Chinese Fraud Victims Contest UK Compensation Plan for £3.2B Seized Bitcoins: Report

Thursday, 12/03/2026 | 14:44 GMT by Jared Kirui
  • UK authorities’ plan would send funds to China, with Britain potentially retaining a share of the Bitcoin.
  • Defrauded investors are challenging the plan to redistribute 61,000 seized Bitcoin.
Bitcoin Scam (Shutterstock)

Chinese investors defrauded in a multi-billion cryptocurrency Ponzi scheme have asked the UK High Court to reject a government-backed redress plan for the 61,000 seized Bitcoin.

They argue that the proposal to route compensation through a Chinese scheme could strip them of the £3.2bn haul’s gains and leave British authorities holding much of the upside, according to the Financial Times.

London police seized about 61,000 Bitcoin during an investigation into Chinese national Zhimin Qian, who ran an investment fraud between 2014 and 2017 that targeted more than 128,000 investors in China.

Qian converted proceeds into Bitcoin and moved the funds to the UK, where officers later recovered the assets from electronic devices at a Hampstead property.

Chinese Victims Contest UK Redress Plan

Qian evaded authorities for nearly five years while amassing one of the largest cryptocurrency fortunes ever seized in the UK. She was sentenced to more than 11 years in prison last November.

She reportedly converted tens of millions of pounds into Bitcoin and entered Britain on a false passport to live in luxury rented properties with accomplices. Bitcoin’s price has since risen sharply since the fraud took place, lifting the value of the seized stash to around £3.2bn at current levels of roughly £52,300 per coin.

Victims are now using section 281 of the Proceeds of Crime Act to seek recovery of the assets through the English courts rather than through an out-of-court scheme proposed by UK authorities.

Under that plan, compensation funds would be sent to China and distributed via an existing redress mechanism there, while the UK would likely retain a significant share of the remaining Bitcoin.

Read more: UK Court Hands Nearly 12-Year Sentence in Massive £5B Bitcoin Case: Report

Law Firms and Prosecutors Clash over Access and Fees

Law firm Candey, which represents about 5,700 victims, told the High Court it has concerns over whether the proposed scheme would run in line with principles of fairness, warning that some clients “could stand to recover nothing without access to justice before the English courts.”

The firm said its fee arrangements, which cap total charges for UK and China legal teams at 18% of any sums recovered, allow victims without resources to pursue claims while keeping the “vast majority” of any recovery.

A preliminary High Court hearing in July will decide whether English or Chinese law governs the victims’ claims to the seized Bitcoin, with a 22 May deadline set for section 281 applications.

Chinese investors defrauded in a multi-billion cryptocurrency Ponzi scheme have asked the UK High Court to reject a government-backed redress plan for the 61,000 seized Bitcoin.

They argue that the proposal to route compensation through a Chinese scheme could strip them of the £3.2bn haul’s gains and leave British authorities holding much of the upside, according to the Financial Times.

London police seized about 61,000 Bitcoin during an investigation into Chinese national Zhimin Qian, who ran an investment fraud between 2014 and 2017 that targeted more than 128,000 investors in China.

Qian converted proceeds into Bitcoin and moved the funds to the UK, where officers later recovered the assets from electronic devices at a Hampstead property.

Chinese Victims Contest UK Redress Plan

Qian evaded authorities for nearly five years while amassing one of the largest cryptocurrency fortunes ever seized in the UK. She was sentenced to more than 11 years in prison last November.

She reportedly converted tens of millions of pounds into Bitcoin and entered Britain on a false passport to live in luxury rented properties with accomplices. Bitcoin’s price has since risen sharply since the fraud took place, lifting the value of the seized stash to around £3.2bn at current levels of roughly £52,300 per coin.

Victims are now using section 281 of the Proceeds of Crime Act to seek recovery of the assets through the English courts rather than through an out-of-court scheme proposed by UK authorities.

Under that plan, compensation funds would be sent to China and distributed via an existing redress mechanism there, while the UK would likely retain a significant share of the remaining Bitcoin.

Read more: UK Court Hands Nearly 12-Year Sentence in Massive £5B Bitcoin Case: Report

Law Firms and Prosecutors Clash over Access and Fees

Law firm Candey, which represents about 5,700 victims, told the High Court it has concerns over whether the proposed scheme would run in line with principles of fairness, warning that some clients “could stand to recover nothing without access to justice before the English courts.”

The firm said its fee arrangements, which cap total charges for UK and China legal teams at 18% of any sums recovered, allow victims without resources to pursue claims while keeping the “vast majority” of any recovery.

A preliminary High Court hearing in July will decide whether English or Chinese law governs the victims’ claims to the seized Bitcoin, with a 22 May deadline set for section 281 applications.

About the Author: Jared Kirui
Jared Kirui
  • 2677 Articles
  • 53 Followers
About the Author: Jared Kirui
Jared Kirui is an Editor at Finance Magnates with more than five years of experience in financial journalism. He covers online trading, fintech, payments, and crypto industries with a focus on companies, regulation and compliance, executive moves, trading technology, and market analysis. His work has been featured in other media outlets, including Benzinga, ZyCrypto, The Distributed, and The Daily Hodl. Education: Bachelor of Commerce degree (Finance option), University of Nairobi
  • 2677 Articles
  • 53 Followers

More from the Author

CryptoCurrency

!"#$%&'()*+,-./0123456789:;<=>?@ABCDEFGHIJKLMNOPQRSTUVWXYZ[\]^_`abcdefghijklmnopqrstuvwxyz{|} !"#$%&'()*+,-./0123456789:;<=>?@ABCDEFGHIJKLMNOPQRSTUVWXYZ[\]^_`abcdefghijklmnopqrstuvwxyz{|}