As groups and individuals diversify across products, regions and time zones, professional trading firms are evolving. Speakers at a recent FOW conference tell us what that looks like in the derivatives marketplace today.
FOW's Conference, The Evolution of Professional Trading II, was held on February 25 in London.
Traders are doing more “extreme things” to make money, as agility trumps the race-to-zero in moving between products and asset classes, said panellists at a recent FOW conference.
“The successful guys seem to be able to jump around to where it’s hot,” said Mark Phelps, Global Head of Sales at GH Financials. The clearing provider connects to some 30 exchanges, representing thousands of products. “If you’ve got the energy to look around, you may find something that is doing 30, 40 thousand (lots) a day.”
...commodities is a random walk.
He pointed to the Euronext Milling Wheat contract as a case in point. “We did 40,000 lots a day over the last three months on average. It’s things like that traders should go out there and try and find because it’s an opportunity that other people aren’t looking at.”
Out of Singapore, Phelps said that at least one firm was making “a disproportionate amount of money” on the out-of-hours session on Eurodollar futures, for example.
The Euribor-Schatz ‘Ted Spread’ meanwhile is in vogue on the back of negative rates, and Phelps is seeing “a few more people dipping their toes back in that”.
From L-R: Mark Phelps, GHF; Irene Perdomo, Devet Capital; Steve Woodyatt, Object Trading
In terms of new products, Phelps said Eurex’s VSTOXX is getting a lot of interest from VIX traders in the US. “That’s one of the few products that seems to be coming to life, and really catching the market’s attention.”
Steve Woodyatt, CEO of Object Trading, a trading tech firm, said that clients are moving further out regionally.
Some examples are: tin and metals contracts in Hong Kong and Shanghai; Japan Exchange Group bringing its Mothers index futures on-line; and notably, the DGCX for its rupee contract, which recently transacted more than 30% of global rupee.
Compare that to 10% in Singapore and single digit percentages via the CME, Woodyatt added.
Irene Perdomo, Principal and Founding Partner at systematic trading firm Devet Capital, said that commodities are also back in fashion but for the wrong reasons. “Commodities are very low, and people think they are going to go up...but until commodities are not zero, they can go down.”
Even if speculators are right directionally, they have to be right, at the right time - specifically, before the roll of the contract. “The contango of the curve is so high, that you are going to lose about four or five percent if you need to roll the contract,” she said.
...applying the market data program to all of the market segments, is not appropriate.
“I personally don’t believe in taking a directional view in commodities, not in the short term. If you want to take direction or view in three years’ time, and you have big pockets for the margin consumption – perfect. But otherwise commodities is a random walk,” Perdomo added.
Woodyatt puts it this way: “What used to be perhaps more of a race- to-zero-latency, it’s no longer that. It’s now breadth and depth of access and agility to move around across different platforms, different asset classes, and combine those in a systematic way that makes people profitable.”
Doing that comes with major caveats, in particular the cost of market data, which led to a heated debate as being too costly. It’s not so much that exchanges shouldn’t charge for data, said GHF’s Phelps, but it's “a bit rich” to charge sometimes crippling fees for data that trading firms themselves create.
It’s a very complex business decision...
“I don’t think there’s anyone in the audience that has a problem with the exchanges trying to derive revenues from market data, the point about this is applying the market data program to all of the market segments, is not appropriate. These guys are creating this data and they are the most price sensitive,” said GHF’s Phelps.
Object Trading's Woodyatt said that becoming an agile multi-asset class prop trader is not an overnight decision: “It’s a very complex business decision, and people are fundamentally looking at their business strategy, as well as their systematic and discretionary strategies that they trade to maintain profitability and return on their investment.”
Traders are doing more “extreme things” to make money, as agility trumps the race-to-zero in moving between products and asset classes, said panellists at a recent FOW conference.
“The successful guys seem to be able to jump around to where it’s hot,” said Mark Phelps, Global Head of Sales at GH Financials. The clearing provider connects to some 30 exchanges, representing thousands of products. “If you’ve got the energy to look around, you may find something that is doing 30, 40 thousand (lots) a day.”
...commodities is a random walk.
He pointed to the Euronext Milling Wheat contract as a case in point. “We did 40,000 lots a day over the last three months on average. It’s things like that traders should go out there and try and find because it’s an opportunity that other people aren’t looking at.”
Out of Singapore, Phelps said that at least one firm was making “a disproportionate amount of money” on the out-of-hours session on Eurodollar futures, for example.
The Euribor-Schatz ‘Ted Spread’ meanwhile is in vogue on the back of negative rates, and Phelps is seeing “a few more people dipping their toes back in that”.
From L-R: Mark Phelps, GHF; Irene Perdomo, Devet Capital; Steve Woodyatt, Object Trading
In terms of new products, Phelps said Eurex’s VSTOXX is getting a lot of interest from VIX traders in the US. “That’s one of the few products that seems to be coming to life, and really catching the market’s attention.”
Steve Woodyatt, CEO of Object Trading, a trading tech firm, said that clients are moving further out regionally.
Some examples are: tin and metals contracts in Hong Kong and Shanghai; Japan Exchange Group bringing its Mothers index futures on-line; and notably, the DGCX for its rupee contract, which recently transacted more than 30% of global rupee.
Compare that to 10% in Singapore and single digit percentages via the CME, Woodyatt added.
Irene Perdomo, Principal and Founding Partner at systematic trading firm Devet Capital, said that commodities are also back in fashion but for the wrong reasons. “Commodities are very low, and people think they are going to go up...but until commodities are not zero, they can go down.”
Even if speculators are right directionally, they have to be right, at the right time - specifically, before the roll of the contract. “The contango of the curve is so high, that you are going to lose about four or five percent if you need to roll the contract,” she said.
...applying the market data program to all of the market segments, is not appropriate.
“I personally don’t believe in taking a directional view in commodities, not in the short term. If you want to take direction or view in three years’ time, and you have big pockets for the margin consumption – perfect. But otherwise commodities is a random walk,” Perdomo added.
Woodyatt puts it this way: “What used to be perhaps more of a race- to-zero-latency, it’s no longer that. It’s now breadth and depth of access and agility to move around across different platforms, different asset classes, and combine those in a systematic way that makes people profitable.”
Doing that comes with major caveats, in particular the cost of market data, which led to a heated debate as being too costly. It’s not so much that exchanges shouldn’t charge for data, said GHF’s Phelps, but it's “a bit rich” to charge sometimes crippling fees for data that trading firms themselves create.
It’s a very complex business decision...
“I don’t think there’s anyone in the audience that has a problem with the exchanges trying to derive revenues from market data, the point about this is applying the market data program to all of the market segments, is not appropriate. These guys are creating this data and they are the most price sensitive,” said GHF’s Phelps.
Object Trading's Woodyatt said that becoming an agile multi-asset class prop trader is not an overnight decision: “It’s a very complex business decision, and people are fundamentally looking at their business strategy, as well as their systematic and discretionary strategies that they trade to maintain profitability and return on their investment.”
The $500 Trillion AI Bet Depends on Energy, Infrastructure, and Policy, Not Just Code
Featured Videos
FM Daily Brief - 29 May 2026
FM Daily Brief - 29 May 2026
FM Daily Brief - 29 May 2026
FM Daily Brief - 29 May 2026
Today is Friday, the 29th of May 2026, and these are our main stories: three global regulators are converging on trading platform design, and a Singapore prop firm launches a deferred-fee challenge model.
Today is Friday, the 29th of May 2026, and these are our main stories: three global regulators are converging on trading platform design, and a Singapore prop firm launches a deferred-fee challenge model.
Today is Friday, the 29th of May 2026, and these are our main stories: three global regulators are converging on trading platform design, and a Singapore prop firm launches a deferred-fee challenge model.
Today is Friday, the 29th of May 2026, and these are our main stories: three global regulators are converging on trading platform design, and a Singapore prop firm launches a deferred-fee challenge model.
Today is Thursday, the 28th of May 2026, and these are our main stories: the chair of CySEC makes clear that prediction markets look like binary options to Brussels, Robinhood enters the age of AI agents, and a Google engineer faces insider trading charges over Polymarket activity.
Today is Thursday, the 28th of May 2026, and these are our main stories: the chair of CySEC makes clear that prediction markets look like binary options to Brussels, Robinhood enters the age of AI agents, and a Google engineer faces insider trading charges over Polymarket activity.
Today is Thursday, the 28th of May 2026, and these are our main stories: the chair of CySEC makes clear that prediction markets look like binary options to Brussels, Robinhood enters the age of AI agents, and a Google engineer faces insider trading charges over Polymarket activity.
Today is Thursday, the 28th of May 2026, and these are our main stories: the chair of CySEC makes clear that prediction markets look like binary options to Brussels, Robinhood enters the age of AI agents, and a Google engineer faces insider trading charges over Polymarket activity.
Today is Thursday, the 28th of May 2026, and these are our main stories: the chair of CySEC makes clear that prediction markets look like binary options to Brussels, Robinhood enters the age of AI agents, and a Google engineer faces insider trading charges over Polymarket activity.
Today is Thursday, the 28th of May 2026, and these are our main stories: the chair of CySEC makes clear that prediction markets look like binary options to Brussels, Robinhood enters the age of AI agents, and a Google engineer faces insider trading charges over Polymarket activity.
Nick Strain, Country Manager Singapore at LMAX Digital, discusses the future of digital assets and shares his views on crypto markets, perpetuals, institutional adoption, tokenization, and why regulatory clarity remains the biggest driver in the space.
The discussion, hosted by Jonathan Fine, Content Strategist at Finance Magnates, covers:
Crypto market sentiment
Bitcoin and Ethereum's role as macro assets
The mechanics of perpetuals and funding rates
Institutional adoption beyond buying crypto
The opportunity in tokenization and programmable money
The critical role of regulation in market growth
Nick Strain, Country Manager Singapore at LMAX Digital, discusses the future of digital assets and shares his views on crypto markets, perpetuals, institutional adoption, tokenization, and why regulatory clarity remains the biggest driver in the space.
The discussion, hosted by Jonathan Fine, Content Strategist at Finance Magnates, covers:
Crypto market sentiment
Bitcoin and Ethereum's role as macro assets
The mechanics of perpetuals and funding rates
Institutional adoption beyond buying crypto
The opportunity in tokenization and programmable money
The critical role of regulation in market growth
Nick Strain, Country Manager Singapore at LMAX Digital, discusses the future of digital assets and shares his views on crypto markets, perpetuals, institutional adoption, tokenization, and why regulatory clarity remains the biggest driver in the space.
The discussion, hosted by Jonathan Fine, Content Strategist at Finance Magnates, covers:
Crypto market sentiment
Bitcoin and Ethereum's role as macro assets
The mechanics of perpetuals and funding rates
Institutional adoption beyond buying crypto
The opportunity in tokenization and programmable money
The critical role of regulation in market growth
Nick Strain, Country Manager Singapore at LMAX Digital, discusses the future of digital assets and shares his views on crypto markets, perpetuals, institutional adoption, tokenization, and why regulatory clarity remains the biggest driver in the space.
The discussion, hosted by Jonathan Fine, Content Strategist at Finance Magnates, covers:
Crypto market sentiment
Bitcoin and Ethereum's role as macro assets
The mechanics of perpetuals and funding rates
Institutional adoption beyond buying crypto
The opportunity in tokenization and programmable money
The critical role of regulation in market growth
Nick Strain, Country Manager Singapore at LMAX Digital, discusses the future of digital assets and shares his views on crypto markets, perpetuals, institutional adoption, tokenization, and why regulatory clarity remains the biggest driver in the space.
The discussion, hosted by Jonathan Fine, Content Strategist at Finance Magnates, covers:
Crypto market sentiment
Bitcoin and Ethereum's role as macro assets
The mechanics of perpetuals and funding rates
Institutional adoption beyond buying crypto
The opportunity in tokenization and programmable money
The critical role of regulation in market growth
Nick Strain, Country Manager Singapore at LMAX Digital, discusses the future of digital assets and shares his views on crypto markets, perpetuals, institutional adoption, tokenization, and why regulatory clarity remains the biggest driver in the space.
The discussion, hosted by Jonathan Fine, Content Strategist at Finance Magnates, covers:
Crypto market sentiment
Bitcoin and Ethereum's role as macro assets
The mechanics of perpetuals and funding rates
Institutional adoption beyond buying crypto
The opportunity in tokenization and programmable money
The critical role of regulation in market growth
FM Daily Brief - 27 May 2026
FM Daily Brief - 27 May 2026
FM Daily Brief - 27 May 2026
FM Daily Brief - 27 May 2026
FM Daily Brief - 27 May 2026
FM Daily Brief - 27 May 2026
Today is Wednesday, the 27th of May 2026, and these are our main stories: questions are swirling around the futures of FXCM and Tradu, as owner Jefferies reportedly weighs a sale, an acquisition of a prop firm, and the demographics of prediction markets.
Today is Wednesday, the 27th of May 2026, and these are our main stories: questions are swirling around the futures of FXCM and Tradu, as owner Jefferies reportedly weighs a sale, an acquisition of a prop firm, and the demographics of prediction markets.
Today is Wednesday, the 27th of May 2026, and these are our main stories: questions are swirling around the futures of FXCM and Tradu, as owner Jefferies reportedly weighs a sale, an acquisition of a prop firm, and the demographics of prediction markets.
Today is Wednesday, the 27th of May 2026, and these are our main stories: questions are swirling around the futures of FXCM and Tradu, as owner Jefferies reportedly weighs a sale, an acquisition of a prop firm, and the demographics of prediction markets.
Today is Wednesday, the 27th of May 2026, and these are our main stories: questions are swirling around the futures of FXCM and Tradu, as owner Jefferies reportedly weighs a sale, an acquisition of a prop firm, and the demographics of prediction markets.
Today is Wednesday, the 27th of May 2026, and these are our main stories: questions are swirling around the futures of FXCM and Tradu, as owner Jefferies reportedly weighs a sale, an acquisition of a prop firm, and the demographics of prediction markets.
FYNXT CEO Samuel Aeby: Why Brokers Need Operating Systems, Not Just CRMs
FYNXT CEO Samuel Aeby: Why Brokers Need Operating Systems, Not Just CRMs
FYNXT CEO Samuel Aeby: Why Brokers Need Operating Systems, Not Just CRMs
FYNXT CEO Samuel Aeby: Why Brokers Need Operating Systems, Not Just CRMs
FYNXT CEO Samuel Aeby: Why Brokers Need Operating Systems, Not Just CRMs
FYNXT CEO Samuel Aeby: Why Brokers Need Operating Systems, Not Just CRMs
Should brokers build their own technology, or buy existing solutions? And with AI changing how firms manage clients, retention, and risk, are traditional CRM systems still enough?
At the Finance Magnates Singapore Summit, Jonathan Fine, Content Strategist at Finance Magnates, spoke with Samuel Aeby, CEO & Founder of FYNXT, about the future of broker technology, AI, and why operational complexity may be holding firms back.
🎥 Watch the interview: What does Samuel Aeby think most brokers are getting wrong when it comes to technology?
Should brokers build their own technology, or buy existing solutions? And with AI changing how firms manage clients, retention, and risk, are traditional CRM systems still enough?
At the Finance Magnates Singapore Summit, Jonathan Fine, Content Strategist at Finance Magnates, spoke with Samuel Aeby, CEO & Founder of FYNXT, about the future of broker technology, AI, and why operational complexity may be holding firms back.
🎥 Watch the interview: What does Samuel Aeby think most brokers are getting wrong when it comes to technology?
Should brokers build their own technology, or buy existing solutions? And with AI changing how firms manage clients, retention, and risk, are traditional CRM systems still enough?
At the Finance Magnates Singapore Summit, Jonathan Fine, Content Strategist at Finance Magnates, spoke with Samuel Aeby, CEO & Founder of FYNXT, about the future of broker technology, AI, and why operational complexity may be holding firms back.
🎥 Watch the interview: What does Samuel Aeby think most brokers are getting wrong when it comes to technology?
Should brokers build their own technology, or buy existing solutions? And with AI changing how firms manage clients, retention, and risk, are traditional CRM systems still enough?
At the Finance Magnates Singapore Summit, Jonathan Fine, Content Strategist at Finance Magnates, spoke with Samuel Aeby, CEO & Founder of FYNXT, about the future of broker technology, AI, and why operational complexity may be holding firms back.
🎥 Watch the interview: What does Samuel Aeby think most brokers are getting wrong when it comes to technology?
Should brokers build their own technology, or buy existing solutions? And with AI changing how firms manage clients, retention, and risk, are traditional CRM systems still enough?
At the Finance Magnates Singapore Summit, Jonathan Fine, Content Strategist at Finance Magnates, spoke with Samuel Aeby, CEO & Founder of FYNXT, about the future of broker technology, AI, and why operational complexity may be holding firms back.
🎥 Watch the interview: What does Samuel Aeby think most brokers are getting wrong when it comes to technology?
Should brokers build their own technology, or buy existing solutions? And with AI changing how firms manage clients, retention, and risk, are traditional CRM systems still enough?
At the Finance Magnates Singapore Summit, Jonathan Fine, Content Strategist at Finance Magnates, spoke with Samuel Aeby, CEO & Founder of FYNXT, about the future of broker technology, AI, and why operational complexity may be holding firms back.
🎥 Watch the interview: What does Samuel Aeby think most brokers are getting wrong when it comes to technology?