BIS & IOSCO Release Second Consultative Paper on FX Margin Requirements for Non Centrally Cleared Derivatives

by Adil Siddiqui
BIS & IOSCO Release Second Consultative Paper on FX Margin Requirements for Non Centrally Cleared Derivatives
BIS

The Basel Committee on Banking Supervision and the International Organization of Securities Commissions (IOSCO) have published a second consultative paper which represents a near-final proposal on margin requirements for non-centrally-cleared derivatives.

Several features of the near-final proposal are intended to manage the Liquidity impact of the margin requirements on financial market participants. The proposed requirements would allow for the introduction of a universal initial margin threshold of €50 million. The results of a quantitative impact study (QIS) conducted in 2012 indicate that application of the threshold could reduce the total liquidity costs by 56% relative to a margining framework with a zero initial margin threshold, which was initially proposed in the July 2012 first consultative paper.

Today's proposal also envisages a gradual phase-in to provide market participants with sufficient time to adjust to the requirements. The requirement to collect and post initial margin on non-centrally cleared trades is proposed to be phased in over a four year period beginning 2015 and begin with the largest, most active and most systemically risky derivative market participants.

The proposed margin standards are articulated through a set of key principles that primarily seek to ensure that appropriate margining practices will be established for all non-centrally-cleared over-the-counter (OTC) derivative transactions. These principles will apply to all transactions that involve either financial firms or systemically important non-financial entities.

The Basel Committee and IOSCO seek public comment on the near-final proposal and specifically solicit feedback on the following four issues relating to:

  • the treatment of physically-settled foreign exchange (FX) forwards and Swaps under the framework,
  • the ability to engage in limited re-hypothecation of collected initial margin,
  • the proposed phase-in framework, and
  • the adequacy of the conducted quantitative impact study (QIS).
BIS

The Basel Committee on Banking Supervision and the International Organization of Securities Commissions (IOSCO) have published a second consultative paper which represents a near-final proposal on margin requirements for non-centrally-cleared derivatives.

Several features of the near-final proposal are intended to manage the Liquidity impact of the margin requirements on financial market participants. The proposed requirements would allow for the introduction of a universal initial margin threshold of €50 million. The results of a quantitative impact study (QIS) conducted in 2012 indicate that application of the threshold could reduce the total liquidity costs by 56% relative to a margining framework with a zero initial margin threshold, which was initially proposed in the July 2012 first consultative paper.

Today's proposal also envisages a gradual phase-in to provide market participants with sufficient time to adjust to the requirements. The requirement to collect and post initial margin on non-centrally cleared trades is proposed to be phased in over a four year period beginning 2015 and begin with the largest, most active and most systemically risky derivative market participants.

The proposed margin standards are articulated through a set of key principles that primarily seek to ensure that appropriate margining practices will be established for all non-centrally-cleared over-the-counter (OTC) derivative transactions. These principles will apply to all transactions that involve either financial firms or systemically important non-financial entities.

The Basel Committee and IOSCO seek public comment on the near-final proposal and specifically solicit feedback on the following four issues relating to:

  • the treatment of physically-settled foreign exchange (FX) forwards and Swaps under the framework,
  • the ability to engage in limited re-hypothecation of collected initial margin,
  • the proposed phase-in framework, and
  • the adequacy of the conducted quantitative impact study (QIS).
About the Author: Adil Siddiqui
Adil Siddiqui
  • 1625 Articles

More from the Author

Institutional FX