Dario Amodei accuses Meta of dangling $1B carrots, gutting startup culture in the process.
Amodei calls out Nvidia’s Jensen Huang for spreading “outrageous lies”.
Is he a "doomer" or someone who's speaking an uncomfortable truth?
Anthropic CEO Dario Amodei is a very angry man right now (TechCrunch, CC BY 2.0).
From Zuckerberg’s $1B talent raids to Nvidia’s “outrageous lies,”
Amodei is calling out Silicon Valley’s power plays and setting a few bridges on
fire.
The AI Talent War Has a New Loudest Voice
Forget quiet quitting, Dario Amodei is loudly combusting. The Anthropic
CEO is lashing out in all directions, accusing Meta of luring away his
engineers with $1 billion signing packages and calling Nvidia’s recent remarks
about Anthropic "an
outrageous lie."
In a scathing internal email to Anthropic staff, Amodei didn’t mince
words. After news broke that Meta, led by a reportedly talent-hungry Mark
Zuckerberg, was offering massive bonuses, sometimes
up to $1 million a head for artificial intelligence (AI) researchers, Amodei accused the tech giant
of trying to "destroy" what startups like his are trying to build.
Speaking of Meta’s hiring spree, and the obscene amounts of money they’re
spending, Amodei claimed it could “destroy”
Anthropic’s culture, and presumably that of AI startups in general. Sure,
“destroy” might sound dramatic. But in a space increasingly driven by GPU
hoarding, regulatory chess, and “move fast, break open-source ethics”
strategies, Amodei’s frustration is more than performative. It’s personal.
Would You Say No to a Million Bucks?
Amodei’s real gripe isn’t just the brain drain. It’s the corrosion of
what he sees as the startup spirit: building ambitious things, not just
stockpiling talent like trading cards. In his internal message, he didn’t just
blame Meta, he accused them of waging an ideological war.
Mark Zuckerberg of META (Oleh Anthony Quintano, CC BY 2.0, Wikipedia).
Amodei claimed that many of his employees had rejected (presumably
vast) offers and that others "wouldn't even talk to Mark Zuckerberg."
"This was a unifying moment for the company where we didn't give in,"
Amodei said. "We refuse to compromise our principles because we have the
confidence that people are at Anthropic because they truly believe in the
mission."
But… it’s hard to argue with the numbers. Meta is reportedly offering
compensation packages worth up to $1 million each for researchers to abandon
ship. That’s enough to make even the most idealistic AI scientists think twice.
For Amodei, though, this is less about cash and more about collapse.
Amodei’s rallying call? Essentially, it’s about the “soul” of AI and
Anthropic. His argument is essentially that the company is special, and that if
you truly care about AI, you should reject Meta et al. But, remember, we’re talking
$1M signing bonuses here.
It’s a rallying cry with a guilt-trip and glimpses of truth. After all,
it’s not easy to turn down $1 million when you’re debugging neural networks at
2 a.m. Still, Amodei’s ask is clear: Stay scrappy. Stay weird. Don’t sell out
to Zuck.
Hopeful? Sure. Realistic? We’ll see.
Nvidia vs. Anthropic: AI Heavyweights In a Scuffle
Meta isn’t the only target of Amodei’s fury. Nvidia
CEO Jensen Huang also caught some strays last week when he appeared to
throw shade at Anthropic during a Q&A. Huang claimed that “Dario thinks
he’s the only one who can build this safely and therefore wants to control the
entire industry”. Amodei’s response? “That is an outrageous lie.”
Nvidia CEO Jensen Huang (Reuters).
In response to Huang, Amodei says he’s “one of the most bullish” voices
when it comes to AI’s rapid acceleration. He’s long argued that progress in AI is exponential: throw more data,
compute, and training at a model, and its capabilities jump dramatically. That
pace of improvement, he warns, is bringing serious national security and
economic risks into the immediate future. Much of this is driven by his father's death to a disease that, had research moved faster, he probably would have survived. But, despite his desire to drive things forward, there's a problem: Our ability to
manage those risks.
To counter that imbalance, Amodei is pushing for clear regulations and
what he calls “responsible scaling policies.” He wants a “race to the
top”—where companies compete to build safer, more trustworthy systems—instead
of half-baked AI products. Anthropic was the
first to publish such a policy, and Amodei sees that transparency as part of
the job. He believes safety research like their work on interpretability and
constitutional AI shouldn’t be trade secrets—it should be shared as a public
good.
This is more than an ego bruise. The comment hits at Anthropic’s very
purpose in a fiercely competitive sector. Luckily for Anthropic, Amodei doesn’t
seem to be a shrinking violet.
Silicon Valley’s Culture War, Now with GPUs
Between the Meta poaching saga and the Nvidia drama, Amodei’s week has
been more public meltdown than polished PR. But is he wrong?
Anthropic, which counts Amazon and Google among its investors, was
meant to be a different kind of AI company—one that emphasized safety,
interpretability, and slower, more thoughtful development. But that position
seems to be open to ridicule and is getting harder to uphold in a world where AI
researchers are becoming free agents in a billion-dollar arms race.
Amodei may not win every battle. Meta will keep writing checks. Nvidia
will always be a power player. But by speaking up, he's at least asking a
question Silicon Valley increasingly prefers to ignore: what does all this
money actually build?
For now, Amodei seems determined not to cash out or shut up. Naïve, or
noble? Perhaps both, but regardless, Amodei’s obviously passionate responses
open up an interesting conversation.
For more of tech and finance around the fringes, visit our Trending section.
From Zuckerberg’s $1B talent raids to Nvidia’s “outrageous lies,”
Amodei is calling out Silicon Valley’s power plays and setting a few bridges on
fire.
The AI Talent War Has a New Loudest Voice
Forget quiet quitting, Dario Amodei is loudly combusting. The Anthropic
CEO is lashing out in all directions, accusing Meta of luring away his
engineers with $1 billion signing packages and calling Nvidia’s recent remarks
about Anthropic "an
outrageous lie."
In a scathing internal email to Anthropic staff, Amodei didn’t mince
words. After news broke that Meta, led by a reportedly talent-hungry Mark
Zuckerberg, was offering massive bonuses, sometimes
up to $1 million a head for artificial intelligence (AI) researchers, Amodei accused the tech giant
of trying to "destroy" what startups like his are trying to build.
Speaking of Meta’s hiring spree, and the obscene amounts of money they’re
spending, Amodei claimed it could “destroy”
Anthropic’s culture, and presumably that of AI startups in general. Sure,
“destroy” might sound dramatic. But in a space increasingly driven by GPU
hoarding, regulatory chess, and “move fast, break open-source ethics”
strategies, Amodei’s frustration is more than performative. It’s personal.
Would You Say No to a Million Bucks?
Amodei’s real gripe isn’t just the brain drain. It’s the corrosion of
what he sees as the startup spirit: building ambitious things, not just
stockpiling talent like trading cards. In his internal message, he didn’t just
blame Meta, he accused them of waging an ideological war.
Mark Zuckerberg of META (Oleh Anthony Quintano, CC BY 2.0, Wikipedia).
Amodei claimed that many of his employees had rejected (presumably
vast) offers and that others "wouldn't even talk to Mark Zuckerberg."
"This was a unifying moment for the company where we didn't give in,"
Amodei said. "We refuse to compromise our principles because we have the
confidence that people are at Anthropic because they truly believe in the
mission."
But… it’s hard to argue with the numbers. Meta is reportedly offering
compensation packages worth up to $1 million each for researchers to abandon
ship. That’s enough to make even the most idealistic AI scientists think twice.
For Amodei, though, this is less about cash and more about collapse.
Amodei’s rallying call? Essentially, it’s about the “soul” of AI and
Anthropic. His argument is essentially that the company is special, and that if
you truly care about AI, you should reject Meta et al. But, remember, we’re talking
$1M signing bonuses here.
It’s a rallying cry with a guilt-trip and glimpses of truth. After all,
it’s not easy to turn down $1 million when you’re debugging neural networks at
2 a.m. Still, Amodei’s ask is clear: Stay scrappy. Stay weird. Don’t sell out
to Zuck.
Hopeful? Sure. Realistic? We’ll see.
Nvidia vs. Anthropic: AI Heavyweights In a Scuffle
Meta isn’t the only target of Amodei’s fury. Nvidia
CEO Jensen Huang also caught some strays last week when he appeared to
throw shade at Anthropic during a Q&A. Huang claimed that “Dario thinks
he’s the only one who can build this safely and therefore wants to control the
entire industry”. Amodei’s response? “That is an outrageous lie.”
Nvidia CEO Jensen Huang (Reuters).
In response to Huang, Amodei says he’s “one of the most bullish” voices
when it comes to AI’s rapid acceleration. He’s long argued that progress in AI is exponential: throw more data,
compute, and training at a model, and its capabilities jump dramatically. That
pace of improvement, he warns, is bringing serious national security and
economic risks into the immediate future. Much of this is driven by his father's death to a disease that, had research moved faster, he probably would have survived. But, despite his desire to drive things forward, there's a problem: Our ability to
manage those risks.
To counter that imbalance, Amodei is pushing for clear regulations and
what he calls “responsible scaling policies.” He wants a “race to the
top”—where companies compete to build safer, more trustworthy systems—instead
of half-baked AI products. Anthropic was the
first to publish such a policy, and Amodei sees that transparency as part of
the job. He believes safety research like their work on interpretability and
constitutional AI shouldn’t be trade secrets—it should be shared as a public
good.
This is more than an ego bruise. The comment hits at Anthropic’s very
purpose in a fiercely competitive sector. Luckily for Anthropic, Amodei doesn’t
seem to be a shrinking violet.
Silicon Valley’s Culture War, Now with GPUs
Between the Meta poaching saga and the Nvidia drama, Amodei’s week has
been more public meltdown than polished PR. But is he wrong?
Anthropic, which counts Amazon and Google among its investors, was
meant to be a different kind of AI company—one that emphasized safety,
interpretability, and slower, more thoughtful development. But that position
seems to be open to ridicule and is getting harder to uphold in a world where AI
researchers are becoming free agents in a billion-dollar arms race.
Amodei may not win every battle. Meta will keep writing checks. Nvidia
will always be a power player. But by speaking up, he's at least asking a
question Silicon Valley increasingly prefers to ignore: what does all this
money actually build?
For now, Amodei seems determined not to cash out or shut up. Naïve, or
noble? Perhaps both, but regardless, Amodei’s obviously passionate responses
open up an interesting conversation.
For more of tech and finance around the fringes, visit our Trending section.
Louis Parks has lived and worked in and around the Middle East for much of his professional career. He writes about the meeting of the tech and finance worlds.
Trump Offers Greenland Talks as US Stock Market Rebounds Despite Tariff Risks
Hannah Hill on Innovation, Branding & Award-Winning Technology | Executive Interview | AXI
Hannah Hill on Innovation, Branding & Award-Winning Technology | Executive Interview | AXI
Recorded live at FMLS:25, this executive interview features Hannah Hill, Head of Brand and Sponsorship at AXI, in conversation with Finance Magnates, following AXI’s win for Most Innovative Broker of the Year 2025.
In this wide-ranging discussion, Hannah shares insights on:
🔹What winning the Finance Magnates award means for AXI’s credibility and innovation
🔹How the launch of AXI Select, the capital allocation program, is redefining industry standards
🔹The development and rollout of the AXI trading app across multiple markets
🔹Driving brand evolution alongside technological advancements
🔹Encouraging and recognizing teams behind the scenes
🔹The role of marketing, content, and social media in building product awareness
Hannah explains why standout products, strategic branding, and a focus on innovation are key to growing visibility and staying ahead in a competitive brokerage landscape.
🏆 Award Highlight: Most Innovative Broker of the Year 2025
👉 Subscribe to Finance Magnates for more executive interviews, industry insights, and exclusive coverage from the world’s leading financial events.
#FMLS25 #FinanceMagnates #MostInnovativeBroker #TradingTechnology #FinTech #Brokerage #ExecutiveInterview #AXI
Recorded live at FMLS:25, this executive interview features Hannah Hill, Head of Brand and Sponsorship at AXI, in conversation with Finance Magnates, following AXI’s win for Most Innovative Broker of the Year 2025.
In this wide-ranging discussion, Hannah shares insights on:
🔹What winning the Finance Magnates award means for AXI’s credibility and innovation
🔹How the launch of AXI Select, the capital allocation program, is redefining industry standards
🔹The development and rollout of the AXI trading app across multiple markets
🔹Driving brand evolution alongside technological advancements
🔹Encouraging and recognizing teams behind the scenes
🔹The role of marketing, content, and social media in building product awareness
Hannah explains why standout products, strategic branding, and a focus on innovation are key to growing visibility and staying ahead in a competitive brokerage landscape.
🏆 Award Highlight: Most Innovative Broker of the Year 2025
👉 Subscribe to Finance Magnates for more executive interviews, industry insights, and exclusive coverage from the world’s leading financial events.
#FMLS25 #FinanceMagnates #MostInnovativeBroker #TradingTechnology #FinTech #Brokerage #ExecutiveInterview #AXI
Executive Interview | Dor Eligula | Co-Founder & Chief Business Officer, BridgeWise | FMLS:25
Executive Interview | Dor Eligula | Co-Founder & Chief Business Officer, BridgeWise | FMLS:25
In this session, Jonathan Fine form Ultimate Group speaks with Dor Eligula from Bridgewise, a fast-growing AI-powered research and analytics firm supporting brokers and exchanges worldwide.
We start with Dor’s reaction to the Summit and then move to broker growth and the quick wins brokers often overlook. Dor shares where he sees “blue ocean” growth across Asian markets and how local client behaviour shapes demand.
We also discuss the rollout of AI across investment research. Dor gives real examples of how automation and human judgment meet at Bridgewise — including moments when analysts corrected AI output, and times when AI prevented an error.
We close with a practical question: how retail investors can actually use AI without falling into common traps.
In this session, Jonathan Fine form Ultimate Group speaks with Dor Eligula from Bridgewise, a fast-growing AI-powered research and analytics firm supporting brokers and exchanges worldwide.
We start with Dor’s reaction to the Summit and then move to broker growth and the quick wins brokers often overlook. Dor shares where he sees “blue ocean” growth across Asian markets and how local client behaviour shapes demand.
We also discuss the rollout of AI across investment research. Dor gives real examples of how automation and human judgment meet at Bridgewise — including moments when analysts corrected AI output, and times when AI prevented an error.
We close with a practical question: how retail investors can actually use AI without falling into common traps.
Brendan Callan joined us fresh off the Summit’s most anticipated debate: “Is Prop Trading Good for the Industry?” Brendan argued against the motion — and the audience voted him the winner.
In this interview, Brendan explains the reasoning behind his position. He walks through the message he believes many firms avoid: that the current prop trading model is too dependent on fees, too loose on risk, and too confusing for retail audiences.
We discuss why he thinks the model grew fast, why it may run into walls, and what he believes is needed for a cleaner, more responsible version of prop trading.
This is Brendan at his frankest — sharp, grounded, and very clear about what changes are overdue.
Brendan Callan joined us fresh off the Summit’s most anticipated debate: “Is Prop Trading Good for the Industry?” Brendan argued against the motion — and the audience voted him the winner.
In this interview, Brendan explains the reasoning behind his position. He walks through the message he believes many firms avoid: that the current prop trading model is too dependent on fees, too loose on risk, and too confusing for retail audiences.
We discuss why he thinks the model grew fast, why it may run into walls, and what he believes is needed for a cleaner, more responsible version of prop trading.
This is Brendan at his frankest — sharp, grounded, and very clear about what changes are overdue.
Elina Pedersen on Growth, Stability & Ultra-Low Latency | Executive Interview | Your Bourse
Elina Pedersen on Growth, Stability & Ultra-Low Latency | Executive Interview | Your Bourse
Recorded live at FMLS:25 London, this executive interview features Elina Pedersen, in conversation with Finance Magnates, following her company’s win for Best Connectivity 2025.
🔹In this wide-ranging discussion, Elina shares insights on:
🔹What winning a Finance Magnates award means for credibility and reputation
🔹How broker demand for stability and reliability is driving rapid growth
🔹The launch of a new trade server enabling flexible front-end integrations
🔹Why ultra-low latency must be proven with data, not buzzwords
🔹Common mistakes brokers make when scaling globally
🔹Educating the industry through a newly launched Dealers Academy
🔹Where AI fits into trading infrastructure and where it doesn’t
Elina explains why resilient back-end infrastructure, deep client partnerships, and disciplined focus are critical for brokers looking to scale sustainably in today’s competitive market.
🏆 Award Highlight: Best Connectivity 2025
👉 Subscribe to Finance Magnates for more executive interviews, industry insights, and exclusive coverage from the world’s leading financial events.
#FMLS25 #FinanceMagnates #BestConnectivity #TradingTechnology #UltraLowLatency #FinTech #Brokerage #ExecutiveInterview
Recorded live at FMLS:25 London, this executive interview features Elina Pedersen, in conversation with Finance Magnates, following her company’s win for Best Connectivity 2025.
🔹In this wide-ranging discussion, Elina shares insights on:
🔹What winning a Finance Magnates award means for credibility and reputation
🔹How broker demand for stability and reliability is driving rapid growth
🔹The launch of a new trade server enabling flexible front-end integrations
🔹Why ultra-low latency must be proven with data, not buzzwords
🔹Common mistakes brokers make when scaling globally
🔹Educating the industry through a newly launched Dealers Academy
🔹Where AI fits into trading infrastructure and where it doesn’t
Elina explains why resilient back-end infrastructure, deep client partnerships, and disciplined focus are critical for brokers looking to scale sustainably in today’s competitive market.
🏆 Award Highlight: Best Connectivity 2025
👉 Subscribe to Finance Magnates for more executive interviews, industry insights, and exclusive coverage from the world’s leading financial events.
#FMLS25 #FinanceMagnates #BestConnectivity #TradingTechnology #UltraLowLatency #FinTech #Brokerage #ExecutiveInterview
In this video, we take an in-depth look at @BlueberryMarketsForex , a forex and CFD broker operating since 2016, offering access to multiple trading platforms, over 1,000 instruments, and flexible account types for different trading styles.
We break down Blueberry’s regulatory structure, including its Australian Financial Services License (AFSL), as well as its authorisation and registrations in other jurisdictions. The review also covers supported platforms such as MetaTrader 4, MetaTrader 5, cTrader, TradingView, Blueberry.X, and web-based trading.
You’ll learn about available instruments across forex, commodities, indices, share CFDs, and crypto CFDs, along with leverage options, minimum and maximum trade sizes, and how Blueberry structures its Standard and Raw accounts.
We also explain spreads, commissions, swap rates, swap-free account availability, funding and withdrawal methods, processing times, and what traders can expect from customer support and additional services.
Watch the full review to see whether Blueberry’s trading setup aligns with your experience level, strategy, and risk tolerance.
📣 Stay up to date with the latest in finance and trading. Follow Finance Magnates for industry news, insights, and global event coverage.
Connect with us:
🔗 LinkedIn: /financemagnates
👍 Facebook: /financemagnates
📸 Instagram: https://www.instagram.com/financemagnates
🐦 X: https://x.com/financemagnates
🎥 TikTok: https://www.tiktok.com/tag/financemagnates
▶️ YouTube: /@financemagnates_official
#Blueberry #BlueberryMarkets #BrokerReview #ForexBroker #CFDTrading #OnlineTrading #FinanceMagnates #TradingPlatforms #MarketInsights
In this video, we take an in-depth look at @BlueberryMarketsForex , a forex and CFD broker operating since 2016, offering access to multiple trading platforms, over 1,000 instruments, and flexible account types for different trading styles.
We break down Blueberry’s regulatory structure, including its Australian Financial Services License (AFSL), as well as its authorisation and registrations in other jurisdictions. The review also covers supported platforms such as MetaTrader 4, MetaTrader 5, cTrader, TradingView, Blueberry.X, and web-based trading.
You’ll learn about available instruments across forex, commodities, indices, share CFDs, and crypto CFDs, along with leverage options, minimum and maximum trade sizes, and how Blueberry structures its Standard and Raw accounts.
We also explain spreads, commissions, swap rates, swap-free account availability, funding and withdrawal methods, processing times, and what traders can expect from customer support and additional services.
Watch the full review to see whether Blueberry’s trading setup aligns with your experience level, strategy, and risk tolerance.
📣 Stay up to date with the latest in finance and trading. Follow Finance Magnates for industry news, insights, and global event coverage.
Connect with us:
🔗 LinkedIn: /financemagnates
👍 Facebook: /financemagnates
📸 Instagram: https://www.instagram.com/financemagnates
🐦 X: https://x.com/financemagnates
🎥 TikTok: https://www.tiktok.com/tag/financemagnates
▶️ YouTube: /@financemagnates_official
#Blueberry #BlueberryMarkets #BrokerReview #ForexBroker #CFDTrading #OnlineTrading #FinanceMagnates #TradingPlatforms #MarketInsights