Breaking: ESMA Rolls-Out Draconian CFD Leverage Restrictions, Kills Binary
The supranational European authority mandates 30:1 leverage only for major currency pairs
The European Securities Markets Authority is out with its verdict on the leverage restrictions for the industry. Despite feedback from clients and brokers, the supranational European regulator chose to limit the choices for leverage for retail brokers.
The ESMA’s decision is to prohibit marketing, distribution, and sale of binary options and introduce tiered leverage for different instruments. Any Contracts for Differences (CFDs) that are allowed on offer will need to adhere to strict requirements and are temporarily restricted to a set of draconian rules.
Join the iFX EXPO Asia and discover your gateway to the Asian Markets
Tiered leverage
The leverage restrictions for retail clients will be introduced in several tiers. CFDs on major FX pairs will be traded with 30:1, indices, non-major currency pairs and gold will be traded at 20:1, while other commodities and non-major indices will be provided with a 10:1 gearing. Brokers will be able to offer individual equities at a 5:1 leverage and cryptocurrencies at 2:1.
As expected brokers will also need to provide negative balance protection and close out margin positions whenever the account reaches 50 percent of the minimum required margin. Bonuses and any form of incentives are also prohibited, while brokers also need to develop a standardized risk warning which displays what percentage of clients loses money.
Terms of the restrictions
The ESMA intends to adopt the new restrictions on Binary and CFDs shortly after the publication of its March 23 decision. The measures will be rolled out in the official languages of the EU in the coming weeks, following which the supranational regulator will publish an official notice on its website.
Suggested articles
What to Look for in a Liquidity ProviderGo to article >>
The procedure dictates that the measures will then be published in the Official Journal of the EU. Official implementation of the binary options ban is expected within a month after that, while the restrictions on CFDs will have to be implemented two months after their publication in the EU’s Official Journal.
According to MiFIR regulations, the ESMA can only introduce such intervention measures on a temporary basis for three months. The regulator is expected to publish those before the end of the three months and will be considering the need for an extension every three months after that.
ESMA Chairman elaborates
According to the official announcement, the ESMA’s decision was driven by the desire to secure retail investor protection. The use of excessive leverage and binary options are considered by the EU-wide watchdog as products that have a structuraly expected negative return.
Commenting on the regulatory move of the ESMA, the regulator’s Chair, said: “the agreed measures ESMA is announcing today will guarantee greater investor protection across the EU by ensuring a common minimum level of protection for retail investors. The new measures on CFDs will for the first time ensure that investors cannot lose more money than they put in, restrict the use of leverage and incentives, and provide risk warning for investors. For binary options, the prohibition we are announcing is needed to protect investors due to the products’ characteristics.”
“The combination of the promise of high returns, easy-to-trade digital platforms, in an environment of historical low interest rates has created an offer that appeals to retail investors. However, the inherent complexity of the products and their excessive leverage – in the case of CFDs – has resulted in significant losses for retail investors. A pan-EU approach is required given the cross-border nature of these products, and ESMA’s intervention is the most appropriate and efficient tool to address this major investor protection issue,” Majoor elaborates
this is a GOOD thing. it forces the industry to migrate from gaming (100s of billions in turnover) to finance (1000s of trillions in turnover) – where would YOU rather take your bite from?
I don’t think a hard cap on leverage was needed. A soft cap at maybe 1:50 with a 30 day waiting period for all new traders.
I know its not very constructive but…… F… YOU!!!!
Overall, no surprise that this was coming. But standby for increased costs of trading for clients.
Not sure where ESMA got the idea that clients lost money on crypto cfds. In fact I’d say most made good money and it was the market-maker brokers who lost a lot of money, as they couldn’t hedge last year.
Combined with google advertising changes, and other reg changes, this will see the demise of many smaller brokers. Larger brokers will benefit.
These are great changes. they only seem draconian to the immoral affiliates egging on retail traders to blow up their own accounts. A long awaited change to potentially signal a cleanup of an ultra-scummy industry.
Ignorance is no excuse.
So i could play DAX with 100 euros with 100:1 leverage,, and now I need 500. Thx EU, fcuk you, I’m moving my money to Australia
They will get rid off a lot of tax payments. What a dumb move by the “Watchdog”. Thank you, all you binary and crypto to crypto brokerage clowns out there!
At 100:1 leverage, you were indeed playing. Just not a game you could win.
Rick, just because you can’t make money in trading doesn’t mean that other traders don’t! I use 500:1 leverage quite carefully and extremely successfully!
ich finde es dem Trader gegenüber der sein Geld damit verdient eine Frechheit ihm die bisherige Einnahmequelle zu nehmen
This is so stupid, it will only push the retailed trader to unregulated broker, What a stupid idiotic thing todo.
would it be possible to move to lets say an australian broker and still trade at a decent leverage ?
The app I used capped buy in and would not allow you to lose more than in your funds. This doesn’t stop people from losing money, it just means you have to be pretty well of to make any decent profits… Another kick in the teeth for the little guy and another blow-job for the wealthy
Yes thats exactly what it is, well said. I stopped trading, no point.
Shouldn’t the brokers also offer lower fees now that they have to leverage lower amounts? But either way I need to find another broker anyway after this stupid change. I’ve been trading stocks (and I still do, I just don’t know until when!) for 3 years now with 500:1. The first year was a break even one but then I started making a good profit, with the last 12 months averaging a profit of 16.66% of my balance per month, or 500€ per month with 3000€ account. I had fun buying Google’s stock after strong selloffs and watching it rise,… Read more »