>
DeFi Yield Is Broken — Why RWAs Could be the Bridge to Generating Real Yield in Crypto
Disclaimer
DeFi Yield Is Broken — Why RWAs Could be the Bridge to Generating Real Yield in Crypto
Wednesday,02/07/2025|09:12GMTby
FM
Disclaimer
Crypto has finally come of age!
Decentralized Finance (DeFi) innovations rose in popularity back in 2020 when pioneer protocols, including Compound and Uniswap launched their governance tokens. What stood out about this particular crypto niche at the time was its lucrative yields, with some protocols like Yearn Finance (YFI) offering APY’s that were as high 1,000+%.
Fast forward to today, DeFi is no longer the powerhouse that it was at the height of the 2021 bull run when the total value locked (TVL) eclipsed $174 billion. In fact, most of the protocols which featured astronomical yields did not see the light of day post the FTX saga.
So what went wrong? Was the revenue generation model for DeFi protocols not sustainable or just like any other speculative market, hype and fleeting narratives could not keep gravy train running for long?
Real Yield from Real Assets
To understand what DeFi innovations missed in terms of a sustainable yield generation formula, one has to appreciate the upcoming Real World Asset (RWA) market. This nascent area of innovation solves the shortcomings in DeFi yield generation models by integrating real world assets with the crypto ecosystem to generate real yields with real impact. A fundamental deviation from DeFi’s typical inflationary tokenomics models where the production of new tokens is what drove the yield.
Imagine a world where investors across the globe can seamlessly participate and generate yield from privileged-access markets such as the U.S. treasuries and bond market or even the booming clean energy funding ecosystem. This is what tokenized RWA solutions like Blackrock’s BUIDL fund, Franklin Templeton’s BENJI and Ecoyield’s decentralized clean energy funding platform are designed to achieve.
To provide some more context, Templeton’s BENJI provides investors with an opportunity to get exposure in U.S. treasuries. The catch is that unlike traditional settlement desks, investors don’t have to go through a centralized intermediary to purchase U.S. securities; instead, BENJI supports multiple blockchain networks, including Solana, Stellar, Polygon, Ethereum and Base which allow investors to gain exposure without going through an intermediary.
Ecoyield is also building an RWA solution that operates in almost similar fashion but with a focus on the clean energy market. This decentralized platform is a pioneer in the tokenization of clean energy infrastructure. At the core, Ecoyield’s RWA model connects investors directly with vetted renewable energy projects, enabling them to deploy funds in verified solar and BESS (Battery Energy Storage System) projects.
So, how are these two RWA examples different from speculative DeFi yield? The real value proposition is that both projects generate yield from real assets; in the case of BENJI, the yield is derived from U.S. treasuries while in Ecoyield, the platform collects real-world revenue (via PPAs), and distributes yield (in ETH/USDC) back to the investors who deploy their capital.
Looking back at DeFi yield generation model, there have been some structural issues which can be attributed to the products or tokens being backed by thin air and the high volatility of digital assets:
Inflationary tokenomics: A huge number of DeFi protocols were only sustainable due to constant emission of tokens to reward users as APY. But when these tokens flooded the market, the value was inevitably diluted and ultimately devalued.
Impermanent Loss: Even when headline APY for DeFi protocols was impressive, the high volatility of token pairs meant actual loss was often lower or negative after accounting for the impermanent loss.
Looking Into the Future
Now that RWAs have emerged as a potential disruptor, one can only but wonder what the future of yield generation in crypto holds.
For starters, it is likely we will start seeing more realistic yields but achievable and backed by a real world revenue generating asset. Instead of scenarios where protocols feature over 1000% APY as was the case with prominent protocols like Sushiswap and Wonderland (TIME) which offered as high as 70,000% via rebase mechanics, the industry will usher in an era where conservative but sustainable APY’s make sense.
The shift is already happening, with U.S. treasuries tokenized RWAs emerging as a favorite amongst investors despite their low returns. For context, the average yield to maturity according to RWA.xyz currently stands at 4.12%; this is much lower than the highly lucrative DeFi yields we witnessed in 2021. But what’s worth noting is despite their conservative nature, the RWA market has been on an uptrend, with tokenized treasuries now at a value of $7.3 billion.
Source: RWA xyz
Meanwhile, DeFi protocols that lead the hype in 2021 continue to struggle with traction; Sushiswap’s TVL in 2021 hit an all-time high of $7.7 billion but has since dropped to a mere $117.36 million as of writing this piece.
Another interesting development that will likely happen is the adoption of real world assets by smaller players, including real estate investment vehicles looking to tokenize their properties to localize access in their specific markets. This particular development will likely revolutionize the concept of fractional ownership through blockchain technology. Instead of depending on third parties, RWAs will make it possible for investors to take up positions in sophisticated investments directly.
More importantly, crypto has finally come of age; an era where yield is not generated from speculative hype but rather real assets with real yield and real impact!
Decentralized Finance (DeFi) innovations rose in popularity back in 2020 when pioneer protocols, including Compound and Uniswap launched their governance tokens. What stood out about this particular crypto niche at the time was its lucrative yields, with some protocols like Yearn Finance (YFI) offering APY’s that were as high 1,000+%.
Fast forward to today, DeFi is no longer the powerhouse that it was at the height of the 2021 bull run when the total value locked (TVL) eclipsed $174 billion. In fact, most of the protocols which featured astronomical yields did not see the light of day post the FTX saga.
So what went wrong? Was the revenue generation model for DeFi protocols not sustainable or just like any other speculative market, hype and fleeting narratives could not keep gravy train running for long?
Real Yield from Real Assets
To understand what DeFi innovations missed in terms of a sustainable yield generation formula, one has to appreciate the upcoming Real World Asset (RWA) market. This nascent area of innovation solves the shortcomings in DeFi yield generation models by integrating real world assets with the crypto ecosystem to generate real yields with real impact. A fundamental deviation from DeFi’s typical inflationary tokenomics models where the production of new tokens is what drove the yield.
Imagine a world where investors across the globe can seamlessly participate and generate yield from privileged-access markets such as the U.S. treasuries and bond market or even the booming clean energy funding ecosystem. This is what tokenized RWA solutions like Blackrock’s BUIDL fund, Franklin Templeton’s BENJI and Ecoyield’s decentralized clean energy funding platform are designed to achieve.
To provide some more context, Templeton’s BENJI provides investors with an opportunity to get exposure in U.S. treasuries. The catch is that unlike traditional settlement desks, investors don’t have to go through a centralized intermediary to purchase U.S. securities; instead, BENJI supports multiple blockchain networks, including Solana, Stellar, Polygon, Ethereum and Base which allow investors to gain exposure without going through an intermediary.
Ecoyield is also building an RWA solution that operates in almost similar fashion but with a focus on the clean energy market. This decentralized platform is a pioneer in the tokenization of clean energy infrastructure. At the core, Ecoyield’s RWA model connects investors directly with vetted renewable energy projects, enabling them to deploy funds in verified solar and BESS (Battery Energy Storage System) projects.
So, how are these two RWA examples different from speculative DeFi yield? The real value proposition is that both projects generate yield from real assets; in the case of BENJI, the yield is derived from U.S. treasuries while in Ecoyield, the platform collects real-world revenue (via PPAs), and distributes yield (in ETH/USDC) back to the investors who deploy their capital.
Looking back at DeFi yield generation model, there have been some structural issues which can be attributed to the products or tokens being backed by thin air and the high volatility of digital assets:
Inflationary tokenomics: A huge number of DeFi protocols were only sustainable due to constant emission of tokens to reward users as APY. But when these tokens flooded the market, the value was inevitably diluted and ultimately devalued.
Impermanent Loss: Even when headline APY for DeFi protocols was impressive, the high volatility of token pairs meant actual loss was often lower or negative after accounting for the impermanent loss.
Looking Into the Future
Now that RWAs have emerged as a potential disruptor, one can only but wonder what the future of yield generation in crypto holds.
For starters, it is likely we will start seeing more realistic yields but achievable and backed by a real world revenue generating asset. Instead of scenarios where protocols feature over 1000% APY as was the case with prominent protocols like Sushiswap and Wonderland (TIME) which offered as high as 70,000% via rebase mechanics, the industry will usher in an era where conservative but sustainable APY’s make sense.
The shift is already happening, with U.S. treasuries tokenized RWAs emerging as a favorite amongst investors despite their low returns. For context, the average yield to maturity according to RWA.xyz currently stands at 4.12%; this is much lower than the highly lucrative DeFi yields we witnessed in 2021. But what’s worth noting is despite their conservative nature, the RWA market has been on an uptrend, with tokenized treasuries now at a value of $7.3 billion.
Source: RWA xyz
Meanwhile, DeFi protocols that lead the hype in 2021 continue to struggle with traction; Sushiswap’s TVL in 2021 hit an all-time high of $7.7 billion but has since dropped to a mere $117.36 million as of writing this piece.
Another interesting development that will likely happen is the adoption of real world assets by smaller players, including real estate investment vehicles looking to tokenize their properties to localize access in their specific markets. This particular development will likely revolutionize the concept of fractional ownership through blockchain technology. Instead of depending on third parties, RWAs will make it possible for investors to take up positions in sophisticated investments directly.
More importantly, crypto has finally come of age; an era where yield is not generated from speculative hype but rather real assets with real yield and real impact!
LMAX Digital on Crypto Markets: Why Regulation, Macro Trends and Tokenization Matter More Than Ever
Featured Videos
FM Daily Brief - 29 May 2026
FM Daily Brief - 29 May 2026
FM Daily Brief - 29 May 2026
FM Daily Brief - 29 May 2026
Today is Friday, the 29th of May 2026, and these are our main stories: three global regulators are converging on trading platform design, and a Singapore prop firm launches a deferred-fee challenge model.
Today is Friday, the 29th of May 2026, and these are our main stories: three global regulators are converging on trading platform design, and a Singapore prop firm launches a deferred-fee challenge model.
Today is Friday, the 29th of May 2026, and these are our main stories: three global regulators are converging on trading platform design, and a Singapore prop firm launches a deferred-fee challenge model.
Today is Friday, the 29th of May 2026, and these are our main stories: three global regulators are converging on trading platform design, and a Singapore prop firm launches a deferred-fee challenge model.
Today is Thursday, the 28th of May 2026, and these are our main stories: the chair of CySEC makes clear that prediction markets look like binary options to Brussels, Robinhood enters the age of AI agents, and a Google engineer faces insider trading charges over Polymarket activity.
Today is Thursday, the 28th of May 2026, and these are our main stories: the chair of CySEC makes clear that prediction markets look like binary options to Brussels, Robinhood enters the age of AI agents, and a Google engineer faces insider trading charges over Polymarket activity.
Today is Thursday, the 28th of May 2026, and these are our main stories: the chair of CySEC makes clear that prediction markets look like binary options to Brussels, Robinhood enters the age of AI agents, and a Google engineer faces insider trading charges over Polymarket activity.
Today is Thursday, the 28th of May 2026, and these are our main stories: the chair of CySEC makes clear that prediction markets look like binary options to Brussels, Robinhood enters the age of AI agents, and a Google engineer faces insider trading charges over Polymarket activity.
Today is Thursday, the 28th of May 2026, and these are our main stories: the chair of CySEC makes clear that prediction markets look like binary options to Brussels, Robinhood enters the age of AI agents, and a Google engineer faces insider trading charges over Polymarket activity.
Today is Thursday, the 28th of May 2026, and these are our main stories: the chair of CySEC makes clear that prediction markets look like binary options to Brussels, Robinhood enters the age of AI agents, and a Google engineer faces insider trading charges over Polymarket activity.
Nick Strain, Country Manager Singapore at LMAX Digital, discusses the future of digital assets and shares his views on crypto markets, perpetuals, institutional adoption, tokenization, and why regulatory clarity remains the biggest driver in the space.
The discussion, hosted by Jonathan Fine, Content Strategist at Finance Magnates, covers:
Crypto market sentiment
Bitcoin and Ethereum's role as macro assets
The mechanics of perpetuals and funding rates
Institutional adoption beyond buying crypto
The opportunity in tokenization and programmable money
The critical role of regulation in market growth
Nick Strain, Country Manager Singapore at LMAX Digital, discusses the future of digital assets and shares his views on crypto markets, perpetuals, institutional adoption, tokenization, and why regulatory clarity remains the biggest driver in the space.
The discussion, hosted by Jonathan Fine, Content Strategist at Finance Magnates, covers:
Crypto market sentiment
Bitcoin and Ethereum's role as macro assets
The mechanics of perpetuals and funding rates
Institutional adoption beyond buying crypto
The opportunity in tokenization and programmable money
The critical role of regulation in market growth
Nick Strain, Country Manager Singapore at LMAX Digital, discusses the future of digital assets and shares his views on crypto markets, perpetuals, institutional adoption, tokenization, and why regulatory clarity remains the biggest driver in the space.
The discussion, hosted by Jonathan Fine, Content Strategist at Finance Magnates, covers:
Crypto market sentiment
Bitcoin and Ethereum's role as macro assets
The mechanics of perpetuals and funding rates
Institutional adoption beyond buying crypto
The opportunity in tokenization and programmable money
The critical role of regulation in market growth
Nick Strain, Country Manager Singapore at LMAX Digital, discusses the future of digital assets and shares his views on crypto markets, perpetuals, institutional adoption, tokenization, and why regulatory clarity remains the biggest driver in the space.
The discussion, hosted by Jonathan Fine, Content Strategist at Finance Magnates, covers:
Crypto market sentiment
Bitcoin and Ethereum's role as macro assets
The mechanics of perpetuals and funding rates
Institutional adoption beyond buying crypto
The opportunity in tokenization and programmable money
The critical role of regulation in market growth
Nick Strain, Country Manager Singapore at LMAX Digital, discusses the future of digital assets and shares his views on crypto markets, perpetuals, institutional adoption, tokenization, and why regulatory clarity remains the biggest driver in the space.
The discussion, hosted by Jonathan Fine, Content Strategist at Finance Magnates, covers:
Crypto market sentiment
Bitcoin and Ethereum's role as macro assets
The mechanics of perpetuals and funding rates
Institutional adoption beyond buying crypto
The opportunity in tokenization and programmable money
The critical role of regulation in market growth
Nick Strain, Country Manager Singapore at LMAX Digital, discusses the future of digital assets and shares his views on crypto markets, perpetuals, institutional adoption, tokenization, and why regulatory clarity remains the biggest driver in the space.
The discussion, hosted by Jonathan Fine, Content Strategist at Finance Magnates, covers:
Crypto market sentiment
Bitcoin and Ethereum's role as macro assets
The mechanics of perpetuals and funding rates
Institutional adoption beyond buying crypto
The opportunity in tokenization and programmable money
The critical role of regulation in market growth
FM Daily Brief - 27 May 2026
FM Daily Brief - 27 May 2026
FM Daily Brief - 27 May 2026
FM Daily Brief - 27 May 2026
FM Daily Brief - 27 May 2026
FM Daily Brief - 27 May 2026
Today is Wednesday, the 27th of May 2026, and these are our main stories: questions are swirling around the futures of FXCM and Tradu, as owner Jefferies reportedly weighs a sale, an acquisition of a prop firm, and the demographics of prediction markets.
Today is Wednesday, the 27th of May 2026, and these are our main stories: questions are swirling around the futures of FXCM and Tradu, as owner Jefferies reportedly weighs a sale, an acquisition of a prop firm, and the demographics of prediction markets.
Today is Wednesday, the 27th of May 2026, and these are our main stories: questions are swirling around the futures of FXCM and Tradu, as owner Jefferies reportedly weighs a sale, an acquisition of a prop firm, and the demographics of prediction markets.
Today is Wednesday, the 27th of May 2026, and these are our main stories: questions are swirling around the futures of FXCM and Tradu, as owner Jefferies reportedly weighs a sale, an acquisition of a prop firm, and the demographics of prediction markets.
Today is Wednesday, the 27th of May 2026, and these are our main stories: questions are swirling around the futures of FXCM and Tradu, as owner Jefferies reportedly weighs a sale, an acquisition of a prop firm, and the demographics of prediction markets.
Today is Wednesday, the 27th of May 2026, and these are our main stories: questions are swirling around the futures of FXCM and Tradu, as owner Jefferies reportedly weighs a sale, an acquisition of a prop firm, and the demographics of prediction markets.
FYNXT CEO Samuel Aeby: Why Brokers Need Operating Systems, Not Just CRMs
FYNXT CEO Samuel Aeby: Why Brokers Need Operating Systems, Not Just CRMs
FYNXT CEO Samuel Aeby: Why Brokers Need Operating Systems, Not Just CRMs
FYNXT CEO Samuel Aeby: Why Brokers Need Operating Systems, Not Just CRMs
FYNXT CEO Samuel Aeby: Why Brokers Need Operating Systems, Not Just CRMs
FYNXT CEO Samuel Aeby: Why Brokers Need Operating Systems, Not Just CRMs
Should brokers build their own technology, or buy existing solutions? And with AI changing how firms manage clients, retention, and risk, are traditional CRM systems still enough?
At the Finance Magnates Singapore Summit, Jonathan Fine, Content Strategist at Finance Magnates, spoke with Samuel Aeby, CEO & Founder of FYNXT, about the future of broker technology, AI, and why operational complexity may be holding firms back.
🎥 Watch the interview: What does Samuel Aeby think most brokers are getting wrong when it comes to technology?
Should brokers build their own technology, or buy existing solutions? And with AI changing how firms manage clients, retention, and risk, are traditional CRM systems still enough?
At the Finance Magnates Singapore Summit, Jonathan Fine, Content Strategist at Finance Magnates, spoke with Samuel Aeby, CEO & Founder of FYNXT, about the future of broker technology, AI, and why operational complexity may be holding firms back.
🎥 Watch the interview: What does Samuel Aeby think most brokers are getting wrong when it comes to technology?
Should brokers build their own technology, or buy existing solutions? And with AI changing how firms manage clients, retention, and risk, are traditional CRM systems still enough?
At the Finance Magnates Singapore Summit, Jonathan Fine, Content Strategist at Finance Magnates, spoke with Samuel Aeby, CEO & Founder of FYNXT, about the future of broker technology, AI, and why operational complexity may be holding firms back.
🎥 Watch the interview: What does Samuel Aeby think most brokers are getting wrong when it comes to technology?
Should brokers build their own technology, or buy existing solutions? And with AI changing how firms manage clients, retention, and risk, are traditional CRM systems still enough?
At the Finance Magnates Singapore Summit, Jonathan Fine, Content Strategist at Finance Magnates, spoke with Samuel Aeby, CEO & Founder of FYNXT, about the future of broker technology, AI, and why operational complexity may be holding firms back.
🎥 Watch the interview: What does Samuel Aeby think most brokers are getting wrong when it comes to technology?
Should brokers build their own technology, or buy existing solutions? And with AI changing how firms manage clients, retention, and risk, are traditional CRM systems still enough?
At the Finance Magnates Singapore Summit, Jonathan Fine, Content Strategist at Finance Magnates, spoke with Samuel Aeby, CEO & Founder of FYNXT, about the future of broker technology, AI, and why operational complexity may be holding firms back.
🎥 Watch the interview: What does Samuel Aeby think most brokers are getting wrong when it comes to technology?
Should brokers build their own technology, or buy existing solutions? And with AI changing how firms manage clients, retention, and risk, are traditional CRM systems still enough?
At the Finance Magnates Singapore Summit, Jonathan Fine, Content Strategist at Finance Magnates, spoke with Samuel Aeby, CEO & Founder of FYNXT, about the future of broker technology, AI, and why operational complexity may be holding firms back.
🎥 Watch the interview: What does Samuel Aeby think most brokers are getting wrong when it comes to technology?