regulators, advisors, and operators who have set up across multiple APAC jurisdictions to break down figures, what's working, what's breaking, and what's next.
Attendees will walk away with:
Survey of capital thresholds and other requirements across regions in APAC
Nuanced understanding of Singapore's role in the retail trading space
Glimpse into parallel developments in digital assets and RWA
As Singapore's capital-intensive requirements leave only a few retail brokers active in the city-state, there are many opportunities to be made in and around.
This session gathers regulators, advisors, and operators who have set up across multiple APAC jurisdictions to break down figures, what's working, what's breaking, and what's next.
Attendees will walk away with:
Survey of capital thresholds and other requirements across regions in APAC
Nuanced understanding of Singapore's role in the retail trading space
Glimpse into parallel developments in digital assets and RWA
As Singapore's capital-intensive requirements leave only a few retail brokers active in the city-state, there are many opportunities to be made in and around.
This session gathers regulators, advisors, and operators who have set up across multiple APAC jurisdictions to break down figures, what's working, what's breaking, and what's next.
Attendees will walk away with:
Survey of capital thresholds and other requirements across regions in APAC
Nuanced understanding of Singapore's role in the retail trading space
Glimpse into parallel developments in digital assets and RWA
As Singapore's capital-intensive requirements leave only a few retail brokers active in the city-state, there are many opportunities to be made in and around.
This session gathers regulators, advisors, and operators who have set up across multiple APAC jurisdictions to break down figures, what's working, what's breaking, and what's next.
Attendees will walk away with:
Survey of capital thresholds and other requirements across regions in APAC
Nuanced understanding of Singapore's role in the retail trading space
Glimpse into parallel developments in digital assets and RWA
Rails for Growth: 'Payments as Infrastructure' for Financial Superapps
Rails for Growth: 'Payments as Infrastructure' for Financial Superapps
Rails for Growth: 'Payments as Infrastructure' for Financial Superapps
Rails for Growth: 'Payments as Infrastructure' for Financial Superapps
Rails for Growth: 'Payments as Infrastructure' for Financial Superapps
Rails for Growth: 'Payments as Infrastructure' for Financial Superapps
For fintechs who try to capture the retail investment crowd, payments can be a game-changer from user experience to back-office plumbing.
This session brings together builders from across the payment ecosystem to examine how new rails are altering the way capital moves in APAC and beyond.
Attendees will walk away with:
A clear view of how stablecoins, on-chain settlement, and tokenised money are being used in live institutional workflows today
Understanding of what MAS initiatives like Project Orchid and Project Bloom signal for the future of digital money in Singapore's capital markets
Insight into how mobile-first fund platforms and digital distribution channels are pulling payment infrastructure closer to the point of investment
Perspective on the compliance and custody challenges firms face when payments, trading, and settlement converge on the same rails
For fintechs who try to capture the retail investment crowd, payments can be a game-changer from user experience to back-office plumbing.
This session brings together builders from across the payment ecosystem to examine how new rails are altering the way capital moves in APAC and beyond.
Attendees will walk away with:
A clear view of how stablecoins, on-chain settlement, and tokenised money are being used in live institutional workflows today
Understanding of what MAS initiatives like Project Orchid and Project Bloom signal for the future of digital money in Singapore's capital markets
Insight into how mobile-first fund platforms and digital distribution channels are pulling payment infrastructure closer to the point of investment
Perspective on the compliance and custody challenges firms face when payments, trading, and settlement converge on the same rails
For fintechs who try to capture the retail investment crowd, payments can be a game-changer from user experience to back-office plumbing.
This session brings together builders from across the payment ecosystem to examine how new rails are altering the way capital moves in APAC and beyond.
Attendees will walk away with:
A clear view of how stablecoins, on-chain settlement, and tokenised money are being used in live institutional workflows today
Understanding of what MAS initiatives like Project Orchid and Project Bloom signal for the future of digital money in Singapore's capital markets
Insight into how mobile-first fund platforms and digital distribution channels are pulling payment infrastructure closer to the point of investment
Perspective on the compliance and custody challenges firms face when payments, trading, and settlement converge on the same rails
For fintechs who try to capture the retail investment crowd, payments can be a game-changer from user experience to back-office plumbing.
This session brings together builders from across the payment ecosystem to examine how new rails are altering the way capital moves in APAC and beyond.
Attendees will walk away with:
A clear view of how stablecoins, on-chain settlement, and tokenised money are being used in live institutional workflows today
Understanding of what MAS initiatives like Project Orchid and Project Bloom signal for the future of digital money in Singapore's capital markets
Insight into how mobile-first fund platforms and digital distribution channels are pulling payment infrastructure closer to the point of investment
Perspective on the compliance and custody challenges firms face when payments, trading, and settlement converge on the same rails
For fintechs who try to capture the retail investment crowd, payments can be a game-changer from user experience to back-office plumbing.
This session brings together builders from across the payment ecosystem to examine how new rails are altering the way capital moves in APAC and beyond.
Attendees will walk away with:
A clear view of how stablecoins, on-chain settlement, and tokenised money are being used in live institutional workflows today
Understanding of what MAS initiatives like Project Orchid and Project Bloom signal for the future of digital money in Singapore's capital markets
Insight into how mobile-first fund platforms and digital distribution channels are pulling payment infrastructure closer to the point of investment
Perspective on the compliance and custody challenges firms face when payments, trading, and settlement converge on the same rails
For fintechs who try to capture the retail investment crowd, payments can be a game-changer from user experience to back-office plumbing.
This session brings together builders from across the payment ecosystem to examine how new rails are altering the way capital moves in APAC and beyond.
Attendees will walk away with:
A clear view of how stablecoins, on-chain settlement, and tokenised money are being used in live institutional workflows today
Understanding of what MAS initiatives like Project Orchid and Project Bloom signal for the future of digital money in Singapore's capital markets
Insight into how mobile-first fund platforms and digital distribution channels are pulling payment infrastructure closer to the point of investment
Perspective on the compliance and custody challenges firms face when payments, trading, and settlement converge on the same rails
From Rewards to Retention: The 5 Loyalty Program Mistakes Brokers Need To Avoid (Case Study)
From Rewards to Retention: The 5 Loyalty Program Mistakes Brokers Need To Avoid (Case Study)
From Rewards to Retention: The 5 Loyalty Program Mistakes Brokers Need To Avoid (Case Study)
From Rewards to Retention: The 5 Loyalty Program Mistakes Brokers Need To Avoid (Case Study)
From Rewards to Retention: The 5 Loyalty Program Mistakes Brokers Need To Avoid (Case Study)
From Rewards to Retention: The 5 Loyalty Program Mistakes Brokers Need To Avoid (Case Study)
Acquisition is getting more expensive. Most brokers already know that. The harder question is what happens after the client funds the account.
This session looks at how broker loyalty programmes are moving from “nice-to-have rewards” into a serious retention layer inside the client portal.
In this session, Desmond Leong, CEO of Returning.AI, will break down the practical mechanics behind high-performing broker loyalty programmes: what to reward, what not to reward, how onshore and offshore entities need different incentive structures, what belongs in the rewards store, and how brokers can recycle reward budgets back into trading value instead of letting them disappear as pure cost.
The talk will cover common mistakes brokers make when launching loyalty programmes, including copying retail-style rewards, ignoring jurisdictional constraints, over-relying on bonuses, failing to connect rewards to lifecycle stages, and measuring vanity engagement instead of retention, LTV, CAC payback, deposits, and active trading behaviour.
Attendees will leave with a clear do-and-don’t framework they can use to pressure-test their own loyalty strategy.
Why loyalty is no longer a “nice-to-have” marketing feature for brokers
The building blocks of any loyalty program and what they mean: points, tiers, missions, stores, leaderboards, boosters, and cashback-style mechanics
Understanding of how key regulators read loyalty incentives and where the compliance lines are
What should go in the rewards store, and what quietly destroys ROI
How trading credits, rebates, VIP perks, education, and service benefits can recycle value back into the brokerage
The 5 mistakes brokers should avoid when building or buying a loyalty programme
Real figures from a live deployment: what moved in daily activity, tier progression, and trader spend
Acquisition is getting more expensive. Most brokers already know that. The harder question is what happens after the client funds the account.
This session looks at how broker loyalty programmes are moving from “nice-to-have rewards” into a serious retention layer inside the client portal.
In this session, Desmond Leong, CEO of Returning.AI, will break down the practical mechanics behind high-performing broker loyalty programmes: what to reward, what not to reward, how onshore and offshore entities need different incentive structures, what belongs in the rewards store, and how brokers can recycle reward budgets back into trading value instead of letting them disappear as pure cost.
The talk will cover common mistakes brokers make when launching loyalty programmes, including copying retail-style rewards, ignoring jurisdictional constraints, over-relying on bonuses, failing to connect rewards to lifecycle stages, and measuring vanity engagement instead of retention, LTV, CAC payback, deposits, and active trading behaviour.
Attendees will leave with a clear do-and-don’t framework they can use to pressure-test their own loyalty strategy.
Why loyalty is no longer a “nice-to-have” marketing feature for brokers
The building blocks of any loyalty program and what they mean: points, tiers, missions, stores, leaderboards, boosters, and cashback-style mechanics
Understanding of how key regulators read loyalty incentives and where the compliance lines are
What should go in the rewards store, and what quietly destroys ROI
How trading credits, rebates, VIP perks, education, and service benefits can recycle value back into the brokerage
The 5 mistakes brokers should avoid when building or buying a loyalty programme
Real figures from a live deployment: what moved in daily activity, tier progression, and trader spend
Acquisition is getting more expensive. Most brokers already know that. The harder question is what happens after the client funds the account.
This session looks at how broker loyalty programmes are moving from “nice-to-have rewards” into a serious retention layer inside the client portal.
In this session, Desmond Leong, CEO of Returning.AI, will break down the practical mechanics behind high-performing broker loyalty programmes: what to reward, what not to reward, how onshore and offshore entities need different incentive structures, what belongs in the rewards store, and how brokers can recycle reward budgets back into trading value instead of letting them disappear as pure cost.
The talk will cover common mistakes brokers make when launching loyalty programmes, including copying retail-style rewards, ignoring jurisdictional constraints, over-relying on bonuses, failing to connect rewards to lifecycle stages, and measuring vanity engagement instead of retention, LTV, CAC payback, deposits, and active trading behaviour.
Attendees will leave with a clear do-and-don’t framework they can use to pressure-test their own loyalty strategy.
Why loyalty is no longer a “nice-to-have” marketing feature for brokers
The building blocks of any loyalty program and what they mean: points, tiers, missions, stores, leaderboards, boosters, and cashback-style mechanics
Understanding of how key regulators read loyalty incentives and where the compliance lines are
What should go in the rewards store, and what quietly destroys ROI
How trading credits, rebates, VIP perks, education, and service benefits can recycle value back into the brokerage
The 5 mistakes brokers should avoid when building or buying a loyalty programme
Real figures from a live deployment: what moved in daily activity, tier progression, and trader spend
Acquisition is getting more expensive. Most brokers already know that. The harder question is what happens after the client funds the account.
This session looks at how broker loyalty programmes are moving from “nice-to-have rewards” into a serious retention layer inside the client portal.
In this session, Desmond Leong, CEO of Returning.AI, will break down the practical mechanics behind high-performing broker loyalty programmes: what to reward, what not to reward, how onshore and offshore entities need different incentive structures, what belongs in the rewards store, and how brokers can recycle reward budgets back into trading value instead of letting them disappear as pure cost.
The talk will cover common mistakes brokers make when launching loyalty programmes, including copying retail-style rewards, ignoring jurisdictional constraints, over-relying on bonuses, failing to connect rewards to lifecycle stages, and measuring vanity engagement instead of retention, LTV, CAC payback, deposits, and active trading behaviour.
Attendees will leave with a clear do-and-don’t framework they can use to pressure-test their own loyalty strategy.
Why loyalty is no longer a “nice-to-have” marketing feature for brokers
The building blocks of any loyalty program and what they mean: points, tiers, missions, stores, leaderboards, boosters, and cashback-style mechanics
Understanding of how key regulators read loyalty incentives and where the compliance lines are
What should go in the rewards store, and what quietly destroys ROI
How trading credits, rebates, VIP perks, education, and service benefits can recycle value back into the brokerage
The 5 mistakes brokers should avoid when building or buying a loyalty programme
Real figures from a live deployment: what moved in daily activity, tier progression, and trader spend
Acquisition is getting more expensive. Most brokers already know that. The harder question is what happens after the client funds the account.
This session looks at how broker loyalty programmes are moving from “nice-to-have rewards” into a serious retention layer inside the client portal.
In this session, Desmond Leong, CEO of Returning.AI, will break down the practical mechanics behind high-performing broker loyalty programmes: what to reward, what not to reward, how onshore and offshore entities need different incentive structures, what belongs in the rewards store, and how brokers can recycle reward budgets back into trading value instead of letting them disappear as pure cost.
The talk will cover common mistakes brokers make when launching loyalty programmes, including copying retail-style rewards, ignoring jurisdictional constraints, over-relying on bonuses, failing to connect rewards to lifecycle stages, and measuring vanity engagement instead of retention, LTV, CAC payback, deposits, and active trading behaviour.
Attendees will leave with a clear do-and-don’t framework they can use to pressure-test their own loyalty strategy.
Why loyalty is no longer a “nice-to-have” marketing feature for brokers
The building blocks of any loyalty program and what they mean: points, tiers, missions, stores, leaderboards, boosters, and cashback-style mechanics
Understanding of how key regulators read loyalty incentives and where the compliance lines are
What should go in the rewards store, and what quietly destroys ROI
How trading credits, rebates, VIP perks, education, and service benefits can recycle value back into the brokerage
The 5 mistakes brokers should avoid when building or buying a loyalty programme
Real figures from a live deployment: what moved in daily activity, tier progression, and trader spend
Acquisition is getting more expensive. Most brokers already know that. The harder question is what happens after the client funds the account.
This session looks at how broker loyalty programmes are moving from “nice-to-have rewards” into a serious retention layer inside the client portal.
In this session, Desmond Leong, CEO of Returning.AI, will break down the practical mechanics behind high-performing broker loyalty programmes: what to reward, what not to reward, how onshore and offshore entities need different incentive structures, what belongs in the rewards store, and how brokers can recycle reward budgets back into trading value instead of letting them disappear as pure cost.
The talk will cover common mistakes brokers make when launching loyalty programmes, including copying retail-style rewards, ignoring jurisdictional constraints, over-relying on bonuses, failing to connect rewards to lifecycle stages, and measuring vanity engagement instead of retention, LTV, CAC payback, deposits, and active trading behaviour.
Attendees will leave with a clear do-and-don’t framework they can use to pressure-test their own loyalty strategy.
Why loyalty is no longer a “nice-to-have” marketing feature for brokers
The building blocks of any loyalty program and what they mean: points, tiers, missions, stores, leaderboards, boosters, and cashback-style mechanics
Understanding of how key regulators read loyalty incentives and where the compliance lines are
What should go in the rewards store, and what quietly destroys ROI
How trading credits, rebates, VIP perks, education, and service benefits can recycle value back into the brokerage
The 5 mistakes brokers should avoid when building or buying a loyalty programme
Real figures from a live deployment: what moved in daily activity, tier progression, and trader spend
Stablecoins from Experimentation to Implementation
Stablecoins from Experimentation to Implementation
Stablecoins from Experimentation to Implementation
Stablecoins from Experimentation to Implementation
Stablecoins from Experimentation to Implementation
Stablecoins from Experimentation to Implementation
With over $300 billion in stablecoins now in circulation and APAC regulators moving from frameworks to enforcement, the conversation has shifted.
Held in partnership with 8Circle, this session brings together the builders of new payment rails and the institutions putting them to work.
Attendees will walk away with:
A clear view of which stablecoin use cases have cleared proof of concept and are now operating at scale in APAC
Understanding of what the MAS Payment Services Act and Hong Kong's fiat stablecoin licensing regime mean for brokers and payment providers in practice
Insight into the infrastructure gaps firms most commonly underestimate before going live
Perspective on where the next wave of adoption is heading and what existing systems need to accommodate
With over $300 billion in stablecoins now in circulation and APAC regulators moving from frameworks to enforcement, the conversation has shifted.
Held in partnership with 8Circle, this session brings together the builders of new payment rails and the institutions putting them to work.
Attendees will walk away with:
A clear view of which stablecoin use cases have cleared proof of concept and are now operating at scale in APAC
Understanding of what the MAS Payment Services Act and Hong Kong's fiat stablecoin licensing regime mean for brokers and payment providers in practice
Insight into the infrastructure gaps firms most commonly underestimate before going live
Perspective on where the next wave of adoption is heading and what existing systems need to accommodate
With over $300 billion in stablecoins now in circulation and APAC regulators moving from frameworks to enforcement, the conversation has shifted.
Held in partnership with 8Circle, this session brings together the builders of new payment rails and the institutions putting them to work.
Attendees will walk away with:
A clear view of which stablecoin use cases have cleared proof of concept and are now operating at scale in APAC
Understanding of what the MAS Payment Services Act and Hong Kong's fiat stablecoin licensing regime mean for brokers and payment providers in practice
Insight into the infrastructure gaps firms most commonly underestimate before going live
Perspective on where the next wave of adoption is heading and what existing systems need to accommodate
With over $300 billion in stablecoins now in circulation and APAC regulators moving from frameworks to enforcement, the conversation has shifted.
Held in partnership with 8Circle, this session brings together the builders of new payment rails and the institutions putting them to work.
Attendees will walk away with:
A clear view of which stablecoin use cases have cleared proof of concept and are now operating at scale in APAC
Understanding of what the MAS Payment Services Act and Hong Kong's fiat stablecoin licensing regime mean for brokers and payment providers in practice
Insight into the infrastructure gaps firms most commonly underestimate before going live
Perspective on where the next wave of adoption is heading and what existing systems need to accommodate
With over $300 billion in stablecoins now in circulation and APAC regulators moving from frameworks to enforcement, the conversation has shifted.
Held in partnership with 8Circle, this session brings together the builders of new payment rails and the institutions putting them to work.
Attendees will walk away with:
A clear view of which stablecoin use cases have cleared proof of concept and are now operating at scale in APAC
Understanding of what the MAS Payment Services Act and Hong Kong's fiat stablecoin licensing regime mean for brokers and payment providers in practice
Insight into the infrastructure gaps firms most commonly underestimate before going live
Perspective on where the next wave of adoption is heading and what existing systems need to accommodate
With over $300 billion in stablecoins now in circulation and APAC regulators moving from frameworks to enforcement, the conversation has shifted.
Held in partnership with 8Circle, this session brings together the builders of new payment rails and the institutions putting them to work.
Attendees will walk away with:
A clear view of which stablecoin use cases have cleared proof of concept and are now operating at scale in APAC
Understanding of what the MAS Payment Services Act and Hong Kong's fiat stablecoin licensing regime mean for brokers and payment providers in practice
Insight into the infrastructure gaps firms most commonly underestimate before going live
Perspective on where the next wave of adoption is heading and what existing systems need to accommodate