Florida Judge Deals a Blow to Bitcoin’s Legitimacy
Another tough development for those who advocate the spread of Bitcoin as an alternative currency.

Charles Bell is a freelance writer who’s passionate about covering a number of different topics. In addition to writing about the latest technology, Charles has a soft spot for anything related to the Marvel Cinematic Universe. When he’s not researching or writing, you can find him playing Fallout 4 on his PS4.
The debate over whether Bitcoin should be classified as a currency or a commodity (or at worst, a gimmick) has been going on for years, and the world still hasn’t come to a consensus.
Join the iFX EXPO Asia and discover your gateway to the Asian Markets

Last fall, a great deal of discussion was generated by the fact that the CFTC designated Bitcoin as a commodity, specifically as opposed to currency. The designation means that Bitcoin was seen by a major trading commission as a resource in the same category as oil or precious metals, rather than as a type of money akin to the dollar or euro. It didn’t have any effect on how people could privately use Bitcoin, but it was a fairly major statement against the idea of cryptocurrency being disruptive in our everyday finances.
On the other hand, the European Union made the reverse ruling, determining that Bitcoin was more of a currency. And for its part, Bitcoin seems to have been designed for financial exchange and storage as opposed to investment. One overview of all things Bitcoin defines it specifically as “a global form of digital currency” rather than a resource or a new means of wealth storage. Thus, it was intended to function like money, and that’s the way that most of its strongest advocates still appear to think of it.
Suggested articles
EuropeFX Partners with Acuity for AI-Powered News Sentiment AnalysisGo to article >>
As the tug-of-war over Bitcoin’s status continues, a recent ruling by a Florida judge dealt a pretty heavy blow to those who would prefer to see it defined as a currency. In a money-laundering case against an individual dealing in Bitcoin, the judge stated that because it lacks backing from any official government or bank, “Bitcoin has a long way to go before it is the equivalent of money.”
It’s odd that this kind of ruling actually helped a suspected money launderer get a case dismissed without charges—something that may further the reputation of Bitcoin as a haven for criminals. However, the greater impact may be the precedent set with regard to the cryptocurrency’s designation. This is the first noteworthy occasion in the U.S. in which a judge has actually ruled on the issue.
Some experts have questioned the determination made by the Florida judge. The chair of the finance department at a New York City business school stated that it was “clearly wrong” to determine that Bitcoin is not an object with tangible value. It’s also been suggested that state judges, without the direction of a strong and consistent federal position on Bitcoin, simply don’t have the economic expertise to make an appropriately informed ruling in a case like this one. That said, the ruling in Florida has already been made.
We’ll see what kind of impact this has in the future, if any, but a legal case like this can set a precedent that would lead other state judges to uphold the idea that Bitcoin isn’t a form of currency. This may actually give license to those who are interested in using cryptocurrency for shady proceedings (such as would-be money laundering). But it’s a tough development, again, for those who advocate the spread of Bitcoin as an alternative currency.
Bitcoin is a community of suicide cult flower children. And it doesn’t really matter what the court rulings are outside of the USA because they don’t have the world reserve currency. The only reason BTC has any acceptance outside of the country is because stupid Americans believe the propaganda and they trade their real money for it. If the only cure for herpes was to tell lies and give it to somebody else, then every bitcoiner would have herpes and they would all be spreading lies about how great it is. The Bitcon community is desperate lately. They need to… Read more »
cryptocurrency is only real because we say so. But so is fiat currency. Fiat currency is stated…and it is only useful as long as people say it is useful. If enough people decide that Value is an abstract concept; fungible money is simply an attempt to put people’s value in quantifiable terms. Both require a certain degree of trust (fiat currency the public trusts central bank, ministry of finance/treasury officials, and banking institutions; cryptocurrency the public trusts the public ledger protocol and exchangers). Cryptocurrency that is fully decentralized (with a public ledger-style blockchain) cannot be a ponzi. You simply trade… Read more »
And by this article you would suggest that everyone who wishes to hide an asset or monetary instrument from government is a criminal, or that a currency is an object with tangible value?
Nice looking guy but rather ignoramus.