What in the World are Bitcoins? Part 1:Foundation

We’ve been focusing more attention on bitcoin, so we thought it was about time to provide a piece explaining more details about the digital currency. If you are a regular reader you probably know that we are excited about the trading potential of this new currency as well as the cost effective payment solution it […]

Sneak Peak: Crypto St, Blending Bitcoin & Forex Trading Together

Innovation in the bitcoin sector continues to take place. Forex Magnates takes a look at Crypto St, a soon to launch bitcoin trading platform that combines elements of the forex trading brokerage model with digital currencies.



We’ve been focusing more attention on bitcoin, so we thought it was about time to provide a piece explaining more details about the digital currency. If you are a regular reader you probably know that we are excited about the trading potential of this new currency as well as the cost effective payment solution it can avail companies.

What are bitcoins & P2P transfers?

bitcoin logoBitcoins are a digital currency that was invented by Satoshi Nakamoto in 2008 and went live in 2009. According to Nakamoto, in his 2008 essay ‘Bitcoin: A Peer-to-Peer Electronic Cash System’, he envisioned a P2P network that was based on an electronic currency that would work without the need of a financial intermediary. In his view, there was need to remove the middleman firms from internet based transactions as they increased costs. In his opinion, the existence of financial intermediaries is based on the need for a “trusted third party” to process payments. Specifically, in the world of credit card fraud, scam online stores, and deficient goods, middleman act as the trusted counterparty for merchants and consumers to contact when there is a transactional problem.

The downsides of financial intermediaries are their  costs and control of a transaction. For example, in an industry or region that is known to have a high percentage of chargebacks (when a consumer cancels a credit card transaction), merchants risk seeing their processing fees being raised. As such, even in the event that a firm has a long standing relationship with its customers, and there is a built trust, fees are liable to rise. Also, to maintain the payment networks, fund processors very often charge minimum fees that have adverse effects on smaller size transfers. Nakamoto also pointed out that internet based transactions are often reversible (specifically in the case of credit card transactions). This causes merchants to be vulnerable to a cancellation of orders.

Working to create a solution that would provide a non-reversible and cost effective form of electronic payments, bitcoins were created. Nakamoto wrote “what is needed is an electronic payment system based on cryptographic proof instead of trust, allowing any two willing parties to transact directly with each other without the need for a trusted third party.” Basically, rather than trusting a third party to process a payment, users would trust a mathematical formula that was created to ensure that a transaction was irreversible.

The formula is based on the creation of a universal ledger that records all transactions. In addition, each bitcoin, sender, and receiver has its own identifier. Therefore, when Jack sends Jill 1 bitcoin (ID:ABC) to fetch his pail of water (Jack’s head still hurts, so he sends Jill on her own), the ledger records a transaction of one bitcoin being sent from Jack to Jill. At this point, on the ledger, Jill has become the owner of the bitcoin ‘ABC’. Therefore, if Jack tries to send the same bitcoin to Jane, the universal ledger rejects the transaction.

Formula, hmmmmm

In bitcoin terminology, the universal ledger is called the ‘block chain’. It is a public record of all transactions in chronological order. Keeping the block chain operating is the bitcoin network community. The network is a collection of pooled computer resources that keeps the block chain operating. To incentify third parties to provide resources to operate the block chain, Nakamoto’s algorithm created the distribution of bitcoins to volunteers. According to the formula, a total of 21 million bitcoins will be dispersed over a period of every 10 minutes until 2140. However, as time passes, the rate of bitcoin creation slows, with every four years the amount decreasing by 50 percent.

So there we have it. The mathematical formula was built to create new bitcoins into circulation, record transactions, and identify who is the owner of each bitcoin.


As mentioned above, each user and bitcoin is identified on the bitcoin network. When the block chain creates new currency, each bitcoin is issued its own identifier string. Users on the other hand aren’t ID’d on the block chain (sorry Jack and Jill). Rather than individuals being recorded on the block chain, users create bitcoin wallets, with each one having its own identifier alphanumeric string. Wallets are free and easy to create, and are available as downloadable products, mobile apps, or cloud based.

To receive bitcoins, users send each other their wallet address. In the sender’s wallet, they enter the receiver’s wallet ID, and amount of bitcoins to send. The transaction is sent to the block chain, and within 10 minutes becomes confirmed. At that point the payment becomes irreversible.

Its really not backed by anything?

Ok, so this sounds cool and all, but how can they be worth anything? I understand the block chain, and irreversible payments and all, but what’s the deal with bitcoins?

Providing an intrinsic value to bitcoins is a little tough. Yup, they aren’t backed by anything. But, they are a different type of currency. You can look at it this way, they are bottom-up instead of top-down. A fiat currency can be described as top-down. It’s created by this central authority and the use, value, and methods of transfer are affected by various other factors. With bitcoins, it’s a bottom-up currency. When Nakamoto created bitcoins, he did so with the goal of creating an electronic payment system that solved problems that with existing technology. Therefore, the foundation of bitcoins are P2P transfers and the universal block chain ledger. Working from the bottom, bitcoins were created to facilitate the electronic payment system.

So yes, they aren’t backed by anything, but they don’t need to. The value of bitcoins is that they facilitate the ability for a technological advance in internet based payments to take place. Therefore, the greater the demand for a P2P payment network is, the value of its entire network (including bitcoins) becomes.

Still not convinced? Well, you aren’t the only one. Believing in the value of bitcoins takes a leap of faith in the future of this technology. Also, as it is mathematical based, there is no reason to believe that a competing currency or payment network won’t exist that will prove to be better than bitcoins.

Bottom line, don’t value bitcoins in their worth being a separate currency, but as a key component of an entirely new payment technology structure. Will there be other better currencies and systems created? It’s too early to tell. But, regardless of that answer, the foundation that the bitcoin electronic payment system created will be the influence of future products.

This is part one of our look at just what bitcoins are, in part two we discuss security, where to get a wallet, and just who is Satoshi Nakamoto. Part three will focus on bitcoin firms such as merchant suppliers, exchanges, and trading firms.

Before we conclude, some food for thought.  Bitcoins were created to solve inefficiencies with internet based payments.  Therefore, they wouldn’t appear to be an alternative for face to face cash transactions.  In such a transfer, the payment is irreversible and there is no lack of trust leading to higher transactional costs.  Second, as bitcoins become more widely used, they will ultimately lead to more competition to existing payment networks and cause them to become more efficiently.  In theory, this would lead to bitcoin’s electronic payment benefits to become less desirable. Or, perhaps not; the closer existing payment methods come to resemble a P2P network, it can lead to greater adoption of bitcoins.

One last thing…The best way to learn about bitcoins is to try them out.  You don’t have to fork down $110 or so for a whole bitcoin, and buy them in fractions.

Got a news tip? Let Us Know
How do you feel about the article?
  • Educated 0
  • Surprised 0
  • Intrigued 0
  • Indifferent 0
  • Annoyed 0

Discuss the Article

1 + 3 =

I agree to the Terms of Use Required field

Notify me of followup comments via e-mail.
You can also subscribe without commenting.


  1. fxgai

    “To incentify third parties to provide resources to operate the block chain, Nakamoto’s algorithm created the distribution of bitcoins to volunteers.”

    I’m curious as to why volunteers would continue to provide resources to operate the block chain, given that over time they will get fewer and fewer bitcoins for their CPU, and (albeit not for a while) eventually get nothing once all the bitcoins have been mined. I guess the deflationary nature will mean less bitcoins will still be worth mining, but eventually you still get nothing extra. Does bitcoin collapse at that point in time? We’ll be dead before we get the chance to find out I guess.

    Solutions that chop out the middle men for international transfers are very desirable however. Even when there is no foreign exchange involved, transferring cash from one country to another does tend to incur ridiculously high levels of fees.

    • 0
    • 0
  2. Justme

    Why are they important?!?! Becouse it is an utopian dream??? Well..so is Marxism, is it important? Better yet, does it have a future?
    Nobody is going to allow a bunch of techies (VC and whatever) to print their own money….its just not going to be allowed. For thousands of years the practice of minting is for kings and governments. It is currently tolerated because they are not important. This kind of business has absolutely no future! The minute they start to matter is the minute they will be closed…obvious.

    • 0
    • 0
  3. Mark Etoo

    If you are in the UK, the only way to buy Bitcoins is using e-bay or other expensive intermediaries (local, bbargain, etc; with spreads way over 10%). Check this blog with alternatives routes: http://howtogetbitcoinsuk.blogspot.com

    • 0
    • 0
  4. Justme

    @Andrew&Ron I believe that you failed to understand the concept of money and No, it is not means to exchange goods and services. You must understand that money represents resources and resources is what gives power – not only in the ugly and corrupt way.
    To put it simply, you don’t envisage the USA, Russia or China’s military budgets and economic policies being dictated by BitCoins on server(s) they don’t control..do you? Or better yet, imagine the news “X was blown in some country by some terrorist group who bought the explosives using BitCoins. Unfortunately, the {insert your favourite agency here} could not see this coming because BitCoin is outside their control and access.”

    Last thing, did you know that more than 50% of IVY League graduates go for a job at a financial institution? Do you think they will let you and me use money without involving them in the middle?! Hmmmm…

    We, the people, can use money, earn money BUT we can NOT CREATE money. It is similar to creating a NUKE! You cant {or you will go to jail if caught} Your country however may! There is a reason for that and it is too long for this post…you either get or you don’t. If you don’t I hope you are not working for the broker I trade with :)

    • 0
    • 0
  5. Ron FinbergRon Finberg

    true – but, as the bitcoin rate declines, so do processing costs

    • 0
    • 0
  6. Jason

    As people adopt and use it more, the value goes up. So while you may be mining fewer bitcoins, they will be able to buy more.

    One thing the author didn’t mention is that you may specify a fee when you make a transaction. The higher the fee, the faster the network will confirm your transaction. Who earns the fee? The miner doing the calculation of the transaction. So even after no new bitcoins can be introduced to the block chain, there is still tremendous incentive to continue lending processing power to the network.

    • 0
    • 0
  7. Ron FinbergRon Finberg

    @Jason – thanks bringing that to my attention – But even without the fee, it still gets transacted, just takes longer, so you can still have a system without anyone paying the fees.

    • 0
    • 0
  8. Ron FinbergRon Finberg

    @Justme What is it exactly that governments don’t want. It’s an emerging technology, removes friction in electronic transfer, and promotes a savings rather than debt bast economy (kind of important thing in 2008 and now). Your government may bot like these things, but you can be sure that there are western country’s that are interested in these points.

    Its similar to the same debate about 3D printers, one dude creates a single shot gun and suddenly people are talking about banning 3D printing

    • 0
    • 0
  9. Andrew Saks McLeod

    @justme – that is very true, until such time that all faith is lost in the legacy monetary system. I think after the Cypriot government helps itself to people’s money, creating a legal precedent to do just the same all over Europe, it may give alot more credibility to VC. Just a thought….

    • 0
    • 0
  10. Ron FinbergRon Finberg

    @Justme – “Or better yet, imagine the news “X was blown in some country by some terrorist group who bought the explosives using BitCoins. Unfortunately, the {insert your favourite agency here} could not see this coming because BitCoin is outside their control and access.”
    I just don’t understand this argument. For all the talk about how anonymous bitcoins are, they really aren’t. Every transaction is publicly broadcast, its just a matter of identifying who are behind the wallet addresses. You don’t think that the {insert your favourite agency here} is flagging every large transaction and trying to follow the funds. There is a huge paper trail, its just digital.
    Also, as often hilghted, bitcoins aren’t so easy to purchase and the easiest way entails the use of bank wires to exchanges. Another paper trail.

    I think it is quite evident from what I wrote and sourcing it back to Nakamoto’s original essay that despite what you hear to the contrary, bitcoins aren’t a libertanian super secret currency, and are part of a technological advance.

    In terms of the Ivy Leaguers on Wall St, I think it is quite evident that their power has dwindled recently. Look how they were schooled by their own hoody wearing Harvard classmate. We are at a point, that VPs in NY are more than happy to dump Wall St in a moments time to bolt to a VC in SF.

    Also, you can check out my comments here https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=195711.0 . I truly expect Wall St to not fight P2P technology but support it once they figure out how to exploit it.

    • 0
    • 0
  11. Jason

    True. But once it catches on to the point of it actually being a widely traded currency there will be the incentive to raise fees in order to prove transactions more speedily.

    • 0
    • 0