The European Parliament’s Committee on Economic and Monetary Affairs (ECON) has released a 30-page report on cryptocurrency entitled “Virtual currencies and central banks monetary policy: challenges ahead”. It concludes that cryptocurrency is unlikely to take the place of fiat currency, even in the long term.
ECON is the body to which the European Central Bank is accountable. It is currently chaired by Roberto Gualtieri of Italy.
The report was written by Marek Dabrowski and Lukasz Janikowski of the Center for Social and Economic Research, which is a non-profit research institution in Warsaw.
Bitcoin experiment survived
The paper begins by stating that contrary to the expectations of many, the Bitcoin “experiment” has not only survived but expanded beyond niche status. It identifies the 2017 bubble as being responsible for attracting so much interest.
After examining the technology behind the three top cryptocurrencies – Bitcoin Ethereum and Ripple – the authors conclude that virtual currencies have no intrinsic value “in the sense that they are not linked to any underlying commodity or sovereign currency,” but it also recognises that fiat currencies share this characteristic.
The classic definition of money is that it should be 1, a means of payment, 2, a unit of account, and 3, a store of value. Some argue that cryptocurrencies do not or only very partially fulfill these criteria. The report, however, recognises their potential to do so eventually and says that this possibility cannot be excluded.
As evidence of this, it notes that a few major companies accept cryptocurrency as payment (although one of the mentioned companies, Expedia, has since discontinued this option).
Advantages of cryptocurrencies, it says, include financial inclusion and the exclusion of the possibility of identity theft. However the technical knowhow required to use cryptocurrency is a considerable barrier in itself, and anonymity precludes protection from theft.
It points out that the advantages of cryptocurrency payments – speed, cost and 24-hour availability – are things that traditional payment systems could offer too, given technological advances.
Going Past the Great Wall: Things to Consider When Entering the Asian MarketGo to article >>
Can virtual currency break the monopoly of the central banks?
The report argues that cryptocurrency is fundamentally private money, and past experiments with private money – such as during the free banking era in the US in the 19th century – failed for a number of reasons. It echoes arguments made recently by Nobel Prize-winning economist Robert J. Shiller of Yale University.
One is that currencies lacked network externality – that is, recognition by external economic agents. This is necessary to create a financial market. Private currencies have always struggled to do this while in competition with other private currencies, which was invariably the situation where private currencies are permitted and in vogue.
Moreover, there are always de facto exchange rates between the private currencies, making them volatile and expensive to use.
Jurisdictions found a need to create a stable, single domestic market for goods and services: “Country after country established central banks and gradually granted them regulatory powers over private commercial banks, the role of a lender of last resort and the central monetary authority with dominant or even exclusive rights to issue national currencies.”
The need for a stable currency is also the reason that the gold standard was adopted in the 19th century.
The report says that some cryptocurrencies, such as Bitcoin, may be able to overcome some of these disadvantages. To compare them to failed money experiments of the past is limited: “…unlike previous incarnations, issuers of contemporary private money are able to ensure a transparent mechanism that is relatively safe, fast and inexpensive… [virtual currencies] have a better chance to survive and develop as compared to their predecessors in the 18th and 19th century.”
But “their exclusively digital form, the quite complicated and labour-intensive mechanism of their creation, and the lack of political willingness to accept them as official legal tender in any jurisdiction (at least in the near future) will limit their circulation and use and make them unlikely competitors to sovereign money.”
Cryptocurrency regulation varies widely across the countries of the union. The central government is working on appropriate laws to govern cryptocurrency continent-wide, and this report is part of the ongoing process. Last week it published its Fifth Anti-Money Laundering Directive, giving local financial watchdogs further powers to access customer information, including from cryptocurrency companies.
A recent survey found that a considerable number of Europeans either have cryptocurrency holdings or are considering buying some in the future.